Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T02:04:25.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Property Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2025

Eric R. Claeys
Eric R. Claeys
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Natural Property Rights , pp. 143 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Alexander, Gregory S. 2018. Property and Human Flourishing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Law Institute. 1965. Restatement (Second) of Torts. St. Paul, Minn.: American Law Institute Publishers.Google Scholar
St. Aquinas, Thomas. 1485/2019. Summa Theologiae, The New Advent, http://www.newadvent.org/summa/ (last accessed March 29, 2023).Google Scholar
Aristotle. c. 350 BCE/ 1984. The Politics, Lord, Carnes trans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ashby, Nathan J. 2010. “Freedom and International Migration,” Southern Economic Journal 77 (1): 49–62.Google Scholar
Becker, Lawrence C. 1992. “Too Much Property,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 21 (2): 196–206.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1765–69/1979. Commentaries on the Laws of England, ed. Katz, Stanley N.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Breakey, Hugh E. 2014. “Who’s Afraid of Property Rights? Rights as Core Concepts, Coherent, Prima Facie, Situated, and Specified,” Law and Philosophy 33 (5): 573–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckle, Stephen A. 1991. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2013. “Productive Use in Acquisition, Accession, and Labour Theory,” Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, 13–46.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2017. “Labor, Exclusion, and Flourishing in Property Law,” North Carolina Law Review 95 (2): 413–92.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch. 2011. Property: Values and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, and Heller, Michael A.. 2001. “The Liberal Commons,” Yale Law Journal 110 (4): 549–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review 57 (2): 347–59.Google Scholar
di Robilant, Anna. 2011. “The Virtues of Common Ownership,” Boston University Law Review 91 (4): 1359–74.Google Scholar
Douglas, Simon. 2011. Liability for Wrongful Interferences with Chattels. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1993. “Property in Land,” Yale Law Journal 102 (6): 1315–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 2002. “Natural Law: The Classical Tradition,” in The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, Coleman, Jules, Shapiro, Scott, and Himma, Kenneth Einar eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert William. 2004. The Escape from Hunger and Premature Death, 170–2000: Europe, America, and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fretwell, Holly. 1999. “Do We Get What We Pay For?,” PERC, January 1, 1999, available at www.perc.org/1999/01/01/do-we-get-what-we-pay-for-2/ (last accessed January 8, 2020).Google Scholar
Gropper, Daniel M., Lawson, Robert A., and Thorne, Jere T. Jr. 2011. “Economic Freedom and Happiness,” Cato Journal 31 (2): 237–56.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1913. “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning.” Yale Law Journal 23 (1): 16–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, A.M. 1961. “Ownership,” in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Guest, A.G. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–47.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Jesse S. 2006. “Tower Cranes, Trespass, and Temporary Airspace Use Agreements,” Property & Probate (Jan./Feb.): 63–66.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1789/1984. “Letter from Thomas Jefferson to James Madison (Sept. 6, 1789),” in Jefferson: Writings, Peterson, Merrill D. ed. New York: Library Classics of the United States, pp. 959–64.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1698/1988. Two Treatises of Government, Laslett, Peter ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Adam J. 2015. Property and Practical Reason. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James. 1792/1999. “Property,” The National Gazette, March 29, 1792, in Madison: Writings, ed. Rakove, Jack N.. New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., pp. 515–17.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2012. “The Property Strategy,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160 (7): 2061–95.Google Scholar
Mossoff, Adam. 2003. “What Is Property? Putting the Pieces Back Together,” Arizona Law Review 45 (2): 371–443.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam, and Nagel, Thomas. 2002. The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzer, Stephen R. 1990. A Theory of Property. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nejad, Marjam Naghsh, and Young, Andrew T.. 2016. “Want Freedom, Will Travel: Emigrant Self-Selection According to Institutional Quality,” European Journal of Political Economy 45: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ovaska, Tomi, and Takashima, Ryo. 2006. “Economic Policy and the Level of Self-Perceived Well-Being: An International Comparison,” Journal of Socio-Economics 35: 308–25.Google Scholar
Penner, James E. 2020. Property Rights: A Re-examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph. 1840/1994. What Is Property? Kelley, Donald R., and Smith, Bonnie G. trans. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2011. Economic Analysis of Law, 8th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.Google Scholar
Restatement. See entries for “American Law Institute.”Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1998. “Makers’ Rights,” The Journal of Ethics 2 (3): 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Joseph W. 2000. Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2012. “Property as the Law of Things,” Harvard Law Review 125 (6): 1691–1726.Google Scholar
Spieker, Manfred. 2005. “The Universal Destination of Goods: The Ethics of Property in the Theory of a Christian Society,” Journal of Markets & Morality 8 (2): 333–54.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, Gopal. 1995. The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veenhoven, Ruut. 2000. “Freedom and Happiness: A Comparative Study in Forty-Four Nations in the Early 1990s,” in Culture and Subjective Well-Being, Diener, Ed and Suh, Eunkook M. eds. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp. 257–88.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1988. The Right to Private Property. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widerquist, Karl, and McCall, Grant S.. 2017. Prehistoric Myths in Modern Political Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
West, Thomas G. 1997. Vindicating the Founders: Race, Sex, Class, and Justice in the Origins of America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P. 1997. “Do Natural Rights Derive from Natural Law?” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 20 (3): 695–731.Google Scholar

References

Avins, Alfred. 1968. “What Is a Place of ‘Public Accommodation’?,” Marquette Law Review 52 (1): 1–74.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1965. Restatement (Second) of Torts. St Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers.Google Scholar
Ballantine, Henry W. 1918. “Title by Adverse Possession,” Harvard Law Review 32 (2): 135–59.Google Scholar
Banner, Stuart. 2008. Who Owns the Sky?: The Struggle to Control Airspace from the Wright Brothers On. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1765–69/1979. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2013. “On the Use and Abuse of Overflight Column Doctrine,” Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 2: 61–108.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2017. “Labor, Exclusion, and Flourishing in Property Law,” North Carolina Law Review 95 (2): 413–92.Google Scholar
di Robilant, Anna. 2010. “Abuse of Rights: The Continental Drug and the Common Law,” Hastings Law Journal 61 (3): 687–748.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1986. “Past and Future: The Temporal Dimension of Property,” Washington University Law Quarterly 64 (3): 667–722.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1994. “On the Optimal Mix of Private and Common Property,” Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (2): 17–41.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1998. Principles for a Free Society: Reconciling Individual Liberty with the Common Good. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2006. “Efficient Trespass: The Case for ‘Bad Faith’ Adverse Possession,” Northwestern University Law Review 100 (3): 1037–96.Google Scholar
Finnis, John M. 1990. “Allocating Risks and Suffering: Some Hidden Traps,” Cleveland State Law Review 38 (2): 193–207.Google Scholar
Finnis, John M. 2002. “Natural Law: The Classical Tradition,” in Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, Coleman, Jules L., Shapiro, Scott J. & Himma, Kenneth Einar eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
Gordley, James. 2005. “Damages Under the Necessity Doctrine,” Issues in Legal Scholarship 5 (2): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 1625/1962. De Jure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres, Kelsey, Francis W. trans. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co.Google Scholar
Harris, J.W. 1996. Property and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael. 2008. The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hilliard, Francis. 1846. The American Law of Real Property, 2d ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Blanchard.Google Scholar
Justinian. 533. The Institutes of Justinian, trans. Moyle, J.B.. 5th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Katz, Larissa M. 2010. “The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law,” McGill Law Journal 55 (1): 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Larissa M. 2013. “Spite and Extortion: A Jurisdictional Principle of Abuse of Right,” Yale Law Journal 122 (6): 1444–82.Google Scholar
Kent, James. 1826–30/1971. Commentaries on American Law. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Klimchuk, Dennis. 2013. “Property and Necessity,” in Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, Penner, James E. and Smith, Henry E. eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1697/1977. “An Essay on the Poor Law,” in Locke: Political Essays, Goldie, Mark ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–98.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1698/1988. Two Treatises of Government, Laslett, Peter ed., Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Forrest, & McWhiney, Grady. 1980. “The South from Self-Sufficiency to Peonage: An Interpretation,” American Historical Review 85 (5): 1095–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2012. “The Property Strategy,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160 (7): 2061–95.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2014. “Property and the Right to Exclude II,” Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 3: 1–25.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E.. 2010. The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Property. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Christopher M. 2011. “Transformation in Property and Copyright,” Villanova Law Review 56 (2): 251–325.Google Scholar
Penner, James E. 1997. The Idea of Property in Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. 1688/1934. De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo, Oldfather, C.H. and Oldfather, William Abbott trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Purdy, Jedediah. 2006. “The American Transformation of Waste Doctrine: A Pluralist Interpretation.” Cornell Law Review 91 (3): 653–98.Google Scholar
Restatement. See entries under “American Law Institute.”Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1985. “Possession as the Origin of Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 52 (1): 73–88.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1986. “The Comedy of the Commons: Custom, Commerce, and Inherently Public Property,” University of Chicago Law Journal 53 (3): 711–81.Google Scholar
Sawers, Brian. 2011. “The Right to Exclude from Unimproved Land,” Temple Law Review 83 (3): 665–96.Google Scholar
Shoked, Nadav. 2016. “Two Hundred Years of Spite,” Northwestern University Law Review 110 (2): 357–421.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William. 2000. Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2012. “Property as the Law of Things,” Harvard Law Review 125 (6): 1691–726.Google Scholar
Sprankling, John G. 1996. “The Anti-Wilderness Bias in American Property Law,” University of Chicago Law Review 53 (2): 519–90.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, Gopal. 1995. The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stake, Jeffrey E. 2001. “The Uneasy Case for Adverse Possession,” Georgetown Law Journal 89 (8): 2419–74.Google Scholar
Stern, James Y. 2017. “The Essential Structure of Property Law,” Michigan Law Review 115 (7): 1167–212.Google Scholar
Van Hecke, M.T. 1954. “Injunctions to Remove or Remodel Structures Erected in Violation of Building Restrictions,” Texas Law Review 32 (5): 521–38.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1988. The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wyman, Bruce. 1904. “The Law of the Public Callings as a Solution of the Trust Problem,” Harvard Law Review 17 (3): 156–73.Google Scholar

References

American Law Institute. 1965. Restatement (Second) of Torts. St Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers.Google Scholar
Anderson, Owen L. 2011. “Lord Coke, the Restatement, and Modern Trespass Law,” Texas Journal of Oil, Gas & Energy Law 6 (2): 204–40.Google Scholar
Angell, Joseph K. 1854. A Treatise on the Law of Watercourses with An Appendix Containing Statutes of Flowing and Forms of Declarations, 7th ed., Perkins, J.C. ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Co., 1877.Google Scholar
Arnold, Earl C. 1922. “The Law of Accession of Personal Property,” Columbia Law Review 22 (2): 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1765–69/1979. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brady, Maureen E. 2019. “The Forgotten History of Metes and Bounds,” Yale Law Journal 128 (4): 872–953.Google Scholar
Brown, Ray A. 1955. The Law of Personal Property, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Callaghan & Co.Google Scholar
Carroll, Andrea B. 2006. “Examining a Comparative Law Myth: Two Hundred Years of Riparian Misconception,” Tulane Law Review 80 (3): 902–45.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2013. “Productive Use in Acquisition, Accession, and Labour Theory,” in Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, Penner, James E. & Smith, Henry E. eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2016. “The Case for Shale,” National Affairs 28 (Summer 2016): 68–82.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2019. “Property, Concepts, and Functions,” Boston College Law Review 60 (1): 1–70.Google Scholar
Coke, Edwardo. 1628/1809. The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary upon Littleton: Not the Name of the Author Only, but of the Law Itself, 16th ed., Hargrave, Francis, & Butler, Charles eds. London: Luke Hansard & Sons.Google Scholar
Daintith, Terence. 2010. Finders Keepers: How the Law of Capture Shaped the World Oil Economy. Washington, DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1993. “Property in Land,” Yale Law Journal 102 (6): 1315–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 2015. “Property Rights in Water, Spectrum, and Minerals,” University of Colorado Law Review 86 (2): 389–429.Google Scholar
Hardwicke, Robert E. 1935. “The Rule of Capture and Its Implications as Applied to Oil and Gas,” Texas Law Review 13 (4): 391–422.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature, Norton, David F., & Norton, Mary J. eds. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2007.Google Scholar
Kent, James. 1826–30/1971. Commentaries on American Law. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Bruce M. 2014. “Horizontal Drilling and Trespass: A Challenge to the Norms of Property and Tort Law,” Colorado Natural Resources, Energy & Environmental Law Review 25 (2): 291–338.Google Scholar
Larsen, Sonja. 2020. “Right to Increase of Animals,” American Jurisprudence 2d 4 § 8.Google Scholar
Lifshitz, Yael R. 2021. “The Geometry of Property,” University of Toronto Law Journal 71 (4): 480–509.Google Scholar
Lindley, Curtis H. 1914/1988. A Treatise on the American Law Relating to Mines and Mineral Lands within the Public Land States and Territories and Governing the Acquisition and Enjoyment of Mining Rights in Lands of the Public Domain, 3rd ed. Littleton, CO: Fred B. Rothman & Co.Google Scholar
Lueck, Dean. 1995. “The Role of First Possession and the Design of the Law,” Journal of Law and Economics 38 (2): 393–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Patrick H. and Kramer, Bruce M.. 2023. Williams & Meyers, Oil and Gas Law. New York: LexisNexis, Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2009. “Accession and Original Ownership,” Journal of Legal Analysis 1 (2): 459–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2013. “Four Questions about Fracking,” Case Western Law Review 63 (4): 971–93.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., & Smith, Henry E.. 2023. “Briggs v. Southwestern Energy Production: Hydraulic Fracturing and Subsurface Trespass,” Journal of Tort Law 16 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1982. “Ethics, Economics, and the Law of Property,” in NOMOS XXIV: Ethics, Economics, and the Law, Pennock, Ronald J. & Chapman, John W. eds. New York: New York University Press, pp. 3–40.Google Scholar
Newman, Christopher M. 2011. “Transformation in Property and Copyright,” Villanova Law Review 56 (2): 251–325.Google Scholar
Newman, Christopher M. 2018. “Using Things, Defining Property,” in Property Theory: Legal and Political Perspectives, Otsuka, Michael & Penner, James eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, Terry D. 1993. “Hydraulic Fracturing: The Stealthy Subsurface Trespass,” Tulsa Law Journal 28 (3): 311–47.Google Scholar
Restatement. See entries under “American Law Institute.”Google Scholar
Schremmer, Joseph A. 2023. “Subsurface Trespass: Private Remedies and Public Regulation,” Nebraska Law Review 101 (4): 1005–79.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2002. “Exclusion versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights,” Journal of Legal Studies 31 (2): S453–S487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2007. “Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information,” Yale Law Journal 116 (8): 1742–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2014. “The Thing about Exclusion,” William and Mary Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 3: 95–123.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 1995. “State Participation and Privatization in the Minerals Sector,” report by the UNCTAD Secretariat. Geneva: United Nations Trade and Development Board.Google Scholar

References

Alexander, Gregory S. 2009. “The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law,” Cornell Law Review 94 (4): 745–819.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S. 2012. “Governance Property,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160 (7): 1853–87.Google Scholar
American Jurisprudence (Second). 2023. St. Paul, MN: West Group.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1936–44. Restatement (First) of Property. St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 2000. Restatement (Third) of Property. St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers.Google Scholar
Arruñada, Benito. 2012. Institutional Foundations of Impersonal Exchange: Theory and Policy of Contractual Registries. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barros, Benjamin D. 2009. “Toward a Model Law of Estates and Future Interests,” Washington and Lee Law Review 66 (3): 3–72.Google Scholar
Bruce, Jon W. & Ely, James W. Jr. 2020. The Law of Easements & Licenses in Land. West Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2019. “Property, Concepts, and Functions,” Boston College Law Review 60 (1): 1–72.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1985. “Why Restrain Alienation?” Columbia Law Review 85 (5): 970–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1986. “Past and Future: The Temporal Dimension in the Law of Property,” Washington University Law Quarterly 64 (3): 667–772.Google Scholar
Fraley, Jill M. 2017. “A New History of Waste Law: How a Misunderstood Doctrine Shaped Ideas about the Transformation of Law,” Marquette Law Review 100 (3): 861–921.Google Scholar
Gray, John Chipman. 1942. The Rule Against Perpetuities, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Honoré, A.M. 1961. “Ownership,” in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Guest, A.G. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–47.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1977. The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kades, Eric. 2019. “Of Piketty and Perpetuities: Dynastic Wealth in the Twenty-First Century (and Beyond),” Boston College Law Review 60 (1): 146–215.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis. 1992. “Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis,” Duke Law Journal 42 (3): 557–629.Google Scholar
Leach, W. Barton. 1938. “Perpetuities in a Nutshell,” Harvard Law Review 51 (4): 638–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, John A. 2007. “Doctrines of Waste in a Landscape of Waste.” Missouri Law Review 72 (4): 1209–57.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2011. “Melms v. Pabst Brewing Co. and the Doctrine of Waste in American Property Law,” Marquette Law Review 94 (4): 1054–94.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2020. “The Economics of Leasing,” Journal of Legal Analysis 12: 221–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. & Smith, Henry E.. 2000. “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle,” Yale Law Journal 110 (1): 1–70.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. & Smith, Henry E.. 2007. “The Morality of Property,” William and Mary Law Review 48 (5): 1849–95.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. & Smith, Henry E.. 2010. The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., Smith, Henry E. & Brady, Maureen E.. 2022. Property: Principles and Policies, 4th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 1952. “Waste,” in American Law of Property: A Treatise on the Law of Property in the United States, Casner, A. James ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, v. 5, part 20, pp. 71–123.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2011. Economic Analysis of Law, 8th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Purdy, Jedediah. 2006. “The American Transformation of Waste Doctrine: A Pluralist Interpretation.” Cornell Law Review 91 (3): 653–93.Google Scholar
Restatement. See entries for “American Law Institute.”Google Scholar
Richardson, Sally Brown. 2017. “Reframing Ameliorative Waste,” American Journal of Comparative Law 65 (2): 335–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudden, Bernard. 1987. “Economic Theory v. Property Law: The Numerus Clausus Problem,” in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Third Series, Eekelaar, John and Bell, John eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239–63.Google Scholar
Shoked, Nadav. 2014. “The Duty to Maintain,” Duke Law Journal 64 (3): 437–513.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William. 2014. Property. 4th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sprankling, John G. 1996. “The Anti-Wilderness Bias in American Property Law,” University of Chicago Law Review 63 (2): 519–90.Google Scholar
Stoebuck, William B. and Whitman, Dale A.. 2000. The Law of Property. 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Thomas, David A. 1999. “Anglo-American Land Law: Diverging Developments from a Shared History,” Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal 34 (2): 295–361.Google Scholar
Thomas, David A. 2019. Thompson on Real Property, Thomas Editions. New York: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Wolf, Michael Allan ed. 1949/2023. Powell on Real Property. New York: LexisNexis, Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
Zabritski, Melinda. 2022. “State of the Automobile Market Q2 2022,” Experian (August 2022), https://www.experian.com/content/dam/noindex/na/us/automotive/finance-trends/2022/q2-2022-state-auto-finance-market.pdf (last accessed June 28, 2023).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Property Law
  • Eric R. Claeys, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Natural Property Rights
  • Online publication: 17 April 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108951395.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Property Law
  • Eric R. Claeys, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Natural Property Rights
  • Online publication: 17 April 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108951395.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Property Law
  • Eric R. Claeys, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Natural Property Rights
  • Online publication: 17 April 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108951395.013
Available formats
×