Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:37:45.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Cell-Free DNA Analysis for PGT-A

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2023

Catherine Racowsky
Affiliation:
Hôpital Foch, France
Jacques Cohen
Affiliation:
IVF 2.0, New York
Nicholas Macklon
Affiliation:
London Women's Clinic
Get access

Summary

It is well known that chromosomal abnormalities are among the major causes of implantation failure especially in patients at high risk of generating aneuploid embryos. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) plays an important role in select patient populations for embryo selection by identifying euploid embryos. The current PGT-A technology involves analysis of trophectoderm (TE) cell biopsies removed from expanded blastocysts. However, when an embryo is mosaic, the chromosome copy number of the biopsied cells may not reflect that of the inner cell mass, thereby leading to false positive and false negative results. Recognizing these shortfalls of TE biopsy, studies have been undertaken to investigate the potential value of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) shed from the embryo as a more accurate reflection of the embryo chromosome copy number. Two approaches for acquiring such PGT-A samples have been investigated: collection of the blastocoelic fluid, and collection of the spent medium in which embryos were cultured. In this chapter, we focus on these two approaches, and present current findings supporting a potential role for each of these developing techniques for PGT-A. We highlight that blastocoelic fluid represents a valuable source of cfDNA, and that it provides important insight regarding blastocyst viability; and that while evidence for analysing cfDNA in spent medium holds promise, care must be taken to reduce the risk of maternal DNA contamination. We conclude that although both these approaches appear valuable in improving the sensitivity and specificity of PGT-A, clinical trials are required to evaluate their efficacy before being accepted into mainstream clinical IVF.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Franasiak, JM, Forman, EJ, Hong, KH, Werner, MD, Upham, KM, Treff, NR, Scott, RT, Jr. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:656–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handyside, AH, Kontogianni, EH, Hardy, K, Winston, RM. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;344:768–70.Google Scholar
Verlinsky, Y, Ginsberg, N, Lifchez, A, Valle, J, Moise, J, Strom, CM. Analysis of the first polar body: preconception genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:826–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verlinsky, Y, Cieslak, J, Ivakhnenko, V, Evsikov, S, Wolf, G, White, M, et al. Prevention of age-related aneuploidies by polar body testing of oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16:165–9.Google Scholar
Munné, S, Alikani, M, Tomkin, G, Grifo, J, Cohen, J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:382–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gianaroli, L, Magli, MC, Munné, S, Fiorentino, A, Montanaro, N, Ferraretti, AP. Will preimplantation genetic diagnosis assist patients with a poor prognosis to achieve pregnancy? Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1762–7.Google Scholar
Gianaroli, L, Magli, MC, Ferraretti, AP, Fiorentino, A, Garrisi, J, Munné, S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:1128–31.Google Scholar
Handyside, AH, Montag, M, Magli, MC, Repping, S, Harper, J, Schmutzler, A, et al. Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilisation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:742–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gianaroli, L, Magli, MC, Cavallini, G, Crippa, A, Capoti, A, Resta, S, et al. Predicting aneuploidy in human oocytes: key factors which affect the meiotic process. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2374–86.Google Scholar
Dahdouh, EM, Balayla, J, García-Velasco, JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1503–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubio, C, Bellver, J, Rodrigo, L, Castillón, G, Guillén, A, Vidal, C, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1122–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornelisse, S, Zagers, M, Kostova, E, Fleischer, K, van Wely, M, Mastenbroek, S. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;9:CD005291.Google Scholar
Gianaroli, L, Magli, MC, Pomante, A, Crivello, AM, Cafueri, G, Valerio, M, Ferraretti, AP. Blatocentesis: a source of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing. Results from a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1692–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, WY, von Versen-Höynck, F, Kapphahn, KI, Fleischmann, RR, Zhao, Q, Baker, VL. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:283–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makhijani, R, Bartels, CB, Godiwala, P, Bartolucci, A, DiLuigi, A, Nulsen, J, et al. Impact of trophectoderm biopsy on obstetric and perinatal outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2021;25:340–8.Google Scholar
Zhang, S, Luo, K, Cheng, D, Tan, Y, Lu, C, He, H, et al. Number of biopsied trophectoderm cells is likely to affect the implantation potential of blastocysts with poor trophectoderm quality. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1222–7.Google Scholar
Palini, S, Galluzzi, L, De Stefani, S, Bianchi, M, Wells, D, Magnani, M, Bulletti, C. Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:603–10.Google Scholar
Shamonki, MI, Jin, H, Haimowitz, Z, Liu, L. Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1312–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capalbo, A, Ubaldi, FM, Cimadomo, D, Noli, L, Khalaf, Y, Farcomeni, A, et al. MicroRNAs in spent blastocyst culture medium are derived from trophectoderm cells and can be explored for human embryo reproductive competence assessment. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:225–35.Google Scholar
Magli, MC, Pomante, A, Cafueri, G, Valerio, M, Crippa, A, Ferraretti, AP, Gianaroli, L. Preimplantation genetic testing: polar bodies, blastomeres, trophectoderm cells, or blastocoelic fluid? Fertil Steril. 2015;105:676–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Perloe, M, Welch, C, Morton, P, Venier, W, Wells, D, Palini, S. Validation of blastocoele fluid aspiration for preimplantation genetic screening using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Fertil Steril. 2013;100:S208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magli, MC, Albanese, C, Crippa, A, Tabanelli, C, Ferrarretti, AP, Gianaroli, L. Deoxyribonucleic acid detection in blastocoelic fluid: a new predictor of embryo ploidy and viable pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:7785.Google Scholar
Mandel, P, Metais, P. Les acides nucléiques du plasma sanguin chez l’homme. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1948;142:241–3.Google Scholar
Xu, J, Fang, R, Chen, L, Chen, D, Xiao, JP, Yang, W, et al. Noninvasive chromosome screening of human embryos by genome sequencing of embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:11907–12.Google Scholar
Ho, JR, Arrach, N, Rhodes-Long, K, Ahmady, A, Ingles, S, Chung, K, et al. Pushing the limits of detection: investigation of cell-free DNA for aneuploidy screening in embryos. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:467–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, L, Bogale, B, Tang, Y, Lu, S, Xie, XS, Racowsky, C. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:14105–12.Google Scholar
Rubio, C, Rienzi, L, Navarro-Sánchez, L, Cimadomo, D, García-Pascual, CM, Albricci, L, et al. Embryonic cell-free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:510–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubio, C, Racowsky, C, Barad, DH, Scott, RT, Jr, Simon, C. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent culture medium as a substitute for trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:841–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, P, Song, Z, Yao, Y, Huang, T, Mao, R, Huang, J, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening with spent culture medium/blastocoelic fluid for in vitro fertilization. Sci Rep. 2018;8:9275.Google Scholar
Kuznyetsov, V, Madjunkova, S, Antes, R, Abramov, R, Motamedi, G, Ibarrientos, Z, Librach, C. Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0197262.Google Scholar
Vera-Rodriguez, M, Diez-Juan, A, Jimenez-Almazan, J, Martinez, S, Navarro, R, Peinado, V, et al. Origin and composition of cell-free DNA in spent medium from human embryo culture during preimplantation development. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:745–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Battaglia, R, Palini, S, Vento, M, La Ferlita, A, Lo Faro, MJ, Caroppo, E, et al. Identification of extracellular vesicles and characterization of miRNA expression profiles in human blastocoelic fluid. Sci Rep. 2019;9:84.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×