Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:59:49.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 13 - Artificial Insemination with Partner’s Sperm for Male Subfertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2020

By
Willem Ombelet
Edited by
R. John Aitken ,
David Mortimer  and
Gabor Kovacs
R. John Aitken
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, New South Wales
David Mortimer
Affiliation:
Oozoa Biomedical Inc, Vancouver
Gabor Kovacs
Affiliation:
Epworth Healthcare Melbourne
Get access

Summary

According to a number of high-quality studies, intrauterine insemination (IUI) with homologous semen should be the first choice of treatment in the case of moderate male factor subfertility. IVF and ICSI are clearly over-used in this selected group of infertile couples. The limited value of IUI in infertility treatment, as mentioned in the 2013 NICE guidelines, was surely a premature statement and should be adapted to the actual literature. Oxidative stress and high sperm DNA damage is associated with lower pregnancy rates after IUI. Concerning clinical outcome, there is no clear evidence of any sperm preparation technique to be superior. More evidence-based data are becoming available on different variables influencing the success rates after IUI. It can be expected that these findings may lead to a better understanding and use of IUI in the near future.

Keywords

artificial inseminationassisted reproductionintrauterine inseminationIUImale subfertilityNICE guidelinessemen qualityunexplained infertility
Type
Chapter
Information
Male and Sperm Factors that Maximize IVF Success , pp. 154 - 165
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J. A. and Nygren, K. G. (2007) International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 22:1506–1512.Google Scholar
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2009) Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update 15:265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICE (2013) Fertility Problems: Assessment and Treatment. London. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156?unlid=86583397720167208641.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, S., Harrild, K., Mollison, J., Wordsworth, S., Tay, C., Harrold, A., et al. (2008) Clomifene citrate or unstimulated intrauterine insemination compared with expectant management for unexplained infertility: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ 337:a716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reindollar, R. H., Regan, M. M., Neumann, P. J., et al. (2010) A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial. Fertil Steril 94:888–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HFEA (2015) Latest UK Fertility Treatment Data and Figures: 2011–2012. Available at: www.hfea.gov.uk/104.htlmGoogle Scholar
Wordsworth, S., Buchanan, J., Mollison, J., Harrild, K., Robertson, L., Tay, C., et al. (2011) Clomifene citrate and intrauterine insemination as first-line treatments for unexplained infertility: are they cost-effective? Hum Reprod 26:369–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahadur, G., Homburg, R., Muneer, A., Racich, P., Alangaden, T., et al. (2016) First line fertility treatment strategies regarding IUI and IVF require clinical evidence. Hum Reprod 31:1141–1146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, D., Child, T. and Farquhar, C. (2015) Intrauterine insemination: a UK survey on the adherence to NICE clinical guidelines by fertility clinics. BMJ Open 5:e007588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bensdorp, A. J., Tjon-Kon-Fat, R. I., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Koks, C. A. M., Oosterhuis, G. J. E., et al. (2015) Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination. BMJ 350:g7771.Google Scholar
Tjon-Kon-Fat, R. I., Bensdorp, A. J., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Koks, C., Oosterhuis, G. J. E., Hoek, A., et al. (2015) Is IVF-served two different ways more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation? Hum Reprod 30:2331–2339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farquhar, C. M., Liu, E., Armstrong, S., Arroll, N., Lensen, S. and Brown, J. (2018) Intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus expectant management for unexplained infertility (TUI): a pragmatic, open-label, randomised, controlled, two-centre trial. Lancet 391(10119):441–450.Google Scholar
Ombelet, W., Dhont, N., Thijssen, A., Bosmans, E. and Kruger, T. (2014) Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 28:300–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ombelet, W., Vandeput, H., Van de Putte, G., Cox, A., Janssen, M., Jacobs, P., et al. (1997) Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. Hum Reprod 12:1458–1463.Google Scholar
Merviel, P., Heraud, M. H., Grenier, N., Lourdel, E., Sanguinet, P. and Copin, H. (2010) Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1,038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 93:79–88.Google Scholar
Lemmens, L., Kos, S., Beijer, C., Brinkman, J. W., van der Horst, F. A., van den Hoven, L., et al. (2016) Semen Section of the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories. Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 105:1462–1468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thijssen, A., Creemers, A., Van Der Elst, W., Creemers, E., Vandormael, E., Dhont, N. and Ombelet, W. (2017) Predictive value of different covariates influencing pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination with homologous semen: a prospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online 34:643–472.Google ScholarPubMed
Moolenaar, L. M., Cissen, M., de Bruin, J. P., Hompes, P. G. A., Repping, S. and van der Veen, F., et al. (2015) Cost-effectiveness of assisted conception for male subfertility. Reprod Biomed Online 30:659–666.Google Scholar
De Brucker, M. and Tournaye, H. (2014) Factors influencing IUI outcome: male age. In Cohlen, B. J. and Ombelet, W. (eds.) Intra-Uterine Insemination: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Daily Practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 35–38.Google Scholar
Hamada, A., Agarwal, A. and Oehninger, S. (2014) Oxidative stress IUI outcomes. In Cohlen, B. J. and Ombelet, W. (eds.) Intra-Uterine Insemination: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Daily Practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 97–104.Google Scholar
Bungum, M., Humaidan, P., Axmon, A., Spano, M., Bungum, L., Erenpreiss, J., et al. (2007) Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod 22:174–179.Google Scholar
Cho, C. L. and Agarwal, A. (2017) Role of sperm DNA fragmentation in male factor infertility: A systematic review. Arab J Urol 16:21–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijs, M. and Boomsma, C. M. (2014) Factors influencing IUI outcome: semen preparation techniques. In Cohlen, B. J. and Ombelet, W. (eds.) Intra-Uterine Insemination: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Daily Practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 49–54.Google Scholar
Boomsma, C. M., Heineman, M. J., Cohlen, B. J. and Farquhar, C. (2004) Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD004507.Google Scholar
Ricci, G., Perticarari, S., Boscolo, R., Montico, M., Guaschino, S. and Presani, G. (2009) Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique. Fertil Steril 91:632–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohlen, B., Tur, R. and Buxaderas, R. (2014) Factors influencing IUI outcome: ovarian hyperstimulation. In Cohlen, B. J. and Ombelet, W. (eds.) Intra-Uterine Insemination: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Daily Practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 77–81.Google Scholar
Cantineau, A. and Cohlen, B. (2014) Factors influencing IUI outcome: Timing and number of inseminations per cycle. In Cohlen, B. J. and Ombelet, W. (eds.) Intra-Uterine Insemination: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Daily Practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 67–73.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Gong, F., Luo, K. and Lu, G. (2006) Comparing the pregnancy rates of one versus two intrauterine inseminations (IUIs) in male factor and idiopathic infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 23:75–79.Google Scholar
Bagis, T., Haydardedeoglu, B., Kilicdag, E. B., Cok, T., Simsek, E. and Parlakgumus, A. H. (2010) Single versus double intrauterine insemination in multi-follicular ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 25:1684–1690.Google Scholar
Xiong, Y. Q., Chen, Y. X., Cheng, M. J., He, W. Q. and Chen, Q. (2018) The risk of human papillomavirus infection for male fertility abnormality: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 20:493–497.Google ScholarPubMed
Boeri, L., Capogrosso, P., Ventimiglia, E., Pederzoli, F., Cazzaniga, W., Chierigo, F., et al. (2019) High-risk human papillomavirus in semen is associated with poor sperm progressive motility and a high sperm DNA fragmentation index in infertile men. Hum Reprod 34:209–217.Google Scholar
Luttmer, R., Dijkstra, M. G., Snijders, P. J., Hompes, P. G., Pronk, D. T., Hubeek, I., et al. (2016) Presence of human papillomavirus in semen in relation to semen quality. Hum Reprod 31:280–286.Google Scholar
Depuydt, C., Donders, G., Verstraete, L., Vanden Broeck, D., Beert, J., Salembier, G., et al. (2019) Infectious human Papillomavirus virions in semen reduce clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing intra-uterine insemination. Fertil Steril 111:1135–1144.Google Scholar
Verheyden, B. (2014) Immunologic male infertility. In Cohlen, B. J. and Ombelet, W. (eds.) Intra-Uterine Insemination: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Daily Practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 21–25.Google Scholar
Ombelet, W., Vandeput, H., Janssen, M., Cox, A., Vossen, C., Pollet, H., et al. (1997) Treatment of male infertility due to sperm surface antibodies: IUI or IVF? Hum Reprod 12:1165–1170.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×