Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:48:50.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - How Long Is Too Long to Determine the Success of a Legal Transplant? International Doctrines and Contract Law in Oceania

from Part II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2019

By
Jessica Viven-Wilksch
Edited by
Vito Breda
Vito Breda
Affiliation:
University of Southern Queensland
Get access

Summary

Legal transplants have captivated comparative scholars for more than four decades. Their definition, their relevance, their possible occurrence, and their danger have been analyzed. Legal transplants do exist and have been occurring for centuries. What the debate has highlighted over time is the fact that transplanting a legal doctrine, an institution, or a structure is a ‘dynamic process’. Contrary to Watson’s assertion that transplanting is socially easy the dynamic nature of the transplant process shows how complex the process can really be. Indeed it can take years for a legal system to identify a gap, for legal reform to be discussed, and for a legal system with a relevant ‘gap filler’ to be identified. This is only the start of a process that will lead to legal reform as a notion is merged with a legal system’s existing laws. And then the waiting game begins.

Type
Chapter
Information
Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania , pp. 132 - 157
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

IX Bibliography

Alshorbagy, A., ‘On the Failure of a Legal Transplant: The Case of Egyptian Takeover Law’, Indiana International and Comparative Law Review 22 (2) (2012), 237.Google Scholar
Australian Government, Attorney General’s Department, Improving Australia’s Law and Justice Framework a Discussion Paper to Explore the Scope for Reforming Australian Contract Law (2012).Google Scholar
Bant, E. and Harding, M. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010) 41.Google Scholar
Berman, P. S., ‘The Inevitable Legal Pluralism within Universal Harmonization Regimes: The Case of the CISG’, Uniform Law Review 21 (2016), 23.Google Scholar
Bonell, M. J., ‘The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and Long-Term Contracts’ (position paper prepared for the Working Group on Long-Term Contracts, Principles of International Commercial Contracts, First session, Rome, 19–23 January 2015) www.unidroit.org/english/documents/2014/study50/s-50–126-e.pdf accessed 16 July 2018.Google Scholar
Bonell, M. J. ‘The CISG, European Contract Law and the Development of a World Contract Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 56 (2008),1.Google Scholar
Bridge, Michael G, ‘Good Faith, the Common Law, and the CISG’, Uniform Law Review 22 (1) (2017), 98.Google Scholar
Cairns, J. W., ‘Watson, Walton and the History of Legal Transplants’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 41 (3) (2013), 637.Google Scholar
Carter, John, ‘Good Faith in Contract: Why Australian Law Is Incoherent’ (Legal Studies Research Paper No 14/38, Sydney Law School, 2014) https://ssrn.com/abstract=2421117 accessed 21 June 2018.Google Scholar
Chen-Wishart, M., ‘Legal Transplant and Undue Influence: Lost in Translation or a Working Misunderstanding?’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62 (1) (2013), 1.Google Scholar
Chianale, A., ‘The CISG as a Model Law: A Comparative Law Approach’, Singapore Journal of Law Studies [2016], 29.Google Scholar
Coyle, J. F., ‘The Role of the CISG in US Contract Practice: An Empirical Study’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 38 (2016), 195.Google Scholar
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, ‘New Colombo Plan’ http://dfat.gov.au/people-to-people/new-colombo-plan/pages/new-colombo-plan.aspx accessed 21 June 2018.Google Scholar
Dharmananda, K. and Firios, L. (eds.), Long Term Contracts (Federation Press, 2013), 136.Google Scholar
DiMatteo, L. (ed.), International Sales Law: A Global Challenge (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
DiMatteo, L.Dhooge, L., Greene, S., Maurer, V. and Pagnattaro, M. ‘The Interpretive Turn in International Sales Law: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of CISG Jurisprudence’, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 34 (2004), 299.Google Scholar
DiMatteo, L.‘Contract Talk: Reviewing the Historical and Practical Significance of the Principles of European Contract Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 43 (2002), 569.Google Scholar
Estrella Faria, J. A., ‘Future Directions of Legal Harmonisation and Law Reform: Stormy Seas or Prosperous Voyage?’, Uniform Law Review 14 (2009), 5.Google Scholar
Felemegas, J., ‘Comparative Editorial Remarks on the Concept of Good Faith in the CISG and the PECL’, Pace International Law Review 13 (2001), 399.Google Scholar
Finn, P., ‘The UNIDROIT Principles: An Australian Perspective’, Australian International Law Journal 17 (2010), 193.Google Scholar
Gutteridge, H. C., Comparative Law: An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study and Research (Cambridge University Press, 1949), 25.Google Scholar
Hayward, B., ‘The CISG in Australia – The Jigsaw Puzzle Missing a Piece’, Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration 14 (2) (2010), 193Google Scholar
Hofmann, N., ‘Interpretation Rules and Good Faith as Obstacles to the UK’s Ratification of the CISG and to the Harmonization of Contract Law in Europe’, Pace International Law Review 22 (2010), 145.Google Scholar
Honnold, J., Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention (Wolters Kluwer, 1982).Google Scholar
Dahan, H., ‘The UNIDROIT Principles and their Influence in the Modernisation of Contract Law in the People’s Republic of China’, Uniform Law Review 8 (2003), 107.Google Scholar
Kanda, H. and Milhaupt, C. J., ‘Re-Examining Legal Transplants: The Director’s Fiduciary Duty in Japanese Corporate Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (4) (2003), 887.Google Scholar
Keily, T., ‘Good Faith and the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)’, Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration 3 (1) (1999), 15.Google Scholar
Lando, O., ‘CISG and its Followers: A Proposal to Adopt Some International Principles of Contract Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 53 (2005), 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, N., ‘Rules of Interpretation of Contracts under the UNIDROIT Principles and Their Possible Adoption in Vietnamese Law’, Uniform Law Review 4 (2002), 1017, 1028–9.Google Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4 (1997), 111.Google Scholar
MacNeil, I., ‘Relational Contract Theory: Challenges and Queries’, Northwestern University Law Review 94 (3) (2000), 877.Google Scholar
Michaels, R., ‘The UNIDROIT Principles as Global Background Law’, Uniform Law Review 19 (4) (2014), 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. M., ‘A Typology of Legal Transplants: Using Sociology, Legal History and Argentine Examples to Explain the Transplant Process’, American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (2003), 839.Google Scholar
Moss, S., ‘Why the United Kingdom Has Not Ratified the CISG’, Journal of Law and Commerce 25 (2005–2006), 483.Google Scholar
Nichols, P. M., ‘The Viability of Transplanted Law: Kazakhstani Reception of a Transplanted Foreign Investment Code’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 18 (4) (1997), 1235.Google Scholar
Nottage, L., ‘Who’s Afraid of the Vienna Sales Convention (CISG)? A New Zealander’s View from Australia and Japan’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 36 (2005), 815.Google Scholar
O’Hara O’Connor, E., ‘The Role of the CISG in Promoting Healthy Jurisdictional Competition for Contract Law’, Uniform Law Review 21 (2016), 41.Google Scholar
Oser, D., The Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Governing Law? (Brill, 2008).Google Scholar
Ricardo, D., On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (John Murray, 1817).Google Scholar
Robertson, D., ‘Long-Term Relational Contracts and the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts’, Australian International Law Journal 17 (2010), 185.Google Scholar
Schlechtriem, P.(ed.), Einheitliches Kaufrecht and Nationales Obligationenrecht: Referate and Diskussionen der Fachtagung Einheitliches Kaufrecht am 16–17 2 1987 (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1987).Google Scholar
Schwenzer, I., ‘Global Unification of Contract Law’, Uniform Law Review 21 (2016), 60.Google Scholar
Schwenzer, I.Schlechtriem & Schwenzer: Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Sheehy, B., ‘Good Faith in the CISG: The Interpretation Problems of Art 7’, Review of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (2007) 153.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A. M., A New World Order (Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Smith, A., Wealth of Nations (Strahan and Cadell, 1776).Google Scholar
Smits, J. S. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Elgar, 2006) 434, 435.Google Scholar
Smythe, D. J., ‘Reasonable Standards for Contract Interpretation under the CISG’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 25 (2016), 1.Google Scholar
Sarcevic, P. and Volken, P. (eds.), International Sale of Goods: Dubrovnik Lectures (Oceana Publications, 1985), 1.Google Scholar
Spagnolo, L., ‘Law Wars: Australian Contract Law Reform v. CISG v. CESL’, Villanova Law Review 58 (4) (2013), 623.Google Scholar
Stewart, A., ‘What’s Wrong with the Australian Law of Contract?’, Journal of Contract Law 29 (2012), 74.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences’, Modern Law Review 61 (1998), 11.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT Secretariat, ‘Report to Working Group on Long-Term Contracts Second Session’ (Hamburg, 26–29 October 2015) see [43], [69], [19] respectively www.unidroit.org/english/documents/2016/study50/s-50-misc32-e.pdf accessed 16 July 2018.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT SecretariatItem No. 4 on the agenda: International Commercial Contracts – (b) Possible future work on long-term contracts’ UNIDROIT 2013 – C.D. (92) 4(b)) www.unidroit.org/english/governments/councildocuments/2013session/cd92-04b-e.pdf accessed 24 July 2018.Google Scholar
Wagner, G., ‘Termination and Cure under the Common European Sales Law’, Common Market Law Review 50 (2013), 147.Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (University of Georgia Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Wesiack, M., ‘Is the CISG Too Much Influenced by Civil Law Principles of Contract Law Rather Than Common Law Principles of Contract Law? Should the CISG Contain a Rule on the Passing of Property?’ (2004) CISG Database www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/wesiack.html accessed 21 June 2018.Google Scholar
Zeller, B., The Unidroit Principles of Contract Law; Is There Room for Their Inclusion into Domestic Contracts?’, Journal of Law and Commerce 26 (2006–2007), 115.Google Scholar
Zeller, B.‘‘Four-Corners – The Methodology for Interpretation and Application of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods’ (2003) CISC Database, Article 7 www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/4corners.html accessed 21 June 2018.Google Scholar
Zeller, B.‘Good Faith – Is It a Contractual Obligation?’, Bond Law Review 15 (2) (2003), 215.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×