Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:59:48.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2022

Sam Selvadurai
Sam Selvadurai
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Law, War and the Penumbra of Uncertainty
Legal Cultures, Extra-legal Reasoning and the Use of Force
 , pp. 331 - 352
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Brownlie, Ian, ‘Memorandum from Professor Ian Brownlie QC’, Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Foreign Affairs Committee, 24 October 2002, in Foreign Affairs Committee, Foreign Policy Aspects of the War on Terrorism, HC196, Session 2002–2003 (19 Dec. 2002).Google Scholar
Lord Butler of Brockwell, , Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction (HC898) (London: The Stationery Office, 2004).Google Scholar
Cameron, David, ‘Syria: Refugees and Counter-terrorism’ (7 September 2015), Hansard, House of Commons, 6th ser., vol. 599, cols. 23–7.Google Scholar
Cameron, David, ‘Syria’ (26 November 2015), Hansard, House of Commons, 6th ser., vol. 602, cols. 1489–94.Google Scholar
Director of Public Prosecutions, ‘Policy for Prosecutors in Respect of Cases of Encouraging or Assisting Suicide’ (London: The Crown Prosecution Service, 2010).Google Scholar
The Federal Council of Switzerland, Swiss Civil Code of 10 December 1907 (Status as of 1 July 2020) (Bern: Official Publications Centre, 2020).Google Scholar
HM Government, ‘Chemical Weapon Use by Syrian Regime: UK Government Legal Position’ (London: HM Government, 2013).Google Scholar
HM Government, Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 (London: HM Government, 2008).Google Scholar
HM Government, ‘Policy Paper: Syria Action – UK Government Legal Position’ (London: HM Government, 14 April 2018).Google Scholar
HM Government Cabinet Office, ‘HMG Legal Position: UKIM Bill and Northern Ireland Protocol’ (London: HM Government, 10 September 2020).Google Scholar
HM Government Cabinet Office, Ministerial Code (London: HM Government, May 2010).Google Scholar
HM Government Cabinet Office, Ministerial Code (London: HM Government, January 2018).Google Scholar
HM Government Legal Department, Guidance Note on Legal Risk (London: HM Government, April 2015).Google Scholar
Iraq Inquiry, The Report of the Iraq Inquiry: Executive Summary (London: HM Stationery Office, 2016).Google Scholar
Iraq Inquiry, ‘Section 5: Advice on the Legal Basis for Military Action, November 2002 to March 2003’, The Report of the Iraq Inquiry, vol. 5 (London: HM Stationery Office, 2016), 1–169.Google Scholar
Iraq Inquiry, ‘Section 3.5: Development of UK Strategy and Options, September to November 2002 – The Negotiation of Resolution 1441’, The Report of the Iraq Inquiry, vol. 2 (London: HM Stationery Office, 2016), 197–390.Google Scholar
May, Theresa, ‘A Statement to the House of Commons by Prime Minister Theresa May Following the Salisbury Incident’ (14 March 2018), Hansard, House of Commons, 6th ser., vol. 637, cols. 855–7.Google Scholar
Ministère des Armées, International Law Applied to Operations in Cyberspace (Paris: Ministère des Armées, 2019).Google Scholar
Newson, Nicola, and Tudor, Sarah, Publishing Government Legal Advice: House of Lords Library Briefing (London: UK Parliament, 7 November 2018).Google Scholar
Office of the UK Prime Minister, ‘Responsibility for the Terrorist Atrocities in the United States, 11 September 2001 – An Updated Account’ (14 November 2001), https://fas.org/irp/news/2001/11/ukreport.html.Google Scholar
Robertson, George ‘Kosovo’ (25 March 1999), Hansard, House of Commons, 6th ser., vol. 328, cols. 616–8.Google Scholar
Symons, Baroness, ‘Kosovo: Use of Military Force’ (16 November 1998), Hansard, House of Lords, 5th ser., vol. 594, col. WA 140.Google Scholar
UK Attorney General Goldsmith, ‘The Use of Force Against Iraq’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52:3 (2003), 811–2.Google Scholar
UK Attorney General Goldsmith, ‘Iraq: Resolution 1441’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54:3 (2005), 767–78.Google Scholar
UK Attorney General Wright, ‘The Modern Law of Self-Defence’, Speech, The International Institute for Strategic Studies (11 January 2017), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/583171/170111_Imminence_Speech.pdf.Google Scholar
UK Ministry of Defence, Understanding and Intelligence Support to Joint Operations, Joint Doctrine Publication 2–00, 3rd ed. (London: Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, UK Ministry of Defence, 2011).Google Scholar
UK Ministry of Justice, Intelligence Collection, Analysis and Dissemination Policy Framework (London: UK Ministry of Justice, 11 March 2019).Google Scholar
US Department of Defense, Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff, Instruction 3160.01, No-Strike and the Collateral Damage Estimation Methodology (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense, 13 February 2009).Google Scholar
US Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, ‘Joint Publication 3–60, Joint Targeting’, II-1 (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense, 31 January 2013).Google Scholar
US Department of Defense, Joint Staff Targeting, Joint Targeting Cycle and Collateral Damage Estimation Methodology (CDM), Slides (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense, 10 November 2009).Google Scholar
US State Department, ‘Rambouillet Agreement – Interim Agreement for Peace and Self-Government in Kosovo’ (US State Department, March 1999), https://1997-2001.state.gov/www/regions/eur/ksvo_rambouillet_text.html.Google Scholar
The White House, National Security Strategy September 2002 (Washington, DC: The White House, 2002).Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I)’, 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS 17512.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-international Armed Conflicts (Protocol II)’, 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS 17513.Google Scholar
International Court of Justice, Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ Statute) (18 April 1946).Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, ‘Activation of the Jurisdiction of the Court over the Crime of Aggression’, 14 December 2017, ICC-ASP/16/Res.5.Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, ‘The Crime of Aggression’, 11 June 2010, ICC-RC/Res.6.Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (17 July 1998).Google Scholar
International Law Association, Committee on Use of Force, Draft Report on Aggression and the Use of Force (May 2016).Google Scholar
International Law Association, Hague Principles on Ethical Standards for Counsel Appearing before International Courts and Tribunals (27 September 2010).Google Scholar
International Law Association, Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, Second Report (July 2016).Google Scholar
International Law Commission, Second Report on State Responsibility, Addendum, 30 April 1999, A/CN.4/498/Add.2.Google Scholar
International Law Commission, ‘State Responsibility’, Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fifty-Third Session, 23 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2001, A/56/10, 20–143.Google Scholar
Organisation of African Unity, ‘Constitutive Act of the African Union’, 1 July 2000, 2158 UNTS 37733.Google Scholar
UN, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, 1 UNTS xvi.Google Scholar
UN, ‘Declaration Recognizing as Compulsory the Jurisdiction of the Court, in Conformity with Article 36, Paragraph 2, of the Statute of the International Court Of Justice Washington, 14 August 1946: Termination’, 7 October 1985, 1408 UNTS 270.Google Scholar
UN, ‘Declaratory Statement by the Republic of South Africa on the Decision to Withdraw from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, 19 October 2016, C.N.786.2016.TREATIESXVIII.10 (Depositary Notification).Google Scholar
UN, Press Release GA/SPD/164, ‘“Humanitarian Intervention”, Slow Reimbursement Rates Assailed as Special Committee Reviews Peacekeeping Operations’, 18 October 1999, GA/SPD/164.Google Scholar
UN, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), 23 May 1969, 1155 UNTS 18232.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility: Report of the Secretary General’s High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, 2 December 2004, A/59/565.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Resolution 377, ‘Uniting for Peace’, A/RES/377 (3 November 1950).Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Resolution 2625 (xxv), ‘Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations’, 24 October 1970, A/RES/2625 (xxv).Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Resolution 3314, ‘Definition of Aggression’, 14 December 1974, A/RES/3314 (xxix).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2001/946, ‘Letter Dated 7 October 2001 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 7 October 2001, S/2001/946.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2001/947, ‘Letter Dated 7 October 2001 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 7 October 2001, S/2001/947.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2003/350 (United Kingdom), ‘Letter Dated 20 March 2003 from the Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 20 March 2003, S/2003/350.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2003/351 (United States), ‘Letter Dated 20 March 2003 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 20 March 2003, S/2003/351.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2003/352 (Australia), ‘Letter Dated 20 March 2003 from the Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 20 March 2003, S/2003/352.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2015/946, ‘Letter dated 10 December 2015 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Germany to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 10 December 2015, S/2015/946.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2016/523, ‘Letter Dated 7 June 2016 from the Permanent Representative of Belgium to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 9 June 2017, S/2016/523.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, ‘Note by the President of the Security Council’, 31 January 1992, S/23500.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Press Release SC/6659, ‘Security Council Rejects Demand for Cessation of Use of Force against Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’, 26 March 1999, SC/6659.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Press Release SC/7143, ‘Security Council Condemns, “In Strongest Terms”, Terrorist Attacks on United States’, 12 September 2001, SC/7143.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 678, 29 November 1990, S/RES/678 (1990).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 686, 2 March 1991, S/RES/686 (1991).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 687, 8 April 1991, S/RES/687 (1991).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1199, ‘The Situation in Kosovo (FRY)’, 23 September 1998, S/RES/1199 (1998).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1291, ‘The Situation concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo’, 24 February 2000, S/RES/1291 (2000).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1368, ‘Condemnation of 11 September Attacks Against United States’, 12 September 2001, S/RES/1368 (2001).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1373, ‘Creation of Counter-Terrorism Committee’, 28 September 2001, S/RES/1373 (2001).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1386, ‘The Situation in Afghanistan’, 20 December 2001, S/RES/1386 (2001).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1441, 8 November 2002, S/RES/1441 (2002).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1846, ‘On Repressing Acts of Piracy and Armed Robbery at Sea off the Coast of Somalia’, 2 December 2009, S/RES/1846 (2008).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1973, ‘On the Situation in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya’, 17 March 2011, S/RES/1973 (2011).Google Scholar
Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2010, 403.Google Scholar
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2007, 43 [Genocide, Judgment].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2005, 168 [Congo, Judgment].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Separate Opinion of Judge Elaraby, ICJ Reports 2005, 327 [Congo, Elaraby].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Dissenting Opinion of Judge Ad Hoc Kateka, ICJ Reports 2005, 361 [Congo, Kateka].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Dissenting Opinion of Judge Kooijmans, ICJ Reports 2005, 306 [Congo, Kooijmans].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Declaration of Judge Koroma, ICJ Reports 2005, 284 [Congo, Koroma].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Separate Opinion of Judge Parra-Aranguren, ICJ Reports 2005, 292 [Congo, Parra-Aranguren].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Separate Opinion of Judge Simma, ICJ Reports 2005, 334 [Congo, Simma].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Declaration of Judge Tomka, ICJ Reports 2005, 351 [Congo, Tomka].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Declaration of Judge Ad Hoc Verhoeven, ICJ Reports 2005, 355 [Congo, Verhoeven].Google Scholar
Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1970, 6.Google Scholar
The Corfu Channel Case, Merits, Judgment, ICJ Reports (1949), 4 [Corfu, Merits].Google Scholar
The Corfu Channel Case Dissenting Opinion of Judge Azevedo, ICJ Reports (1949), 78.Google Scholar
The Corfu Channel Case Dissenting Opinion of Judge Krylov, ICJ Reports (1949), 68.Google Scholar
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US 184 No. 11 (Supreme Court of United States, 22 June 1964).Google Scholar
Judgment and Sentences, International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg), American Journal of International Law 41(1946).Google Scholar
Hostage case (USA v. List et al.) (American Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 1948), 11 NMT 1230, 1253.Google Scholar
ICTY, Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.Google Scholar
ICTY Appeals Chamber, ‘Press Release: Convictions for Kosovo crimes upheld for four senior Serbian officials’, MS/CS/1594e (The Hague: ICTY, 2014).Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2004, 136 [Wall, Opinion].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Al-Khasawneh, ICJ Reports 2004, 235 [Wall, Al-Khasawneh].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Declaration of Judge Buergenthal, ICJ Reports 2004, 240 [Wall, Buergenthal].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Elaraby, ICJ Reports 2004, 246 [Wall, Elaraby].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Higgins, ICJ Reports 2004, 207 [Wall, Higgins].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Kooijmans, ICJ Reports 2004, 219 [Wall, Kooijmans].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Koroma, ICJ Reports 2004, 204 [Wall, Koroma].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Owada, ICJ Reports 2004, 260 [Wall, Owada].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1971, 12 [South West Africa, Advisory Opinion].Google Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996, 226.Google Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons Judge Higgins, Dissenting Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996, 583 [Nuclear Weapons, Higgins].Google Scholar
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), Verbatim Record, 10 May 1999, ICJ CR99/15.Google Scholar
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium) Order, 2 June 1999, ICJ Reports (1999) 916 [Yugoslavia v. United States, Provisional Measures].Google Scholar
Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, Joint Dissenting Opinion of Judges Bedjaoui, Ranjeva, and Koroma, ICJ Reports 2001, 145.Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1986, 14 [Nicaragua, Merits].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Ago, ICJ Reports 1986, 181 [Nicaragua, Ago].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Elias, ICJ Reports 1986, 178 [Nicaragua, Elias].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Dissenting Opinion of Judge Sir Robert Jennings, ICJ Reports 1986, 528 [Nicaragua, Jennings].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Lachs, ICJ Reports 1986, 158 [Nicaragua, Lachs].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Ni, ICJ Reports 1986, 201 [Nicaragua, Ni].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Dissenting Opinion of Judge Oda, ICJ Reports 1986, 212 [Nicaragua, Oda].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Ruda, ICJ Reports 1986, 174 [Nicaragua, Ruda].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebel, ICJ Reports 1986, 259 [Nicaragua, Schwebel].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Sette-Camara, ICJ Reports 1986, 192 [Nicaragua, Sette-Camara].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of President Nagendra Singh, ICJ Reports 1986, 151 [Nicaragua, Singh].Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98–29-T, Judgment (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 5 December 2003), 58; [Prosecutor v. Galić, Judgment].Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Tadic, Judgment, ICTY Case No. IT-94–1-A, Appeals Chamber, International Legal Materials 38 (1999) [Prosecutor v. Tadic, Judgment].Google Scholar
R (on the application of Purdy) v. Director of Public Prosecutions, [2009] UKHL 45 (Lords of Appeal 30 July 2009).Google Scholar
The Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice (Israel) HCJ769/02, The Public Committee against Torture in Israel et al – vs – the Government of Israel et al, 11 December 2005 [Israel Supreme Court (2005)].Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Brownlie, Ian, ‘Memorandum from Professor Ian Brownlie QC’, Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Foreign Affairs Committee, 24 October 2002, in Foreign Affairs Committee, Foreign Policy Aspects of the War on Terrorism, HC196, Session 2002–2003 (19 Dec. 2002).Google Scholar
Lord Butler of Brockwell, , Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction (HC898) (London: The Stationery Office, 2004).Google Scholar
Cameron, David, ‘Syria: Refugees and Counter-terrorism’ (7 September 2015), Hansard, House of Commons, 6th ser., vol. 599, cols. 23–7.Google Scholar
Cameron, David, ‘Syria’ (26 November 2015), Hansard, House of Commons, 6th ser., vol. 602, cols. 1489–94.Google Scholar
Director of Public Prosecutions, ‘Policy for Prosecutors in Respect of Cases of Encouraging or Assisting Suicide’ (London: The Crown Prosecution Service, 2010).Google Scholar
The Federal Council of Switzerland, Swiss Civil Code of 10 December 1907 (Status as of 1 July 2020) (Bern: Official Publications Centre, 2020).Google Scholar
HM Government, ‘Chemical Weapon Use by Syrian Regime: UK Government Legal Position’ (London: HM Government, 2013).Google Scholar
HM Government, Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 (London: HM Government, 2008).Google Scholar
HM Government, ‘Policy Paper: Syria Action – UK Government Legal Position’ (London: HM Government, 14 April 2018).Google Scholar
HM Government Cabinet Office, ‘HMG Legal Position: UKIM Bill and Northern Ireland Protocol’ (London: HM Government, 10 September 2020).Google Scholar
HM Government Cabinet Office, Ministerial Code (London: HM Government, May 2010).Google Scholar
HM Government Cabinet Office, Ministerial Code (London: HM Government, January 2018).Google Scholar
HM Government Legal Department, Guidance Note on Legal Risk (London: HM Government, April 2015).Google Scholar
Iraq Inquiry, The Report of the Iraq Inquiry: Executive Summary (London: HM Stationery Office, 2016).Google Scholar
Iraq Inquiry, ‘Section 5: Advice on the Legal Basis for Military Action, November 2002 to March 2003’, The Report of the Iraq Inquiry, vol. 5 (London: HM Stationery Office, 2016), 1–169.Google Scholar
Iraq Inquiry, ‘Section 3.5: Development of UK Strategy and Options, September to November 2002 – The Negotiation of Resolution 1441’, The Report of the Iraq Inquiry, vol. 2 (London: HM Stationery Office, 2016), 197–390.Google Scholar
May, Theresa, ‘A Statement to the House of Commons by Prime Minister Theresa May Following the Salisbury Incident’ (14 March 2018), Hansard, House of Commons, 6th ser., vol. 637, cols. 855–7.Google Scholar
Ministère des Armées, International Law Applied to Operations in Cyberspace (Paris: Ministère des Armées, 2019).Google Scholar
Newson, Nicola, and Tudor, Sarah, Publishing Government Legal Advice: House of Lords Library Briefing (London: UK Parliament, 7 November 2018).Google Scholar
Office of the UK Prime Minister, ‘Responsibility for the Terrorist Atrocities in the United States, 11 September 2001 – An Updated Account’ (14 November 2001), https://fas.org/irp/news/2001/11/ukreport.html.Google Scholar
Robertson, George ‘Kosovo’ (25 March 1999), Hansard, House of Commons, 6th ser., vol. 328, cols. 616–8.Google Scholar
Symons, Baroness, ‘Kosovo: Use of Military Force’ (16 November 1998), Hansard, House of Lords, 5th ser., vol. 594, col. WA 140.Google Scholar
UK Attorney General Goldsmith, ‘The Use of Force Against Iraq’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52:3 (2003), 811–2.Google Scholar
UK Attorney General Goldsmith, ‘Iraq: Resolution 1441’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54:3 (2005), 767–78.Google Scholar
UK Attorney General Wright, ‘The Modern Law of Self-Defence’, Speech, The International Institute for Strategic Studies (11 January 2017), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/583171/170111_Imminence_Speech.pdf.Google Scholar
UK Ministry of Defence, Understanding and Intelligence Support to Joint Operations, Joint Doctrine Publication 2–00, 3rd ed. (London: Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, UK Ministry of Defence, 2011).Google Scholar
UK Ministry of Justice, Intelligence Collection, Analysis and Dissemination Policy Framework (London: UK Ministry of Justice, 11 March 2019).Google Scholar
US Department of Defense, Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff, Instruction 3160.01, No-Strike and the Collateral Damage Estimation Methodology (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense, 13 February 2009).Google Scholar
US Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, ‘Joint Publication 3–60, Joint Targeting’, II-1 (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense, 31 January 2013).Google Scholar
US Department of Defense, Joint Staff Targeting, Joint Targeting Cycle and Collateral Damage Estimation Methodology (CDM), Slides (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense, 10 November 2009).Google Scholar
US State Department, ‘Rambouillet Agreement – Interim Agreement for Peace and Self-Government in Kosovo’ (US State Department, March 1999), https://1997-2001.state.gov/www/regions/eur/ksvo_rambouillet_text.html.Google Scholar
The White House, National Security Strategy September 2002 (Washington, DC: The White House, 2002).Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I)’, 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS 17512.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-international Armed Conflicts (Protocol II)’, 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS 17513.Google Scholar
International Court of Justice, Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ Statute) (18 April 1946).Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, ‘Activation of the Jurisdiction of the Court over the Crime of Aggression’, 14 December 2017, ICC-ASP/16/Res.5.Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, ‘The Crime of Aggression’, 11 June 2010, ICC-RC/Res.6.Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (17 July 1998).Google Scholar
International Law Association, Committee on Use of Force, Draft Report on Aggression and the Use of Force (May 2016).Google Scholar
International Law Association, Hague Principles on Ethical Standards for Counsel Appearing before International Courts and Tribunals (27 September 2010).Google Scholar
International Law Association, Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, Second Report (July 2016).Google Scholar
International Law Commission, Second Report on State Responsibility, Addendum, 30 April 1999, A/CN.4/498/Add.2.Google Scholar
International Law Commission, ‘State Responsibility’, Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fifty-Third Session, 23 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2001, A/56/10, 20–143.Google Scholar
Organisation of African Unity, ‘Constitutive Act of the African Union’, 1 July 2000, 2158 UNTS 37733.Google Scholar
UN, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, 1 UNTS xvi.Google Scholar
UN, ‘Declaration Recognizing as Compulsory the Jurisdiction of the Court, in Conformity with Article 36, Paragraph 2, of the Statute of the International Court Of Justice Washington, 14 August 1946: Termination’, 7 October 1985, 1408 UNTS 270.Google Scholar
UN, ‘Declaratory Statement by the Republic of South Africa on the Decision to Withdraw from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, 19 October 2016, C.N.786.2016.TREATIESXVIII.10 (Depositary Notification).Google Scholar
UN, Press Release GA/SPD/164, ‘“Humanitarian Intervention”, Slow Reimbursement Rates Assailed as Special Committee Reviews Peacekeeping Operations’, 18 October 1999, GA/SPD/164.Google Scholar
UN, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), 23 May 1969, 1155 UNTS 18232.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility: Report of the Secretary General’s High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, 2 December 2004, A/59/565.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Resolution 377, ‘Uniting for Peace’, A/RES/377 (3 November 1950).Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Resolution 2625 (xxv), ‘Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations’, 24 October 1970, A/RES/2625 (xxv).Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, Resolution 3314, ‘Definition of Aggression’, 14 December 1974, A/RES/3314 (xxix).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2001/946, ‘Letter Dated 7 October 2001 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 7 October 2001, S/2001/946.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2001/947, ‘Letter Dated 7 October 2001 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 7 October 2001, S/2001/947.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2003/350 (United Kingdom), ‘Letter Dated 20 March 2003 from the Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 20 March 2003, S/2003/350.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2003/351 (United States), ‘Letter Dated 20 March 2003 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 20 March 2003, S/2003/351.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2003/352 (Australia), ‘Letter Dated 20 March 2003 from the Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 20 March 2003, S/2003/352.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2015/946, ‘Letter dated 10 December 2015 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Germany to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 10 December 2015, S/2015/946.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Document S/2016/523, ‘Letter Dated 7 June 2016 from the Permanent Representative of Belgium to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council’, 9 June 2017, S/2016/523.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, ‘Note by the President of the Security Council’, 31 January 1992, S/23500.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Press Release SC/6659, ‘Security Council Rejects Demand for Cessation of Use of Force against Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’, 26 March 1999, SC/6659.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Press Release SC/7143, ‘Security Council Condemns, “In Strongest Terms”, Terrorist Attacks on United States’, 12 September 2001, SC/7143.Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 678, 29 November 1990, S/RES/678 (1990).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 686, 2 March 1991, S/RES/686 (1991).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 687, 8 April 1991, S/RES/687 (1991).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1199, ‘The Situation in Kosovo (FRY)’, 23 September 1998, S/RES/1199 (1998).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1291, ‘The Situation concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo’, 24 February 2000, S/RES/1291 (2000).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1368, ‘Condemnation of 11 September Attacks Against United States’, 12 September 2001, S/RES/1368 (2001).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1373, ‘Creation of Counter-Terrorism Committee’, 28 September 2001, S/RES/1373 (2001).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1386, ‘The Situation in Afghanistan’, 20 December 2001, S/RES/1386 (2001).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1441, 8 November 2002, S/RES/1441 (2002).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1846, ‘On Repressing Acts of Piracy and Armed Robbery at Sea off the Coast of Somalia’, 2 December 2009, S/RES/1846 (2008).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, Resolution 1973, ‘On the Situation in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya’, 17 March 2011, S/RES/1973 (2011).Google Scholar
Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2010, 403.Google Scholar
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2007, 43 [Genocide, Judgment].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2005, 168 [Congo, Judgment].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Separate Opinion of Judge Elaraby, ICJ Reports 2005, 327 [Congo, Elaraby].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Dissenting Opinion of Judge Ad Hoc Kateka, ICJ Reports 2005, 361 [Congo, Kateka].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Dissenting Opinion of Judge Kooijmans, ICJ Reports 2005, 306 [Congo, Kooijmans].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Declaration of Judge Koroma, ICJ Reports 2005, 284 [Congo, Koroma].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Separate Opinion of Judge Parra-Aranguren, ICJ Reports 2005, 292 [Congo, Parra-Aranguren].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Separate Opinion of Judge Simma, ICJ Reports 2005, 334 [Congo, Simma].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Declaration of Judge Tomka, ICJ Reports 2005, 351 [Congo, Tomka].Google Scholar
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo Declaration of Judge Ad Hoc Verhoeven, ICJ Reports 2005, 355 [Congo, Verhoeven].Google Scholar
Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1970, 6.Google Scholar
The Corfu Channel Case, Merits, Judgment, ICJ Reports (1949), 4 [Corfu, Merits].Google Scholar
The Corfu Channel Case Dissenting Opinion of Judge Azevedo, ICJ Reports (1949), 78.Google Scholar
The Corfu Channel Case Dissenting Opinion of Judge Krylov, ICJ Reports (1949), 68.Google Scholar
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US 184 No. 11 (Supreme Court of United States, 22 June 1964).Google Scholar
Judgment and Sentences, International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg), American Journal of International Law 41(1946).Google Scholar
Hostage case (USA v. List et al.) (American Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 1948), 11 NMT 1230, 1253.Google Scholar
ICTY, Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.Google Scholar
ICTY Appeals Chamber, ‘Press Release: Convictions for Kosovo crimes upheld for four senior Serbian officials’, MS/CS/1594e (The Hague: ICTY, 2014).Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2004, 136 [Wall, Opinion].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Al-Khasawneh, ICJ Reports 2004, 235 [Wall, Al-Khasawneh].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Declaration of Judge Buergenthal, ICJ Reports 2004, 240 [Wall, Buergenthal].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Elaraby, ICJ Reports 2004, 246 [Wall, Elaraby].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Higgins, ICJ Reports 2004, 207 [Wall, Higgins].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Kooijmans, ICJ Reports 2004, 219 [Wall, Kooijmans].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Koroma, ICJ Reports 2004, 204 [Wall, Koroma].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Separate Opinion of Judge Owada, ICJ Reports 2004, 260 [Wall, Owada].Google Scholar
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1971, 12 [South West Africa, Advisory Opinion].Google Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996, 226.Google Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons Judge Higgins, Dissenting Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996, 583 [Nuclear Weapons, Higgins].Google Scholar
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium), Verbatim Record, 10 May 1999, ICJ CR99/15.Google Scholar
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium) Order, 2 June 1999, ICJ Reports (1999) 916 [Yugoslavia v. United States, Provisional Measures].Google Scholar
Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, Joint Dissenting Opinion of Judges Bedjaoui, Ranjeva, and Koroma, ICJ Reports 2001, 145.Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1986, 14 [Nicaragua, Merits].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Ago, ICJ Reports 1986, 181 [Nicaragua, Ago].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Elias, ICJ Reports 1986, 178 [Nicaragua, Elias].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Dissenting Opinion of Judge Sir Robert Jennings, ICJ Reports 1986, 528 [Nicaragua, Jennings].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Lachs, ICJ Reports 1986, 158 [Nicaragua, Lachs].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Ni, ICJ Reports 1986, 201 [Nicaragua, Ni].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Dissenting Opinion of Judge Oda, ICJ Reports 1986, 212 [Nicaragua, Oda].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Ruda, ICJ Reports 1986, 174 [Nicaragua, Ruda].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebel, ICJ Reports 1986, 259 [Nicaragua, Schwebel].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of Judge Sette-Camara, ICJ Reports 1986, 192 [Nicaragua, Sette-Camara].Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Separate Opinion of President Nagendra Singh, ICJ Reports 1986, 151 [Nicaragua, Singh].Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Galić, Case No. IT-98–29-T, Judgment (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 5 December 2003), 58; [Prosecutor v. Galić, Judgment].Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Tadic, Judgment, ICTY Case No. IT-94–1-A, Appeals Chamber, International Legal Materials 38 (1999) [Prosecutor v. Tadic, Judgment].Google Scholar
R (on the application of Purdy) v. Director of Public Prosecutions, [2009] UKHL 45 (Lords of Appeal 30 July 2009).Google Scholar
The Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice (Israel) HCJ769/02, The Public Committee against Torture in Israel et al – vs – the Government of Israel et al, 11 December 2005 [Israel Supreme Court (2005)].Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, and Liefländer, Thomas, ‘Clarifying Necessity, Imminence, and Proportionality in the Law of Self-Defense’, The American Journal of International Law, 107:3 (2013), 563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allott, Philip, ‘The Concept of International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 10:1 (1999), 31–50.Google Scholar
Allott, Philip, ‘The International Lawyer in Government Service: Ontology and Deontology’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 23:1 (2005), 13–23.Google Scholar
Allott, Philip, ‘State Responsibility and the Unmaking of International Law’, Harvard International Law Journal, 29 (1988), 1–26.Google Scholar
Australian Attorney-General, ‘Memorandum of Advice on the Use of Force against Iraq’, Australian Year Book of International Law, 24 (2003), 415–18.Google Scholar
Bailey, Sydney D., ‘New Light on Abstentions in the UN Security Council’, International Affairs, 50:4 (October 1974), 554–73.Google Scholar
Bailey, Teresa A., ‘Presidential Plenary Panel: An Exchange with Former Legal Advisors of the US Department of State’, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 98 (2004), 131–4.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J., and Williams, Paul D., ‘The New Politics of Protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect’, International Affairs, 87:4 (2011), 825-50.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, Frances von, ‘Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism?’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47 (2002), 37–82.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Dr Joanna, ‘Sources of Legal Risk for Financial Institutions’, Journal of International Banking & Financial Law, 19:4 (2004), 25–42.Google Scholar
Berman, Sir Franklin, QC, ‘What Do We Expect of Lawyers in Armed Conflict?’, George Washington International Law Review, 38 (2006), 627–33.Google Scholar
Bethlehem, Daniel, ‘Self-Defense against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors’, The American Journal of International Law, 106:4 (2012), 770–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieler, Andreas, and Morton, Adam David, ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’, Capital and Class, 82 (2004), 85–113.Google Scholar
Bilder, Richard B., ‘On Being an International Lawyer’, Loyola University of Chicago International Law Review, 3 (2006), 135–47.Google Scholar
Boer, Lianne, ‘“Echoes of Times Past”: On the Paradoxical Nature of Article 2(4)’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 20 (2015), 5–26.Google Scholar
Bolton, John R., ‘Is There Really “Law” in International Affairs?’, Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 10:1 (2000), 1–48.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’, Hastings Law Journal, 38 (July 1987), 805–53.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, and Apperley, Brian, ‘Kosovo Crisis Inquiry: Memorandum on the International Law Aspects’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49 (2000), 878–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Agreeing to Disagree: Security Council Resolution 1441 and Intentional Ambiguity’, Global Governance, 10 (2004), 165–86.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Custom, Power, and the Power of Rules’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 17 (1995), 109–80.Google Scholar
Cass, Deborah Z. ‘Navigating the Newstream: Recent Critical Scholarship in International Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 65 (1996), 341–83.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘Ex Inuria Ius Oritur: Are We Moving towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?’ European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 23–30.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘Terrorism Is Also Disrupting Some Crucial Legal Categories in International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 12 (2001), 993–1001.Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan, ‘The Use of Force Against Terrorism and International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 95 (2001), 835–9.Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine, ‘The Legality of NATO’s Action in the FRY’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49 (2000), 910–25.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger, ‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’, Journal of Law and Society, 25:2 (June 1998), 171–92.Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew, Marks, Susan, Simpson, Gerry and Wilde, Ralph, ‘We are Teachers of International Law’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 17 (2004), 363–74.Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony, ‘Legal Uncertainty’, California Law Review 71 (1983), 1–55.Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley, ‘Multi-Part Tests in the Jus Ad Bellum’, Houston Law Review, 53:4 (April 2016), 1035–64.Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley, ‘Unwilling or Unable: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 52 (2012), 483–550.Google Scholar
De Smet, Simon, ‘Book Review’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 68:3 (2009), 664–7.Google Scholar
Lord Devlin, , ‘Law, Morality and Democracy’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 110:5 (1962), 635–49.Google Scholar
Dhami, Mandeep K., Belton, Ian K. and Mandel, David R., ‘The “Analysis of Competing Hypotheses” in Intelligence Analysis’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33 (2019), 1080–90.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Hard Cases’, Harvard Law Review, 88:6 (1975), 1057–109.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘No Right Answer?’, New York University Law Review, 53 (1978), 1–32.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 25:2 (1996), 87–139.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugene and Isaacs, Nathan, ‘The Sociology of Law’, Harvard Law Review, 36:2, (December 1922), 130–45.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo, ‘World Culture and Military Power’, Security Studies, 14:3 (2005), 448–88.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘Legitimacy in the International System’, American Journal of International Law, 82:4 (1988), 705–59.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘Who Killed Article 2 (4)?’, American Journal of International Law, 64 (1970), 809–37.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law – a Reply to Professor Hart’, Harvard Law Review, 71:4 (1958), 630–72.Google Scholar
Gewirtz, Paul, ‘On “I Know It When I See It”’, Yale Law Journal, 105 (1996), 1023–47.Google Scholar
Gino, Francesca and Ariely, Dan, ‘The Dark Side of Creativity: Original Thinkers Can Be More Dishonest’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102:3 (2012), 445–59.Google Scholar
Glueck, Sheldon, ‘The Nuremberg Trial and Aggressive War’, Harvard Law Review, 59:3 (1946), 396–456.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, and Posner, Eric A., ‘The New International Law Scholarship’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 34 (2006), 463–88.Google Scholar
Gray, Colin, ‘National Style in Strategy: The American Example’, International Security, 6:2 (1981), 21–47.Google Scholar
Gray, Colin, ‘Out of the Wilderness: Prime Time for Strategic Culture’, Comparative Strategy, 26:1 (2007), 1–20.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of Kosovo’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law (2002), 141–75.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Law and the NATO Intervention in Kosovo’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49 (2000), 926–34.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Law and the “War against Terrorism”’, International Affairs, 78 (2002), 301–17.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Law and the Pre-emptive Use of Force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, and Iraq’, San Diego International Law Journal, 4 (2003), 7–38.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John, ‘What Is Legal Pluralism?’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18 (1986), 1–55.Google Scholar
Gunther, Klaus, ‘Legal Pluralism or Uniform Concept of Law? Globalisation as a Problem of Legal Theory’, No Foundations, 5 (2008), 5–21.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter, ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46 (1992), 1–35.Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica, ‘The Jus ad bellum’s Regulatory Form’, American Journal of International Law, 112:2 (2018), 151–90.Google Scholar
Halink, Simone, ‘All Things Considered: How the International Court of Justice Delegated Its Fact-Assessment to the United Nations in the Armed Activities Case’, International Law and Politics, 40 (2008), 13–52.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’, Harvard Law Review, 71 (1958), 593–629.Google Scholar
Hazard, Jr, Geoffrey C. ‘An Historical Perspective on the Attorney-Client Privilege’, California Law Review, 66:5 (1978), 1061–91.Google Scholar
Head, Namoi, ‘Critical Theory and Its Practices: Habermas, Kosovo and International Relations’, Politics, 28:3 (2008), 150–9.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, ‘Kosovo and the Law of “Humanitarian Intervention”’, American Journal of International Law, 3 (1999), 824–8.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Anders, and Schack, Marc, ‘The Crisis in Syria and Humanitarian Intervention’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 1 (2014), 127–47.Google Scholar
Hensley, Thomas R., ‘National Bias and the International Court of Justice’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 12 (1968), 568–86.Google Scholar
Hsee, Christopher K., ‘Elastic Justification: How Unjustifiable Factors Influence Judgments’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66:1 (1996), 122–9.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H., ‘Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 19:2 (1990), 261–72.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain, ‘Thinking About Strategic Culture’, International Security, 19:4 (1995), 32–64.Google Scholar
Jouannet, Emmanuelle, ‘French and American Perspectives on International Law: Legal Cultures and International Law’, Maine Law Review, 58:2 (2006), 292–337.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Klein, Gary, ‘Conditions for Intuitive expertise: A Failure to Disagree’, American Psychologist, 64:6 (2009), 515–26.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jorg, ‘Uncertainties of the Law on Self-Defence in the United Nations Charter’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 35 (2004), 143–204.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jorg, ‘Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems’, European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), 523–53.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Jr, ‘Power and Interdependence Revisited’, International Organization, 41:4 (1987), 725–53.Google Scholar
Kirgis, Frederic, ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’, American Journal of International Law, 81 (1987), 146–51.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H., ‘Is There a “New” New Haven School of International Law?’, Yale Journal of International Law, 32 (2007), 559–74.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H., ‘The State Department Legal Adviser’s Office: Eight Decades in Peace and War’, Georgetown Law Journal, 110 (2012), 1747–81.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes About International Law and Globalization’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8:1 (2007), 9–36.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘“The Lady Doth Protest Too Much” Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law’, The Modern Law Review, 65:2 (2002), 159–75.Google Scholar
Kress, Claus, ‘Major Post-Westphalian Shifts and Some Important Neo-Westphalian Hesitations in the State Practice on the International Law on the Use of Force’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 1 (2014), 11–54.Google Scholar
Kuperman, Alan, ‘A Model Humanitarian Intervention? Reassessing NATO’s Libya Campaign’, International Security, 38:1 (2013), 105–136.Google Scholar
Kuperman, Alan, ‘The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans’, International Studies Quarterly, 52 (2008), 49–80.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War’, British Year Book of International Law, 29 (1952), 360–82.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘International Legal Issues Arising in the Kosovo Crisis’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49 (2000), 934–43.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘The Iraq Crisis: What Now’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52:4 (2003), 859–71.Google Scholar
Mahler, Tobias, ‘Assessing Legal Risks of Closed Generic Top-Level Domains’, European Journal of Law and Technology, 5:3 (2014), 1–25.Google Scholar
Mahler, Tobias, ‘Tool-Supported Legal Risk Management: A Roadmap’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 2:3 (2010), http://hdl.handle.net/1814/15122.Google Scholar
Maxeiner, James R., ‘Legal Certainty: A European Alternative to American Legal Indeterminacy?’, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 15 (2007), 541–607.Google Scholar
McCleery, Alistair, ‘The Return of the Publisher to Book History: The Case of Allen Lane’, Book History, 5 (2002), 161–85.Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean D., ‘Protean Jus ad Bellum’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 27 (2009), 22–53.Google Scholar
Myjer, Eric, and White, Nigel, ‘The Twin Towers Attack: an Unlimited Right to Self-Defence?’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 7 (2002), 5–17.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Jan, ‘Suicide as a Crime: Legal History, International Comparisons and Present Implications’, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 94 (1996), 252–7.Google Scholar
Okpe, Samuel, ‘Anti-Impunity Norm of the International Criminal Court: A Curse or Blessing for Africa?’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55:7 (2020), 1077–90.Google Scholar
Overbeck, Alfred. E. von, ‘Some Observations on the Role of the Judge in the Swiss Civil Code’, Louisiana Law Review, 37:3 (1977), 681–700.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, ‘Second Thoughts on the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 1117–28.Google Scholar
Pietrowski, Robert, ‘Evidence in International Arbitration’, Arbitration International, 22:3 (2006), 373–410.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter, ‘Eubulides as a 20th-Century Semanticist’, Language Sciences, 27 (2005), 75–95.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam, ‘The So-Called “Right” of Humanitarian Intervention’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3 (2000), 3–51.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, ‘The Ethics of War’, International Journal of Ethics, 25:2 (1915), 127–42.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘Invisible College of International Lawyers’, Northwestern University Law Review, 72:2 (1977–8), 217–26.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Right of States to Use Armed Force’, Michigan Law Review, 82 (1984), 1620–46.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, ‘Is Common Law Law?’, California Law Review, 77:2 (1989), 455–71.Google Scholar
Sellars, Kirsten, ‘Imperfect Justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo’, The European Journal of International Law, 21:4 (2011), 1085–102.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory and Ginsburg, Tom, ‘The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship’, American Journal of International Law, 106:1 (2012), 1–47.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects’, European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 1–22.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam M., ‘Judicial Nationalism in International Law: National Identity and Judicial Autonomy at the ICJ’, Texas International Law Journal, 40 (2004), 197–232.Google Scholar
Smith, M. L. R. and Stone, John, ‘Explaining Strategic Theory’, Infinity Journal, 4 (2011), 27–30.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., ‘On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 54:2 (1987), 462–503.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R. and Marks, Gary, ‘Evaluating Expert Judgments’, European Journal of Political Research, 46 (2007), 347–66.Google Scholar
Stern, Brigitte, ‘Custom at the Heart of International Law’, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 11 (2001), 89–108.Google Scholar
Stroble, James A., ‘Justification of War in Ancient China’, Asian Philosophy, 8:3 (1998), 165–90.Google Scholar
Suh, Il Ro, ‘Voting Behaviour of National Judges in International Courts’, American Journal of International Law, 63 (1969), 224–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, William H., IV, ‘Self-Defense and the Oil Platforms Decision’, The Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (2004), 295–306.Google Scholar
Taft, William H. and Buchwald, Todd F., ‘Preemption, Iraq, and International Law’, The American Journal of International Law, 97 (2003), 557–63.Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’, European Journal of International Law, 26 (2015), 417–43.Google Scholar
Tansey, Oisín, ‘Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 40:3 (October 2007), 765–72.Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, ‘Reflections on Lex Ferenda’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 32 (2001), 3–26.Google Scholar
Topik, Steven C., ‘When Mexico Had the Blues: A Transatlantic Tale of Bonds, Bankers, and Nationalists, 1862–1910’, American Historical Review, 105:3 (June 2000), 714–40.Google Scholar
Tropman, Elizabeth, ‘Non-inferential Moral Knowledge’, Acta Analytica, 26 (2011), 355–66.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel, ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science, 185:4157 (1974), 1124–31.Google Scholar
Varzi, Achille, ‘Supervaluationism and Its Logics’, Mind, 116 (2007), 633–75.Google Scholar
Verdirame, Guglielmo, ‘“The Divided West”: International Lawyers in Europe and America’, European Journal of International Law, 18:3 (2007), 553–80.Google Scholar
Verdirame, Guglielmo, ‘The “Sinews of Peace”: International Law, Strategy, and the Prevention of War’, British Yearbook of International Law, 77:1 (2006), 83–162.Google Scholar
Voyiakis, Emmanuel, ‘Customary International Law and the Place of Normative Considerations’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 55 (2010), 163–200.Google Scholar
Wack, Pierre, ‘Scenarios: Uncharted Waters Ahead’, Harvard Business Review, 85516 (September 1985), 73–89.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., ‘The Politics of Peace’, International Studies Quarterly, 11:3 (1967), 199–211.Google Scholar
Watts, Arthur, ‘International Law and International Relations: United Kingdom Practice’, European Journal of International Law, 2 (1991), 157–65.Google Scholar
Weber, Steven, Bernstein, Steven, Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross, ‘God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World’, European Journal of International Relations, 6:1 (2000), 43–76.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper, ‘“The Court Cannot Conclude Definitively … ” Non Liquet Revisited’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 (1998), 109–19.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46:2 (1992), 391–425.Google Scholar
White, Nigel D. and Myjer, Eric P. J., ‘Editorial: The Use of Force against Iraq’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 8:1 (2003), 1–14.Google Scholar
Whittemore, Luke A., ‘Proportionality Decision Making in Targeting: Heuristics, Cognitive Biases, and the Law’, Harvard National Security Journal, 7:2 (2016), 577–636.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elizabeth, ‘The Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force in Self-Defence’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55 (2006), 963–72.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elizabeth, ‘Disciplining the Discipline: Roles and Responsibilities of International Lawyers: Remarks’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 100 (2006), 449–50.Google Scholar
Wood, Michael, ‘The Law on the Use of Force: Current Challenges’, Singapore Yearbook of International Law, 11 (2007), 1–14.Google Scholar
Wright, Daniel B., Memon, Amina, Skagerberg, Elin M. and Gabbert, Fiona, ‘When Eyewitnesses Talk’, Current Directions In Psychological Science, 18:3 (2009), 174–8.Google Scholar
Yablon, Charles M., ‘The Indeterminacy of the Law: Critical Legal Studies and the Problem of Legal Explanation’, Cardozo Law Review, 6 (1985), 917–45.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo and Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Concept of Aggression’, in Kreß, Claus and Barriga, Stefan, eds., The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 214–32.Google Scholar
Ambrus, Mónika, Rayfuse, Rosemary and Werner, Wouter, ‘Risk and International Law’, in Ambrus, Mónika, Rayfuse, Rosemary, Werner, Wouter, eds., Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 3–9.Google Scholar
Anderson, David, CMG, ‘The Role of the International Lawyer in the Negotiation of Treaties’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000), 21–40.Google Scholar
Aristotle (Ross, D., ed.), The Nicomachean Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Armstrong, David, Farrell, Theo and Lambert, Helene, International Law and International Relations, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, ‘A Fragment on Government’, in Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A., eds., A Comment on the Commentaries and A Fragment on Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy and Dumont, Etienne, Treatise on Judicial Evidence (London: JW Paget, 1825).Google Scholar
Berman, Franklin, ‘Conclusion’, in Zidar, Andraz and Gauci, Jean-Pierre, eds., The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law (Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff, 2016), 380–6.Google Scholar
Berman, Franklin, ‘The International Lawyer, inside and outside Foreign Ministries’, in Hill, C. and Beshoff, P., eds., Two Worlds of International Relations – Academics, Practitioners and the Trade in Ideas (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar
Berman, Franklin, ‘The Role of the International Lawyer in the Making of Foreign Policy’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000).Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, ‘Theorizing the Sources of International Law’, in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, eds., The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Bobbitt, Philip, The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace and the Course of History (London: Penguin, 2003).Google Scholar
Bowden, Mark, The Finish: The Killing of Osama Bin Laden (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bryman, Alan and Teevan, James J, Social Research Methods (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (London: MacMillan, 1977).Google Scholar
Burns, Robert, ‘Epistle to a Young Friend’, Poems and Songs (Edinburgh: William P Nimmo, 1868), 122–4.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, War Law: Understanding International Law and Armed Conflict, Kindle ed. (New York: Grove Press, 2005).Google Scholar
‘The Caroline Case’, in Dixon, Martin and McCorquodale, Robert, eds., Cases and Materials on International Law, 4th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Ceadel, Martin, The Origins of War Prevention: The British Peace Movement and International Relations 1730–1854 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine, ‘Rethinking Legality/Legitimacy after the Iraq War’, in Falk, Richard, Juergensmeyer, Mark and Popovski, Vesselin, Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 219–47.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius, ‘Pro Milone’, in Curtis Clark, Albert, ed., Oxford Classical Texts: M. Tulli Ciceronis: Orationes, Vol. 2: Pro Milone; Pro Marcello; Pro Ligario; Pro Rege Deiotaro; Philippicae I–XIV (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1918).Google Scholar
Carl, von Clausewitz, On War, trans. and ed. Howard, Michael, Paret, Peter and Heuser, Beatrice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Connelly, James and Carrick, Don, ‘Ethical and Legal Reasoning About War in a Time of Terror’, in Hehir, Aidan, Kuhrt, Natasha and Mumford, Andew, International Law, Security and Ethics (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011), 44–57.Google Scholar
Corten, Olivier, The Law Against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
Courtney, Hugh, 20/20 Foresight: Crafting Strategy in an Uncertain World (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2001).Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony A., The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman, Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Davis, Jack, ‘Introduction: Improving Intelligence Analysis at CIA: Dick Heuer’s Contribution to Intelligence Analysis’, in Heuer, Richards J., Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (Washington, DC: CIA, 1999), xx–xxi.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, War, Aggression and Self-Defence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dorr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten, eds., Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Heidelberg: Springer, 2012), 533–6.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Easton, David, The Political System (New York: Knopf, 1953).Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy A., Vagueness in Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, ‘Introduction: Legality and Legitimacy’, in Falk, Richard, Juergensmeyer, Mark and Popovski, Vesselin, eds., Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 4–39.Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M., Wars of Law: Unintended Consequences in the Regulation of Armed Conflict (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Fisher, David, Morality and War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, Strategy: A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence, ‘The Place of Legal Culture in the Sociology of Law’, in Freeman, Michael, ed., Law and Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 185–99.Google Scholar
Galligan, Denis J., ‘Legal Theory and Empirical Research’, in Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 976–1001.Google Scholar
Gauci, Jean-Pierre and Jones, Kate, ‘Conference Report: The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law’, in Zidar, Andraz and Gauci, Jean-Pierre, eds., The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law (Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff, 2016), 371–79.Google Scholar
Gow, James, Defending the West (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gray, Christine, International Law and the Use of Force (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Green, James A., The International Court of Justice and Self-Defence in International Law (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, The Contemporary Law of Armed Conflict, 3rd ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, ‘Introduction to the Third Edition’, in Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), xv–lv.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, ‘Notes to the Third Edition’, in Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 309–27.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert and Thomson, Judith J., Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Heuer, Richards J., Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (Washington, DC: CIA, 1999).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula, ‘Methods of Elite Research’, in Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans‐Dieter, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 910–29.Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula, ‘Studying Elite versus Mass Opinion’, in Donsbach, Wolfgang and Traugott, Michael W., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research (London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2008), 53–63.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, War and the Liberal Conscience (London: Hurst, 2008).Google Scholar
Human Security Report Project, Human Security Report 2009/2010 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
IICK, Independent International Commission on Kosovo: The Kosovo Report (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001).Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2000 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jack, Malcolm, ed., Erskine May’s Treatise on The Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament (London: LexisNexis, 2011).Google Scholar
Jennings, Robert, ‘Introduction’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000).Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob, State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Kahn, Herman, On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios; with a New Introduction by Thomas Schelling (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking Fast and Slow (London: Penguin, 2011).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law, 2nd ed., ed. Tucker, R. W. (New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1966).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, Legal Reasoning: Collected Essays (Aurora, CO: The Davies Group Publishers, 2008).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., ‘Political Authority after Intervention: Gradations in Sovereignty’, in Holzgrefe, J. L. and Keohane, Robert O., eds., Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 275–98.Google Scholar
King, Mervyn and Kay, John, Radical Uncertainty: Decision-Making for an Unknowable Future (London: Little, Brown Book Group, 2020).Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘The Legal Adviser’s Duty to Explain’, in Zidar, Andraz and Gauci, Jean-Pierre, eds., The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law (Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff, 2016), 290–312.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civiliser of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A. and Presser, Stanley, ‘Question and Questionnaire Design’, in Handbook of Survey Research, 2nd ed. (Bingley: Emerald Group, 2010), 263–314.Google Scholar
Lovell, Julia, The Opium War: Drugs, Dreams and the Making of China (London: Picador, 2012).Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, ‘The Problem of Imminence in an Uncertain World’ in Weller, Marc, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
McCormick, Roger, Legal Risk in the Financial Markets, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Rob, ‘The Legal Regime Applicable to Use of Lethal Force When Operating under a United Nations Security Council Chapter VII Mandate Authorising “All Necessary Means”’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 12:3 (2008), 389–417.Google Scholar
Madison, James, ‘Concerning the Difficulties of the Convention in Devising a Proper Form of Government’, in The Federalist, ed. Carey, George W. and McClellan, James (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001), 179–85.Google Scholar
Malanczuk, Peter, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law, Kindle ed. (New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Marxsen, Christian, ‘A Note on Indeterminacy of the Law on Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors’, Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War, MPIL Research Paper Series No. 2017–07 (Heidelberg: Max Planck Institute, 2017), 79–81.Google Scholar
Merrills, Gerald, Judge Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice and the Discipline of International Law: Opinions on the International Court of Justice, 1961–1973 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998).Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘Accounting for the Complexity of the Law Applicable to Modern Armed Conflicts’, in Schmitt, Michael N., Reeves, Shane R., Ford, Christopher M., Williams, Winston S., eds., Complex Battlespaces: The Law of Armed Conflict and the Dynamics of Modern Warfare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 33–59.Google Scholar
Milton, John, Paradise Lost (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), bk 2., 329–35.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, Reappraising the Resort to Force: International law, Jus ad Bellum and the War on Terror (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
More, Thomas, Utopia, eBook ed., Morley, H., ed. (The Project Gutenberg, 2005).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006).Google Scholar
Mullerson, Rein, Ordering Anarchy: International Law in International Society (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 2000).Google Scholar
Nelken, David, ‘Rethinking Legal Culture’, in Freeman, Michael, ed., Law and Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 200–24.Google Scholar
Norman, Richard, Ethics, Killing and War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Orend, Brian, The Morality of War (Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Peters, Anne and Marxsen, Christian, ‘Editors’ Introduction: Self-Defence in Times of Transition’, Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War, MPIL Research Paper Series No. 2017–07 (Heidelberg: Max Planck Institute, 2017), 3–13.Google Scholar
Pherson, Randolph H. and Heuer, Richards J., Jr, Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis, 3rd ed. (Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2021).Google Scholar
Plato, The Republic, 2nd ed., trans. A. Bloom (New York: Basic Books, 1991).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Legal Principles and the Limits of Law’, in Cohen, Marshall, ed., Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (London: Duckworth, 1983).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law A Partial Comparison’, in Coleman, Jules L., ed., Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 1–37.Google Scholar
Riddell, Anna and Plant, Brendan, Evidence before the International Court of Justice, (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009).Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, Is International Law International? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo, ‘Political Institutions: An Overview’, in Goodin, Robert E. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, eds., A New Handbook of Political Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 133–61.Google Scholar
Rumi, Jalal al-Din, The Masnavi, Book Three (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, Armed Attack and Article 51 of the UN Charter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Sarvarian, Arman, Professional Ethics at the International Bar (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991).Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm, International Law, 6th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Soames, Scott, ‘What Vagueness and Inconsistency Tell Us about Interpretation’, in Marmor, Andrei and Soames, Scott, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 31–57.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Scott, ‘What Is the Rule of Recognition (And Does It Exist)’, in Adler, Matthew and Himma, Keneth E., eds., The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 235–68.Google Scholar
Smartt, Ursula, Media and Entertainment Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Tebbit, Mark, Philosophy of Law: An Introduction, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip, Expert Political Judgement (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip and Gardner, Dan, Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction, Kindle ed. (London: Random House, 2015).Google Scholar
Tsagourias, Nicholas, ‘Risk and the Use of Force’, in Ambrus, Mónika, Rayfuse, Rosemary and Werner, Wouter, eds., Risk and Uncertainty in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Waibel, Michael, ‘Interpretive Communities in International Law’, in Bianchi, Andrea, Peat, Daniel, Windsor, Matthew, eds., Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York: Random House, 1979).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Arguing about War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 3rd ed. (New York: Basic Books, 2000).Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., ‘Political Institutions: Rational Choice Perspectives’, in Goodin, Robert E. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, eds., A New Handbook of Political Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 167–85.Google Scholar
Weisburd, Mark, ‘Use of Force: Justiciability and Admissibility’, in Weller, Marc, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 329–46.Google Scholar
Whalley, Matthew and Guzelian, Chris, The Legal Risk Management Handbook: An International Guide to Protect Your Business from Legal Loss (London: Kogan Page, 2016).Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas, Saving Strangers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ‘Preface’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000), xvii–xx.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy, ‘Vagueness in Reality’, in Loux, Michael J. and Zimmermann, Dean W., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Zacklin, Ralph, ‘The Role of the International Lawyer in an International Organisation’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000).Google Scholar
Zidar, Andraž, ‘Legal Advisers and Professional Ethics’ in Zidar, Andraz and Gauci, Jean-Pierre, eds., The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law (Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff, 2016).Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, ‘The International Criminal Court Gets Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression’, EJIL: Talk! (15 December 2017), www.ejiltalk.org/the-international-criminal-court-gets-jurisdiction-over-the-crime-of-aggression.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, ‘The Use of Nerve Agents in Salisbury: Why Does It Matter Whether It Amounts to a Use of Force in International Law?’, EJIL: Talk! (17 March 2018), www.ejiltalk.org/the-use-of-nerve-agents-in-salisbury-why-does-it-matter-whether-it-amounts-to-a-use-of-force-in-international-law/.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel, ‘Non Liquet’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1669?prd=EPIL.Google Scholar
Borger, Julian and Miller, Stuart, ‘How “Shy Foreigners” Learned to Pilot Flying-Bomb Boeings’, The Guardian (14 September 2001), www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/14/september11.usa18.Google Scholar
Brandewinder, Mathias, PowerScatterPlot, Copyright © 2009, Clear Lines Consulting, LLC, www.clear-lines.com/blog/post/Excel-ScatterPlot-with-labels-colors-and-markers.aspx.Google Scholar
Brown, Derek, ‘Timeline: Terror and Its Aftermath (Part 1)’, The Guardian (5 October 2001), www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/11/september11.usa24.Google Scholar
Chambers and Partners, ‘Public International Law Firms in London’, www.chambersandpartners.com/11814/96/editorial/1/1.Google Scholar
CIA, A Tradecraft Primer: Structured Analytic Techniques for Improving Intelligence Analysis (4 May 2009), www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/Tradecraft%20Primer-apr09.pdf.Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley S., ‘Pakistan’s Sovereignty and the Killing of Osama Bin Laden’, ASIL Insights, 15:11 (2011), www.asil.org/insights/volume/15/issue/11/pakistans-sovereignty-land-killing-osama-bin-laden.Google Scholar
Edelstein, D. M., ‘Why Realists Don’t Go for Bombs and Bullets’, ForeignPolicy.Com (21 July 2010), http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/07/20/why_realists_don_t_go_for_bombs_and_bullets.Google Scholar
Egan, Brian, US State Department Legal Adviser, ‘International Law, Legal Diplomacy, and the Counter-ISIL Campaign’, American Society of International Law (4 April 2016), www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Egan-ASIL-speech.pdf.Google Scholar
France24, ‘France Stands Firm on Syria despite Shock UK Vote’, France 24 (30 August 2013), www.france24.com/en/20130830-france-hollande-syria-usa-uk-vote-francois.Google Scholar
Gannon, Kathy, ‘Bush Rejects Taliban Bin Laden Offer’, Washington Post (14 October 2001), www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20011014/aponline135016_000.htm.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Mark and Manchin, Robert, ‘Kosovo Air Strikes Receive Support in Britain, Hungary’, Gallup News Service (30 March 1999), https://news.gallup.com/poll/3967/kosovo-air-strikes-receive-support-britain-hungary.aspx.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold, ‘Syria and the Law of Humanitarian Intervention (Part II: International Law and the Way Forward)’, JustSecurity (2 October 2013), http://justsecurity.org/2013/10/02/koh-syria-part2/.Google Scholar
Ipsos MORI, ‘War in Afghanistan Poll’, Ipsos MORI (4 November 2001), www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/war-afghanistan-poll-1Google Scholar
ISO 31000:2009(en), ‘Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines’, www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:31000:ed-1:v1:en.Google Scholar
ISO/Guide 73:2009(en), ‘Risk Management – Vocabulary’, www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:guide:73:ed-1:v1:en.Google Scholar
Journal of Conflict and Security Law, https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/pages/Editorial_Board.Google Scholar
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=editorialBoard&journalCode=rjuf20.Google Scholar
Kent, Sherman, ‘Words of Estimative Probability’, Sherman Kent and the Board of National Estimates: Collected Essays, CIA (19 March 2007), www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/sherman-kent-and-the-board-of-national-estimates-collected-essays/6words.html.Google Scholar
Laville, Sandra, ‘Mercy Killing Mother Cleared of Murder after Helping Seriously Ill Daughter Die’, The Guardian (25 January 2010), www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/25/mercy-killing-kay-gilderdale-cleared.Google Scholar
Mahler, Tobias, Presentation, www.industrijuristgruppen.no/dokumenter/pres12/tobias_mahler.pptx.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘Self-Defense and Non-State Actors: Indeterminacy and the Jus ad Bellum’, EJIL: Talk! (21 February 2010), www.ejiltalk.org/self-defense-and-non-state-actors-indeterminacy-and-the-jus-ad-bellum/.Google Scholar
Nessa, Jasmin Johurun, ‘Self-Defense in International Law: What Level of Evidence?’, Just Security (8 July 2019), www.justsecurity.org/64796/self-defense-in-international-law-what-level-of-evidence.Google Scholar
Non-Aligned Movement, ‘Final Communique of the Meeting of Ministers for Foreign Affairs and Heads of Delegation of the Non-Aligned Movement, held in New York on 23 September 1999’, www.nam.gov.za/minmeet/newyorkcom.htm.Google Scholar
Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, ‘OSCE Kosovo Verification Mission/OSCE Task Force for Kosovo (Closed)’, www.osce.org/kvm-closedGoogle Scholar
Russell Group Universities, http://russellgroup.ac.uk/about/our-universities/.Google Scholar
Savage, Charlie, ‘Obama Tests Limits of Power in Syria Conflict’, The New York Times (8 September 2013), www.nytimes.com/2013/09/09/world/middleeast/obama-tests-limits-of-power-in-syrian-conflict.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.Google Scholar
Urban, Mark, ‘A Fork in the Road for UK Foreign Policy’, BBC News (29 August 2013), www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23885524.Google Scholar
Stop the War Coalition, ‘Constitution’, www.stopwar.org.uk/constitution.Google Scholar
UN, ‘United Nations Peacekeeping’, UN Website (https://peacekeeping.un.org/en).Google Scholar
‘US Rejects Taliban Concession’, The Guardian (20 September 2001), www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/20/september11.usa11.Google Scholar
Valtorta, Marco, et al., ‘Extending Heuer’s Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method to Support Complex Decision Analysis’ (February 10, 2005), Center for Information Technology, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.122.3422&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Verdirame, Guglielmo, ‘The Law and Strategy of Humanitarian Intervention’, EJIL: Talk! (30 August 2013), www.ejiltalk.org/the-law-and-strategy-of-humanitarian-intervention/.Google Scholar
Voice of America, ‘Mullah Omar – In His Own Words’, The Guardian (26 September 2001), www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/26/afghanistan.features11.Google Scholar
Wisehart, Daniel, ‘The Crisis in Ukraine and the Prohibition of the Use of Force: A Legal Basis for Russia’s Intervention?’, EJIL: Talk! (4 March 2014), www.ejiltalk.org/the-crisis-in-ukraine-and-the-prohibition-of-the-use-of-force-a-legal-basis-for-russias-intervention/.Google Scholar
Wood, Michael, ‘Legal Advisers’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (May 2013), http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1064?prd=EPIL.Google Scholar
Explosion Image by Oceloti, from Vectorstock.Google Scholar
Island generated using Polygon Map Generator by Amit Patel, Red Blob Games, www.redblobgames.com/maps/mapgen2/.Google Scholar
Predator Type Drone image by boscorelli3D, from 3DExport.com.Google Scholar
Sea Dart Missile image by Hristov, from 3DExport.com.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, and Liefländer, Thomas, ‘Clarifying Necessity, Imminence, and Proportionality in the Law of Self-Defense’, The American Journal of International Law, 107:3 (2013), 563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allott, Philip, ‘The Concept of International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 10:1 (1999), 31–50.Google Scholar
Allott, Philip, ‘The International Lawyer in Government Service: Ontology and Deontology’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 23:1 (2005), 13–23.Google Scholar
Allott, Philip, ‘State Responsibility and the Unmaking of International Law’, Harvard International Law Journal, 29 (1988), 1–26.Google Scholar
Australian Attorney-General, ‘Memorandum of Advice on the Use of Force against Iraq’, Australian Year Book of International Law, 24 (2003), 415–18.Google Scholar
Bailey, Sydney D., ‘New Light on Abstentions in the UN Security Council’, International Affairs, 50:4 (October 1974), 554–73.Google Scholar
Bailey, Teresa A., ‘Presidential Plenary Panel: An Exchange with Former Legal Advisors of the US Department of State’, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 98 (2004), 131–4.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J., and Williams, Paul D., ‘The New Politics of Protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect’, International Affairs, 87:4 (2011), 825-50.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, Frances von, ‘Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism?’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47 (2002), 37–82.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Dr Joanna, ‘Sources of Legal Risk for Financial Institutions’, Journal of International Banking & Financial Law, 19:4 (2004), 25–42.Google Scholar
Berman, Sir Franklin, QC, ‘What Do We Expect of Lawyers in Armed Conflict?’, George Washington International Law Review, 38 (2006), 627–33.Google Scholar
Bethlehem, Daniel, ‘Self-Defense against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors’, The American Journal of International Law, 106:4 (2012), 770–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieler, Andreas, and Morton, Adam David, ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’, Capital and Class, 82 (2004), 85–113.Google Scholar
Bilder, Richard B., ‘On Being an International Lawyer’, Loyola University of Chicago International Law Review, 3 (2006), 135–47.Google Scholar
Boer, Lianne, ‘“Echoes of Times Past”: On the Paradoxical Nature of Article 2(4)’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 20 (2015), 5–26.Google Scholar
Bolton, John R., ‘Is There Really “Law” in International Affairs?’, Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 10:1 (2000), 1–48.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’, Hastings Law Journal, 38 (July 1987), 805–53.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, and Apperley, Brian, ‘Kosovo Crisis Inquiry: Memorandum on the International Law Aspects’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49 (2000), 878–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Agreeing to Disagree: Security Council Resolution 1441 and Intentional Ambiguity’, Global Governance, 10 (2004), 165–86.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Custom, Power, and the Power of Rules’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 17 (1995), 109–80.Google Scholar
Cass, Deborah Z. ‘Navigating the Newstream: Recent Critical Scholarship in International Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 65 (1996), 341–83.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘Ex Inuria Ius Oritur: Are We Moving towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?’ European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 23–30.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘Terrorism Is Also Disrupting Some Crucial Legal Categories in International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 12 (2001), 993–1001.Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan, ‘The Use of Force Against Terrorism and International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 95 (2001), 835–9.Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine, ‘The Legality of NATO’s Action in the FRY’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49 (2000), 910–25.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger, ‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’, Journal of Law and Society, 25:2 (June 1998), 171–92.Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew, Marks, Susan, Simpson, Gerry and Wilde, Ralph, ‘We are Teachers of International Law’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 17 (2004), 363–74.Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony, ‘Legal Uncertainty’, California Law Review 71 (1983), 1–55.Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley, ‘Multi-Part Tests in the Jus Ad Bellum’, Houston Law Review, 53:4 (April 2016), 1035–64.Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley, ‘Unwilling or Unable: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 52 (2012), 483–550.Google Scholar
De Smet, Simon, ‘Book Review’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 68:3 (2009), 664–7.Google Scholar
Lord Devlin, , ‘Law, Morality and Democracy’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 110:5 (1962), 635–49.Google Scholar
Dhami, Mandeep K., Belton, Ian K. and Mandel, David R., ‘The “Analysis of Competing Hypotheses” in Intelligence Analysis’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33 (2019), 1080–90.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Hard Cases’, Harvard Law Review, 88:6 (1975), 1057–109.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘No Right Answer?’, New York University Law Review, 53 (1978), 1–32.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 25:2 (1996), 87–139.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugene and Isaacs, Nathan, ‘The Sociology of Law’, Harvard Law Review, 36:2, (December 1922), 130–45.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo, ‘World Culture and Military Power’, Security Studies, 14:3 (2005), 448–88.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘Legitimacy in the International System’, American Journal of International Law, 82:4 (1988), 705–59.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘Who Killed Article 2 (4)?’, American Journal of International Law, 64 (1970), 809–37.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law – a Reply to Professor Hart’, Harvard Law Review, 71:4 (1958), 630–72.Google Scholar
Gewirtz, Paul, ‘On “I Know It When I See It”’, Yale Law Journal, 105 (1996), 1023–47.Google Scholar
Gino, Francesca and Ariely, Dan, ‘The Dark Side of Creativity: Original Thinkers Can Be More Dishonest’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102:3 (2012), 445–59.Google Scholar
Glueck, Sheldon, ‘The Nuremberg Trial and Aggressive War’, Harvard Law Review, 59:3 (1946), 396–456.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, and Posner, Eric A., ‘The New International Law Scholarship’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 34 (2006), 463–88.Google Scholar
Gray, Colin, ‘National Style in Strategy: The American Example’, International Security, 6:2 (1981), 21–47.Google Scholar
Gray, Colin, ‘Out of the Wilderness: Prime Time for Strategic Culture’, Comparative Strategy, 26:1 (2007), 1–20.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of Kosovo’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law (2002), 141–75.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Law and the NATO Intervention in Kosovo’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49 (2000), 926–34.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Law and the “War against Terrorism”’, International Affairs, 78 (2002), 301–17.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Law and the Pre-emptive Use of Force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, and Iraq’, San Diego International Law Journal, 4 (2003), 7–38.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John, ‘What Is Legal Pluralism?’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18 (1986), 1–55.Google Scholar
Gunther, Klaus, ‘Legal Pluralism or Uniform Concept of Law? Globalisation as a Problem of Legal Theory’, No Foundations, 5 (2008), 5–21.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter, ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46 (1992), 1–35.Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica, ‘The Jus ad bellum’s Regulatory Form’, American Journal of International Law, 112:2 (2018), 151–90.Google Scholar
Halink, Simone, ‘All Things Considered: How the International Court of Justice Delegated Its Fact-Assessment to the United Nations in the Armed Activities Case’, International Law and Politics, 40 (2008), 13–52.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’, Harvard Law Review, 71 (1958), 593–629.Google Scholar
Hazard, Jr, Geoffrey C. ‘An Historical Perspective on the Attorney-Client Privilege’, California Law Review, 66:5 (1978), 1061–91.Google Scholar
Head, Namoi, ‘Critical Theory and Its Practices: Habermas, Kosovo and International Relations’, Politics, 28:3 (2008), 150–9.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, ‘Kosovo and the Law of “Humanitarian Intervention”’, American Journal of International Law, 3 (1999), 824–8.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Anders, and Schack, Marc, ‘The Crisis in Syria and Humanitarian Intervention’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 1 (2014), 127–47.Google Scholar
Hensley, Thomas R., ‘National Bias and the International Court of Justice’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 12 (1968), 568–86.Google Scholar
Hsee, Christopher K., ‘Elastic Justification: How Unjustifiable Factors Influence Judgments’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66:1 (1996), 122–9.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H., ‘Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 19:2 (1990), 261–72.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain, ‘Thinking About Strategic Culture’, International Security, 19:4 (1995), 32–64.Google Scholar
Jouannet, Emmanuelle, ‘French and American Perspectives on International Law: Legal Cultures and International Law’, Maine Law Review, 58:2 (2006), 292–337.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Klein, Gary, ‘Conditions for Intuitive expertise: A Failure to Disagree’, American Psychologist, 64:6 (2009), 515–26.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jorg, ‘Uncertainties of the Law on Self-Defence in the United Nations Charter’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 35 (2004), 143–204.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jorg, ‘Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems’, European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), 523–53.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Jr, ‘Power and Interdependence Revisited’, International Organization, 41:4 (1987), 725–53.Google Scholar
Kirgis, Frederic, ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’, American Journal of International Law, 81 (1987), 146–51.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H., ‘Is There a “New” New Haven School of International Law?’, Yale Journal of International Law, 32 (2007), 559–74.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H., ‘The State Department Legal Adviser’s Office: Eight Decades in Peace and War’, Georgetown Law Journal, 110 (2012), 1747–81.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes About International Law and Globalization’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8:1 (2007), 9–36.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘“The Lady Doth Protest Too Much” Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law’, The Modern Law Review, 65:2 (2002), 159–75.Google Scholar
Kress, Claus, ‘Major Post-Westphalian Shifts and Some Important Neo-Westphalian Hesitations in the State Practice on the International Law on the Use of Force’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 1 (2014), 11–54.Google Scholar
Kuperman, Alan, ‘A Model Humanitarian Intervention? Reassessing NATO’s Libya Campaign’, International Security, 38:1 (2013), 105–136.Google Scholar
Kuperman, Alan, ‘The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans’, International Studies Quarterly, 52 (2008), 49–80.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War’, British Year Book of International Law, 29 (1952), 360–82.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘International Legal Issues Arising in the Kosovo Crisis’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49 (2000), 934–43.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘The Iraq Crisis: What Now’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52:4 (2003), 859–71.Google Scholar
Mahler, Tobias, ‘Assessing Legal Risks of Closed Generic Top-Level Domains’, European Journal of Law and Technology, 5:3 (2014), 1–25.Google Scholar
Mahler, Tobias, ‘Tool-Supported Legal Risk Management: A Roadmap’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 2:3 (2010), http://hdl.handle.net/1814/15122.Google Scholar
Maxeiner, James R., ‘Legal Certainty: A European Alternative to American Legal Indeterminacy?’, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 15 (2007), 541–607.Google Scholar
McCleery, Alistair, ‘The Return of the Publisher to Book History: The Case of Allen Lane’, Book History, 5 (2002), 161–85.Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean D., ‘Protean Jus ad Bellum’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 27 (2009), 22–53.Google Scholar
Myjer, Eric, and White, Nigel, ‘The Twin Towers Attack: an Unlimited Right to Self-Defence?’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 7 (2002), 5–17.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Jan, ‘Suicide as a Crime: Legal History, International Comparisons and Present Implications’, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 94 (1996), 252–7.Google Scholar
Okpe, Samuel, ‘Anti-Impunity Norm of the International Criminal Court: A Curse or Blessing for Africa?’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55:7 (2020), 1077–90.Google Scholar
Overbeck, Alfred. E. von, ‘Some Observations on the Role of the Judge in the Swiss Civil Code’, Louisiana Law Review, 37:3 (1977), 681–700.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, ‘Second Thoughts on the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 1117–28.Google Scholar
Pietrowski, Robert, ‘Evidence in International Arbitration’, Arbitration International, 22:3 (2006), 373–410.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter, ‘Eubulides as a 20th-Century Semanticist’, Language Sciences, 27 (2005), 75–95.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam, ‘The So-Called “Right” of Humanitarian Intervention’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3 (2000), 3–51.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, ‘The Ethics of War’, International Journal of Ethics, 25:2 (1915), 127–42.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘Invisible College of International Lawyers’, Northwestern University Law Review, 72:2 (1977–8), 217–26.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Right of States to Use Armed Force’, Michigan Law Review, 82 (1984), 1620–46.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, ‘Is Common Law Law?’, California Law Review, 77:2 (1989), 455–71.Google Scholar
Sellars, Kirsten, ‘Imperfect Justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo’, The European Journal of International Law, 21:4 (2011), 1085–102.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory and Ginsburg, Tom, ‘The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship’, American Journal of International Law, 106:1 (2012), 1–47.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects’, European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 1–22.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam M., ‘Judicial Nationalism in International Law: National Identity and Judicial Autonomy at the ICJ’, Texas International Law Journal, 40 (2004), 197–232.Google Scholar
Smith, M. L. R. and Stone, John, ‘Explaining Strategic Theory’, Infinity Journal, 4 (2011), 27–30.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., ‘On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 54:2 (1987), 462–503.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R. and Marks, Gary, ‘Evaluating Expert Judgments’, European Journal of Political Research, 46 (2007), 347–66.Google Scholar
Stern, Brigitte, ‘Custom at the Heart of International Law’, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 11 (2001), 89–108.Google Scholar
Stroble, James A., ‘Justification of War in Ancient China’, Asian Philosophy, 8:3 (1998), 165–90.Google Scholar
Suh, Il Ro, ‘Voting Behaviour of National Judges in International Courts’, American Journal of International Law, 63 (1969), 224–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, William H., IV, ‘Self-Defense and the Oil Platforms Decision’, The Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (2004), 295–306.Google Scholar
Taft, William H. and Buchwald, Todd F., ‘Preemption, Iraq, and International Law’, The American Journal of International Law, 97 (2003), 557–63.Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’, European Journal of International Law, 26 (2015), 417–43.Google Scholar
Tansey, Oisín, ‘Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 40:3 (October 2007), 765–72.Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, ‘Reflections on Lex Ferenda’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 32 (2001), 3–26.Google Scholar
Topik, Steven C., ‘When Mexico Had the Blues: A Transatlantic Tale of Bonds, Bankers, and Nationalists, 1862–1910’, American Historical Review, 105:3 (June 2000), 714–40.Google Scholar
Tropman, Elizabeth, ‘Non-inferential Moral Knowledge’, Acta Analytica, 26 (2011), 355–66.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel, ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science, 185:4157 (1974), 1124–31.Google Scholar
Varzi, Achille, ‘Supervaluationism and Its Logics’, Mind, 116 (2007), 633–75.Google Scholar
Verdirame, Guglielmo, ‘“The Divided West”: International Lawyers in Europe and America’, European Journal of International Law, 18:3 (2007), 553–80.Google Scholar
Verdirame, Guglielmo, ‘The “Sinews of Peace”: International Law, Strategy, and the Prevention of War’, British Yearbook of International Law, 77:1 (2006), 83–162.Google Scholar
Voyiakis, Emmanuel, ‘Customary International Law and the Place of Normative Considerations’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 55 (2010), 163–200.Google Scholar
Wack, Pierre, ‘Scenarios: Uncharted Waters Ahead’, Harvard Business Review, 85516 (September 1985), 73–89.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., ‘The Politics of Peace’, International Studies Quarterly, 11:3 (1967), 199–211.Google Scholar
Watts, Arthur, ‘International Law and International Relations: United Kingdom Practice’, European Journal of International Law, 2 (1991), 157–65.Google Scholar
Weber, Steven, Bernstein, Steven, Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross, ‘God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World’, European Journal of International Relations, 6:1 (2000), 43–76.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper, ‘“The Court Cannot Conclude Definitively … ” Non Liquet Revisited’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 (1998), 109–19.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46:2 (1992), 391–425.Google Scholar
White, Nigel D. and Myjer, Eric P. J., ‘Editorial: The Use of Force against Iraq’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 8:1 (2003), 1–14.Google Scholar
Whittemore, Luke A., ‘Proportionality Decision Making in Targeting: Heuristics, Cognitive Biases, and the Law’, Harvard National Security Journal, 7:2 (2016), 577–636.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elizabeth, ‘The Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force in Self-Defence’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55 (2006), 963–72.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elizabeth, ‘Disciplining the Discipline: Roles and Responsibilities of International Lawyers: Remarks’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 100 (2006), 449–50.Google Scholar
Wood, Michael, ‘The Law on the Use of Force: Current Challenges’, Singapore Yearbook of International Law, 11 (2007), 1–14.Google Scholar
Wright, Daniel B., Memon, Amina, Skagerberg, Elin M. and Gabbert, Fiona, ‘When Eyewitnesses Talk’, Current Directions In Psychological Science, 18:3 (2009), 174–8.Google Scholar
Yablon, Charles M., ‘The Indeterminacy of the Law: Critical Legal Studies and the Problem of Legal Explanation’, Cardozo Law Review, 6 (1985), 917–45.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo and Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Concept of Aggression’, in Kreß, Claus and Barriga, Stefan, eds., The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 214–32.Google Scholar
Ambrus, Mónika, Rayfuse, Rosemary and Werner, Wouter, ‘Risk and International Law’, in Ambrus, Mónika, Rayfuse, Rosemary, Werner, Wouter, eds., Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 3–9.Google Scholar
Anderson, David, CMG, ‘The Role of the International Lawyer in the Negotiation of Treaties’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000), 21–40.Google Scholar
Aristotle (Ross, D., ed.), The Nicomachean Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Armstrong, David, Farrell, Theo and Lambert, Helene, International Law and International Relations, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, ‘A Fragment on Government’, in Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A., eds., A Comment on the Commentaries and A Fragment on Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy and Dumont, Etienne, Treatise on Judicial Evidence (London: JW Paget, 1825).Google Scholar
Berman, Franklin, ‘Conclusion’, in Zidar, Andraz and Gauci, Jean-Pierre, eds., The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law (Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff, 2016), 380–6.Google Scholar
Berman, Franklin, ‘The International Lawyer, inside and outside Foreign Ministries’, in Hill, C. and Beshoff, P., eds., Two Worlds of International Relations – Academics, Practitioners and the Trade in Ideas (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar
Berman, Franklin, ‘The Role of the International Lawyer in the Making of Foreign Policy’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000).Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, ‘Theorizing the Sources of International Law’, in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, eds., The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Bobbitt, Philip, The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace and the Course of History (London: Penguin, 2003).Google Scholar
Bowden, Mark, The Finish: The Killing of Osama Bin Laden (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bryman, Alan and Teevan, James J, Social Research Methods (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (London: MacMillan, 1977).Google Scholar
Burns, Robert, ‘Epistle to a Young Friend’, Poems and Songs (Edinburgh: William P Nimmo, 1868), 122–4.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, War Law: Understanding International Law and Armed Conflict, Kindle ed. (New York: Grove Press, 2005).Google Scholar
‘The Caroline Case’, in Dixon, Martin and McCorquodale, Robert, eds., Cases and Materials on International Law, 4th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Ceadel, Martin, The Origins of War Prevention: The British Peace Movement and International Relations 1730–1854 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine, ‘Rethinking Legality/Legitimacy after the Iraq War’, in Falk, Richard, Juergensmeyer, Mark and Popovski, Vesselin, Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 219–47.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius, ‘Pro Milone’, in Curtis Clark, Albert, ed., Oxford Classical Texts: M. Tulli Ciceronis: Orationes, Vol. 2: Pro Milone; Pro Marcello; Pro Ligario; Pro Rege Deiotaro; Philippicae I–XIV (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1918).Google Scholar
Carl, von Clausewitz, On War, trans. and ed. Howard, Michael, Paret, Peter and Heuser, Beatrice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Connelly, James and Carrick, Don, ‘Ethical and Legal Reasoning About War in a Time of Terror’, in Hehir, Aidan, Kuhrt, Natasha and Mumford, Andew, International Law, Security and Ethics (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011), 44–57.Google Scholar
Corten, Olivier, The Law Against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
Courtney, Hugh, 20/20 Foresight: Crafting Strategy in an Uncertain World (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2001).Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony A., The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman, Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Davis, Jack, ‘Introduction: Improving Intelligence Analysis at CIA: Dick Heuer’s Contribution to Intelligence Analysis’, in Heuer, Richards J., Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (Washington, DC: CIA, 1999), xx–xxi.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, War, Aggression and Self-Defence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dorr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten, eds., Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Heidelberg: Springer, 2012), 533–6.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Easton, David, The Political System (New York: Knopf, 1953).Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy A., Vagueness in Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, ‘Introduction: Legality and Legitimacy’, in Falk, Richard, Juergensmeyer, Mark and Popovski, Vesselin, eds., Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 4–39.Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M., Wars of Law: Unintended Consequences in the Regulation of Armed Conflict (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Fisher, David, Morality and War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, Strategy: A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence, ‘The Place of Legal Culture in the Sociology of Law’, in Freeman, Michael, ed., Law and Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 185–99.Google Scholar
Galligan, Denis J., ‘Legal Theory and Empirical Research’, in Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 976–1001.Google Scholar
Gauci, Jean-Pierre and Jones, Kate, ‘Conference Report: The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law’, in Zidar, Andraz and Gauci, Jean-Pierre, eds., The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law (Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff, 2016), 371–79.Google Scholar
Gow, James, Defending the West (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gray, Christine, International Law and the Use of Force (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Green, James A., The International Court of Justice and Self-Defence in International Law (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, The Contemporary Law of Armed Conflict, 3rd ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, ‘Introduction to the Third Edition’, in Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), xv–lv.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, ‘Notes to the Third Edition’, in Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 309–27.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert and Thomson, Judith J., Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Heuer, Richards J., Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (Washington, DC: CIA, 1999).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula, ‘Methods of Elite Research’, in Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans‐Dieter, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 910–29.Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula, ‘Studying Elite versus Mass Opinion’, in Donsbach, Wolfgang and Traugott, Michael W., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research (London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2008), 53–63.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, War and the Liberal Conscience (London: Hurst, 2008).Google Scholar
Human Security Report Project, Human Security Report 2009/2010 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
IICK, Independent International Commission on Kosovo: The Kosovo Report (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001).Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2000 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jack, Malcolm, ed., Erskine May’s Treatise on The Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament (London: LexisNexis, 2011).Google Scholar
Jennings, Robert, ‘Introduction’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000).Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob, State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Kahn, Herman, On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios; with a New Introduction by Thomas Schelling (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking Fast and Slow (London: Penguin, 2011).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law, 2nd ed., ed. Tucker, R. W. (New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1966).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, Legal Reasoning: Collected Essays (Aurora, CO: The Davies Group Publishers, 2008).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., ‘Political Authority after Intervention: Gradations in Sovereignty’, in Holzgrefe, J. L. and Keohane, Robert O., eds., Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 275–98.Google Scholar
King, Mervyn and Kay, John, Radical Uncertainty: Decision-Making for an Unknowable Future (London: Little, Brown Book Group, 2020).Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘The Legal Adviser’s Duty to Explain’, in Zidar, Andraz and Gauci, Jean-Pierre, eds., The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law (Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff, 2016), 290–312.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civiliser of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A. and Presser, Stanley, ‘Question and Questionnaire Design’, in Handbook of Survey Research, 2nd ed. (Bingley: Emerald Group, 2010), 263–314.Google Scholar
Lovell, Julia, The Opium War: Drugs, Dreams and the Making of China (London: Picador, 2012).Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, ‘The Problem of Imminence in an Uncertain World’ in Weller, Marc, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
McCormick, Roger, Legal Risk in the Financial Markets, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Rob, ‘The Legal Regime Applicable to Use of Lethal Force When Operating under a United Nations Security Council Chapter VII Mandate Authorising “All Necessary Means”’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 12:3 (2008), 389–417.Google Scholar
Madison, James, ‘Concerning the Difficulties of the Convention in Devising a Proper Form of Government’, in The Federalist, ed. Carey, George W. and McClellan, James (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001), 179–85.Google Scholar
Malanczuk, Peter, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law, Kindle ed. (New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Marxsen, Christian, ‘A Note on Indeterminacy of the Law on Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors’, Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War, MPIL Research Paper Series No. 2017–07 (Heidelberg: Max Planck Institute, 2017), 79–81.Google Scholar
Merrills, Gerald, Judge Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice and the Discipline of International Law: Opinions on the International Court of Justice, 1961–1973 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998).Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘Accounting for the Complexity of the Law Applicable to Modern Armed Conflicts’, in Schmitt, Michael N., Reeves, Shane R., Ford, Christopher M., Williams, Winston S., eds., Complex Battlespaces: The Law of Armed Conflict and the Dynamics of Modern Warfare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 33–59.Google Scholar
Milton, John, Paradise Lost (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), bk 2., 329–35.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, Reappraising the Resort to Force: International law, Jus ad Bellum and the War on Terror (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
More, Thomas, Utopia, eBook ed., Morley, H., ed. (The Project Gutenberg, 2005).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006).Google Scholar
Mullerson, Rein, Ordering Anarchy: International Law in International Society (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 2000).Google Scholar
Nelken, David, ‘Rethinking Legal Culture’, in Freeman, Michael, ed., Law and Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 200–24.Google Scholar
Norman, Richard, Ethics, Killing and War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Orend, Brian, The Morality of War (Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Peters, Anne and Marxsen, Christian, ‘Editors’ Introduction: Self-Defence in Times of Transition’, Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War, MPIL Research Paper Series No. 2017–07 (Heidelberg: Max Planck Institute, 2017), 3–13.Google Scholar
Pherson, Randolph H. and Heuer, Richards J., Jr, Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis, 3rd ed. (Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2021).Google Scholar
Plato, The Republic, 2nd ed., trans. A. Bloom (New York: Basic Books, 1991).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Legal Principles and the Limits of Law’, in Cohen, Marshall, ed., Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (London: Duckworth, 1983).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law A Partial Comparison’, in Coleman, Jules L., ed., Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 1–37.Google Scholar
Riddell, Anna and Plant, Brendan, Evidence before the International Court of Justice, (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009).Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, Is International Law International? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo, ‘Political Institutions: An Overview’, in Goodin, Robert E. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, eds., A New Handbook of Political Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 133–61.Google Scholar
Rumi, Jalal al-Din, The Masnavi, Book Three (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, Armed Attack and Article 51 of the UN Charter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Sarvarian, Arman, Professional Ethics at the International Bar (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991).Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm, International Law, 6th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Soames, Scott, ‘What Vagueness and Inconsistency Tell Us about Interpretation’, in Marmor, Andrei and Soames, Scott, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 31–57.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Scott, ‘What Is the Rule of Recognition (And Does It Exist)’, in Adler, Matthew and Himma, Keneth E., eds., The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 235–68.Google Scholar
Smartt, Ursula, Media and Entertainment Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Tebbit, Mark, Philosophy of Law: An Introduction, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip, Expert Political Judgement (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip and Gardner, Dan, Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction, Kindle ed. (London: Random House, 2015).Google Scholar
Tsagourias, Nicholas, ‘Risk and the Use of Force’, in Ambrus, Mónika, Rayfuse, Rosemary and Werner, Wouter, eds., Risk and Uncertainty in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Waibel, Michael, ‘Interpretive Communities in International Law’, in Bianchi, Andrea, Peat, Daniel, Windsor, Matthew, eds., Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York: Random House, 1979).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Arguing about War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 3rd ed. (New York: Basic Books, 2000).Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., ‘Political Institutions: Rational Choice Perspectives’, in Goodin, Robert E. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, eds., A New Handbook of Political Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 167–85.Google Scholar
Weisburd, Mark, ‘Use of Force: Justiciability and Admissibility’, in Weller, Marc, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 329–46.Google Scholar
Whalley, Matthew and Guzelian, Chris, The Legal Risk Management Handbook: An International Guide to Protect Your Business from Legal Loss (London: Kogan Page, 2016).Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas, Saving Strangers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ‘Preface’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000), xvii–xx.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy, ‘Vagueness in Reality’, in Loux, Michael J. and Zimmermann, Dean W., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Zacklin, Ralph, ‘The Role of the International Lawyer in an International Organisation’, in Wickremasinghe, Chanaka, ed., The International Lawyer as Practitioner (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000).Google Scholar
Zidar, Andraž, ‘Legal Advisers and Professional Ethics’ in Zidar, Andraz and Gauci, Jean-Pierre, eds., The Role of Legal Advisers in International Law (Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff, 2016).Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, ‘The International Criminal Court Gets Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression’, EJIL: Talk! (15 December 2017), www.ejiltalk.org/the-international-criminal-court-gets-jurisdiction-over-the-crime-of-aggression.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, ‘The Use of Nerve Agents in Salisbury: Why Does It Matter Whether It Amounts to a Use of Force in International Law?’, EJIL: Talk! (17 March 2018), www.ejiltalk.org/the-use-of-nerve-agents-in-salisbury-why-does-it-matter-whether-it-amounts-to-a-use-of-force-in-international-law/.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel, ‘Non Liquet’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1669?prd=EPIL.Google Scholar
Borger, Julian and Miller, Stuart, ‘How “Shy Foreigners” Learned to Pilot Flying-Bomb Boeings’, The Guardian (14 September 2001), www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/14/september11.usa18.Google Scholar
Brandewinder, Mathias, PowerScatterPlot, Copyright © 2009, Clear Lines Consulting, LLC, www.clear-lines.com/blog/post/Excel-ScatterPlot-with-labels-colors-and-markers.aspx.Google Scholar
Brown, Derek, ‘Timeline: Terror and Its Aftermath (Part 1)’, The Guardian (5 October 2001), www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/11/september11.usa24.Google Scholar
Chambers and Partners, ‘Public International Law Firms in London’, www.chambersandpartners.com/11814/96/editorial/1/1.Google Scholar
CIA, A Tradecraft Primer: Structured Analytic Techniques for Improving Intelligence Analysis (4 May 2009), www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/Tradecraft%20Primer-apr09.pdf.Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley S., ‘Pakistan’s Sovereignty and the Killing of Osama Bin Laden’, ASIL Insights, 15:11 (2011), www.asil.org/insights/volume/15/issue/11/pakistans-sovereignty-land-killing-osama-bin-laden.Google Scholar
Edelstein, D. M., ‘Why Realists Don’t Go for Bombs and Bullets’, ForeignPolicy.Com (21 July 2010), http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/07/20/why_realists_don_t_go_for_bombs_and_bullets.Google Scholar
Egan, Brian, US State Department Legal Adviser, ‘International Law, Legal Diplomacy, and the Counter-ISIL Campaign’, American Society of International Law (4 April 2016), www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Egan-ASIL-speech.pdf.Google Scholar
France24, ‘France Stands Firm on Syria despite Shock UK Vote’, France 24 (30 August 2013), www.france24.com/en/20130830-france-hollande-syria-usa-uk-vote-francois.Google Scholar
Gannon, Kathy, ‘Bush Rejects Taliban Bin Laden Offer’, Washington Post (14 October 2001), www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20011014/aponline135016_000.htm.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Mark and Manchin, Robert, ‘Kosovo Air Strikes Receive Support in Britain, Hungary’, Gallup News Service (30 March 1999), https://news.gallup.com/poll/3967/kosovo-air-strikes-receive-support-britain-hungary.aspx.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold, ‘Syria and the Law of Humanitarian Intervention (Part II: International Law and the Way Forward)’, JustSecurity (2 October 2013), http://justsecurity.org/2013/10/02/koh-syria-part2/.Google Scholar
Ipsos MORI, ‘War in Afghanistan Poll’, Ipsos MORI (4 November 2001), www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/war-afghanistan-poll-1Google Scholar
ISO 31000:2009(en), ‘Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines’, www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:31000:ed-1:v1:en.Google Scholar
ISO/Guide 73:2009(en), ‘Risk Management – Vocabulary’, www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:guide:73:ed-1:v1:en.Google Scholar
Journal of Conflict and Security Law, https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/pages/Editorial_Board.Google Scholar
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=editorialBoard&journalCode=rjuf20.Google Scholar
Kent, Sherman, ‘Words of Estimative Probability’, Sherman Kent and the Board of National Estimates: Collected Essays, CIA (19 March 2007), www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/sherman-kent-and-the-board-of-national-estimates-collected-essays/6words.html.Google Scholar
Laville, Sandra, ‘Mercy Killing Mother Cleared of Murder after Helping Seriously Ill Daughter Die’, The Guardian (25 January 2010), www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/25/mercy-killing-kay-gilderdale-cleared.Google Scholar
Mahler, Tobias, Presentation, www.industrijuristgruppen.no/dokumenter/pres12/tobias_mahler.pptx.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘Self-Defense and Non-State Actors: Indeterminacy and the Jus ad Bellum’, EJIL: Talk! (21 February 2010), www.ejiltalk.org/self-defense-and-non-state-actors-indeterminacy-and-the-jus-ad-bellum/.Google Scholar
Nessa, Jasmin Johurun, ‘Self-Defense in International Law: What Level of Evidence?’, Just Security (8 July 2019), www.justsecurity.org/64796/self-defense-in-international-law-what-level-of-evidence.Google Scholar
Non-Aligned Movement, ‘Final Communique of the Meeting of Ministers for Foreign Affairs and Heads of Delegation of the Non-Aligned Movement, held in New York on 23 September 1999’, www.nam.gov.za/minmeet/newyorkcom.htm.Google Scholar
Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, ‘OSCE Kosovo Verification Mission/OSCE Task Force for Kosovo (Closed)’, www.osce.org/kvm-closedGoogle Scholar
Russell Group Universities, http://russellgroup.ac.uk/about/our-universities/.Google Scholar
Savage, Charlie, ‘Obama Tests Limits of Power in Syria Conflict’, The New York Times (8 September 2013), www.nytimes.com/2013/09/09/world/middleeast/obama-tests-limits-of-power-in-syrian-conflict.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.Google Scholar
Urban, Mark, ‘A Fork in the Road for UK Foreign Policy’, BBC News (29 August 2013), www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23885524.Google Scholar
Stop the War Coalition, ‘Constitution’, www.stopwar.org.uk/constitution.Google Scholar
UN, ‘United Nations Peacekeeping’, UN Website (https://peacekeeping.un.org/en).Google Scholar
‘US Rejects Taliban Concession’, The Guardian (20 September 2001), www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/20/september11.usa11.Google Scholar
Valtorta, Marco, et al., ‘Extending Heuer’s Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method to Support Complex Decision Analysis’ (February 10, 2005), Center for Information Technology, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.122.3422&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Verdirame, Guglielmo, ‘The Law and Strategy of Humanitarian Intervention’, EJIL: Talk! (30 August 2013), www.ejiltalk.org/the-law-and-strategy-of-humanitarian-intervention/.Google Scholar
Voice of America, ‘Mullah Omar – In His Own Words’, The Guardian (26 September 2001), www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/26/afghanistan.features11.Google Scholar
Wisehart, Daniel, ‘The Crisis in Ukraine and the Prohibition of the Use of Force: A Legal Basis for Russia’s Intervention?’, EJIL: Talk! (4 March 2014), www.ejiltalk.org/the-crisis-in-ukraine-and-the-prohibition-of-the-use-of-force-a-legal-basis-for-russias-intervention/.Google Scholar
Wood, Michael, ‘Legal Advisers’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (May 2013), http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1064?prd=EPIL.Google Scholar
Explosion Image by Oceloti, from Vectorstock.Google Scholar
Island generated using Polygon Map Generator by Amit Patel, Red Blob Games, www.redblobgames.com/maps/mapgen2/.Google Scholar
Predator Type Drone image by boscorelli3D, from 3DExport.com.Google Scholar
Sea Dart Missile image by Hristov, from 3DExport.com.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sam Selvadurai, King's College London
  • Book: Law, War and the Penumbra of Uncertainty
  • Online publication: 31 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009051934.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sam Selvadurai, King's College London
  • Book: Law, War and the Penumbra of Uncertainty
  • Online publication: 31 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009051934.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sam Selvadurai, King's College London
  • Book: Law, War and the Penumbra of Uncertainty
  • Online publication: 31 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009051934.009
Available formats
×