Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:52:17.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2022

Roberto Gargarella
Roberto Gargarella
Affiliation:
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Law As a Conversation among Equals , pp. 327 - 337
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovich, V. & Courtis, C. (2002), Los derechos sociales como derechos exigibles, Barcelona: Trotta.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (1980), Social Justice in the Liberal State, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (1991), We the People, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2007), The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall and the Rise of Presidential Democracy, New York: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2010), The Decline and Fall of the American Republic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2014), The Civil Rights Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,Google Scholar
Alberdi, J. B. (1852) (1981), Bases y puntos de partida para la organización política de la República Argentina, Buenos Aires: Plus Ultra.Google Scholar
Alberdi, J. B. (1854) Sistema económico y rentístico de la confederación argentina, Valparaíso: Imprenta y Librería del Mercurio.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. & Schauer, F. (1997), “On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation,” 110 Harv. L. Rev. 1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, L. & Schauer, F. (2000), “Defending Judicial Supremacy: A Reply,” 17 Const. Comment. 455.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. & Solum, L. (2005), “Popular? Constitutionalism?” 118 Harvard L. Rev. 1594.Google Scholar
Allan, T. (2016), “The Rule of Law,” in Dyzenhaus, D. & Thorburn, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–221.Google Scholar
Arato, A. (2017), The Adventures of the Constituent Power, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (2006), On Revolution, London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Atria, F. (2016), La forma del derecho, Marcial Pons, Madrid.Google Scholar
Ávila Santamaría, R. (2009), ed., Desafíos constitucionales. La Constitución ecuatoriana del 2008 en perspectiva, Tribunal Constitucional del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Bachtiger, A., Dryzek, J., Mansbridge, J., & Warren, M. (2018), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (1984), Strong Democracy, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Basadre, J. (1949), Historia de la República del Perú, Lima,Editorial Cultura Antártica.Google Scholar
Bateup, C. (2007), “Expanding the Conversation: American and Canadian Experiences of Constitutional Dialogue in Comparative Perspective,” 21 Temp. Int´l L. J. 1.Google Scholar
Benedetti, M. & Sáenz, J. (2016), Las audiencias públicas ante la Corte Suprema, Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1843), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 6, The Online Library of Liberty. Liberty Fund, https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/1923/Bentham_0872-06_EBk_v6.0.pdf.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (2002), The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. by Schofield, P., Pease-Watkin, C., & Blamires, C., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergallo, P., Jaramillo, I. & Vaggione, J. (comps. 2018), El aborto en América Latina. Estrategias jurídicas para luchar por su legalización y enfrentar las resistencias conservadoras, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Bickel, A. (1962), The Least Dangerous Branch, Connecticut, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bolívar, S. (1951), Selected Writings of Bolívar, 2 vols., New York: The Colonial Press.Google Scholar
Bolívar, S. (1976), Doctrina del Libertador, Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho.Google Scholar
Bonilla, D. (1993), Constitutionalism on the Global South. The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, D. & Blass, A. (2018), The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. (2000), Politics as Public Choice, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Burke, E. [1774] (1999), “Speech to the Electors of Bristol,” in Selected Works of Edmund Burke (4 vols.), vol. 4, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/659/20392.Google Scholar
Cepeda, M. (2004), “Judicial Activism in a Violent Context: The Origin, Role, and Impact of the Colombian Constitutional Court,” 3 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 259.Google Scholar
Chipman, N. (1833), Principles of Government, Burlington, IN.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2009), Why Not Socialism? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Colon Ríos, J. (2020), Constituent Power and the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Contesse, J. (2015), “Subsidiarity in Inter-American Human Rights Law,” SELA, manuscript on file with the author.Google Scholar
Courtis, C. (2006), “Judicial Enforcement of Social Rights: Perspectives from Latin America,” in Gargarella, R.. Gloppen, Siri & Skaar, Elin, eds., Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cover, R. (1983), “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative” (1983). Faculty Scholarship Series. 2705, https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2705Google Scholar
Cover, R. (1985), “Violence and the Word,” 95 Yale L.J. 1601.Google Scholar
Crozier, M., Huntington, S., & Watanuki, J. (1975), The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission Paperback, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Da Silva, V. A. (2011), “Ideas e institucois constitutionais do século xx no Brasil,” in Valadés, D. et al., eds., Ideas e instituciones constitucionales en el siglo XX. México: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1989), Democracy and Its Critics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (2003), How Democratic Is the American Constitution? Connecticut, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
De Jongh, M. (2013), “Group Dynamics in the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform,” Thesis, Grasten (Denmark), Toptryk Grafisk, at Utrecht University Repository, dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/275018.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. (2018), “Constitutional Rights as Bribes,” 50 Connecticut Law Review 769.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1975), “Hard Cases,” 88 Harvard Law Review 1057.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1977), Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1997), “The Arduous Virtue of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia, Tribe, and Nerve,” 65 Fordham Law Review.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2004), “The Left and the Question of Law,” 17 Can. J.L. & Jurisprudence, 7.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2010), Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems: Pathologies of Legality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2012), “Response to Ian Shapiro, ‘On Non-Domination,’” 62 UTLJ 337.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. & Thorburn, M. (2016), Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, L. (2017), “La Revocatoria de Mandato en América Latina: una herramienta de participación y control al servicio de los ciudadanos (¿o de los gobernantes?),” Doctoral thesis, on file with author.Google Scholar
Echeverría, J. (2008), “Plenos poderes y democracia en el proceso constituyente ecuatoriano,” in Echeverría, J. & Montúfar, C., eds., Plenos poderes y transformación constitucional, Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1983), Sour Grapes, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1986), “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory,” in Elster, J. and Hylland, A., eds., Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 104–132.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1988), Ulysses and the Sirens. Studies in Rationality and Irrationality, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2000), Ulysses Unbound, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. & Slagstad, R. (1988), Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. et al. (2018), Constitutional Conventions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrand, M., ed. (1937), The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, D., Suiter, J. & Harris, C. (2019), “Systematizing Constitutional Deliberation: The 2016–18 Citizens’ Assembly in Ireland,” 34 (1) Irish Political Studies 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (2008), “Conclusion: The Citizens’ Assembly Model,” in Warren, M. & Pearse, H., eds., Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrajoli, L. (2008), Democracia y garantismo, Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. (1991), Democracy and Deliberation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. (1997), The Voice of the People, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. (2009), When the People Speak, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J., Kousser, T., Luskin, R. & Siu, A. (2015), “Deliberative Agenda Setting: Piloting Reform of Direct Democracy in California,” 13 (4) Perspectives on Politics 1030–1042.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. (1976), “Groups and the Equal Protection Clause,” 5 (2) Philosophy and Public Affairs 107–177.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. (2005), “El carácter indócil de la política,” 80 Lecciones y ensayos 1–25.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2013), Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S. (2013), The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S. (2020), “Comparative Political Process Theory,” 18 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1429–1457.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (1995), Nos los representantes, Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (1998), “Full Representation, Deliberation, and Impartiality,” in Elster, J., ed., Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2005), El derecho a la protesta. El primer derecho, Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2010) The Legal Foundations of Inequality, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2012), “Law and Social Protests,” 6 Criminal Law and Philosophy 15–27.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2013), Latin American Constitutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2014), La sala de máquinas de la Constitución. Dos siglos de constitucionalismo en América Latina (1810–2010), Buenos Aires: Katz ed.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2020), “Constituent Power in ‘a Community of Equals’,” 41 Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, https://journals.openedition.org/revus/.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2020a), “Diálogo democrático y emergencia en América Latina” (Democratic Dialogue and Emergency in Latin America) (June 10). Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Research Paper No. 2020-21, c/ Jorge Roa. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3623812 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3623812.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2020b), “Argentina: Facing Coronavirus in the Shadow of the Rule of Law,” Bill of Health. Harvard Law, https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2020/06/08/argentina-global-responses-covid19/.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2020c), “The Fight Against COVID-19 in Argentina: Executive vs Legislative Branch,” Verfassungsblog. On Matters Constitutional (June, 2020), https://verfassungsblog.de/author/roberto-gargarella/.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2021), “From ‘Democracy and Distrust’ to a Contextually Situated Dialogic Theory,” 18(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 1466–1473, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa094.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2022), “In the Name of the People. Review of Joel Colon Ríos’ Constituent Power” manuscript, to be published.Google Scholar
Garzón Valdés, E. (1992), “No pongas tus sucias manos sobre Mozart,” 19 Claves de la Razón Práctica 16–23.Google Scholar
Gilly, A. (1994), La revolución interrumpida, México: Ediciones Era.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. (2021), “Notes on a Continuing Conversation,” 49 Revista Derecho del Estado (May–August).Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. & Huq, A. (2018), How to Save a Constitutional Democracy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gloppen, S., Wilson, B., et al (2010), Courts and Power in Latin America and Africa, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Godoy, M. (2017), Devolver a Constituicao ao povo: critica a supremacia judicial e dialogos interinstitucionais. Belo Horizonte: Editora Forum.Google Scholar
Graber, M., Levinson, S., & Tushnet, M., eds. (2018), Constitutional Democracy in Crisis?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. (2020) “Legal Interpretation and Natural Law,” Natural Law Colloquium Special Issue, 89 Fordham Law Review 109.Google Scholar
Guastini, R. (2017), Saggi scettici sull’interpretazione, Roma: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
Guzmán, J. (1979), “El camino político,” Revista Realidad, 13–23.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory on Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halperín Donghi, T. (1980), Proyecto y Construcción de una Nación, Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J. & Jay, J. [1788] (1961), The Federalist Papers, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hart, H. (1961), The Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (1988), “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy,” in Elster, J. & Slagstad, R., Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. (1983), American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jaksic, I. (1997), Andrés Bello. Selected Writings, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, T. (1999), Political Writings, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1967) (2005) Pure Theory of Law, New York: The Lawbook Exchange Ltd.Google Scholar
Kramer, L. (2005), The People Themselves. Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (1996), Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2020), Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, D. (2013), “Abusive Constitutionalism,” 47 UC Davis Law Review 189–260.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2013), Democratic Reason, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2014), “Inclusive Constitution-Making, The Icelandic Example,” 23(2) Journal of Political Philosophy, 166–191.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2014a), “We, All of the People. Five Lessons from Iceland’s Failed Experiment in Creating a Crowdsourced Constitution,” Slate, available at https://slate.com/technology/2014/07/five-lessons-from-icelands-failed-crowdsourced-constitution-experiment.html.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2020), Open Democracy. Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lechner, N. (1991), “A la búsqueda de la comunidad perdida,” 129 Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, UNESCO, 8.Google Scholar
Lerner, H. (2013), Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, H. (2017), “Constituent Assemblies in Divided Societies,” in Elster, J., Gargarella, R. et al., Constituent Assemblies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2008), Our Undemocratic Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018), How Democracies Die, New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Levy, R., Kong, H, Orr, G. & King, J. , eds. (2018), The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, S. (2012), “Engaging the Paradoxes of the Universal and Particular in Human Rights Adjudication. The Possibilities and Pitfalls of ‘Meaningful Engagement’,” 12 African Human Rights Law Journal 1–29.Google Scholar
Lima Lopes, J. (2008), O Direito na Historia, Sao Paulo: Editorial Atlas.Google Scholar
Luo, Z. & Przeworski, A. (2019), “Subversion by Stealth: Dynamics of Democratic Backsliding,” manuscript on file with the author.Google Scholar
Lutz, D. (1988), The Origins of American Constitutionalism, Baton Rouge: Louisiana University Press.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1997), The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (1983), Beyond Adversary Democracy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Molina, G. (1970), Las ideas liberales en Colombia, Bogotá: Ediciones Tercer Mundo.Google Scholar
Moyn, S. (2010), The Last Utopia, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moyn, S. (2018), “Human Rights Are Not Enough,” The Nation, www.thenation.com/article/human-rights-are-not-enough/.Google Scholar
Hogg, P. & Bushell, A. (1997), “The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures,” 35 Osgoode Hall L. J. 75.Google Scholar
Manfredi, C. & Kelly, J. (1990), “Six Degrees of Dialogue: A Response to Hogg and Bushell,” 37 Osgoode Hall L. J. 513.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1997), The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. [1843] (1978), “Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right,” in Tucker, R. ed., The Marx-Engels Reader, New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Marx, K. [1844] (1983) “Alienated Labor,” in The Portable Karl Marx, London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. (1969), “On Protecting the Poor Through the Fourteenth Amendment,” 83 Harvard Law Review 7.Google Scholar
Mill, J. [1859] 2003, On Liberty, London: Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Molina, G. (1987), Las ideas liberales en Colombia, Bogotá: Tercer Mundo.Google Scholar
Murillo Toro, M. (1979), Obras Selectas, Bogotá: Camara de Representantes.Google Scholar
Nino, C. (1987), ed., Presidencialismo vs. Parlamentarismo, Buenos Aires: Consejo para la Consolidación de la Democracia.Google Scholar
Nino, C. (1991), The Ethics of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nino, C. (1997), The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (2007), “Las crisis perpetuas de la democracia,” 3(1) Polis 11–20.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (2010), Democracia, agencia y Estado. Teoría con intención comparativa, Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. & Mansbridge, J. (2012), Deliberative systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.Google Scholar
Petter, A. (2003), “Twenty Years of Charter Justification: From Liberal Legalism to Dubious Dialogue,” 52 UNB Law Journal 187–199.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2012), On the People’s Terms, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (1995), The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pincione, G. & Tesón, F. (2006), Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1972), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Posner, E. & Vermeule, A. (2010), The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Post, R. & Siegel, R. (2004), “Popular Constitutionalism, Departmentalism, and Judicial Supremacy,” Faculty Scholarship Series No. 178. Yale Law School, https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/178.Google Scholar
Post, R. & Siegel, R. (2007), “Roe Rage: Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash,” 42 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 373–433.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. (1791), Lectures on History and General Policy, Dublin.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2019), Crisis of Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. & Sprague, J. (1988), Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., & Manin, M., eds. (1999), Democracy, Accountability and Representation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1991), Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Roach, K. (2001), “Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues Between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures,” 80 La Revue du Barreau Canadien 481–533.Google Scholar
Roach, K. (2004), “Dialogic Judicial Review and its Critics,” 23 Supreme Court Law Review, 49–104.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2011), “Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America,” 89 (7) Texas Law Review 1669–1698.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G. (1991), The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, J. & Filippini, L. (2010), “El derecho internacional en la justiciabilidad de los derechos sociales,” in Arcidiácono, P et al., Derechos sociales: justicia, política y economía en América Latina, Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre-Universidad de Los Andes.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1996), Democracy’s Discontent. America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (2020), The Tyranny of Merit, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Salazar, D. (2015), “My Power in the Constitution: The Perversion of the Rule of Law in Ecuador,” SELA, Yale University, at www.law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/SELA15_Salazar_CV_Eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (1984), “Rights, Goals and Fairness,” in Waldron, J., ed., Theories of Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scalia, A. (1996), “Judicial Adherence to The Text of Our Basic Law: A Theory of Constitutional Interpretation.” Speech delivered at the Catholic University of America on October 18,www.proconservative.net/PCVol5Is225ScaliaTheoryConstlInterpretation.shtml.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (2008), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Harper Classics.Google Scholar
Setala, M. (2017), “Connecting Deliberative Mini-Publics to Representative Decision Making,” 56(4) European Journal of Political Research 846–863.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. (2012), “On Non-domination,” 62 UTLJ 293.Google Scholar
Sigalet, G., Webber, G., & Dixon, R. (2019), Constitutional Dialogue, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, G. (2018), “It Can’t Happen Here. The Lessons of History,” in Sunstein, C. ed., Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America, New York: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Storing, H. (1981), The Complete Anti-Federalist, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, D. (2018), “Law and the Slow-Motion Emergency,” in Sunstein, C. ed., Can it Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America, New York: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1985), “Interest Groups in American Public Law,” 38 (1) Stanford Law Review 29–87.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1993), “Against Positive Rights,” 2 East European Constitutional Review 35.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1993), The Partial Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1996), “The Supreme Court 1995 Term: Foreword: Living Things Undecided,” 110 Harvard Law Review 6.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2001), “Social and Economic Rights? Lessons from South Africa,” Chicago Unbound, University of Chicago Law School.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2006), The Second Bill of Rights, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., ed. (2018), Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America, New York: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., Schkade, D. , & Ellman, L. (2004), “Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation,” 90 Virginia Law Review 301.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., Schkade, D. , Ellman, L. , & Sawicki, A. (2006), Are Judges Political?: An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary, New York: Brookings Inst.Google Scholar
Suteu, S. (2015), “Constitutional Conventions in the Digital Era: Lessons from Iceland and Ireland,” 38 (2) Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 251.Google Scholar
Suteu, S. & Tierney, S. (2018), “Squaring the Circle? Bringing Deliberation and Participation Together in Processes of Constitution-Making,” in Levy, R. et al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Svampa, M. (2019), “Hacia dónde se mueven las placas tectónicas?” Brecha, available at https://brecha.com.uy/hacia-donde-se-mueven-las-placas-tectonicas/?fbclid=IwAR1yj90_22dQzcOmooLIfcx8CGNwE0zA7vhzEQmkCBk4WnarODxPUnBXHAI.Google Scholar
Tullock, G., Seldon, A., & Brady, G. (2002), Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice, Indianapolis: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2003), “Non-Judicial Review,” 40 Harv. J. on Legisl. 453–492.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2008), Weak Courts, Strong Rights, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2009), “Dialogic Judicial Review,” 61 Ark. L. Rev. 205.Google Scholar
Unger, R. (1996), What Should Legal Analysis Become? London: Verso Press.Google Scholar
Valencia Villa, A. (1992), El pensamiento constitucional de Miguel Antonio Caro, Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Van Reybrouck, D. (2017), Against Elections: The Case for Democracy, London: Random House.Google Scholar
Vile, M. (1967), Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Villa, M. A. (2011), A historia das constituicoes brasileiras, San Pablo: Leya.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999), Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999a), The Dignity of Legislation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999b), “Deliberation, Disagreement, and Voting,” in Koh, H. & Slye, R., Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2009), “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review,” 115 Yale Law Journal 1348–1406.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2016), Political Political Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
White, M. (1987), Philosophy, The Federalist, and the Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, K. (2002), “Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation: Three Objections and Responses,” 80 N.C.L. Rev. 773–783.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2018), “Book Review: The Adventures of the Constituent Power. Arato, Andrew, Cambridge University Press, 2018,” Constellations Issue Online, March 20, 2019.Google Scholar
Winterton, G. (1998) “Australia’s Constitutional Convention 1998,” 5(1) Agenda 97–109.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (1966), “A Note on Mobs in the American Revolution,” XXIII(4) William and Mary Quarterly 635–642.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (1969), The Creation of the American Republic, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (1991), The Radicalism of the American Revolution, New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (2002), The American Revolution. A History, New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Young, A. (2017), Democratic Dialogue and the Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Roberto Gargarella, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Book: The Law As a Conversation among Equals
  • Online publication: 25 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009105682.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Roberto Gargarella, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Book: The Law As a Conversation among Equals
  • Online publication: 25 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009105682.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Roberto Gargarella, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Book: The Law As a Conversation among Equals
  • Online publication: 25 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009105682.022
Available formats
×