Book contents
- Language Politics and Policies
- Language Politics and Policies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contributor Personal Statements
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Orientations
- Part II The United States Context
- 5 Disciplining Bilingual Education
- 6 Measured Multilingualism
- 7 The Rise, Fall, and Rebirth of Bilingual Education in California and the Ongoing American Dilemma
- 8 Language Policy Conflicts
- 9 Indigenous Language Movements in a Settler State
- 10 The Politics of Language Education Policy Development and Implementation
- Part III The Canadian Context
- Index
- References
7 - The Rise, Fall, and Rebirth of Bilingual Education in California and the Ongoing American Dilemma
from Part II - The United States Context
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Language Politics and Policies
- Language Politics and Policies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contributor Personal Statements
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Orientations
- Part II The United States Context
- 5 Disciplining Bilingual Education
- 6 Measured Multilingualism
- 7 The Rise, Fall, and Rebirth of Bilingual Education in California and the Ongoing American Dilemma
- 8 Language Policy Conflicts
- 9 Indigenous Language Movements in a Settler State
- 10 The Politics of Language Education Policy Development and Implementation
- Part III The Canadian Context
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter analyzes major shifts in US educational policies toward bilingual education in California, where voters are often called on to decide policy by voting on propositions. It focuses on: how language policies have functioned as an instrument of social control; the lingering impact of the Americanization century and English-only ideologies on contemporary educational policies; the contemporary English-only movement and its impact on language minority education; and how a series of discriminatory propositions in California set the stage for language restriction in 1998. The chapter next looks at factors affecting the resurgence of bilingual education as “dual-language” education amidst discourses of globalization since 2016. The chapter concludes by noting new threats to immigrants posed by the criminalization of immigrant status and efforts to deny education as a human right. Implicit in this discussion are questions related to the relationship between language policy and racism and the salience of language policies in racial politics.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language Politics and PoliciesPerspectives from Canada and the United States, pp. 135 - 152Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Adams, D. W. (1992). Education for Extinction: American Indians and the Boarding School Experience, 1875–1928. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Arias, M. B. & Wiley, T. G. (2015). Forty years after Lau: The continuing assault on educational human rights in the United States with implications for linguistic minorities. Languages Problems and Language Planning, 39(3), 227–44.Google Scholar
Bale, J. (2011a). Language and imperialism: The case of Title VI and Arabic, 1958–1991. Journal for Critical Educational Policies, 9, 376–409.Google Scholar
Bale, J. (2011b). The campaign for Spanish language education in the “colossus of the north,” 1914–45. Language Policy, 10, 137–57.Google Scholar
Bale, J. (2014). Heritage language education and the “National Interest.” Review of Research in Education, 38, 166–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballotpedia, (2016, June 2a). California Proposition 63, English Is the Official Language Amendment (1986). Middleton, WI. Retrieved from https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_63,_English_is_the_Official_Language_Amendment_(1986) [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Ballotpedia, (2016, June 2b). California Proposition 209: California Affirmative Action Proposition. Middleton, WI. Retrieved from https://ballotpedia.org/California_Affirmative_Action,_Proposition_209_(1996) [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Ballotpedia, (2016, August 16). Proposition 58: California Multicultural Education Act. Middleton, WI. Retrieved from https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=California_Multilingual_Education_Act,_Proposition_58_(2016)&redirect=no [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Ballotpedia, (2016, September 5). California Proposition 227: English in Public Schools. Middleton, WI. Retrieved from https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_227,_the_%22English_in_Public_Schools%22_Initiative_(1998) [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Ballotpedia, (2017, April 7). California Proposition: 187: Illegal Aliens Ineligible for Public Benefits. Author. Middleton, WI. Retrieved from https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_187,_Illegal_Aliens_Ineligible_for_Public_Benefits_(1994) [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Blanton, C. (2007). The Strange Career of Bilingual Education in Texas, 1836–1981. College Station, TX: A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, A. (2014). Undocumented: How Immigration Became Illegal. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (1992). Hold Your Tongue: Bilingualism and the Politics of English Only. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (2000). At War With Diversity: US Language Policy in an Age of Anxiety. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Donahue, T. S. (1995). American language policy and compensatory opinion. In Tollefson, J. (ed.), Power and Inequaltiy in Languge Education. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press, pp. 112–41.Google Scholar
Epstein, N. (1977). Language, Ethnicity, and the Schools: Policy Alternatives for Bilingual-Bicultural Education. Washington, DC: George Washington University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service: ED 151434).Google Scholar
Faltis, C. & Arias, M. B. (2012). Implementing Educational Language Policy in Arizona: Legal, Historical and Current Practices in SEI. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gándara, P. & Hopkins, M. (eds.). (2010). Forbidden Language: English Learners and Restrictive Language Policies. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1989). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers Co.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1986). Mirror of Language: The Debate on Bilingual Education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Holly, P. (2017, May 12). One Republican’s “shameful” plan to save money: Turn 82,000 non-English-speaking kids over to ICE. Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/11/one-gop-lawmakers-plan-to-save-money-turning-non-english-speaking-kids-over-to-ice/ [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Katznelson, N.; & Bernstein, K. A. (2017, August). Rebranding bilingualism: The shifting discourses of language education policy in California’s 2016 election. Linguistics and Education, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar
LAO. (2016, November 8a) Proposition 58: English Language Education. Sacramento, CA: Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO). Retrieved from www.lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Proposition?number=58&year=2016 [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
LAO. (2016, November 8b). Proposition 227: English Language in Public Schools. Sacramento, CA: Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO). Retrieved from www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/1998/227_06_1998.htm [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Lehrer, D. A., & Hicks, J. (2010, July 12). UC proves Prop. 209’s point. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/12/opinion/la-oe-lehrer-affirmativeaction-20100712 [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Leibowitz, A. H. (1969). English literacy: Legal sanction for discrimination. Notre Dame Lawyer, 25(1), 7–66.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, A. H. (1971). Educational policy and political acceptance: The imposition of English as the language of instruction in American schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service: ED 047 321).Google Scholar
Leibowitz, A. H. (1974). Language as a means of social control: The United States experience. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the World Congress of Sociology. Toronto, ON. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service: ED 093 163).Google Scholar
Lillie, K. E., Markos, A., Arias, M. B. & Wiley, T. G. (2012). Separate and not equal: The implementation of SEI in Arizona classrooms. Teachers College Record, 114(9), 6–7.Google Scholar
Lillie, K. E., Markos, A., Estrella, A., Nguyen, T., Peer, K., Pérez, K., Trifiro, A., Arias, M. B. & Wiley, T. G. (2010, July). Policy in Practice: The Implementation of Structured English Immersion in Arizona. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project: University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
McField, G. P. (ed.). (2014). The Miseducation of English Learners: A Tale of Three States and Lessons to Be Learned. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Migration News. (1994, December). Prop. 187 approved. Retrieved from https://migration.ucdavis.edu/mn/more.php?id=492 [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Moore, S. K. (ed.). (2014). Language Policy Processes and Consequences: Arizona Case Studies. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1944). An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Ngai, M. M. (2004). Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton, University Press.Google Scholar
Olivas, M. A. (2012). No Undocumented Child Left Behind: Plyler v. Doe and the Education of undocumented School Children. New York, NY: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982).Google Scholar
Powers, J. M. (2014). From s.egregation to school finance. The legal context for language rights in the United States. In Borman, K. M., Wiley, T. G., Garcia, D. R., Danzig, A. B. & Stigler, M. L. (eds.), Review of Educational Research in Education: Language Policy, Politics, and Diversity in Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 81–105.Google Scholar
Ramírez, J. D., Wiley, T. G., de Klerk, G., Lee, E., & Wright, W. (eds.). (2005). Ebonics in the Urban Education Debate (2nd ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, LTD.Google Scholar
Ricento, T. (2003). The discursive construction of Americanism. Discourse & Society, 14(5), 611–37.Google Scholar
Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the “language as resource” discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the USA. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 348–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Miguel, G. (2004). The Rise and Fall of Federal Bilingual Education in the United States, 1960–2001. Denton, TX: North Texas State University Press.Google Scholar
SPLC (2017). Hate Map. Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Retrieved from www.splcenter.org/hate-map [Last accessed March 9, 2019].Google Scholar
Tamura, E. (1994). Americanization, Acculturation, and Ethnic Identity: The Nisei Generation in Hawaii. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Tatalovich, R. (1995). Nativism Reborn?: The Official English Language Movement and the American States. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. (1995). Power and Inequality in Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toth, C. R. (1990). German-English Bilingual Schools in America: The Cincinnati Tradition in Historical Context. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Weinberg, M. (1995). A Chance to Learn: A History of Race and Education in the United States (2nd ed.). Long Beach, CA: California State University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, B. (1982). American Education and the European Immigrant: 1840–1940. Urbana-Champaign, IL. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (1998). The imposition of World War I–era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. In Ricento, T. & Burnaby, B. (eds.), Language and Politics in the United States and Canada. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 211–41.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (2000). Proposition 227: California’s new restrictions on the educational choices of language minority parents and children. Multilingual Educator, 1(1), 34–35.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (2004). Language policy and English-only. In Finegan, E. & Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Language in the USA: Perspectives for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 319–38.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (2005). Literacy and Language Diversity in the United States (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics & Delta Systems.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (2007). The foreign language “crisis” in the US: Are heritage and community languages the remedy? Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 4(2–3), 179–205.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (2013). Constructing and deconstructing “illegal” children. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 13(3), 167–72.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (2015). The Civil Rights Act and the weight of history. International Multilingual Research Journal, 9(4), 3018–312.Google Scholar
Wright, W. E. (2014). Proposition 203 and Arizona’s early school reform efforts: The nullification of accommodations. In Moore, S. K. (ed.), Language Policy Processes and Consequences: Arizona Case Studies. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, T. K. (2017). The Politics of Immigration: Partisanship, Demographic Change, and the American National Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wyman, M. (1993). Round-Trip to America: The Immigrants Return to Europe, 1880–1930. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, H. (2011). Immigrants Raising Citizens: Undocumented Parents and Their Young Children. NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Yanow, D. (2003). Constructing “Race” and “Ethnicity” in America: Category-Making in Public Policy Administration. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by