Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T10:16:16.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2025

Christopher Hart
Christopher Hart
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Language, Image, Gesture
The Cognitive Semiotics of Politics
 , pp. 253 - 279
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abid, R. Z., Manan, S. A. and Rahman, Z. A. A. A. (2017). ‘A flood of Syrians has slowed to a trickle’: The use of metaphors in the representation of Syrian refugees in the online media news reports of host and non-host countries. Discourse and Communication 11 (2): 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abner, N., Cooperrider, K. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). Gesture for linguists: A handy primer. Language and Linguistics Compass 9 (11): 437–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abousnnouga, G. and Machin, D. (2010). War monuments and the changing discourses of nation and soldiery. In Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. (eds.), Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. Continuum. Pp. 219–240.Google Scholar
Abousnnouga, G. and Machin, D. (2011). Visual discourses of the role of women in war commemoration: A multimodal analysis of British war monuments. Journal of Language and Politics 10 (3): 322–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abousnnouga, G. and Machin, D. (2013). The Language of War Monuments. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. (1970). Negative Dialektik. Jargon der Eigentlichkeit [Negative Dialectics. Jargon of Authenticity]. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Alibali, M. W., Flevares, L. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology 89 (1): 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. L. (2016). Report: A Decade of Immigration in the British Press. The Migration Observatory.Google Scholar
Altheide, D. L. (2002). Creating Fear: News and the Construction of Crisis. Transaction.Google Scholar
Antonopoulou, E. and Nikiforidou, K. (2011). Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 2594–2609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atanasova, D. and Koteyko, N. (2017). Metaphors in Guardian Online and Mail Online opinion-page content on climate change: War, religion, and politics. Environmental Communication 11 (4): 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, M. (1984). Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. Methuen.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Azevedo, R. T., De Beukelaer, S., Jones, I. L., Safra, L. and Tsakiris, M. (2021). When the lens is too wide: The political consequences of the visual dehumanization of refugees. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8: 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. and Levon, E. (2015). Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about masculinity. Discourse and Communication 9 (2): 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In Holquist, M. (ed.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Trans. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4): 577–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. Trans. Heath, S.. Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, J. A. (2014). Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, B. R. (2020). The (in)appropriateness of the WAR metaphor in response to SARS-CoV-2: A rapid analysis of Donald J. Trump’s rhetoric. Frontiers in Communication 5: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, S. R., Kerr, P. Byrne, C. and Stanley, L. (2014). Questions to the Prime Minister: A comparative study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron. Parliamentary Affairs 67 (2): 253–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC. (2016). Royal Charter for the continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation. www.bbc.com/aboutthebbc/governance/charter/Google Scholar
Bednarek, M. (2006). Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach. Text and Talk 26 (6): 635–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M. and Caple, H. (2012). News Discourse. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Beer, F. A. and De Landtsheer, C. (eds.) (2004). Metaphorical World Politics. Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belmonte, I. A. and Porto, M. D. (2020). Multimodal framing devices in European online news. Language and Communication 71: 65–71.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. (2007). Experimental methods for studying simulation semantics. In Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S. and Spivey, M. J. (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins. Pp. 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B. (2012). Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bergen, B., Matlock, T. and Narayan, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science 31 (5): 733–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bevelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A. and Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes 15 (4): 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, M. (2008). The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization. Discourse and Society 19 (6): 783–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankshain, J. D., Glick, D. M. and Lupton, D. L. (2023). War metaphors (what are they good for?): Militarized rhetoric and attitudes toward essential workers during the Covid-19 pandemic. American Politics Research 51(2): 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A. and Steen, G. J. (2017). The effects of metaphorical framing on political persuasion: A systematic literature review. Metaphor and Symbol 32 (2): 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bounegru, L. and Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication 10 (2): 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1989). The Logic of Practice. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Boykoff, J. (2006). Framing dissent: Mass-media coverage of the global justice movement. New Political Science 28(2): 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M. P., McLeod, D. M. and Armstrong, C. L. (2012). Adherence to the protest paradigm: The influence of protest goals and tactics on news coverage in US and international newspapers. International Journal of Press/Politics 17 (2): 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics 21 (4): 493–525.Google Scholar
Bressem, J. and Müller, C. (2014). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D. and Bressem, J. (eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. De Gruyter Mouton. Pp. 1575–1592.Google Scholar
Browse, S. (2018). Cognitive Rhetoric: The Cognitive Poetics of Political Discourse. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browse, S. (2019). ‘That’s just what we hear on telly all the time, isn’t it?’: Political discourse and the cognitive linguistic ethnography of critical reception. In Hart, C. (ed.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Text and Discourse: From Poetics to Politics. Edinburgh University Press. Pp. 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, C. and Lakoff, G. (1988). Cognitive topology in lexical networks. In Small, S., Cottrell, G. and Tanenhaus, M. (eds.), Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann. Pp. 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, B. C., Droog, E., Reijnierse, W. G., Leymann, S., Frezza, G. and de Lavalette, K. Y. R. (2022). Audience perceptions of COVID-19 metaphors: The role of source domain and country context. Metaphor and Symbol 37 (2): 101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S. and Taylore, H. A. (2009). When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science 20 (1): 27–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bucher, H-J. and Schumacher, P. (2006). The relevance of attention for selecting news content: An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print and online media. Communications 31 (3): 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucy, E. P., Foley, J. M., Lukito, J., Doroshenko, L., Shah, D. V., Pevehouse, J. C. W. and Wells, C. (2020). Performing populism: Trump’s transgressive debate style and the dynamics of Twitter response. New Media and Society 22 (4): 634–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, P. (1986). The use of hand gesture in political speeches: Some case studies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 5 (2): 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds.). (1996). Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Routledge.Google Scholar
Cap, P. (2002). Explorations in Political Discourse: Methodological and Critical Perspectives. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cap, P. (2006). Legitimization in Political Discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Cap, P. (2008). Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1): 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cap, P. (2013). Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cap, P. (2019a). Discourse studies: Between social constructionism and linguistics. A critical overview. Topics in Linguistics 20 (2): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cap, P. (2019b). ‘Britain is full to bursting point!’: Immigration themes in the Brexit discourse of the UK Independence Party. In Koller, V., Kopf, S. and Miglbauer, M. (eds.), Discourses of Brexit. Routledge. Pp. 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cap, P. and Okulska, U. (eds.) (2013). Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caple, H. (2013). Photojournalism: A Social Semiotic Approach. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caple, H. and Knox, J. S. (2015). A framework for the multimodal analysis of online news galleries: What makes a ‘good’ picture gallery. Social Semiotics 25 (3): 292–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2013). Gesture and language processing. In Pashler, H. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the Mind. Sage. Pp. 372–374.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. and Jasmin, K. (2010). Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE 5 (7): e11805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Castro Seixas, E. (2021). War metaphors in political communication on Covid-19. Frontiers in Sociology 5: 583680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catalano, T. and Fielder, G. E. (2018). European spaces and the Roma: Denaturalizing the naturalized in online reader comments. Discourse and Communication 12 (3): 240–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalano, T. and Musolff, M. (2019). ‘Taking the shackles off’: Metaphor and metonymy of migrant children and border officials in the US Metaphorik.de 29: 11–46.Google Scholar
Chan, J. M. and Lee, C. C. (1984). Journalistic paradigms on civil protests: A case study of Hong Kong. In Arno, A. and Dissanayake, W. (eds.), The News Media in National and International Conflict. Westview Press. Pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse and Society 17 (6): 563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2017). Fire Metaphors: Discourses of Awe and Authority. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2021). Metaphors of Coronavirus: Invisible Enemy of Zombie Apocalypse. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. (1996). Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. (2005a). Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In Wodak, R. and Chilton, P. (eds.), A New Research Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. John Benjamins. Pp. 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. (2005b). Manipulation, memes and metaphors: The case of Mein Kampf. In De Saussure, L. and Schulz, P. (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. John Benjamins. Pp. 15–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. (2014). Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. and Lakoff, G. (1995). Foreign policy by metaphor. In Schäffner, C. and Wenden, A. L. (eds.), Language and Peace. Harwood Academic Publishers. Pp. 37–59.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. and Schäffner, C. (2002). Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In Chilton, P. and Schäffner, C. (eds.), Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. John Benjamins. Pp. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. and Schäffner, C. (eds.) (2002). Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chkhaidze, A., Buyruk, P. and Boroditsky, L. (2021). Linguistic metaphors shape attitudes towards immigration. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 43: 2863–2868.Google Scholar
Chovanec, J. (2003). The uses of the present tense in headlines. Theory and Practice in English Studies 1: 83–92.Google Scholar
Chovanec, J. (2019). Multimodal storytelling in the news: Sequenced images as ideological scripts of othering. Discourse, Context and Media 28: 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, J. and Molek-Kozakowska, K. (eds.) (2017). Representing the Other in European Media Discourses. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In Koenig, J-P. (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap. CSLI. Pp.189–204.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2004). Bush’s and Gore’s language and gestures in the 2000 US presidential debates: A test case for two models of metaphors. Journal of Language and Politics 3 (3): 409–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2008). Why study metaphor and gesture? In Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (eds.), Metaphor and Gesture. John Benjamins. Pp. 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2013). Cognitive linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Teßendorf, S. (eds.), Body – Language – Communication. Vol. 1: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. De Gruyter Mouton. Pp. 182–201.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2015). Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. In Pinar Sanz, M. J. (ed.), Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins. Pp. 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4): 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2017). Analysing metaphor in gesture: A set of metaphor identification guidelines for gesture (MIG-G). In Semino, E. and Demjén, Z. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. Routledge. Pp. 131–147.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2022). The study of gesture in cognitive linguistics: How it could inform and inspire other research in cognitive science. WIREs Cognitive Science 13 (6): e1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. and Giansante, G. (2014). Conversational framing in televised political discourse: A comparison from the 2008 elections in the United States and Italy. Journal of Language and Politics 13 (2): 255–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. and Iriskhanova, O. K. (eds.) (2018). Aspectuality across Languages: Event Construal in Speech and Gesture. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (eds.) (2008). Metaphor and Gesture. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A. and Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. PNAS 118 (9): e2023301118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cisneros, D. J. (2008). Contaminated communities: The metaphor of ‘immigrant as pollutant’ in media representations of immigration. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 11 (4): 569–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. D., Sanders, D. Stewart, M. C. and Whiteley, P. F. (2009). Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C. and O’Halloran, K. (2006). The role of APPRAISAL and corpora in detecting covert evaluation. Functions of Language 13 (1): 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooperrider, K. (2014). Body-directed gestures: Pointing to the self and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics 71: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, K. and Mesh, K. (2022). Pointing in gesture and sign. In Morgenstern, A. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Gesture in Language: Development across the Lifespan. De Gruyter Mouton. Pp. 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, P. and Maccaferri, M. (2023). The UK, the EU and Covid-19: Media reporting, the recontextualization of Eurosceptic discourse and the fait accompli of Brexit. Politics 43 (1): 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottle, S. (2008). Reporting demonstrations: The changing media politics of dissent. Media, Culture and Society 30 (6): 853–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couldry, N. (2000). The Place of Media Power: Pilgrims and Witnesses of the Media Age. Routledge.Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2006). Conceptual blending in thought, rhetoric and ideology. In Kristiansen, G., Achard, M., Dirven, R. and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coventry, K and Garrod, S. (2004). Saying, Seeing and Acting: The Psychological Semantics of Spatial Prepositions. Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crines, A. and Heppell, T. (2017). Rhetorical style and issue emphasis within the conference speeches of UKIP’s Nigel Farage 2010–2014. British Politics 12 (2): 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1993). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4 (4): 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. and Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtice, J. (2010). A Revolt on The Right? The social and political attitudes of UKIP supporters. British Social Attitudes 32: 1–15.Google Scholar
Curran, J. (2002). Media and Power. Routledge.Google Scholar
Currie, J. S. G. and Clarke, B. (2022). Fighting talk: The use of the conceptual metaphor climate change is conflict in the UK Houses of Parliament, 2015–2019. Journal of Language and Politics 21 (4): 589–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. and Sweetser, E. (1996). Conditionals, distancing and alternative spaces. In Goldberg, A. E. (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. CSLI Publications. Pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. and Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambrdige University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. and Sweetser, E. (2012). Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. and Vandelanotte, L. (eds.) (2017a). Special issue: Viewpoint phenomena in multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics 28 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. and Vandelanotte, L. (2017b). Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 28 (3): 565–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. and Vandelanotte, L. (2017c). Image-schematic scaffolding in textual and verbal artefacts. Journal of Pragmatics 122: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lavalette, K. Y. R., Andone, C. and Steen, G. J. (2019a). Figurative analogies and how they are resisted in British public bill committee debates. Metaphor and the Social World 9 (1): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lavalette, K. Y. R., Andone, C. and Steen, G. J. (2019b). ‘I did not say that the Government should be plundering anybody’s savings’: Resistance to metaphors expressing starting points in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 18 (5): 718–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C. and Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press / Politics 23 (4): 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, D., Harmer, E., Downey, J., Stanyer, J. and Wring, D. (2016). UK news coverage of the 2016 EU Referendum. Report 5 (6 May–22 June 2016). Loughborough University Centre for Research in Communication and Culture. https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/report/UK_news_coverage_of_the_2016_EU_Referendum_Report_5_6_May_22_June_2016_/9471194.Google Scholar
Debras, C. (2017). The shrug: Forms and meanings of a compound enactment. Gesture 16 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demata, M. (2019). ‘A great a beautiful wall’: Donald Trump’s populist discourse on immigration. In Musolff, A. (ed.), Language Aggression in Public Debates on Immigration. John Benjamins. Pp.101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R., Frank, R. and Pütz, M. (2003a). Introduction: Categories, cognitive models and ideologies. In Dirven, R., Frank, R. and Pütz, M. (eds.), Cognitive Models in Language and Thought: Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings. Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R., Frank, R. and Pütz, M. (eds.) (2003b). Cognitive Models in Language and Thought: Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings. Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R., Polzenhagen, F. and Wolf, H-G. (2007). Cognitive linguistics, ideology and critical discourse analysis. In Geeraerts, D. and Cuckyens, H. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford University Press. Pp. 1222–1240.Google Scholar
Domínguez, M. and Sapiña, L. (2022). She-Coronavirus: How cartoonists reflected women health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Women’s Studies 29 (2): 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A. and Hewitt, L. E. (eds.) (1995). Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. (2002). Gesture, verb aspect and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture 2 (2): 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunmire, P. (2011). Projecting the Future through Political Discourse. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An Introduction. Verso.Google Scholar
Eatwell, R. (2006). The concept and theory of charismatic leadership. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 7 (2): 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, R. (2007). The concept and theory of charismatic leadership. In Pinto, A., Eatwell, R. and Stein, U. L. (eds.), Charisma and Facism in Interwar Europe. Routledge. Pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Edelman, M. (1985). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. 2nd ed. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ekström, M. and Patrona, M. (eds.) (2011). Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekström, M., Patrona, M. and Thornborrow, J. (2018). Right-wing populism and the dynamics of style: A discourse-analytic perspective on mediated political performances. Palgrave Communications 4: 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2001). Metaphors we discriminate by: Naturalized themes in Austrian newspaper articles about asylum seekers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (3): 352–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication 2 (1): 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2019). Visual Metaphor and Embodiment in Graphic Illness Narratives. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2009). The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture and Composite Utterances. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J., Kita, S. and de Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (10): 1722–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethical Consumer (2022). Addressing subtle forms and drivers of hate in UK media coverage of migration. Research project conducted by Ethical Consumer for Stop Funding Hate. https://research.ethicalconsumer.org/research-hub/addressing-subtle-forms-of-anti-migrant-hate-2022.Google Scholar
Ethical Journalism Network (2015). Moving stories: International review of how media cover migration. https://ethicaljournalismnetwork.org/moving-stories-international-review-of-how-media-cover-migrationGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. (2003). The Structure of Time. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education 4 (3–4): 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language? Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2016). A dialectical-relation approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3rd ed. Sage. Pp. 86–108.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J. and Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Pp. 357–378.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse As Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 2. Sage. Pp. 258–284.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In Goldberg, A. E. (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. CSLI Publications. Pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fausey, C. M. and Matlock, T. (2011). Can grammar win elections? Political Psychology 32 (4): 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D. and Wu, X. (2022). Coronavirus, Demons, and War: Visual and Multimodal Metaphor in Chinese Public Service Advertisements. Sage Open 12 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenlon, J., Cooperrider, K., Keane, J., Brentari, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (2019). Comparing sign language and gesture: Insights from pointing. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4 (1): 2.Google Scholar
Fesmire, S. (1994). What is ‘cognitive’ about cognitive linguistics? Metaphor and Symbol 9 (2): 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, A. (2008). ‘And I think that is a very straight forward way of dealing with it’: The communicative function of cognitive verbs in political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27 (4): 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, L. (2010). Discourse worlds in Northern Ireland: The legitimation of 1988 agreement. In Hayward, K. and O’Donell, C. (eds.), Political Discourse and Conflict Resolution: Debating Peace in Northern Ireland. Routledge. Pp. 62–76.Google Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, L. (2021). From the war on Covid-19 to political wars: Metaphor as a mechanism of polarization in the early stages of the 2020 pandemic. In Filardo-Llamas, L., Morales-López, E. and Floyd, A. (eds.), Discursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict. Routledge. Pp. 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, L., Hart, C. and Kaal, B. (eds.) (2017). Space, Time and Evaluation in Ideological Discourse. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Hanshin Publishing. Pp. 111–137.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1985). Frames in the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6 (2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1986) Varieties of conditional sentences. ESCOL 3: 163–182.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1990). Epistemic stance and grammatical form in English conditional sentences. In Ziolkowski, M., Noske, M. and Deaton, K. (eds.), Papers from the Twenty-Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. University of Chicago Press. Pp. 137–162.Google Scholar
Flood, C. (1996). Political Myth: A Theoretical Introduction. Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. (eds.) (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, A. (2017). Media representations of recent human migrations to the United Kingdom and other Western countries. In Morales-López, E. and Floyd, A. (eds.), Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist Perspectives. John Benjamins. Pp. 107–132.Google Scholar
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T. and Thibodeau, P. H. (2018). War metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 33 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (1999). Review: ‘Educating the eye? Kress and van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996)’. Language and Literature 8 (2): 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 462–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Forceville, C. and Urios-Aparisi, (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor. Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2016). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor. In Klug, N-M. and Stöckl, H. (eds.), Handbuch Sprache im Multimodalen Kontext. De Gruyter. Pp. 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. and Urios-Aparisi, E. (eds.) (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forchtner, B. and Wodak, R. (2018). Critical discourse studies: A critical approach to the study of language and communication. In Wodak, R. and Forchtner, B. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Routledge. Pp. 135–150.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control. Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fozdar, F. and Pedersen, A. (2013). Diablogging about asylum seekers: Building a counterhegemonic discourse. Discourse and Communication 7 (4): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, D. (2014). The Contradictions of Media Power. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Fridolfsson, C. (2008). Political protest and metaphor. In Carver, T. and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World. Routledge. Pp. 132–148.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrialetos, C. and Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press 1996–2005. Journal of English. 36 (1): 5–38.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A. and Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2): 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J. (2007). Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J. and Steen, G. (eds.) (2003). Cognitive Poetics in Practice. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C. and Fitch, W. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition 83 (1): 49–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). The Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. Pluto.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr (2005). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr and Bogdonovich, J. (1999). Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 14 (1): 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr and Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr and Siman, J. (2021). How we resist metaphors. Language and Cognition 13 (4): 670–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, G. and Angosto-Ferrandez, L. F. (2018). Introduction: Symbolism and politics. Politics, Religion and Ideology 19 (4): 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillis, M. (2020). Ventilators, missiles, doctors, troops … the justification of legislative responses to Covid-19 through military metaphors. Law and Humanities 14 (2): 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givens, D. (2015). Obama, Putin and Castro at UN: What world leaders’ body language tells us. www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/29/obama-putin-castro-un-body-languageGoogle Scholar
Glasgow Media Group (1976). Bad News. Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. and Kaschak, M. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (3): 558–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glenberg, A. M. and Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43: 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 8 (4): 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr and Steen, G. (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins. Pp. 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Trans. Hoare, Q. and Smith, G. N.. International.Google Scholar
Groom, N. (2019). Construction grammar and the corpus-based analysis of discourses: The case of the way in which construction. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24 (3): 335–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilbeault, D. (2017). How politicians express different viewpoints in gesture and speech simultaneously. Cognitive Linguistics 28 (3): 417–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1967). Erkenntnis und Interesse. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hackett, R. and Zhou, Y. (1994). Challenging a master narrative: Peace, protest and opinion/editorial discourse in the US press during the Gulf war. Discourse and Society 5 (4): 509–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, K., Goldstein, D. M. and Ingram, M. B. (2016). The hands of Donald Trump: Entertainment, gesture, spectacle. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6 (2): 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. (1973). A world at one with itself. In Cohen, S. and Young, J. (eds.), The Manufacture of News: Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media. Constable. Pp. 147–156.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A. and Willis, P. (eds.), Culture, Media, Language. Routledge. Pp. 117–127.Google Scholar
Hampe, B. and Grady, J. (eds.) (2005). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampl, M. (2022). The use of the PATH and FORCE image schemas in Barack Obama’s counterterrorism discourse against ISIL. Critical Discourse Studies 19 (3): 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hands, J. (2011). @ Is for Activism. Pluto.Google Scholar
Hanne, M. (2022). How we escape capture by the ‘war’ metaphor for Covid-19. Metaphor and Symbol 37 (2): 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, R. A., Sevenans, J. and Van Aelst, P. (2017). Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. The International Journal of Press / Politics 22 (3): 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. (2014). Critical Political Economy of the Media: An Introduction. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42 (1–3): 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C. and Stockwell, P. (2015). Cognitive poestics. In Littlemore, J. and Taylor, J. R. (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics. Bloomsbury. pp. 218–233.Google Scholar
Hart, C. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2011a). Legitimising assertions and the logico-rhetorical module: Evidence and epistemic vigilance in media discourse on immigration. Discourse Studies 13 (6): 751–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2011b). Force-interactive patterns in immigration discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic approach to CDA. Discourse and Society 22 (3): 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2011c). Moving beyond metaphor in the cognitive linguistic approach to CDA: Construal operations in immigration discourse. In Hart, C. (ed.), Critical discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. John Benjamins. Pp. 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2013). Event-construal in press reports of violence in political protests: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA. Journal of Language and Politics 12 (3): 400–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2014a). Constructing contexts through grammar: Cognitive models and conceptualization in British newspaper reports of political protests. In Flowerdew, J. (ed.), Discourse in Context. Bloomsbury. Pp.159–184.Google Scholar
Hart, C. (2014b). Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hart, C. (2015a). Viewpoint in linguistic discourse: Space and evaluation in news reports of political protests. Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 238–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2015b). Discourse. In Dąbrowska, E. and Divjak, D. (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Mouton De Gruyter. Pp. 322–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2016). The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for CDS: Integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse and Society 27 (3): 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2017). Metaphor and intertextuality in media framings of the (1984–1985) British miners’ strike: A multimodal analysis. Discourse and Communication 11 (1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2018a). ‘Riots engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder. Discourse and Society 29 (3): 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2018b). Event-frames affect blame assignment and perception of aggression: An experimental case study in CDA. Applied Linguistics 39 (3): 400–421.Google Scholar
Hart, C. (ed.) (2019a). Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Text and Discourse: From Poetics to Politics. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2019b). Spatial properties of ACTION verb semantics: Experimental evidence for image schema orientation in transitive versus reciprocal verbs and its implications of ideology. In. Hart, C. (ed.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Text and Discourse: From Poetics to Politics. Edinburgh University Press. Pp. 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2019c). Metaphor and the (1984–1985) miners’ strike: A multimodal analysis. In Hart, C. and Kelsey, D. (eds.), Discourses of Disorder: Riots, Strikes and Protests in the Media. Edinburgh University Press. Pp. 133–153.Google Scholar
Hart, C. (2021). Animals vs. armies: Resistance to extreme metaphors in anti-immigration discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 20 (2): 226–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2024). Fire, war and revolution in media discourses of political protest. In Romano, M. (ed.), Metaphor in Social-Political Contexts: Critical, Sociocognitive Approaches. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hart, C. and Cap, P. (eds.) (2014). Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. and Fuoli, M. (2020). Objectification outperforms subjectification in military interventionist discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 162: 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. and Marmol Queralto, J. (2021). What can cognitive linguistics tell us about language-image relations? A multidimensional approach to intersemiotic convergence in multimodal texts. Cognitive Linguistics 32 (4): 529–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassemer, J. and McCleary, L. (2018). The multidimensionality of pointing. Gesture 17 (3): 417–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. and Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41 (2): 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, S. (2014). Teargas, flags and Harlem shake: Images of and for revolution in Tunisia and the dialectics of the local in the global. In Werbner, P. and Webb, M. (eds.), The Political Aesthetics of Global Protest: The Arab Spring and Beyond. Edinburgh University Press. Pp. 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, J. (1989). Introducing Stylistics. Hyman.Google Scholar
Herman, E. and Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured and emergent. In Tannen, D. and Trester, A. M. (eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Georgetown University Press. Pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Herskovits, A., (1986). Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinnell, J. (2018). The multimodal marking of aspect: The case of five periphrastic auxiliary constructions in North American English. Cognitive Linguistics 29 (4): 773–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1993). Language as Ideology. 2nd ed. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. and Haltinner, K. (2015). Floods, invaders, and parasites: Immigration, threat narratives and right-wing populism in the USA, UK and Australia. Journal of Intercultural Studies 36 (5): 520–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsanova, J. and Nord, A. (2010). Multimodal design: Media structures, media principles and users’ meaning-making in printed and digital media. In Bucher, H-J., Gloning, T. and Lehnen, K. (eds.), Neue Medie – Neue Formate. Ausdifferenzierung und Konvergenz in der Medienkommunikation. Campus Verlag. Pp. 81–103.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical Theory: Selected Essays. Trans. O’Connell, M. J., et al. Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. (2006). Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Jamalian, A. and Tversky, B. (2012). Gestures alter thinking about time. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 34: 503–508.Google Scholar
Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, L. and McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehoul, A. Brône, G. and Feyaerts, K. (2017). The shrug as marker of obviousness. Linguistics Vanguard 3 (s1): 20160082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, C. (2009). Introduction: Handbook rationale, scope and structure. In Hewitt, C. (ed.), Routledge Handbook to Multimodal Analysis. Routledge. Pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Jiminez, T., Arndt, J. and Landau, M. J. (2021). Walls block waves: Using an inundation metaphor of immigration predicts support for a border wall. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 9 (1): 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. (2012). Border Walls: Security and the War on Terror in the United States, India and Israel. Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Z. (2009). Public (non-) apologies: The discourse of minimizing responsibility. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11): 2257–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, D. (2005). Media, Myth and Terrorism: A Discourse-Mythological Analysis of the ‘Blitz Spirit’ in British Newspaper Responses to the July 7th Bombings. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Kelsey, D. (2012). Remembering to forget: Supporting and opposing the war on terror through the myth of the Blitz Spirit after the July 7th bombings. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 6 (1): 23–37.Google Scholar
Kelsey, D. (2016). Hero mythology and right-wing populism: A discourse-mythological case study of Nigel Farage in the Mail Online. Journalism Studies 17(8): 971–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, D. and Bennett, L. (2014). Discipline and resistance on social media: Discourse, power and context in the Paul Chambers ‘Twitter Joke Trial’. Discourse, Context and Media 3: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2017). Pragmatic functions of gestures: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture 16 (2): 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, M. and Unger, J. W. (2016). Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3rd ed. Sage. Pp. 205–233.Google Scholar
Kim, C-Y. and Blake, R. (2007). Brain activity accompanying perception of implied motion in abstract paintings. Spatial Vision 20 (6): 545–560Google ScholarPubMed
Koetsenruijter, A.W.M. (2011). Using numbers in news increases story credibility. Newspaper Research Journal 32 (2): 74-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Kok, K. and Cienki, A. (2016). Cognitive grammar and gesture: Points of convergence, advances and challenges. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (1): 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, K., Bergmann, K., Cienki, A. and Kopp, S. (2016). Mapping out the multifunctionality of speakers’ gestures. Gesture 15 (1): 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A critical cognitive study. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V. and Davidson, P. (2008). Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: A cross-genre study of British policy-making. Discourse and Society 19 (3): 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V. and Ryan, J. (2019). ‘A nation divided’: Metaphors and scenarios in media coverage of the 2016 British EU Referendum. In Hart, C. (ed.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Text and Discourse: From Poetics to Politics. Edinburgh University Press. Pp. 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V., Kopf, S. and Miglbauer, M. (eds.) (2019a). Discourses of Brexit. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V., Kopf, S. and Miglbauer, M. (2019b). Introduction: Context, history and previous research. In Koller, V., Kopf, S. and Miglbauer, M. (eds.), Discourses of Brexit. Routledge. Pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koteyko, N., Brown, B. and Crawford, P. (2008). The dead parrot and the dying swan: The role of metaphor scenarios in UK press coverage of avian flu in the UK in 2005–2006. Metaphor and Symbol 23 (4): 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kourtzi, Z. and Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (1): 248–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. (1996). Representational resources and the production of subjectivity: Questions for the theoretical development of Critical Discourse Analysis in a multicultural society. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Routledge. Pp. 15–31.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. ([1996] 2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue and the novel. In Moi, T. (ed.), The Kristeva Reader. Columbia University Press. Pp. 35–61.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, G. and Dirven, R. (eds.) (2008). Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowska, N. (2016). The discourse of counter-monuments: Semiotics of material commemoration in contemporary urban spaces. Social Semiotics 26 (5): 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. (2018). Discursive shifts in ethno-nationalist politics: On politicization and mediatization of the ‘refugee crisis’ in Poland. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 16 (1–2): 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. (2020). Discursive shifts and the normalisation of racism: Imaginaries of immigration, moral panics and the discourse of contemporary right-wing populism. Social Semiotics 30 (4): 503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, S., Stilla, R. and Sathian, K. (2012). Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language 120 (3): 416–421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1): 39–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 202–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. 2nd ed. Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4 (1): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2002). Concept, Image, Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. 2nd ed. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. . (2004). Metonymy in grammar. Journal of Foreign Languages 6: 2–24.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2010). Reflections on the functional characterization of spatial prepositions. Corela HS-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, A. I. (2012). The Personalisation of Politics in the UK: Mediated Leadership from Attlee to Cameron. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Langer, A. I. and Gruber, J. B. (2021). Political agenda setting in the hybrid media system: Why legacy media still matter a great deal. The International Journal of Press / Politics 26 (2): 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leckner, S. (2012). Presentation factors affecting reading behaviour in readers of newspaper media: An eye-tracking perspective. Visual Communication 11 (2): 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Triggering the protest paradigm: Examining factors affecting news coverage of protests. International Journal of Communication 8: 2725–2746.Google Scholar
Leggett, M. (2020). Brexit and war rhetoric: An electoral strategy? Observatroire de la Société Britannique 25: 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, M. (2011). Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture 11 (3): 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, M. (2017). Uncommon resemblance: Pragamtic affinity in political gesture. Gesture 16 (1): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. and O’Halloran, K. (2009). Intersemiotic texture: Analysing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics 19 (4): 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorson, A., Macuch Silva, V., Hart, C. and Winter, B. (2024). Gesture size affects numerical estimates in quantifier comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.Google Scholar
Lovunduski, J. (2012). Prime Minister’s questions as political ritual. British Politics 7 (4): 314–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lule, J. (2001). Daily News, Eternal Stories: The Mythological Role of Journalism. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Machin, D. (2004). Building the world’s visual language: The increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media. Visual Communication 3 (3): 316–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, D. (2007). An Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Machin, D. (2013). What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies 10 (4): 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012). How To Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. Sage.Google Scholar
Maillat, D. and Oswald, S. (2011). Constraining context: A pragmatic account of cognitive manipulation. In Hart, C. (ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. John Benjamins. Pp. 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (2004). The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2002). Introduction. In Marín-Arrese, J. I. (ed.), Conceptualization of Events in Newspaper Discourse: Mystification of Agency and Degree of Implication in News Reports. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2011). Effective vs. epistemic stance and subjectivity in political discourse: Legitimising strategies and mystification of responsibility. In Hart, C. (ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. John Benjamins. Pp.193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2015). Epistemic legitimisation and inter/subjectivity in the discourse of parliamentary and public inquiries: A contrastive case study. Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2021a). Stance, emotion and persuasion: Terrorism and the press. Journal of Pragmatics 177: 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2021b): Winds of war: Epistemic and effective control in political discourse. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación 26: 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschall, S. (2017). Targeting statues: Monument ‘vandalism’ as an expression of sociopolitical protest in South Africa. African Studies Review 60 (3): 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. R. and Shapiro, J. R. (2018). When ‘scurry’ vs. ‘hurry’ makes the difference: Vermin metaphors, disgust and anti-immigrant attitudes. Journal of Social Issues 74 (4): 774–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin Rojo, L. and van Dijk, T. A. (1997). There was a problem, and it was solved! Legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ immigrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse and Society 8 (4): 523–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinec, R. and Salway, A. (2005). A system for image–text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication 4 (3): 337–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Lirola, M. (2017). Linguistic and visual strategies for portraying immigrants as people deprived of human rights. Social Semiotics 27 (1): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Lirola, M. (2022). Critical analysis of dehumanizing news photographs on immigrants: Examples of the portrayal of non-citizenship. Discourse and Society 33 (4): 478–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Lirola, M. and Zammit, K. (2017). Disempowerment and inspiration: A multimodal discourse analysis of immigrant women in the Spanish and Australian online press. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 8 (2): 58–79.Google Scholar
Matlock, T. and Richardson, D. C. (2004). Do eye movements go with fictive motion? Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Matlock, T. and Winter, B. (2015). Experimental semantics. In Heine, B. and Narrog, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford University Press. Pp. 771–790.Google Scholar
Mayr, A. (2016). Multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA). In Klug, N-M. and Stöckl, H. (eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext. De Gruyter. Pp. 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. E. (2014). Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Polity Press.Google Scholar
McCullagh, C. (2002). Media Power: A Sociological Introduction. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, D. (2006). Point of View in Plays: A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Viewpoint in Drama and Other Text-types. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, D. (2007). Deixis, cognition and the construction of viewpoint. In Lambrou, M. and Stockwell, P. (eds.), Contemporary Stylistics. Continuum. Pp. 118–130.Google Scholar
McLeod, D. M. (1995). Communicative deviance: The effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 39 (1): 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, D. M. and Hertog, J. K. (1992). The manufacture of public opinion by reporters: Informal cues for public perceptions of protest groups. Discourse and Society 3 (3): 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNair, B. (2009). News and Journalism in the UK. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merkl-Davies, D. and Koller, V. (2012). ‘Metaphoring’ people out of this world: A critical discourse analysis of a chairman’s statement of a UK defence firm. Accounting Forum 36 (3): 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B. and Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies 62 (2): 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. (2007). The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. (2017). Post-truth politics? Authenticity, populism and electoral discourses of Donald Trump. Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 619–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. and Ramsay, G. (2017). UK media coverage of the 2016 EU Referendum campaign. Centre for the Study of Media, Communication and Power. www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/cmcp/uk-media-coverage-of-the-2016-eu-referendum-campaign.pdfGoogle Scholar
Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World. Penguin.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representation. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (1998). Iconicity and gesture. In Santi, S., Guaïtella, I., Cavé, C. and Konopczynski, G. (eds.), Oralité et Gestualité: Communication Multimodale, Interaction. L’Harmattan. Pp. 321–328.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, G. (1973). Political deviance: The press presentation of a militant mass demonstration. In Cohen, S. and Young, J. (eds.), The Manufacture of News: Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media. Constable. Pp. 206–225.Google Scholar
Mushin, I. (2001). Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2003). Ideological functions of metaphor: The conceptual metaphors of health and illness in public discourse. In Dirven, R., Roslyn, F., and Pütz, M. (eds.), Cognitive Models in Language and Thought: Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings. Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2010a). Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2010b). Political metaphor and bodies politic. In Okulska, U. and Cap, P. (eds.), Perspectives in Politics and Discourse. John Benjamins. Pp. 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2011). Metaphor in discourse history. In Winters, M., Tissari, H. and Allan, K. (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics. De Gruyter. Pp. 70–90.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2012). Immigrants and parasites: The history of a bio-social metaphor. In Messer, M., Schroeder, R., and Wodak, R. (eds.), Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Springer. Pp .249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3 (1): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. and Zinken, J. (eds.) (2009). Metaphor and Discourse. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, G. (2010). Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. Critical Discourse Studies 7 (4): 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, R. K. and Schrøder, K. C. (2014). The relative importance of social media for accessing, finding, and engaging with news. Digital Journalism 2 (4): 472–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. (2004). Analysing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuñez-Perucha, B. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive linguistics as tools for ideological research: A diachronic analysis of feminism. In Hart, C. (ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. John Benjamins. Pp. 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. (2007). Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. In Geeraerts, D. and Cuckyens, H. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford University Press. Pp. 543–565.Google Scholar
O’Brien, G. V. (2003). Indigestible food, conquering hordes, and waste materials: Metaphors of immigrants and the Early Immigration Restriction Debate in the United States. Metaphor and Symbol 18 (1): 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, G. (2019). SFL and critical discourse analysis. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L. and Schönthal, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 462–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2005). Causal cognition and socio-cognition in critical discourse analysis: A reply to Rick Iedema. Linguistics and Education 16 (3): 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2007). Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretiation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics 28 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, K. and Coffin, C. (2004). Checking over-interpretation and under-interpretation: Help from corpora in critical linguistics. In Coffin, C., Hewings, A. and O’Halloran, K. (eds.), Applying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches. Hodder and Stoughton Educational. Pp. 275–297.Google Scholar
Oakley, T. (2005). Force-dynamic dimension of rhetorical effect. In Hampe, B. and Grady, J. E. (eds.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 443–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofcom. (2021). News Consumption in the UK: 2021 report.Google Scholar
Okulska, U. and Cap, P. (eds.) (2010). Perspectives in Politics and Discourse. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostermeyer, S. and Sittler, D. (2019). Rioting and disorderly behaviour as political media practice: Body postures on the streets of L.A. during the riots of 1992. In Hart, C. and Kelsey, D. (eds.), Discourses of Disorder: Riots, Strikes and Protests in the Media. Edinburgh University Press. Pp. 194–210.Google Scholar
Parrill, F., Bergen, B. K. and Lichtenstein, P. V. (2013). Grammatical aspect, gesture, and conceptualization: Using co-speech gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics 24 (1): 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L. and Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 2010 (1): 227.Google Scholar
Pinar Sanz, M. J. (ed.) (2015). Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, R. (2001). Language and ideology: An interview with George Lakoff. In Dirven, R., Hawkins, B. and Sankikcioglu, E. (eds.), Language and Ideology: Theoretical Cognitive Approaches. John Benjamins. Pp. 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, B. (2006). ‘Are you thinking what we’re thinking?’ Immigration, multiculturalism and the disavowal of racism in the run-up to the 2005 British General Election. Social Semiotics 16 (4): 535–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poell, T. and Borra, E. (2012). Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism 13 (6): 695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porto, M. D. (2022). Water metaphors and evaluation of Syrian Migration: The flow of refugees in the Spanish press. Metaphor and Symbol 37 (3): 252–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourcel, S. (2010). Motion: A conceptual typology. In Evans, V. and Chilton, P. (eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. Euinox. Pp. 419–450.Google Scholar
Pragglejazz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proverbio, A. M., Dederica, R. and Zani, A. (2009). Observation of static pictures of dynamic actions enhances the activity of movement-related brain areas. PLoS ONE 4 (5): e5389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pruitt, L. J. (2019). Closed due to ‘flooding’? UK media representations of refugees and migrants in 2015–2016: Creating a crisis of borders. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21 (2): 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, S., Stark, P. and Edmonds, R. (2007). Eyetracking the News: A Study of Print and Online Reading. The Poynter Institute.Google Scholar
Radden, G. and Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G. and Panther, K-U. (eds.) (2004). Studies in Linguistic Motivation. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rai, S. M. (2014). Political performance: A framework for analysing democratic politics. Political Studies 63 (5): 1179–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. Routledge.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3rd ed. Sage. Pp. 23–61.Google Scholar
Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse and Society 22 (6): 781–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Edelman, S. and Naples, A. D. (2001). ‘Language is spatial’: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. E. (2013). Racial populism in British fascist discourse: The case of COMBAT and the British National Party (1960–1967). In Wodak, R. and Richardson, J. E. (eds.), Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Text and Talk. Routledge. Pp. 181–202.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. E. (2017). British Fascism A Discourse-historical Analysis. Ibidem Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. E. and Stanyer, J. (2011). Reader opinion in the digital age: Tabloid and broadsheet newspaper websites and the exercises of political voice. Journalisim 12 (8): 983–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. E. and Wodak, R. (2009). The impact of visual racism: Visual arguments in political leaflets of Austrian and British far-right parties. Contraversia 6 (2): 45–77.Google Scholar
Robins, S. and Mayer, R. E. (2000). The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Processes 30 (1): 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, M. (ed.) (2024). Metaphor in Social-Political Contexts: Critical, Sociocognitive Approaches. De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, M. and Porto, M. D. (2021). Framing conflict in the Syrian refugee crisis: Multimodal representations in the Spanish and British press. In Filardo-Llamas, L., Morales-López, E. and Floyd, A. (eds.) Discursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict. Routledge. Pp. 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royce, T. D. (1998). Synergy on the page: Exploring intersemiotic complementarity in page-based multimodal text. Japan Association for Systemic Functional Linguistics Occasional Papers 1 (1): 25–49.Google Scholar
Royce, T. D. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In Royce, T. D. and Bowcher, W. L. (eds.), New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pp. 63–110.Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., Baker, C. F. and Scheffczyk, J. (2016). FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/the_bookGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In Barcelona, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. De Gruyter. Pp. 109–132.Google Scholar
Sanders, J. and van Krieken, K. (2019). Traveling through narrative time: How tense and temporal deixis guide the representation of time and viewpoint in news narratives. Cognitive Linguistics 30 (2): 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santa Ana, O. (1999). ‘Like an animal I was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse and Society 10 (2): 191–224.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, O. (2002). Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, R. (2018). Social Theory after the Internet: Media, Technology and Globalization. UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, D. (2012). Images in the news: Photojournalism. In Finn, J. (ed.), Vsiual Communication and Culture: Images in Action. Oxford University Press. Pp. 222–233.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2009). Metaphor and situational motivation. Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis Lingüístics 14: 221–233.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2021). ‘Not soldiers but fire-fighters’ – Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication 36 (1): 50–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semino, E. and Culpeper, J. (eds.) (2002). Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, C., Stewart, P., Bucy, E. and Lee, N. (2021). Performance, politics and Boris Johnson’s Brexit. Frontiers in Psychology 12: e709756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoemaker, P. J. (1984). Media treatment of deviant political groups. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 61 (1): 66–75.Google Scholar
Silaški, N. and Đurović, T. (2019). The journey metaphor in Brexit-related political cartoons. Discourse, Context and Media 31: 100318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23 (3/4): 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of View. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Shibatani, M. and Thompson, S. A. (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning. Oxford University Press. Pp. 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Strömqvist, S. & Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2. Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Pp. 219–257.Google Scholar
Snow, D. and Moffitt, B. (2012). Straddling the divide: Mainstream populism and conservatism in Howard’s Australia and Harper’s Canada. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 50 (3): 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sontag, S. (1979). Illness As Metaphor. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. (1989). Aids and Its Metaphors. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Šorm, E. and Steen, G. J. (2018). Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In Steen, G. J. (ed.), Visual Metaphor: Structure and Process. John Benjamins. Pp. 47–88.Google Scholar
Spivey, M., Richardson, D., Tyler, M. J. and Young, E. E. (2000). Eye movements during comprehension of spoken scene descriptions. In Gleitman, L. R. and Joshi, A. K. (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum. Pp. 487–492.Google Scholar
Stanfield, R. A. and Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science 12 (2): 153–156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steen, F. and Turner, M. (2013). Multimodal construction grammar. In Borkent, M., Dancygier, B. and Hinnell, J. (eds.), Language and the Creative Mind. CSLI Publications. Pp. 25–274.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 23: 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2010). When is metaphor deliberate? In Johannesson, N-L., Alm-Arvius, C. and Minugh, D. C. (eds.), Selected Papers from the Stockholm 2008 Metaphor Festival. University of Stockholm. Pp. 43–63Google Scholar
Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Routledge.Google Scholar
Stocchetti, M. (2011). Images: Who gets what, when and how? In Stocchetti, M. and Kukkonen, K. (eds.), Images in Use: Towards the Critical Analysis of Visual Communication. John Benjamins. Pp. 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2001). Towards a critical cognitive linguistics. In Combrink, A. and Biermann, I. (eds.), Discourses of War and Conflict. Potchefstroom University Press. Pp. 510–528.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2009). Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2015). Poetics. In Dąbrowska, E. and Divjak, D. (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Mouton De Gruyter. Pp. 432–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2020). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Routledge.Google Scholar
Stolee, G. and Caton, S. (2018). Twitter, Trump, and the base: A shift to a new form of presidential talk? Signs and Society 6 (1): 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, J. (2019). The language of leaving: Brexit, the Second World War and cultural trauma. Journal of Cultural Resaerch 23 (3): 225-251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2008). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 154–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The Manu-facture of Meaning. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, J. (2004). Celebrity politicians: Popular culture and political representation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (4): 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stukenbrock, A. (2014). Pointing to an ‘empty’ space: Deixis am Phantasma in face-to-face interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 74: 70–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stukker, N. (2019). Genre as a factor determining the viewpoint-marking quality of verb tenses. Cognitive Linguistics 30 (2): 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1996). Mental spaces and the grammar of conditional constructions. In Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E. (eds.), Spaces, Worlds and Grammar. University of Chicago Press. Pp. 318–333.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (2012). Introduction: Viewpoint and perspective in language and gestures, from the Ground down. In Dancygier, B. and Sweetser, E. (eds.), Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 57–149.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L. and Garrett, M. F. (eds.), Language and Space. MIT Press. Pp. 211–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2007). Foreword. In Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S. and Spivey, M. J. (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins. Pp. Xi–xxi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tay, D. (2021). Is the social unrest like Covid-19 or is Covid-19 like the social unrest? A case study of source-target reversability. Metaphor and Symbol 36 (2): 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (2021). Metaphors of migration over time. Discourse and Society 32 (4): 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H. and Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE 6 (2): e16782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (1995). The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toolan, M. (1991). Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Trew, T. (1979). Theory and ideology at work. In Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (eds.), Language and Control. Routledge and Keegan Paul. Pp. 94–116.Google Scholar
Turner, M. (1991). Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. (2002). The cognitive study of art, language and literature. Poetics Today 23 (1): 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. (2017). Opening commentary: Polytropos and communication in the wild. In Dancygier, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. and Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance on her visit to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4154add2-visit-united-kingdom-great-britain-and-northern-irelandGoogle Scholar
Utych, S.M. (2018). How dehumanization influences attitudes toward immigrants. Political Research Quarterly 7 (2): 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Javier (2017). A new multimodal construction? What do I care? Paper presented at the 14th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC), University of Tartu (Estonia). 10–14 July.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News As Discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse and Society 3(1): 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11 (1): 11–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2000a). The reality of racism: On analysing parliamentary debates on immigration. In Zurstiege, G. (ed.), Festschrift für die Wirklichkeit. Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2000b) New(s) racism: A discourse analytical approach. In Cottle, S. (ed.), Ethnic Minorities and the Media. Open University Press. Pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse and ideology. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Sage. Pp. 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2018). Discourse and migration. In Zapata-Barrero, R. and Yalaz, E. (eds.), Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies. IMISCOE Research Series. Springer, Cham. Pp. 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Krieken, K., Sanders, J. and Sweetser, E. (eds.) (2019). Special issue: Time and viewpoint in narrative discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 30 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (1991). Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television. Continuum 5 (1): 76–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In Coulthard, C. R. Caldas and Coulthard, M. (eds.), Text and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Routledge. Pp. 32–70.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse and Communication 1 (1): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Critical discourse analysis and multimodality. In Hart, C. and Cap, P. (eds.), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. Bloomsbury. Pp. 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Legitimation and multimodality. In Wodak, R. and Forchtner, B. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Routledge. Pp. 218–233.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 10 (1): 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vandelanotte, L. (2017). Viewpoint. In Dancygier, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, L. and Dancygier, B. (2017) (eds.). Special issue: Multimodal artefacts and the texture of viewpoint. Journal of Pragmatics 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandeloise, C. (1994). Methodology and analyses of the preposition in. Cognitive Linguistics 5 (2): 157–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicari, S. (2013). Public reasoning around social contention: A case study of Twitter use in the Italian mobilization for global change. Current Sociology 61 (4): 474–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl-Jorgensen, K, Sambrook, R, Berry, M, et al. (2013). BBC breadth of opinion review content analysis. Final report on content analysis for the breadth of opinion review, 4 July. http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/breadth_opinion/content_ analysis.pd.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. A. and Scacco, J. M. (2013). Revisiting the protest paradigm: The Tea Party as filtered through prime-time cable news. International Journal of Press / Politics 18 (1): 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, G. and Wodak, R. (eds.) (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Weizman, E. and Fetzer, A. (eds) (2015). Follow-ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, W. (2004). On political cartoons and social studies textbooks: Visual analogies, intertextuality and cultural memory. Canadian Social Studies 38 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar
Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Longman.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. and Collett, P. (2015). Leaders’ debate: Triumphs, turn-offs and body language giveaways. www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/apr/03/leaders-debate-general-election-body-languageGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. (2001). Political discourse. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. E. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell. Pp. 398–415.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. L. and Gibbs, R. W. Jr (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31 (4): 721–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, B. and Bergen, B. (2012). Language comprehenders represent object distance both visually and auditorily. Language and Cognition 4 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Marghetis, T. and Matlock, T. (2015). Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time and number. Cortex 64: 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M. and Matlock, T. (2013). Using space to talk and gesture about numbers: Evidence from the TV news archive. Gesture 13 (3): 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2011). Disenchantment with politics and the salience of images. In Stocchetti, M. and Kukkonen, K. (eds.), Images in Use: Towards the Critical Analysis of Visual Communication. John Benjamins. Pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2013). ‘Anything goes!’: The Haiderization of Europe. In Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M. and Mral, B. (eds.), Right-wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. Bloomsbury. Pp. 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2015a). The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2015b). Critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach. In Tracey, K., Illie, C. and Sandel, T. (eds.), The International Encyclopaedia of Language and Social Interaction. John Wiley and Sons. Pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2020a). ‘The boundaries of what can be said have shifted’: An expert interview with Ruth Wodak (questions posed by Andreas Schulz). Discourse and Society 31 (2): 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2020b). The language of walls: Inclusion, exclusion, and the racialisation of space. In Solomons, J. (ed.), Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Racisms. Routledge. Pp. 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M. and Mral, B. (eds.) (2013). Right-wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.) (2016). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3rd ed. Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Richardson, J. E. (eds.) (2013). Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Text and Talk. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, H-G. and Polzenhagen, F. (2003). Conceptual metaphor as ideological stylistic means: An exemplary analysis. In Dirven, R., Frank, R. and Pütz, M. (eds.), Cognitive Models in Language and Thought: Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings. Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 247–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, M., Corbett, J. and Flinders, M. (2016). Just like us: Everyday celebrity politicians and the pursuit of popularity in an age of anti-politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18 (3): 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodin, G., Winter, B., Perlman, M., Littlemore, J. and Matlock, T. (2020). ‘Tiny numbers’ are actually tiny: Evidence from gestures in the TV news archive. PLoS ONE 15 (11): e0242142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yaxley, R. H. and Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Simulating visibility during language comprehension. Cognition 105 (1): 229–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zima, E. (2017). Multimodal constructional resemblance: The case of English circular motion constructions. In de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. Ruiz, Oyón, A. L. and Pérez-Sobrino, P. (eds.), Constructing Families of Constructions: Analytical Perspectives and Theoretical Challenges. John Benjamins. Pp. 301–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zima, E. and Bergs, A. (2017). Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 3 (s1): 20161006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J. and David, C. (2010). Translocation, language and the categorization of experience. In Evans, V. and Chilton, P. (eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. Equinox. Pp. 389–418.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 44. Academic Press. Pp. 35–62.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. and Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In Pecher, D. and Zwaan, R. A. (eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 224–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A. and Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Do language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects? Psychological Science 13 (2): 168–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Christopher Hart, Lancaster University
  • Book: Language, Image, Gesture
  • Online publication: 08 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009257572.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Christopher Hart, Lancaster University
  • Book: Language, Image, Gesture
  • Online publication: 08 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009257572.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Christopher Hart, Lancaster University
  • Book: Language, Image, Gesture
  • Online publication: 08 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009257572.010
Available formats
×