Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:34:04.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Aptitude–Treatment Interaction (ATI)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2023

Edited by
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen ,
Peter Skehan  and
Richard L. Sparks
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Shue Yan University
Peter Skehan
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
Richard L. Sparks
Affiliation:
Mount St Joseph University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Language Aptitude Theory and Practice , pp. 355 - 440
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Artieda, G., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The LLAMA tests and the underlying structure of language aptitude at two levels of foreign language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 50 , 42–48. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.023Google Scholar
Bokander, L., & Bylund, E. (2020). Probing the internal validity of the LLAMA language aptitude tests. Language Learning, 70, 11–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAN-8 Virtual Lab [Computer software]. (2018). Toronto, ON: Sounds Virtual Inc. www.can8.com/Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1965). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Training, Research, and Education. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 87–136.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: MLAT; Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on Task-Based Language Teaching. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 464–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml001Google Scholar
Forsberg, F., & Bartning, I. (2010). Can linguistic features discriminate between the communicative CEFR‐levels? A pilot study of written L2 French. EUROSLA Monographs Series, 1, 133–158.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA language aptitude test. In Granena, G. & Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp. 105–129.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgement tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000041Google Scholar
Hwu, F., & Sun, S. (2012). The aptitude–treatment interaction effects on the learning of grammar rules. System, 40, 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwu, F., Wei, P., & Sun, S. (2014). Aptitude–treatment interaction effects on explicit rule learning: A latent growth curve analysis. Language Teaching Research, 18, 294–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813510381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachinske, I., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). The interaction between timing of explicit grammar explanation and individual differences in second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(2), 197–232. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19003.kacCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., & Nam, H. (2017). Measures of implicit knowledge revisited: Processing modes, time pressure, and modality. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000510Google Scholar
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12030.xGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 385–408.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 801–842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500042XGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2016). Task-based versus task-supported language instruction: An experimental study. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 205–229.Google Scholar
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000796Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (eds.), Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 123–167.Google Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests [Measurement instruments]. Swansea, UK: Lognostics. www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/Google Scholar
Michaud, G. (2020). À quel moment enseigner la forme dans le cadre d’un enseignement basé sur la tâche? [Doctoral dissertation, Université de Montréal]. Papyrus. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/23557Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analysis review. Language Learning, 51(1), 157–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00017.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S. (1990). Prescription, intuition et usage : le subjonctif français et la variabilié inhérente [Prescription, intuition and use: The French subjunctive and inherent variability]. Langage et société, 54 , 5–33. https://doi.org/10.3406/lsoc.1990.2499Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 301–322.Google Scholar
Shintani, N. (2017). The effects of the timing of isolated FFI on the explicit knowledge and written accuracy of learners with different prior knowledge of the linguistic target. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 367–384.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2019). Language aptitude implicates language and cognitive skills. In Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. (eds), Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 56–77.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44(2), 225–236.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y. (2021). Probing the construct validity of LLAMA_D as a measure of implicit learning aptitude: Incidental instructions, confidence ratings, and reaction time measure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1(14), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000704Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–195.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2016). Task-based language teaching. In Hall, G. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching. New York, NY: Rougledge, pp. 238–251.Google Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty: An EFL classroom-based study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 239–263.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2016). The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891400090XGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R. (2015). Measuring university-level L2 learners’ implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000370Google Scholar

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310808073XGoogle Scholar
Andringa, S., & Curcic, M. (2015). How explicit knowledge affects online L2 processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(s2), 237–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000017Google Scholar
Andringa, S., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). New directions in the study of implicit and explicit learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(s2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500008XGoogle Scholar
Bolibaugh, C., & Foster, P. (2021). Implicit statistical learning in naturalistic and instructed morphosyntactic attainment: An aptitude–treatment interaction design. Language Learning, 71(4), 959–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1991). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In Parry, T. & Stansfield, C. (eds.), Language Aptitude Reconsidered. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: MLAT. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., Filip, H., & Carlson, G. N. (2002). Circumscribing referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 30–49.Google Scholar
Cheng, L., & Sybesma, R. (1998). Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 28(3), 385–412.Google Scholar
Cheng, L., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of np. Linguistic inquiry, 30(4), 509–542.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, H. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 312–348.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55(S1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.xGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(s2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.xGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2016). Of moving targets and chameleons: Why the concept of difficulty is so hard to pin down. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000024Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000056Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., Ravid, D., & Shi, M. (2017). The role of salience in the acquisition of Hebrew as a second language: Interaction with age of acquisition. In Gass, S., Spinner, P., & Behney, J. (eds.), Salience in Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 131–146.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., & Li, S. (2021). Epilogue: Evidence for the validity of implicit aptitude and the need for construct validation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 692–697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000140Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000915Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit and explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In Rebuschat, P. (ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Hafeez, K., Martin, K. I., et al. (2012). An eye-tracking study of learned attention in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(3), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000501Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096Google Scholar
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: London, UK: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., Spinner, P., & Behney, J. (2017). Salience in Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A. (2016). The effects of implicit instruction on implicit and explicit knowledge development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 177–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000388Google Scholar
Godfroid, A. (2019). Eye Tracking in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism: A Research Synthesis and Methodological Guide. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A., & Kim, K. (2021). The contributions of implicit-statistical learning aptitude to implicit second-language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 606–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000085Google Scholar
Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., et al. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgements measure distinct types of knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(s2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000850Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2013a). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63(4), 665–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G. (2013b). Reexamining the robustness of aptitude in second language acquisition. In Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 179–204.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Links between LLAMA and Hi-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000256Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2020). Implicit Language Aptitude. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497Google Scholar
Graus, J., & Coppen, P.-A. (2015). Defining grammatical difficulty: A student teacher perspective. Language Awareness, 24(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2014.994639Google Scholar
Hagedorn, J., Hailpern, J., & Karahalios, K. G. (2008). Vcode and vdata: Illustrating a new framework for supporting the video annotation workflow. Paper presented at the Advanced Video Interface, May 28–30, 2008, Naples, Italy. http://social.cs.uiuc.edu/papers/pdfs/vcode.pdfGoogle Scholar
Housen, A. (2014). Difficulty and complexity of language features and second language instruction. In Chapelle, C. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Simoens, H. (2016). Introduction: Cognitive perspectives on difficulty and complexity in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000176Google Scholar
Hua, D., & Lee, H. (2005). Chinese ESL learners’ understanding of the English count-mass distinction. In Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Liljestrand, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004), Somerville, MA, pp. 138–149.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18(3), 193–223. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr207oaGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050084Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M. L., & Philippov, V. (2009). Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2-English learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(3), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990149Google Scholar
Isbell, D. R., & Rogers, J. (2021). Measuring implicit and explicit learning and knowledge. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, P. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing. New York: Routledge, pp. 304–313.Google Scholar
Jiang, N., Hu, G., Chrabaszcz, A., & Ye, L. (2015). The activation of grammaticalized meaning in L2 processing: Toward an explanation of the morphological congruency effect. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915603823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X. (2011). Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61(3), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00627.xGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., et al. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, M. (2020). Exploring the interface of explicit and implicit second-language knowledge: A longitudinal perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2007). Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2014). Crosslinguistic differences in implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(4), 733–755. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000333Google Scholar
Li, S., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2021). Implicit language aptitude: Conceptualizing the construct, validating the measures, and examining the evidence: Introduction to the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000024Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., et al. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12011Google Scholar
Lu, C. F.-C. (2001). The acquisition of English articles by Chinese learners. Second Language Studies, 20(1), 43–78.Google Scholar
Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matin, E., Shao, K., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception and Psychophysics, 53(4), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206780Google Scholar
Meara, P. M. (2005). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests: The Manual. Swansea, UK: Lognostics. www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/llama_manual.pdfGoogle Scholar
Murakami, A., & Alexopoulou, T. (2016). L1 influency on the acquisition order of English grammartical morphemes: A learner corpus study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 365–401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000352Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(5), 888–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.5.888Google Scholar
Roberts, L., & Liszka, S. A. (2013). Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations on-line in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 29(4), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313503171Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16(2), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800672262975Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult SLA. Language Learning, 47(1), 45–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.21997002Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength and frequency effects during implicit artificial grammar, and incidental second language learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance to SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050126Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar
Snape, N. (2008). Resetting the nominal mapping parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count-mass distinction. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 11(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003215Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y. (2015). Using new measures of implicit L2 knowledge to study the interface of explicit and implicit knowledge. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y. (2017). Validity of new measures of implicit knowledge: Distinguishing implicit knowledge from automatized explicit knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5), 1229–1261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641700011XGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y. (2021). How does Japanese grammatical knowledge develop in naturalistic setting: Roles of grammatical features and individual difference factors. [dainigengokankyou de nihongo no bunpou chishiki wa donoyouni hattatsushiteikuka: Bunpoukoumoku no tokuchou to gakushusha no kojinsa no eikyou]. In Suzuki, W., Sakuma, Y., & Terasawa, T. (eds.), What Are the Roles of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in Foreign Language Learning?. Tokyo, Japan: Taishukan, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65(4), 860–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12138Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12241Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Jeong, H., Cui, H., et al. (2022). An fMRI validation study of the word-monitoring task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Exploring the role of explicit and implicit aptitudes in behavioral and neural processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, first view. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000043Google Scholar
Trenkic, D. (2002). Form–meaning connections in the acquisition of English articles. EUROSLA Yearbook, 2(1), 115–133.Google Scholar
Trenkic, D. (2008). The representation of English articles in second language grammars: Determiners or adjectives? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003185Google Scholar
Trenkic, D., Mirkovic, J., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2014). Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000321Google Scholar
Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachinske, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 59–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000455Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(02), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001081Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2009). Implicit learning in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Bingly, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 319–353.Google Scholar
Xia, H.-Y. (2011). A language aptitude test for native Chinese: Development and validation. [汉语语境下的外语学能测试研究及效度验证]. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 5, 52–55.Google Scholar
Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000509Google Scholar
Young, R. (1996). Form-function relations in articles in English interlanguage. In Bayley, R. & Preston, D. R. (eds.), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 135–175.Google Scholar

References

*Included in synthesis (RQs 1–2)

**Included in synthesis and meta-analysis (RQ 3)

Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2009). What statistical learning can and can’t tell us about language acquisition. In Colombo, J., McCardle, P., & Freund, L. (eds.), Infant Pathways to Language: Methods, Models, and Research Disorders. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar
**Brooks, P. J., & Kempe, V. (2013). Individual differences in adult foreign language learning: The mediating effect of metalinguistic awareness. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0262-9Google Scholar
**Brooks, P. J., Kwoka, N., & Kempe, V. (2017). Distributional effects and individual differences in L2 morphology learning. Language Learning, 67(1), 171–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12204Google Scholar
Büerkner, P.-C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian Multilevel Models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01Google Scholar
Chan, R. K., & Leung, J. H. (2014). Implicit learning of L2 word stress regularities. Second Language Research, 30(4), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0267658313510169Google Scholar
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modelling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Implicit statistical learning: A tale of two literatures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(3), 468–481 https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12332Google Scholar
**Chui, Y. L. (2017). The role of language proficiency and statistical learning in on-line comprehension of syntax among bilingual adult readers. Master’s thesis, Australian National University. https://doi.org/10.25911/5D6668CFE6E31Google Scholar
Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009Google Scholar
Cooper, H. (2017). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
*Cox, J. G. (2013). Bilingualism, aging, and instructional conditions in non-primary language development. Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University. http://hdl.handle.net/10822/707455Google Scholar
**Ćurčić, M. (2018). Explaining Differences in Adult Second Language Learning: The Role of Language Input Characteristics and Learners’ Cognitive Aptitudes. Utrecht, the Netherlands: LOT.Google Scholar
Deeks, J. J., Higgings, J. P. T., & Altman, D. G. (2019). Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In Higgings, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., et al. (eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd ed. London, UK: Cochrane, pp. 241–284.Google Scholar
**Degani, T., & Goldberg, M. (2019). How individual differences affect learning of translation‐ambiguous vocabulary. Language Learning, 69(3), 600–651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12344Google Scholar
Doughty, C. J., Campbell, S. G., Mislevy, M. A., et al. (2010). Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In Prior, M. T., Watanabe, Y., & Lee, S.-K. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 10–31.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Statistical learning research: A critical review and possible new directions. Psychological Bulletin, 145(12), 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000210Google Scholar
Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., Siegelman, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2015). Domain generality versus modality specificity: The paradox of statistical learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010Google Scholar
**Frost, R., Siegelman, N., Narkiss, A., & Afek, L. (2013). What predicts successful literacy acquisition in a second language? Psychological Science, 24(7), 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797612472207Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., et al. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457–511. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136Google Scholar
Godfroid, A., & Kim, K. M. (2021). The contribution of implicit-statistical learning aptitude to implicit second-language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(s3), 606–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000085Google Scholar
Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-9280.00476Google Scholar
**Granena, G. (2013). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63(4), 665–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12018Google Scholar
**Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Links between LLAMA and Hi-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000256Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2020). Implicit Language Aptitude. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y. (2019). Corrective feedback and the role of implicit sequence-learning ability in L2 online performance. Language Learning(s1), 69, 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12319Google Scholar
Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.) (2016). Cognitive Individual Differences in L2 Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hamrick, P. (2015). Declarative and procedural memory abilities as individual differences in incidental language learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.003Google Scholar
Hamrick, P., & Rebuschat, P. (2012). How implicit is statistical learning? In Williams, J. & Rebuschat, P. (eds.), Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 365–382.Google Scholar
Hamrick, P., Lum, J. A., & Ullman, M. T. (2018). Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(7), 1487–1492. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713975115Google Scholar
Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A, & Ebert, D. D. (2019). Doing Meta-Analysis in R: A Hands-On Guide. London, UK: Routledge. https://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/Google Scholar
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486Google Scholar
**Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., et al. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2020). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Ten years later. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000038Google Scholar
**Kerz, E., & Wiechmann, D. (2019). Effects of statistical learning ability on the second language processing of multiword sequences. In Pastor, G. C. & Mitkov, R. (eds.), Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 200–214.Google Scholar
Kidd, E., & Arciuli, J. (2016). Individual differences in statistical learning predict children’s comprehension of syntax. Child Development, 87(1), 184–193.Google Scholar
**Lee, O. S. (2014). Individual differences in first and second language sentence processing: Evidence from statistical learning. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/100442Google Scholar
**Lee, O. S. (2016). Artificial grammar learning ability predicts L2 processing of English number agreement. Language Research, 52(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12461Google Scholar
Lenth, R. V. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. CRAN-R Project. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeansGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu054Google Scholar
Li, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2021). Implicit language aptitude: Conceptualizing the construct, validating the measures, and examining the evidence: Introduction to the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000024Google Scholar
*Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., et al. (2013). Hi‐LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high‐level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12011Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–88. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2Google Scholar
Long, M. (2015). Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
**McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2016). The role of statistical learning and working memory in L2 speakers’ pattern learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 428–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12331Google Scholar
**McDonough, K., Kielstra, P., Crowther, D., & Smith, G. (2016). Structural priming in L2 speech production: Examining relationships among English L2 speakers’ production, cognitive abilities, and awareness. In Mackey, A. & Marsden, E. (eds.), Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 112–131.Google Scholar
Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009). Statistical learning of nonadjacencies predicts on-line processing of long-distance dependencies in natural language. In Taatgen, N. A. & van Rijn, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, pp. 177–182.Google Scholar
**Mor, B., & Prior, A. (2020). Individual differences in L2 frequency effects in different script bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(4), 672–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/136700691987635Google Scholar
Norouzian, R., de Miranda, M. A., & Plonsky, L. (2018). The Bayesian revolution in second language research: An applied approach. Language Learning, 68, 1032–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12310Google Scholar
Onnis, L. (2012). The potential contribution of statistical learning to second language acquisition. In Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. N. (eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 203–235.Google Scholar
**Onnis, L., Frank, S. L., Yun, H., & Lou-Magnuson, M. (2016). Statistical learning bias predicts second-language reading efficiency. In Papafragou, A., Grodner, D., & Mirman, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2105–2110.Google Scholar
Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Richmond, K., & Chater, N. (2005). Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(2), 225–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.011Google Scholar
Onnis, L., Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S. (2008). Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition, 109(3), 423–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.004Google Scholar
Paciorek, A., & Williams, J. (2015). Implicit learning of semantic preferences of verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 359–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000108Google Scholar
Perruchet, P. (2021). Why is the componential construct of implicit language aptitude so difficult to capture?: A commentary on the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312100019XGoogle Scholar
Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006Google Scholar
Pigott, T. D. (2009). Handling missing data. In Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 399–416.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-XGoogle Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (ed.) (2015). Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2012a). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 829–856. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000580Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (eds.) (2012b). Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
**Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength, and frequency effects in implicit artificial grammar and incidental L2 learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance for SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050126Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2010). Implicit artificial grammar and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they? Language Learning, 60(s2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00608.xGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0032Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129Google Scholar
Seipel, B. E. (2011). The role of implicit learning in incidental vocabulary acquisition while reading. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/116315.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (2009). Combining estimates of effect size. In Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 257–277.Google Scholar
Siegelman, N., & Frost, R. (2015). Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.001Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O. & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive Individual Differences in L2 Processing and Acquisition. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
Stan Development Team (2018). Stan: A C++ library for programming and sampling. Retrieved from http://mc-stan.orgGoogle Scholar
**Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65(4), 860–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12138Google Scholar
**Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12241Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y, DeKeyser, R., & Huang, Y. (Chapter 15, this volume). Implicit (not explicit) learning aptitude predicts the acquisition of difficult (not easy) structure: A visual-world eye-tracking study. In Wen, Z. E., Skehan, P., & Sparks, R. (eds.), Language Aptitude Theory and Practice (pp. xxx–xxx). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 279–298.Google Scholar
Vuong, L. C., Meyer, A. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Concurrent statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies. Language Learning, 66(1), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12137Google Scholar
Weiss, D. J., Schwob, N., & Lebkuecher, A. L. (2020). Bilingualism and statistical learning: Lessons from studies using artificial languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000579Google Scholar
Wen, Z. E., Borges Mota, M., & McNeill, A. (2015). Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wen, Z. E., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (eds.) (2019). Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 269–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050138Google Scholar
**Yi, W. (2018). Statistical sensitivity, cognitive aptitudes, and processing of collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 831–856. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000141Google Scholar
**Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive individual differences as predictors of improvement and awareness under implicit and explicit feedback conditions. The Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12587Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×