Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:50:12.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Edited by
Lara Denis
Lara Denis
Affiliation:
Agnes Scott College, Decatur
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant's Metaphysics of Morals
A Critical Guide
 , pp. 256 - 263
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenwall, G.Ius Naturae, 5th edn., Göttingen: Bossiegel, 1763Google Scholar
Achenwall, G.Prolegomena Iuris Naturalis, 2nd edn., Göttingen: Bossiegel, 1763Google Scholar
Allison, H.E.Kant's Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K.Kant's Theory of Mind, Oxford University Press, 1982, 2002Google Scholar
Aristotle, . De Anima, Smith, J.A. (trans.), in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Princeton University Press, 1984, vol. i, 641–92Google Scholar
Anima, Aristotle.Nicomachean Ethics, Broadie, S. (ed.), Rowe, C. (ed. and trans.), Oxford University Press, 2002Google Scholar
Anima, Aristotle.Nicomachean Ethics, Ross, W.D. (trans.), in Barnes, (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. ii, 1729–867
Arnoldt, E.Gesammelte Schriften, 6 vols., Schöndörffer, O. (ed.), Berlin: B. Cassirer, 1907–09Google Scholar
Arntzen, S.“Kant on Duty to Oneself and Resistance to Political Authority,”Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3) (1996), 409–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranzke, H.“Tierethik, Tiernatur und Moralanthropologie im Kontext von §17 Tugendlehre,”Kant-Studien 96 (2005), 336–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, M.Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Baron, M., and Seymour Fahmy, M.. “Beneficence and Other Duties of Love in The Metaphysics of Morals,” in Hill, Thomas E., Jr. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics, Oxford and Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 211–28Google Scholar
Baxley, A.M.“Autonomy and Autocracy,”Kant-Studien 94 (2003), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, L.W.A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, University of Chicago Press, 1960Google Scholar
Brandt, R. “Das Erlaubnisgesetz, oder: Vernunft und Geschichte in Kants Rechtslehre,” in R. Brandt, (ed.), Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung: Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1981, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1982, 233–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, R. “Das Problem der Erlaubnisgesetze im Spätwerk Kants,” in Höffe, O. (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Zum ewigen Frieden, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995, 69–86Google Scholar
Broadie, A., and Pybus, E.M.. “Kant's Treatment of Animals,”Philosophy 49 (1974), 375–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, W.Die Entstehung der kritischen Rechtsphilosophie Kants, 1762–1780, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, B.S.“Kant's Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution,”Law and Philosophy 8 (1989), 151–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, B.S., and Hruschka, J.. Kant's Doctrine of Right: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, J.Ethics without Principles, Oxford University Press, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, L.“Animality and Agency: A Kantian Approach to Abortion,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2008), 117–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, L.“Kant on the Wrongness of ‘Unnatural’ Sex,”History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (2) (1999), 225–48Google Scholar
Denis, L.“Kant's Conception of Duties Regarding Animals: Reconstruction and Reconsideration,”History of Philosophy Quarterly 17 (2000), 405–23Google Scholar
Denis, L.“Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself,”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1997), 321–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, L.Moral Self-Regard: Duties to Oneself in Kant's Moral Theory, New York and London: Garland Publishing, 2001Google Scholar
Donagan, A.“Moral Dilemmas, Genuine and Spurious: A Comparative Anatomy,”Ethics 104 (1993), 7–21; reprinted in J.E. Malpas (ed.), Philosophical Papers of Alan Donagan, vol. ii, University of Chicago Press, 1994, 153–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donagan, A. “The Relation of Moral Theory to Moral Judgment: A Kantian Review,” in Brody, Baruch (ed.), Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Medical Ethics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988, 171–92; reprinted in Malpas (ed.), Philosophical Papers of Alan Donagan, vol. ii, 194–216Google Scholar
Donagan, A.The Theory of Morality, University of Chicago Press, 1977Google Scholar
Dreier, R.“Zur Einheit der praktischen Philosophie Kants,”Perspektiven der Philosophie 5 (1979), 5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, S. “The Inner Freedom of Virtue,” in Timmons, M. (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 289–315.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J.“The Expressive Function of Punishment,”Monist 49 (1965), 394–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, J.“The Nature and Value of Rights,”Journal of Value Inquiry 4 (1970), 243–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichte, J.F.Fichtes sämtliche Werke, Fichte, I.H. (ed.), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1970Google Scholar
Fichte, J.F.Foundations of Natural Right, Baur, M. (trans.), Neuhouser, F. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 2000Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S.“Kant's Theory of Punishment,”Kant-Studien 79 (4) (1988), 434–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flikschuh, K. “Freedom and Constraint in Kant's Metaphysical Elements of Justice,” in Byrd, S. and Hruschka, J. (eds.), Kant and Law, Hants: Ashgate, 2006, 87–108Google Scholar
Flikschuh, K. “Hobbes and Kant on Public Authority,” Hobbes Studies (in press)
Flikschuh, K.“Ist das rechtliche Postulat ein Postulat der reinen praktischen Vernunft? Zum Endzweck der Kantischen Rechtslehre,”Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 12 (2004), 299–330Google Scholar
Flikschuh, K.Kant and Modern Political Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flikschuh, K. “Kant's Kingdom of Ends: Metaphysical, Not Political,” in Timmermann, J. (ed.), Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press 2009, 119–39Google Scholar
Flikschuh, K.“Reason, Right, and Revolution: Locke and Kant,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2008), 375–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. “Formulations on the Two Principles of Mental Functioning,” in The Case of Schreber, Papers on Technique and Other Works, Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. xii (1911–13), Strachey, J. (ed.), London: Hogarth Press, 1958, 218–26Google Scholar
Freud, S. “Formulierungen über die zwei Prinzipien des psychischen Geschehens,” in Mitscherlich, A. (ed.), Studienausgabe, 8th edn., Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1997, vol. iii, 13–24Google Scholar
Frierson, P.“Kant's Empirical Account of Human Action,”Philosophers' Imprint 5 (7) (2005), 1–34Google Scholar
Gregor, M.J.Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant's Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963Google Scholar
Gregor, M.J. “Translator's Note on the Text of the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, Gregor, M.J. (ed. and trans.), Cambridge University Press, 1996, 355–59Google Scholar
Grenberg, J.M.Kant and the Ethics of Humility: A Story of Dependence, Corruption, and Virtue, Cambridge University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenberg, J.M.“Replies,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3) (2007), 640–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, J. and G. (eds.). Deutsches Wörterbuch, 33 vols, Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1984, vol. xxii.
Grotius, H.De Iure Belli ac Pacis, Tromp, B.J.A. de Kanter-van Hettinga (ed.), Louvain: Brill, 1939Google Scholar
Guevara, D.Kant's Theory of Moral Motivation, Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000Google Scholar
Guyer, P. “Duties Regarding Nature,” in Kant and the Experience of Freedom, 303–34
Guyer, P.Kant and the Experience of Freedom, Cambridge University Press, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P.Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness, Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, J.E.The Moral Gap, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996Google Scholar
Hampton, J.“The Moral Education Theory of Punishment,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3) (1984), 208–38Google Scholar
Herman, B.“Making Room for Character,” in Moral Literacy, 1–28.
Herman, B.Moral Literacy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007Google Scholar
Herman, B.The Practice of Moral Judgment, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993Google Scholar
Herman, B. “Rethinking Kant's Hedonism,” in Moral Literacy, 176–202
Hill, Thomas E.. “Donagan's Kant,”Ethics 104 (1993), 22–52; reprinted in Thomas E. Hill, Jr., Respect, Pluralism, and Justice, Oxford University Press, 2000, 119–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E.. “Four Conceptions of Conscience,”Nomos 40 (1998), 13–52; reprinted in Human Welfare and Moral Worth, 277–309Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E.. Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives, Oxford University Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E.. “Kant on Imperfect Duty and Supererogation,”Kant-Studien 72 (1971), 55–76Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E.. “Meeting Needs and Doing Favors,” in Human Welfare and Moral Worth, 201–44
Anima, Aristotle.“Wrongdoing, Desert, and Punishment,” in Human Welfare and Moral Worth, 310–39; originally published as “Kant on Wrongdoing, Desert and Punishment,” Law and Philosophy 18 (1) (1999), 407–75Google Scholar
Hobbes, T.Leviathan [1651], Curley, E. (ed.), Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1994Google Scholar
Höffe, O. “Categorical Imperatives of Right According to Ulpian,” in Kant's Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace, Newton, A. (trans.), Cambridge University Press, 2006, 119–33Google Scholar
Höffe, O.Categorical Principles of Law: A Counterpoint to Modernity, Migotti, M. (trans.), University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002Google Scholar
Höffe, O. “Der kategorishe Rechtsimperativ. ‘Einleitung in die Rechtslehre,’” in Höffe, O. (ed.), Immanuel Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Klassiker Auslegen XIX, Berlin: C.H. Beck-Verlag, 1999, 41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, O. “Kategorische Rechtsimperative nach Ulpian,” in “Königliche Völker”: Zu Kants kosmopolitischer Rechts- und Friedenstheorie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2001, 147–60Google Scholar
Höffe, O.Kategorishe Rechtsprinzipien. Ein Kontrapunkt der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1995Google Scholar
Höffe, O.Political Justice: Foundation for a Liberal Philosophy of Law and the State, Cohen, J.C. (trans.), Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995Google Scholar
Höffe, O.Politische Gerechtigkeit. Grundlegung einer kritischen Philosophie von Recht und Staat, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1987Google Scholar
Höffe, O. “The Principle of Justice as Categorical Imperative of Law,” in Yovel, Y. (ed.), Kant's Practical Philosophy Reconsidered, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, 149–67Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W.Fundamental Legal Conceptions, Cook, W. (ed.), New Haven: Yale University Press, 1919Google Scholar
Hruschka, J.“The Permissive Law of Practical Reason in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals,”Law and Philosophy 23 (2004), 45–72Google Scholar
Hume, D.A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd edn., Selby-Bigge, L.A. and Nidditch, P.H. (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978Google Scholar
Hutcheson, F.An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, Garret, A. (ed.), Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2002Google Scholar
Ilting, K.-H.“Gibt es eine kritische Ethik und Rechtsphilosophie Kants?”Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 63 (1983), 325–45Google Scholar
Ingensiep, H.W.“Tierseele und tierethische Argumentationen in der Deutschen philosophischen Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts,”NTM: Internationale Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Ethik der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin (N.S.) 4 (1996), 103–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jellinek, G.System der subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte, Tübingen: Mohr, 1892, 1905Google Scholar
Johnson, R.N. “Self-Improvement: An Essay in Kantian Ethics,” unpublished manuscript
Johnson, R.N. “Value and Autonomy in Kantian Ethics,” in Shafer-Landau, R. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. ii, Oxford University Press, 2007, 33–48Google Scholar
Kain, P.“Kant's Defense of Human Moral Status,”Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2009), 59–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, P.“Self-Legislation in Kant's Moral Philosophy,”Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (2004), 257–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I.Die Metaphysik der Sitten in zwey Theilen. Erster Teil: Metaphysische Anfangsgründeder Rechtslehre; Zweiter Teil: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre, Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius, 1797Google Scholar
Kant, I.Erläuternde Anmerkungen zu der Rechtslehre, Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius, 1798Google Scholar
Kant, I.Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Hill, T.E., Jr. (ed.), Zweig, A. (trans.), Oxford University Press, 2002Google Scholar
Kant, I.Metaphysik der Sitten, 2nd edn., Vorländer, K. (ed.), Leipzig: Verlag der Dürr'schen Buchhandlung, 1907Google Scholar
Kant, I.Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre: Metaphysik der Sitten, Erster Teil, Ludwig, B. (ed.), Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1986, 1998Google Scholar
Kant, I.Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre: Metaphysik der Sitten, Zweiter Teil, Ludwig, B. (ed.), Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1990Google Scholar
Kant, I.Vorlesungen zur Moralphilosophie, Stark, W. (ed.), Introduction by M. Kuehn, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004Google Scholar
Kelsen, H.Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory: A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law, Litschewski Paulson, B. and Paulson, S.L. (trans.), Oxford University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H.Reine Rechtslehre, Vienna: Auflage, 1960Google Scholar
Kerstein, S.J. “Treating Oneself Merely as a Means,” in Betzler, M. (ed.), Kant's Ethics of Virtue, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008, 201–18Google Scholar
Kersting, W.Wohlgeordnete Freiheit, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1984
Köhl, H.Kants Gesinnungsethik, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C.M.Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge University Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C.M. “Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals,” in Peterson, G.B. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. xxv, Salt Lake City: Utah University Press, 2005, 77–110Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C.M. “Interacting with Animals: A Kantian Account,” in Beauchamp, T. and Frey, R.G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Ethics and Animals, Oxford University Press, in press
Korsgaard, C.M.The Sources of Normativity, O'Neill, O. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, M. “Introduction,” in Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Louden, R.B. (ed. and trans.), Cambridge University Press, 2006, vii–xxixGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W.Liberalism, Community, and Culture, Oxford University Press, 1991Google Scholar
Mackie, J.“Can There Be a Rights-Based Moral Theory?”Midwest Studies in Philosophy 3 (1978), 350–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, G.F.Philosophische Sittenlehre, Halle: Hemmerde, 1753–61, §975Google Scholar
Morris, H.“Persons and Punishment,”Monist 52 (1968), 475–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, L.Kant's System of Rights, New York: Columbia University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Murphy, J.G.Kant: The Philosophy of Right, London: Macmillan, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naragon, S. “Kant in the Classroom,” online at www.manchester.edu/kant/
Naragon, S.“Kant on Descartes and the Brutes,”Kant-Studien 81 (1990), 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naragon, S. “Reason and Animals: Descartes, Kant, and Mead on the Place of Humans in Nature,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame (1987)
Nozick, R.Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books, 1974Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.Frontiers of Justice: Disabilities, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006Google Scholar
Oberer, H.“Zur Frühgeschichte der Kantischen Rechtslehre,”Kant-Studien 64 (1973), 88–102Google Scholar
Oberhausen, M., and Pozzo, R. (eds.), Vorlesungsverzeichnisse der Universität Königsberg (1720–1804), 2 vols., Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog, 1999
O'Neill, O.Bounds of Justice, Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, O.Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1989Google Scholar
Pincoffs, E.The Rationale of Legal Punishment, New York: Humanities Press, 1966Google Scholar
Potter, N. “Does Kant Have Two Concepts of Freedom?” in Funke, G. and Kopper, J. (eds.), Akten des Vierten Internationalen Kant Kongresses, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1974, 590–96Google Scholar
Potter, N. “Duties to Oneself, Motivational Internalism, and Self-Deception in Kant's Ethics,” in Timmons, M. (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 371–89Google Scholar
Potter, N. “Kant on Punishment,” in Hill, Thomas E., Jr. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 179–95Google Scholar
Pybus, E., and Broadie, A.. “Kant's Treatment of Animals,”Philosophy 49 (1974), 375–83Google Scholar
Rawls, J.Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 2000Google Scholar
Rawls, J. “Themes in Kant's Moral Philosophy,” in Förster, E. (ed.), Kant's Transcendental Deductions: The Three “Critiques” and the “Opus postumum,”Stanford University Press, 1989, 81–113Google Scholar
Rawls, J.A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971Google Scholar
Reath, A.Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory: Selected Essays, Oxford University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, A. “Self-Legislation and Duties to Oneself,” in Timmons, M. (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 349–70; reprinted in Agency and Autonomy, 231–49Google Scholar
Regan, T.The Case for Animal Rights, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984Google Scholar
Ripstein, A.“Authority and Coercion,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (1) (2004), 2–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, C.Der Rechtsgedanke nach den frühen Quellen Kants, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1971Google Scholar
Ross, W. D.The Right and the Good, Stratton-Lake, Philip (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M.What We Owe Each Other, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1998Google Scholar
Scheid, D.E.“Kant's Retributivism,”Ethics 93 (1983), 262–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleiermacher, F.Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1984Google Scholar
Schmucker, J. Rezension, in Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants in seinen vorkritischen Schriften und Reflexionen, Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain, 1961, 365–69Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A.Werke in fünf Bänden, Ludger, Lüdtkehaus (ed.), Ulm: Haffmanns Verlag, 1988, vols. i and iiiGoogle Scholar
Sensen, O. “Dignity and the Formula of Humanity,” in Timmermann, J. (ed.), Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press, 2009, 102–18Google Scholar
Shell, S.M.“Kant on Punishment,”Kantian Review 1 (1997), 115–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, N.Making a Necessity of Virtue, Cambridge University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P.Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals, New York: Random House, 1975Google Scholar
Thomasius, C.Fundamenta Juris Naturae et Gentium, 4th edn. [1718], Aalen: Scientia, reprint 1963Google Scholar
Timmermann, J.“Kant on Conscience, ‘Indirect’ Duty, and Moral Error,”International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2006), 293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, J.“Kantian Duties to the Self, Explained and Defended,”Philosophy 81 (2006), 505–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, J.“When the Tail Wags the Dog: Animal Welfare and Indirect Duty in Kantian Ethics,”Kantian Review 10 (2005), 128–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmons, M. (ed.). Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002
Unna, Y.“Kant's Answers to the Casuistical Questions Concerning Self-Disembodiment,”Kant-Studien 94 (2003), 454–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasilyev, V., Korsgaard, C., and Singer, P.. “International Kant Interview, 2004–2005,” online at www.philos.msu.ru/community/staff/vasiliev/Kant_Interview/Kant_Interview.htm
Vorländer, K. “Einleitung,” in Immanuel Kant, Metaphysik der Sitten, 2nd edn., Leipzig: Verlag der Dürr'schen Buchhandlung, 1907, ix–li
Walch, J.G. “Zulassung,” in Hennings, J.C. (ed.), Philosophisches Lexicon, 4th edn. [1775], Hildesheim: Olms, reprint 1968, vol. ii, col. 1708Google Scholar
Warren, M.A.Moral Status: Obligation to Persons and Other Living Things, Oxford University Press, 1997Google Scholar
Wellman, C.Real Rights, Oxford University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Westphal, K.R.“Do Kant's Principles Justify Property or Usufruct?”Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 5 (1997), 142–94Google Scholar
Willaschek, M. “Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridical Law in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals,” in Timmons, M. (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 65–87Google Scholar
Willaschek, M.“Why the Doctrine of Right Does Not Belong in the Metaphysics of Morals,”Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 5 (1997), 205–27Google Scholar
Williams, H.Kant's Political Philosophy, London: St. Martin's Press, 1983Google Scholar
Wood, A.W. “The Final Form of Kant's Practical Philosophy,” in Timmons, M. (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002, 1–21Google Scholar
Wood, A.W. “General Introduction,” in Gregor, M.J. (ed. and trans.), Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1996, xiii–xxxiiiGoogle Scholar
Wood, A.W.Hegel's Ethical Thought, Cambridge University Press, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A.W.“Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature I,”Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 72 (1998), 189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A.W.Kantian Ethics, Cambridge University Press, 2008Google Scholar
Wood, A.W.Kant's Ethical Thought, Cambridge University Press, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Lara Denis, Agnes Scott College, Decatur
  • Book: Kant's Metaphysics of Morals
  • Online publication: 10 January 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763250.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Lara Denis, Agnes Scott College, Decatur
  • Book: Kant's Metaphysics of Morals
  • Online publication: 10 January 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763250.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Lara Denis, Agnes Scott College, Decatur
  • Book: Kant's Metaphysics of Morals
  • Online publication: 10 January 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763250.014
Available formats
×