Twelve Years of Mixed Tribunals in Argentina

doi:10.1017/9781108669290.003

3 - Twelve Years of Mixed Tribunals in Argentina

from Part I - Advances in Lay Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2021

María Inés Bergoglio

Edited by

Sanja Kutnjak Ivković ,

Shari Seidman Diamond ,

Valerie P. Hans and

Nancy S. Marder

Show author details

Sanja Kutnjak Ivković: Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Shari Seidman Diamond: Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Valerie P. Hans: Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Nancy S. Marder: Affiliation:
Chicago-Kent College of Law

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Now that Córdoba has had more than a decade of experience with lay participation in criminal trials, it offers the opportunity to analyze whether the institution of mixed tribunals has fulfilled the expectations held by those who promoted this innovation. This review of the Córdoba experience with mixed tribunals summarizes the main findings of a research program initiated in 2008. It is focused on three issues: the differences between jury and judge decisions and the actual levels of lay participation obtained when judges and juries sit and deliberate together; the tensions between the approaches of professional judges and the social demand for penal harshness associated with fear of crime; and the contribution of lay participation in the courts toward legitimizing the judiciary, a key issue in a society where trust in the justice system has been chronically low. Data sources are varied and include a set of 445 verdicts reached between 2005 and 2017, as well as interviews with judges, judicial clerks, lawyers, and jurors. Data from two public opinion surveys, conducted in 1993 and 2011, were also used to assess the effects of lay participation on the legitimacy of the judiciary.

Keywords

confidence in the judiciary death penalty attitudes fear of crime judge–jury differences lay participation legitimacy mixed tribunal penal populism punishment attitudes

Type: Chapter
Information: Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
A Global Perspective
, pp. 47 - 68

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108669290.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amietta, S. A. (2010). Tendencias en juicios por jurados en Latinoamérica [Latin American trends in trials by jury]. In Bergoglio, M. I. (Ed.), Subiendo al estrado: La experiencia cordobesa de juicios por jurados [Getting on the stand: Cordoba’s experience with jury trials] (pp. 37–51). Córdoba, Argentina: Advocatus.Google Scholar

Amietta, S. A.(2011). Governance in Córdoba’s mixed tribunal: A study on microphysics of power. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 1(1), 1–33. http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/43 Google Scholar

Bergoglio, M. I. (2008). New paths toward judicial legitimacy: The experience of mixed tribunals in Córdoba. Southwestern Journal of International Law, 14(2), 319–339.Google Scholar

Bergoglio, M. I.(2011). Metropolitan and town juries: The influence of social context on lay participation. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86, 831–853.Google Scholar

Cavallero, R., & Hendler, E. (1988). Justicia y participación: El juicio por jurados en materia penal [Justice and participation: Jury trials in criminal matters]. Buenos Aires: Universidad.Google Scholar

Dirección Nacional de Política Criminológica [National Directorate of Criminal Intelligence (Arg.)]. (2017). https://datos.gob.ar/dataset/seguridad-estadisticas-criminales-republica-argentina-por-provincias Google Scholar

Dzur, A. W. (2012). Punishment, participatory democracy and the jury. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: John Wiley & Son.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, T., Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Waters, N. L., Munsterman, G. T., Schwab, S. J., & Wells, M. T. (2005). Judge-jury agreement in criminal cases: A partial replication of Kalven and Zeisel’s The American jury. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2, 171–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740–1461.2005.00035.x Google Scholar

Farrell, A., & Givelber, D. (2010). Liberation reconsidered: Understanding why judges and juries disagree about guilt. Journal of Criminal Law, 100, 1549–1586. http://iris.lib.neu.edu/slaw_fac_pubs/27 Google Scholar

Ferrer, C., & Grundy, C. (2005). El nuevo juicio penal con jurados en la provincia de Córdoba [The new criminal jury trial in the province of Córdoba]. Córdoba, Argentina: Ed. Mediterránea.Google Scholar

Freedman, D., Pisani, R., & Purves, R. (2007). Statistics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gastil, J. (2018). The lessons and limitations of experiments in democratic deliberation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14, 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci CrossRef Google Scholar

Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P. J., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: How jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., & Spence, L. K. (2005). Why do people accept public policies they oppose? Testing legitimacy theory with a survey-based experiment. Political Research Quarterly, 58(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800201 Google Scholar

Gibson, J. L., Lodge, M., & Woodson, B. (2014). Losing, but accepting: Legitimacy, positivity theory, and the symbols of judicial authority. Law & Society Review, 48, 837–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12104 Google Scholar

Goldbach, T., & Hans, V. (2014). Juries, lay judges, and trials. In Bruinsma, G & Weisburd, D (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 2716–2727). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Han, P., Párraga, J., & Morales, J. (2006). La participación ciudadana en la justicia penal venezolana [Citizen participation in Venezuelan criminal justice]. CENIPEC, 2(25), 247–269.Google Scholar

Hans, V. P. (2008). Jury systems around the world. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4, 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172319 Google Scholar

Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (1991). The American jury at twenty-five years. Law & Social Inquiry, 16, 324–351.Google Scholar

Iontcheva, J. (2003). Jury sentencing as democratic practice. Virginia Law Review, 89, 311–383.Google Scholar

Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Kessler, G. (2009). El sentimiento de inseguridad: Sociología del temor al delito [The feeling of insecurity: Sociology of the fear of crime]. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Kim, S., Park, J., Park, K., & Eom, J.-S. (2013). Judge–jury agreement in criminal cases: The first three years of the Korean jury system. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10, 35–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2015). Ears of the deaf: The theory and reality of lay judges in mixed tribunals. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 90, 1031–1067.Google Scholar

Latinobarómetro [Latinobarometer]. (1995–2011). www.latinobarometro.org/latOnline.jsp Google Scholar

Ley No. 9182, Legislación Provincial de Córdoba [Law No. 9182, Legislature of the Province of Córdoba (Arg.)] (2004).Google Scholar

Leipold, A. D. (2005). Why are federal judges so acquittal prone? Washington University Law Quarterly, 83, 151–227.Google Scholar

Lembcke, O. W. (2008). The dynamics of legitimacy: A critical reconstruction of Max Weber’s concept. Recht der Werkelijkheid, 3, 33–47.Google Scholar

Levine, J. P. (1983). Jury toughness: The impact of conservatism on criminal court verdicts. Crime & Delinquency, 29, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112878302900103 Google Scholar

Machura, S. (2003). Fairness, justice, and legitimacy: Experiences of people’s judges in South Russia. Law & Policy, 25, 123–150.Google Scholar

Marder, N. (2005). The jury process. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Orias Arredondo, R. (2013). Jueces ciudadanos: Democratizando la justicia en Bolivia [Citizen judges: Democratizing justice in Bolivia]. Revista Sistemas Judiciales, 9(17), 26–38.Google Scholar

Park, R. Y. (2010). The globalizing jury trial: Lessons and insights from Korea. American Journal of Comparative Law, 58, 525–582. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2009.0049 Google Scholar

Piden debate sobre jurados populares [They are calling for a debate on popular juries]. (2004, August 7). La Voz del Interior. http://buscador.lavoz.com.ar Google Scholar

Power, T. J., & Cyr, J. M. (2010). Mapping political legitimacy in Latin America. International Social Science Journal, 60, 253–272.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V., & Hough, M. (2009). Public opinion and the jury: An international literature review. London: Ministry of Justice. http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/3795/Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, P. (2009). La legitimidad democrática: Imparcialidad, reflexividad, proximidad [Democratic legitimacy: Impartiality, reflexivity, proximity]. Buenos Aires: Manantial.Google Scholar

Rusca, B. (2014). La implementación del juicio por jurado en delitos de corrupción: Un análisis de la experiencia cordobesa [The implementation of the jury trial in corruption crimes: An analysis of the Córdoba experience]. Revista de La Facultad. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales de La Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), 5, 107–124.Google Scholar

Smulovitz, C. (2008). La política por otros medios: Judicialización y movilización legal en Argentina [Politics by other means: Judicialization and legal mobilization in Argentina]. Desarrollo Económico, 48, 287–305.Google Scholar

Tarditti, A., & Ferrer, C. (2016). El juicio con jurados populares: A diez años de su aplicación en la provincia de Córdoba [The trial with popular juries: Ten years after its application in the province of Córdoba]. In Investigaciones aplicadas en el ámbito del Poder Judicial de Córdoba III [Applied research in the area of the Córdoba Judicial Power III] (pp. 49–84). Córdoba: Centro Judicial Ricardo Nuñez. http://campusvirtual.justiciacordoba.gob.ar/moodle/repository/investigacion/publica/tomo11/11_02.pdf Google Scholar

Tocqueville, A. de. (1840). Democracy in America. Translated by Henry Reeve. Pennsylvania State University, Electronic Classics Series. http://seas3.elte.hu/coursematerial/LojkoMiklos/Alexis-de-Tocqueville-Democracy-in-America.pdf Google Scholar

Toharia, J. J. (1987). Pleitos tengas … Introducción a la cultura legal española [Disputes you have … Introduction to Spanish legal culture]. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar

Turner, F. C., & Carballo, M. (2010). Cycles of legitimacy and delegitimation across regimes in Argentina, 1900–2008. International Social Science Journal, 60, 273–283.Google Scholar

Varona Gómez, D. (2009). ¿Somos los españoles punitivos? Actitudes punitivas y reforma penal en España [Are we Spaniards punitive? Punitive attitudes and penal reform in Spain]. InDret, 1/2009, 2–31.Google Scholar

Voigt, S. (2008). The (economic) effects of lay participation in courts: A cross-country analysis. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2365. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1226682 Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology. Edited by Roth, G & Wittich, C. Los Angeles: University of California Press. https://archive.org/details/MaxWeberEconomyAndSociety Google Scholar

Zaffaroni, R. (2012, November 12). El juicio por jurados no funciona [Trial by jury doesn’t work]. Página/12. www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/elpais/subnotas/76068–24551-2006–11-12.html Google Scholar

Book contents

3 - Twelve Years of Mixed Tribunals in Argentina

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive