Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:26:38.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Action and freedom in Suárez's ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Daniel Schwartz
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access

Summary

Human action and its place in Suárez's ethics

Fundamental to Suárez's ethics is the idea of actus humani – of fully human actions. These are the properly intentional or deliberate actions that adult humans perform and through which they can exercise the power of freedom. It is these actions by which humans conform to or breach law in its various forms, and on the basis of which they may be deserving of reward or punishment; and it is by these actions, therefore, that humans determine their final salvation or damnation.

Human action is understood by Suárez to consist in a distinctive mode of exercising rationality. But, so understood, the nature of action does not of itself deliver the reality of or constitute the nature of freedom. Freedom is something additional to our capacity for rationality, being a distinctively contingent efficient causal power that we possess as agent-substances. The existence and reality of this power is revealed to us directly through our consciousness – through our awareness of our possession and exercise of the power. And it is from its connection with freedom that action derives its central ethical significance. Our freedom allows us to be subject to a distinctively practical or action-governing normativity of law – a normativity which importantly both helps determine our moral status and directs our actions. Law leaves us in possession of moral rights, but also subject to moral obligations which bind us in the exercise of our freedom. So freedom provides a moral basis not only for moral and political liberty, but also for our liability to coercion and punishment. All these are founded on our subjection, through our rational and free nature, to various kinds of legal jurisdiction, including, most fundamentally, the pre-positive or purely moral jurisdiction involved in natural law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interpreting Suárez
Critical Essays
, pp. 115 - 141
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×