Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:02:53.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - The History of Psychological Assessment in North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

By
Janet F. Carlson  and
Kurt F. Geisinger
Edited by
Sumaya Laher
Sumaya Laher
Affiliation:
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Get access

Summary

Relatively speaking, the history of psychological testing in North America is brief but dense. Given the similarities in language and culture of Canada and the United States, it is not surprising that many events in the history of psychological testing were shared by the two countries. Progress in academic and professional realms readily crosses the border, helping to sustain a stable and mutually beneficial relationship. This chapter begins by describing milestone events in the shared history of these two countries that marked turning points in the development of instruments and testing practices. Activities by European scholars laid the foundation for further developments in North America. These activities are reviewed first, followed by discussions of events concerning the North American history of intellectual assessment, personality testing, and psychological testing used in employment contexts. Next, major impacts of the history of psychological testing in North American are described to demonstrate how they have helped to shape psychological testing in the larger international sphere.

Keywords

assessmentCanadahistorypsychologypsychological assessmentUnited States
Type
Chapter
Information
International Histories of Psychological Assessment , pp. 334 - 357
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, S. C., Wood, W., & Liebman, S. J. (2001). Children’s human figure drawings as measures of intelligence: The comparative validity of three scoring systems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19(3), 204–215.Google Scholar
AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
APA. (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychological Bulletin, 51(2, Pt.2), 1–38.Google Scholar
Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Archer, R. P., Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2016). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-adolescents-restructured form (MMPI-A-RF): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Becker, K. A. (2003). History of the Stanford–Binet intelligence scales: Content and psychometrics. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition Assessment Service Bulletin No. 1.Google Scholar
Ben-Porath, Y. S. & Tellegen, A. (2008). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2-restructured form (MMPI-2-RF): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Benson, N. F., Floyd, R. G., Kranzler, J. H., Eckert, T. L., Fefer, S. A., & Morgan, G. B. (2019). Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 National Survey. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buros, O. K. (ed.). (1938). The nineteen thirty eight mental measurements yearbook of the School of Education, Rutgers University. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Buros, O. K. (ed.). (1961). Tests in print. Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N. (2009). Clinical personality assessment: History, evolution, contemporary models, and practical applications. In Butcher, J. N. (ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 5–21). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N., Williams, C. L., Graham, J. R., Archer, R., Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Kaemmer, B. (1992). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-adolescent (MMPI-A): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31(2), 141–154.Google Scholar
Canadian Academy of Psychologists in Disability Assessment. (2004). Practice standards for the psychological assessment of disability and impairment. Retrieved from www.capda.ca.Google Scholar
CPA. (2017, February 1). CPA publications. Retrieved from https://cpa.ca/thecpastore/purchasecpapublications/.Google Scholar
Cattell, J. McK. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, 15(59), 373–381.Google Scholar
Chapman, P. B. (1988). Schools as sorters: Lewis M. Terman, applied psychology, and the intelligence testing movement, 1890–1917. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cizek, G J., Rosenberg, S. L., & Koons, H. H. (2008). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, R. H. (1986). Personality assessment and Native Americans. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(3), 480–500.Google Scholar
Darou, W. G. (1992). Native Canadians and intelligence testing. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 26, 96-99.Google Scholar
DuBois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Elosua, P. & Iliescu, D. (2012). Tests in Europe: Where we are and where we should go. International Journal of Testing, 12(2), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibby, R. E. & Zickar, M. J. (2008). A history of the early days of personality testing in American industry: An obsession with adjustment. History of Psychology, 11(3), 164–184.Google Scholar
Glennon, J. R. (1965). Test review of the Humm-Wadsworth Temperament Scale. In Buros, O. K. (ed.), The sixth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 251–252). Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, H. H. (1908). The Binet and Simon tests of intellectual capacity. The Training School Bulletin, 5(10), 3–9.Google Scholar
Hakel, M. D. (2000). Dr. G. Frederic Kuder 1903–2000. Personnel Psychology, 53(2), 273–274.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. C. (1987). Edward Kellog Strong, Jr.: First author of the strong interest inventory. Journal of Counseling & Development, 66(3), 119–125.Google Scholar
Hathaway, S. R. & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Helmes, E., Holden, R. R., & Ziegler, M. (2015). Response bias, malingering, and impression management. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H., & Matthews, G. (eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 16–43). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Huey, E. B. (1910). The Binet scale for measuring intelligence and retardation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(8), 435–444.Google Scholar
Keane, T. M., Malloy, P. F., & Fairbank, J. A. (1984). Empirical development of an MMPI subscale for the assessment of combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52(5), 888–891.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, F. (1911). Binet and Simon’s system for measuring the intelligence of children. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 11, 79–92.Google Scholar
Lawrence, I. M., Rigol, G. W., Van Essen, T., & Jackson, C. A. (2003). A historical perspective on the content of the SAT. College Board Research Report No. 2003-3.Google Scholar
Lemann, N. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27–66.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1968 ). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Oxford: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
MacAndrew, C. (1965). The differentiation of male alcoholic outpatients from non-alcoholic psychiatric outpatients by means of the MMPI. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 26(2), 238–246.Google Scholar
Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure: A method of personality investigation. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, G. J. & Archer, R. P. (2001). The hard science of Rorschach research: What do we know and where do we go? Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 486-502.Google Scholar
Murray, H. A. & the staff of the Harvard Psychological Clinic. (1943). Thematic apperception test: Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oakland, T., Douglas, S., & Kane, H. (2016). Top ten standardized tests used internationally with children and youth by school psychologists in 64 countries: A 24-year follow-up study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(2), 166–176.Google Scholar
Papurt, M. (1930). A study of the Woodworth Psychoneurotic Inventory with suggested revision. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25(3), 335–352.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. (1925). Early conceptions and tests of intelligence. Yonkers, NY: World Book.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, G. & Crabtree, S. (2013, December 16). Worldwide, median household income about $10,000. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/166211/worldwide-median-household-income-000.aspx.Google Scholar
Pintner, R. & Paterson, D. G. (1915). The Binet scale and the deaf child. Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(4), 201–210.Google Scholar
Pintner, R., & Paterson, D. G. (1917). A scale of performance tests. New York, NY: Appleton.Google Scholar
Public Service Commission of Canada. (2020, June). Public Service Commission. Retrieved from www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission.html.Google Scholar
Public Service Commission of Canada. (2019, July). Appointment Policy. www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/appointment-framework/appointment-policy.html.Google Scholar
Public Service Commission of Canada. (2007, September). Standards for the Development and Use of Tests for Appointment Purposes. www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/public-service-hiring-guides/testing-public-service-canada.html#toc3.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Howard Andrew Knox: Pioneer of intelligence testing at Ellis Island. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Saxton, J. D. (2001). An introduction to cultural issues relevant to assessment with Native American youth. The California School Psychologist, 6, 31–38.Google Scholar
Schlueter, J., Carlson, J. F., Geisinger, K. F., & Murphy, L. L. (eds.). (2013). Pruebas publicadas en Español [Tests published in Spanish]: An index of Spanish tests in print. Lincoln, NE: Buros Center for Testing.Google Scholar
Skadeland, D. R. (1986). Bruno Klopfer: A Rorschach pioneer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(3), 358–361.Google Scholar
Strong, E. K. Jr. (1943). Vocational interests of men and women. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. & Merrill, M. A. (1937). Revised Stanford–Binet scale. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. & Merrill, M. A. (1960). Stanford–Binet intelligence scale: Manual for the third revision, form L-M. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1904). An introduction to the theory of mental and social measurements. New York: Science Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its use. Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227–235.Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. M. & Lohman, D. F. (1990). A century of ability testing. Chicago, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38, 175–197.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1935). The vectors of the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric monographs, No. 1.Google Scholar
Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. (1978). Federal Register, 43(166), 38296-38309.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Weiner, I. B. (2013). Assessment of personality and psychopathology with performance-based measures. In Geisinger, K. F. (ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology: Vol. 2. Testing and assessment in clinical and counseling psychology (pp. 153–170). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. (1910). Racial differences in mental traits. Science, 31(788), 171–186.Google Scholar
Wright, C. V., Beattie, S. G., Galper, D. I., Sawaqdeh Church, A., Bufka, L. F., Brabender, V. M., & Smith, B. L. (2017). Assessment practices of professional psychologists: Results of a national survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48(2), 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoakum, C. S. & Yerkes, R. M. (1920). Army mental tests. New York: H. Holt.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×