Complementarity and the construction of national ability

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316134115.044

33 - Complementarity and the construction of national ability

from PART VI - Complementarity in practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2014

Morten Bergsmo ,

Olympia Bekou and

Annika Jones

Edited by

Carsten Stahn and

Mohamed M. El Zeidy

Show author details

Carsten Stahn: Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Mohamed M. El Zeidy: Affiliation:
International Criminal Court

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter considers the emphasis of the Rome Statute on the capacity of national institutions to investigate and prosecute international crimes, and its significance under the International Criminal Court (‘ICC's’) complementarity regime. In light of the importance placed on national ability under the Rome Statute, the chapter highlights difficulties national institutions may face in investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating core international crimes. The chapter goes on to introduce the Legal Tools platform which criminal justice institutions may draw on in the processing of international crimes. The ICC's Legal Tools, it concludes, make an effective infrastructure contribution to the construction of national ability and, by that, help states to fulfil their role under the ICC's complementarity regime.

Introduction

The ability of national institutions to seek justice for the commission of core international crimes is central to the regime created by the International Criminal Court (‘ICC’) that aims to put an end to impunity for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The institutional design of the ICC confirms that states have priority in the investigation and prosecution of international crimes. It is grounded in the idea that states will share the burden of establishing accountability for cases arising from the commission of mass atrocities. However, the complex nature of the process of criminal justice for atrocities, the resources and expertise required for the investigation and prosecution of international crimes and the relative incapacity of national justice institutions may prevent states from fulfilling the role they have pursuant to the Rome Statute.

Type: Chapter
Information: The International Criminal Court and Complementarity
From Theory to Practice
, pp. 1052 - 1070

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316134115.044 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Lee, R. S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (1999), 41

Bassiouni, M. C., ‘Where is the ICC Heading?’ (2006) 4 JICJ 421, 422Google Scholar

Turner, J., ‘Nationalizing International Criminal Law’ (2005) 41 Stan. J. Int'l L. 1, 3Google Scholar

Neuner, M. (ed.), National Legislation Incorporating International Crimes: Approaches of Civil and Common Law Countries (2003), 257

Schabas, W. A., ‘“Complementarity in Practice”: Some Uncomplimentary Thoughts’ (2008) 19(5) Crim. L.F. 33Google Scholar

Kleffner, J. and Kor, G. (eds.) Complementary Views on Complementarity – Proceedings of the International Roundtable on the Complementary Nature of the International Criminal Court (2006), 79–104

Slaughter, A.-M. and Burke-White, W., ‘The Future of International Law is Domestic (or, the European Way of Law)’, (2006) 47 Harv. Int'l L.J. 327, 341Google Scholar

Bekou, O. and Cryer, R., ‘The International Criminal Court and Universal Jurisdiction: A Close Encounter?’, (2007) 56 ICLQ 49, 63CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, S. A., ‘The Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court: From 1947–2000 and Beyond’, (2000) 38 Osgoode Hall L. J. 297Google Scholar

Stahn, C., ‘The Geometry of Transitional Justice: Choices of Institutional Design’, (2005) 18 LJIL 425, 449CrossRef Google Scholar

Romano, C. P. R., ‘The Price of International Justice’, (2005)

Wippman, D., ‘The Costs of International Justice’, (2006)

Romano, C., Nollkaemper, A. and Kleffner, J. (eds.), Internationalized Criminal Courts and Tribunals: Sierra Leone, East Timor and Cambodia (2004), 272

Drumbl, M., Atrocity, Punishment and International Law (2007), 148

Sriram, C. L., ‘Revolutions in Accountability: New Approaches to Past Abuses’ (2003) 19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 301, 383Google Scholar

Stromseth, J. E., ‘Pursuing Accountability for Atrocities After Conflict: What Impact on Binding the Rule of Law’, (2007) 38 Geo J.Int'l L 251, 260Google Scholar

Cassese, A., ‘On Current Trends towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law’, (1998) 9 EJIL 1, 9CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferdinandusse, W., ‘The Prosecution of Grave Breaches in National Courts’ (2009) JICJ 723, 729–34

Radtke, H., Rössner, D., Schiller, T. and Form, W. (eds.), Historische Dimensionen von Kriegsverbrecherprozessen nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg (2007), 205

Kaufman, Z. and Clark, P. (eds.), After Genocide: Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Reconciliation in Rwanda and Beyond (2008), 357

Straus, S., ‘How Many Perpetrators Were There in the Rwandan Genocide? An Estimate’ (2004) 6(1) Journal of Genocide Research 85CrossRef Google Scholar

Bergsmo, M., Helvig, K., Utmelidze, I. and Žagovec, G., ‘The Backlog of Core International Crimes Case Files in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, (2009) FICHL Publication Series, Number 3,

Bergsmo, M. (ed.), ‘Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crimes Cases’, (2009) FICHL Publication Series, Number 4,

Burke-White, W., ‘Implementing a Policy of Positive Complementarity in the Rome System of Justice’, (2008) 19 Crim. L.F. 59, 62Google Scholar

Burke-White, W., ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome Statute System of International Justice’ (2008) 49 Harv. Int'l L.J. 53Google Scholar

Concannon, B., ‘Beyond Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Prosecutions, A View from Haiti’, (2000) 32 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 201, 234Google Scholar