Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T03:37:41.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 20 - Role of biotechnology in sustainable agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

By
Jarrad R. Prasifka ,
Richard L. Hellmich  and
Michael J. Weiss
Edited by
Edward B. Radcliffe ,
William D. Hutchison  and
Rafael E. Cancelado
Edward B. Radcliffe
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
William D. Hutchison
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A basic concept of sustainable agriculture includes using resources in a way that does not deplete or permanently damage systems used for plant and animal production. In early history, humans survived as hunter–gatherers and perhaps less than 1% of biomass could be used as food (Diamond, 1997). As a result, most resources in the environment were not likely to be used directly by humans. The limited availability of food also restricted population growth, helping to make the hunter–gatherer way of life sustainable. In contrast, domestication of crops and animals for food has greatly increased edible biomass, leading to dramatic population growth and the possibility that production of adequate food will lead to long-term damage to agricultural systems.

The high productivity of twenty-first-century agriculture is the cumulative result of periods of change called agricultural revolutions. Another revolution based on biotechnology is arguably under way. Some have called the biotechnology-based changes in agriculture the “gene revolution” because they follow the green revolution of the twentieth century, during which high-yielding crop varieties and other changes in production were spread to developing nations. The use of biotechnology in agriculture includes well-publicized techniques such as production of genetically modified (GM; alternatively called transgenic or genetically engineered [GE]) plants and animals, but also less controversial techniques (Herdt, 2006). For example, biotechnology may be used to improve or supplement conventional agricultural methods, such as when marker-assisted selection is employed to enhance traditional breeding of crops.

Type
Chapter
Information
Integrated Pest Management
Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies
 , pp. 260 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

,American Society of Agronomy (1989). Decision reached on sustainable ag. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Agronomy News (January).Google Scholar
Ammann, K. (2005). Effects of biotechnology on biodiversity: herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant GM crops. Trends in Biotechnology, 23, 388–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andow, D. A. (2003). UK farm-scale evaluations of transgenic herbicide-tolerant crops. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 1453–1454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, R., Buthelezi, T. J., Ismael, Y. & Morse, S. (2003). Bt cotton, pesticides, labour and health: a case study of smallholder farmers in the Makhathini Flats, Republic of South Africa. Outlook on Agriculture, 32, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R., Morse, S. & Ismael, Y. (2006). The economic impact of genetically modified cotton on South African smallholders: yield, profit and health effects. Journal of Development Studies, 42, 662–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, D. T., May, O. L. & Creech, J. B. (2003). Genetic uniformity of the US upland cotton crop since the introduction of transgenic cottons. Crop Science, 43, 515–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brimner, T. A., Gallivan, G. J. & Stephenson, G. R. (2005). Influence of herbicide-resistant canola on the environmental impact of weed management. Pest Management Science, 61, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brookes, G. & Barfoot, P. (2006). GM crops: the global economic and environmental impact – the first nine years 1996–2004. AgBioForum, 8, 187–196.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J. E. & Gianessi, L. P. (2001). Agricultural Biotechnology: Updated Benefit Estimates. Washington, DC: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Available at www.ncfap.org/reports/biotech/updatedbenefits.pdf.Google Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Miffin.Google Scholar
Casida, J. E. & Quistad, G. B. (1998). Golden age of insecticide research: past, present, or future? Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattaneo, M. G., Yafuso, C., Schmidt, C.et al. (2006). Farm-scale evaluation of the impacts of transgenic cotton on biodiversity, pesticide use, and yield. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103, 7571–7576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, D. E., Freeman, S. N. & Vickery, J. A. (2007). The effects of GMHT crops on bird abundance in arable fields in the UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 118, 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demont, M. & Tollens, E. (2004). First impact of biotechnology in the EU: Bt maize adoption in Spain. Annals of Applied Biology, 145, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, M. D. (2005). Why are there not more herbicide-tolerant crops? Pest Management Science, 61, 312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. M. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Dively, G. P. (2005). Impact of transgenic VIP3A × Cry1Ab lepidopteran-resistant field corn on the nontarget arthropod community. Environmental Entomology, 34, 1267–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, S. O. (2005). Taking stock of herbicide-resistant crops ten years after introduction. Pest Management Science, 61, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Economic Research Service (2002). Adoption of Bioengineered Crops, Agricultural Economic Report No. 810. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer810/aer810.pdf.Google Scholar
,Economic Research Service (2006). Adoption of Genetically-Engineered Crops in the US. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/alltables.xls.Google Scholar
,Environmental Protection Agency (2001). Insect resistance management. In Biopesticides Registration Action Document Bacillus thuringiensis Plant-Incorporated Protectants. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. Available at www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/bt_brad2/4-irm.pdf.Google Scholar
Evans, L. T. (2003). Agricultural intensification and sustainability. Outlook on Agriculture, 32, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Food and Agriculture Organization (1998). Part III: Rural non-farm income in developing countries. In The State of Food and Agriculture 1998, FaO Agriculture Series no. 31, pp. 227–248. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Falck-Zepeda, J. B., Traxler, G. & Nelson, R. G. (2000). Surplus distribution from the introduction of a biotechnology innovation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firbank, L. G., Heard, M. S., Woiwod, I. P.et al. (2003). An introduction to the farm-scale evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaba, V., Zelcer, A. & Gal-On, A. (2004). Cucurbit biotechnology: the importance of virus resistance. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant, 40, 346–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatch, E.W. & Munkvold, G.P. (2002). Fungal species composition in maize stalks in relation to European corn borer injury and transgenic insect protection. Plant Disease, 86, 1156–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gepts, P. & Papa, R. (2003). Possible effects of trans(gene) flow from crops to the genetic diversity from landraces and wild relatives. Environmental Biosafety Research, 2, 89–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonsalves, C., Lee, D. R. & Gonsalves, D. (2007). The adoption of genetically modified papaya in Hawaii and its implications for developing countries. Journal of Development Studies, 43, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatherly, L. G., Elmore, C. D. & Spurlock, S. R. (2002). Weed management systems for conventional and glyphosate-resistant soybean with and without irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 94, 1419–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellmich, R. L., Siegfried, B. D., Sears, M. K.et al. (2001). Monarch larvae sensitivity to Bacillus thuringiensis-purified proteins and pollen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 98, 11 925–11 930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herdt, R. W. (2006). Biotechnology in agriculture. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 31, 265–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbeck, A., Baumgartner, M., Fried, P. M. & Bigler, F. (1998). Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environmental Entomology, 27, 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J. K., Hu, R. F., Rozelle, S. & Pray, C. (2005). Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers' fields: assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science, 308, 688–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C. (2006). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2006, ISAAA Brief No. 35. Ithaca, NY: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications.Google Scholar
Kambhampati, U., Morse, S., Bennett, R. & Ismael, Y. (2006). Farm-level performance of genetically modified cotton: A frontier analysis of cotton production in Maharashtra. Outlook on Agriculture, 35, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kniss, A. R., Wilson, R. G., Martin, A. R., Burgener, P. A. & Feuz, D. M. (2004). Economic evaluation of glyphosate-resistant and conventional sugar beet. Weed Technology, 18, 388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, O. G. G., Constable, G. A., Pyke, B. & Gupta, V. V. S. R. (2006). Environmental impact of conventional and Bt insecticidal cotton expressing one and two Cry genes in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57, 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, E., Oloumi-Sadeghi, H. & Fisher, J.R. (1992). Discovery of multiyear diapause in Illinois and South Dakota northern corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) eggs and incidence of the prolonged diapause trait in Illinois. Journal of Economic Entomology, 85, 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobao, L. & Meyer, K. (2001). The great agricultural transition: crisis, change, and social consequences of twentieth century US farming. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losey, J. E., Rayor, L. S. & Carter, M. E. (1999). Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature, 399, 214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyson, T. A. (2002). Advanced agricultural biotechnologies and sustainable agriculture. Trends in Biotechnology, 20, 193–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyson, T. A. & Welsh, R. (2005). Agricultural industrialization, anticorporate farming laws, and rural community welfare. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1479–1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, S., Bennett, R. & Ismael, Y. (2006). Environmental impact of genetically modified cotton in South Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 117, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naranjo, S. E. (2005). Long-term assessment of the effects of transgenic Bt cotton on the function of the natural enemy community. Environmental Entomology, 34, 1211–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, M. D. K. & Zelaya, I. A. (2005). Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Management Science, 61, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pingali, P. & Raney, T. (2005). From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution: How Will The Poor Fare?, ESA Working Paper No. 05–09. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/af276e/af276e00.pdf.Google Scholar
Prasifka, J. R., Heinz, K. M. & Minzenmayer, R. R. (2004a). Relationships of landscape, prey and agronomic variables to the abundance of generalist predators in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fields. Landscape Ecology, 19, 709–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasifka, J. R., Heinz, K. M. & Winemiller, K. O. (2004b). Crop colonization, feeding, and reproduction by the predatory beetle, Hippodamia convergens, as indicated by stable carbon isotope analysis. Ecological Entomology, 29, 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pray, C. E., Huang, J., Hu, R. & Rozelle, S. (2002). Five years of Bt cotton in China: the benefits continue. Plant Journal, 31, 423–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qaim, M. & Janvry, A. (2005). Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qaim, M. & Traxler, G. (2005). Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agricultural Economics, 32, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. E. (2004). Transgenic rootworm corn: assessing potential agronomic, economic, and environmental benefits. Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-2004–0301-01-RV, available at www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/php/review/2004/rootworm/.Google Scholar
Romeis, J., Dutton, A. & Bigler, F. (2004). Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) has no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 50, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondon, S. I. & Gray, M. E. (2004). Ovarian development and ovipositional preference of the western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) variant in East Central Illinois. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 390–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandermann, H. (2006). Plant biotechnology: ecological case studies on herbicide resistance. Trends in Plant Science, 11, 324–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sankula, S. (2006). A 2006 Update of Impacts on US Agriculture of Biotechnology-Derived Crops Planted in 2005: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Available at www.ncfap.org/whatwedo/pdf/2005biotechExecSummary.pdf/.Google Scholar
Schaller, N. (1993). The concept of agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 46, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, A. M., Zhao, J. Z. & Roush, R. T. (2002). Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants. Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 845–881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sneller, C. H. (2003). Impact of transgenic genotypes and subdivision on diversity within elite North American soybean germplasm. Crop Science, 43, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, A. J., Sachdev, H. P. S. & Qaim, M. (2006). Potential impact and cost-effectiveness of Golden Rice. Nature Biotechnology, 24, 1200–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stringam, G. R., Ripley, V. L., Love, H. K. & Mitchell, A. (2003). Transgenic herbicide tolerant canola: the Canadian experience. Crop Science, 43, 1590–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabashnik, B. E., Carrière, Y., Dennehy, T. J.et al. (2003). Insect resistance to transgenic Bt crops: lessons from the laboratory and field. Journal of Economic Entomology, 96, 1031–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabashnik, B. E., Dennehy, T. J. & Carrière, Y. (2005). Delayed resistance to transgenic cotton in pink bollworm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 15 389–15 393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres, J. B. & Ruberson, J. R. (2005). Canopy- and ground-dwelling predatory arthropods in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields: patterns and mechanisms. Environmental Entomology, 34, 1242–1256.Google Scholar
Traxler, G., Godoy-Avila, S., Falck-Zepeda, J. & Espinoza-Arellano, J. (2003). Transgenic cotton in Mexico: a case study of the Comarca Lagunera. In The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: a Global Perspective, ed. Kalaitzandonakes, N., pp. 183–202. Norwell, MA: Kluwer-Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, K., Mu, W., Liang, G. & Guo, Y. (2005). Regional reversion of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is associated with the use of Bt cotton in northern China. Pest Management Science, 61, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, P. Y., Li, K. W., Shi, S. B.et al. (2005). Impacts of transgenic Bt cotton and integrated pest management education on smallholder cotton farmers. International Journal of Pest Management, 51, 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yorobe, J. M. & Quicoy, C. B. (2006). Economic impact of Bt corn in the Philippines. Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 89, 258–267.Google Scholar
Young, B. G. (2006). Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technology, 20, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., Cao, J., Li, Y.et al. (2003). Transgenic plants expressing two Bacillus thuringiensis toxins delay insect resistance evolution. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 1493–1497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×