Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T06:05:51.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 39 - From IPM to organic and sustainable agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

By
John Aselage  and
Donn T. Johnson
Edited by
Edward B. Radcliffe ,
William D. Hutchison  and
Rafael E. Cancelado
Edward B. Radcliffe
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
William D. Hutchison
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

Agricultural production is moving from less to more sustainable practices. This is a response to changing cultural values that promote environmental stewardship and ensure a healthy planet for future generations. Producers supply and consumers demand a product that is economical and uncomplicated. Consequently, most agriculture is a monoculture, an oversimplified system where crops grow in neat rows with little genetic diversity. This structure invites pest and disease problems and urges over-reliance on synthetic pesticides. IPM, then, is an essential tool in reducing dependence on pesticides because IPM balances economic and environmental interests through biological and chemical controls (see Chapter 1). Pesticide-treated products and industrially driven systems are now less appealing because of greater attention paid to food quality and agricultural practices, a fact underscored by the 20% annual increase in organic food consumption in comparison to a 2% to 3% increase for industrially produced foods (US Department of Agriculture, 2005, 2007; National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2006). This rising public awareness makes organic and sustainable agriculture increasingly attractive, challenging existing IPM methods to bridge our desire to grow crops outside their natural habitats and our want of a healthier environment.

Definitions

Comprehensible definitions for the terms organic and sustainable were in order given the host of organizations actively concentrating agricultural, academic and marketing efforts in these areas. In 1990, the US Farm Bill and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) through the National Organic Program (NOP) defined organic production as a “system that is managed in accordance with the Act and regulations in this part to respond to site-specific conditions by integrating cultural, biological and mechanical practices that foster cycling of resources, promote ecological balance and conserve biodiversity” (US Congress, 1990; Pollack & Lynch, 1991).

Type
Chapter
Information
Integrated Pest Management
Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies
 , pp. 489 - 505
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alston, D., Murray, M. & Reding, M. (2006). Codling Moth (Cydia pomonella), Utah Pest Fact Sheet No. 200ENT-13-06 6. Logan, UT: Utah State University Extension and Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Laboratory. Available at http://extension.usu.edu/files/publications/factsheet/ENT-13-06.pdf.Google Scholar
Altieri, M. A. & Nicholls, C. I. (1995). Biodiversity and Pest Management in Agroecosystems. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Aselage, J. M. (2002). Orchard Management Practices for Apple, Technical Consultancy Report No. IND078. Little Rock, AR: Winrock International.Google Scholar
Arthurs, S. P., Lacey, L. A. & Miliczkya, E. R. (2007). Evaluation of the codling moth granulovirus and spinosad for codling moth control and impact on non-target species in pear orchards. Biological Control, 41, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beers, E. H., Brunner, J. F., Willett, M. J. & Warner, G. M. (1993). Orchard Pest Management. Yakima, WA: Good Fruit Grower.Google Scholar
Bret, B. L., Larson, L. L., Schoonover, J. R., Sparks, T. C. & Thompson, G. D. (1997). Biological properties of spinosad. Down to Earth, 52, 6–13.Google Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Dimitri, C. & Greene, C. (2002). Recent Growth Patterns in the U.S. Organic Foods Market, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 777. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Market and Trade Economics Division and Resource Economics Division.Google Scholar
,Dow (1997). Spinosad Technical Bulletin. Indianapolis, IN: Dow AgroSciences.Google Scholar
Earles, R., Ames, G., Balasubrahmanyam, R. & Born, H. (1999). Organic and Low-Spray Apple Production Horticulture Production Guide, NCAT ATTRA Publication No. IP020. Layetteville, AR: National Center for Alternative Agriculture, Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas.Google Scholar
Eberle, K. E. & Jehle, J. A. (2006). Field resistance of codling moth against Cydia pomonella granulovirus (CpGV) is autosomal and incompletely dominant inherited. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 93, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, C. A., Poincelot, R. P. & Bird, G. W. (2006). Developing and Extending Sustainable Agriculture: A New Social Contract. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, M. E., Berkett, L. P. & Bradshaw, T. (2003). Does Surround have non-target impacts on New England Orchards?Proceedings of New England Fruit Meetings 2002–2003. Available at www.massfruitgrowers.org/nefrtmtg/proc-2002-03/a03.pdf.Google Scholar
Glen, D. M. & Payne, C. C. (1984). Production and field-evaluation of codling moth granulosis virus for control of Cydia pomonella in the United Kingdom. Annals of Applied Biology, 104, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granatstein, D., Kirby, E. & Feise, C. (2005). Trends of organic tree fruit production in Washington State. Proceedings of the 3rd National Organic Tree Fruit Research Symposium June 6–8, Chelan, WA. Available at http://organic.tfrec.wsu.edu/OrganicIFP/OrganicFruitProduction/PROCEED.FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Herrmann, R. O., Warland, R. H. & Sterngold, A. (1997). Who reacts to food safety scares? Examining the Alar crisis. Agribusiness, 13, 511–520.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (2005). Norms for Organic Production and Processing: IFOAM Basic Standards. Bonn, Germany: IFOAM. Available at hwww.ifoam.org/.Google Scholar
Jaynes, H. A.Marucci, P. F. (1947). Effect of artificial control practices on the parasites and predators of the codling moth. Journal of Economic Entomology, 40, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. T., Lewis, , Striegler, R. K, B. A.et al. (2002a). Development and implementation of a peach integrated pest management program in the southern USA. ActaHort, 592, 681–688.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. T., Mulder, P. G., McCraw, D.et al. (2002b). Trapping plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in the Southern USA. Environmental Entomology, 31, 1259–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C, Degni, J.Tette, J. (1992). A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York Food and Life Sciences Bulletin No., 139. Geneva, NY: Cornell University New York State Agricultural Experiment Station. Available at http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/5203/.Google Scholar
Krawczyk, G. (2006). Insect management in organic apple orchard. Presentation at Pennsylvania Association for Sustainable Agriculture, Science-Based Organic Apple Production, July 12. Biglerville, PA: Pennsylvania State Fruit Center. Available at www.cas.psu.edu/docs/CASDEPT/plant/EXTENSION/FRUITPATH/FIELD_DAY/field%20day%202006/397,1,Slide 1.Google Scholar
Lecos, C. (1989). Alar use on apples. Food and Drug Administration P89–12 News Release March 16, 1989. Available at www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/NEW00128.html.
Lehnert, D. (2005). Growing apples organically in Michigan: researchers are figuring out how it can be done. Good Fruit Grower 56(5). Available at www.goodfruit.com/issues.php?article=763&issue=26.Google Scholar
Liebig, J. (1872). Chemistry in the Application to Agriculture and Physiology. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Mader, P., Fliebbach, A., Dubois, D.et al. (2002). Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science, 296, 1694–1697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansour, M. & Fater, M. (2001). Mating disruption for codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), control in Syrian apple orchards. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 70, 151–163.Google Scholar
Miles, M. (2003). The effects of spinosad, a naturally derived insect control agent to the honeybee. Bulletin of Insectology, 56, 119–124.Google Scholar
Mills, N. (2005). Selecting effective parasitoids for biological control introductions: codling moth as a case study. Biological Control, 34, 274–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minarro, M. & Dapena, E. (2000). Control de Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) con granulovirus y confusión sexual en plantaciones de manzano de Asturias. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal, Plagas, 26, 305–316.Google Scholar
,National Agricultural Statistics Service (2006). Agricultural Statistics Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/ Data/Organic/Data/Certified %20and%20total%20US%20acreage%20selected%20crops%20livestock%2095-05.xls.Google Scholar
,National Organic Standards Board (2007). Principles of Organic Production and Handling: National Organic Standards Board Policy and Procedures Manual Section VII. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Available at www.ams.usda.gov/nosb/BoardPolicyManual/BoardPolicyManual8-23-05.pdf.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (1993). Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Committee on Pesticide, Board on Agriculture and Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology Commission on Life Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available at http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309048753.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (1996). Ecologically-Based Pest Management: New Solutions for a New Century. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Board on Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Olszak, R. W. & Pluciennik, Z. (1999). Leafroller (Tortricidae) and fruit moth (Laspeyresia funebrana and Cydia pomonella) control with modern insecticides. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pests in Agriculture, Montpellier, France, December 7–9, Part 2, 311–318.Google Scholar
Pepperl, R. (2007). Stemilt transitions peaches, nectarines and other summer fruits to an all-organic crop. FreshPlaza.com Newsletter 13, April 2007. Available at www.freshplaza.com/news_detail.asp?id=124.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. K. D. (2005). Comparing ecological risks of pesticides: the utility of a Risk Quotient ranking approach across refinements of exposure. Pest Management Science, 62, 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirog, R. & Pelt, T. (2002). How far do your fruit and vegetables travel?Leopold Letter, 14 (1), Spring. Available at www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/other/files/food_chart.pdf.Google Scholar
Polesny, F., Muller, W., Polesny, F., Verheyden, C. & Webster, A. D. (2000). Integrated control of codling moth (Cydia pomonella) in Austria. Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Fruit Production, Leuven, Belgium, July 27--August 1, 1998. ActaHort, 525, 285–290.Google Scholar
Pollack, S. L. & Lynch, L. (1991). Provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 624. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Jácome, I., Gray, E.et al. (2004). Establishing characteristics of odor-baited trap trees for monitoring plum curculio. University of Massachusetts Fruit Notes Fruit Notes, 69 (Winter), 9–13.Google Scholar
Quarles, W. (2000). Mating disruption success in codling moth IPM. IPM Practitioner, 22(5/6), 1–12.Google Scholar
Rashid, T., Johnson, D. T., Steinkraus, D. C. & Rom, C. R. (2001). Effects of microbial, botanical and synthetic insecticides on “Red Delicious” apple arthropods in Arkansas. HortTech, 11, 615–621.Google Scholar
Robinson, T., Schupp, J., Merwin, I.et al. (2002). A Commercial Organic Apple Production System for New York. Progress Report. Ithaca, NY: Toward Sustainability Foundation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Shapiro-Ilan, D. I., Mizell, R. F., Cottrell, T. E. & Horton, D. L. (2004). Measuring field efficacy of Steinernema feltiae and Steinernema riobrave for suppression of plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar, larvae. Biological Control, 30, 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, S., Corroyer, N., Getti, F. X.et al. (1999). Organic farming: optimization of techniques. [Agriculture biologique: optimisation des techniques.] Arboriculture Fruitière, 533, 27–32.Google Scholar
Smith, T. J. (2001). Crop Profile for Apples in Washington, Publication No. MISC0368E. Seattle, WA: Washington State University Cooperative Extension and US Department of Agriculture. Available at www.tricity.wsu.edu/∼cdaniels/profiles/apple.pdf.
Steiner, R. (1993). The Spiritual Foundations for the Renewal of Agriculture: A Course of Lectures, ed. Gardner, M.. Kimberton, PA: Bio Dynamic Farming and Gardening Association.Google Scholar
Steiner, R. (2004). Agricultural Course, The Birth of the Biodynamic Method, transl. Adams, George. Glasgow, UK: Rudolf Steiner Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, R. (2005). What Is Biodynamics? A Way to Heal and Revitalize the Earth. Great Barrington, MA: Steiner Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. D., Dutton, R. & Sparks, T. C. (2000). Spinosad: a case study – an example from a natural products discovery programme. Pest Management Science, 56, 696–702.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,US Congress (1990). Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act. Public Law 101–624. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib624/aib624.pdf.Google Scholar
,US Congress (1996). Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–170). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Available at www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/laws/fqpa/gpogate.pdf.Google Scholar
,US Department of Agriculture (2005). US Market Profile for Organic Food Products. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, Commodity and Marketing Programs, Processed Products Division, International Strategic Marketing Group. Available at www.fas.usda.gov/agx/organics/USMarketProfileOrganicFoodFeb2005.pdf.Google Scholar
,US Department of Agriculture (2007). Organic Agriculture: Consumer Demand Continues to Expand. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Organic/Demand.htm.Google Scholar
Warner, G. (2007). Food miles gain traction. The Good Fruit Grower, 58 (13). Available at www.goodfruit.com/issues.php?article=1700&issue=63.Google Scholar
Whalon, M. E., Coombs, A. B. & Nortman, D. (2005). An attract and kill strategy for plum curculio in Michigan tree fruit. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of America Annual Meeting, Fort Lauderdale, FL, December 18, 2005 (abstract). Available at http://esa.confex.com/esa/2005/techprogram/paper_22927.htm.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, T. & Minx, J. (2007). A Definition of “Carbon Footprint,” Integrated Sustainability Analysis UK (ISAUK) Report No. 07–01. Available at www.isa- research.co.uk/docs/ISA-UK_Report_07–01_carbon_ footprint.pdf.
Wright, S., Fleury, R.Mittenthal, R. & Prokopy, R. (2000). Small-plot trials of SurroundTM and ActaraTM for control of common insect pests of apples. University of Massachusetts Fruit Notes, 65, 22–27. Available at www.umass.edu/fruitadvisor/fruitnotes/FNarticle65–06.pdf.Google Scholar
Zehnder, G., Gurr, G. M., Kühne, S.et al. (2007). Arthropod pest management in organic crops. Annual Review of Entomology, 52, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×