Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:28:56.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Institutional Theory and World Society (2009)

from Part IV - Institutions of Modernity and Postmodernity: The Construction of Actors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2021

Ronald L. Jepperson  and
John W. Meyer
By
J. Meyer
Ronald L. Jepperson
Affiliation:
University of Tulsa
John W. Meyer
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Reflections on how sociological neoinstitutionalism has been used to understand the rise, nature, and impact of the modern world order as itself a society. Discussion of globalization, and large-scale social change, from this perspective. Includes a discussion of Anglo-European modernity as a quasi-religious system.

Keywords

institutional theoryworld societyactorsactorhoodotherhoodcosmologyreligion
Type
Chapter
Information
Institutional Theory
The Cultural Construction of Organizations, States, and Identities
 , pp. 243 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu Sharkh, M. (2002). History and Results of Labor Standard Initiatives. PhD dissertation, Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bendor, J., Moe, T. M., & Shotts, K. W.. (2001). Recycling the Garbage Can: An Assessment of the Research Program. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 169–90.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., Berger, B., & Kellner, H.. (1974). The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness, New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T.. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality, New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Berkovitch, N. (1999). From Motherhood to Citizenship, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Berkovitch, N. & Thomas, G.. (1999). Constructing World Culture: International Non-Governmental Organizations Since 1875, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bongaarts, J. & Watkins, S. C.. (1996). Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 639–82.Google Scholar
Boyle, E. H. (2002). Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. & Ramirez, F.. (1996). World Polity and Gender Parity: Women’s Share of Higher Education, 1965–1985. In Pallas, A. M., ed., Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, Vol. XI. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 63–91.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. (1985). The Irrational Organization, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. (1989). The Organization of Hypocrisy, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. (2006). Mechanisms of Hope: Maintaining the Dream of the Rational Organization, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. & Olsen, J. P.. (1993). The Reforming Organization, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bull, H. & Watson, A., eds. (1984). The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camic, C. (1986). The Matter of Habit. American Journal of Sociology, 91(5), 1039–87.Google Scholar
Cole, W. (2005). Sovereignty Relinquished? Explaining Commitment to the International Human Rights Covenants, 1966–1999. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 472–95.Google Scholar
Collins, R. (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J.. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1986). Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1309–35.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G., eds. (1996). Translating Organizational Change, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dalton, M. (1959). Men Who Manage, New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In Zucker, L., ed., Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. W.. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djelic, M. & Sahlin-Andersson, K., eds. (2006). Transnational Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F. & Sutton, J. R.. (1998). The Strength of a Weak State: The Employment Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 441–76.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., Sutton, J. R., Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R.. (1993). Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets. American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 396–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drori, G. S. & Meyer, J. W.. (2006). Scientization: Making a World Safe for Organizing. In Djelic, M. & Sahlin-Andersson, K., eds., Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H., eds. (2006). Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E.. (2003). Science in the Modern World Polity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Drori, G. S. & Moon, H.. (2006). The Changing Nature of Tertiary Education: Cross-National Trends in Disciplinary Enrollment, 1965–1995. In Baker, D. P. & Wiseman, A. W., eds., The Impact of Comparative Education Research on Institutional Theory. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Edelman, L. (1992). Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1531–76.Google Scholar
Edelman, L., Uggen, C., & Erlanger, H. S.. (1999). The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 406–54.Google Scholar
Finnemore, M. (1993). International Organizations as Teachers of Norms. International Organization, 47(4), 565–97.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P., eds, The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87-104.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences, New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Frank, D. J. & Gabler, J.. (2006). Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Changes in Academic Emphases over the 20th Century, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E.. (2000). The Nation-State and the Natural Environment Over the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 96–116.Google Scholar
Frank, D. J. & McEneaney, E.. (1999). The Individualization of Society and the Liberalization of State Policies on Same-Sex Sexual Relations, 1984–1995. Social Forces, 77(3), 911–44.Google Scholar
Frank, D. J. & Meyer, J. W.. (2007). University Expansion and the Knowledge Society. Theory and Society, 36(4), 287–311.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, P. (1992). Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. & Tsutsui, K.. (2005). Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1373–411.Google Scholar
Hasse, R. & Kruecken, G.. (2005). Neo-Institutionalismus. Rev. ed. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. A. (2002). Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal, 111(8), 1935–2042.Google Scholar
Heintz, P. (1972). A Macrosociological Theory of Societal Systems: With Special Reference to the International System, Bern: Hans Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. (1997). Sociology Without Social Structure: Neoinstitutional Theory Meets Brave New World. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1702–23.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. & Lounsbury, M.. (1997). Ending the Family Quarrel: Toward a Reconciliation of “Old” and “New” Institutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 406–18.Google Scholar
Hwang, H. (2006). Planning Development: Globalization and the Shifting Locus of Planning. In Drori, G., Meyer, J., & Hwang, H., eds., Globalization and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepperson, R. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J., eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 143-63.Google Scholar
Jepperson, R. (2002). The Development and Application of Sociological Neo-Institutionalism. In Berger, J. & Zelditch, M., Jr., eds., New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 229-66.Google Scholar
Jepperson, R. & Meyer, J. W.. (2007). Analytical Individualism and the Explanation of Macrosocial Change. In Nee, V. & Swedberg, R., eds., On Capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 273-304.Google Scholar
Jepperson, R. & Swidler, A.. (1993–4). What Properties of Culture Should We Measure? Poetics, 22(4), 359–71.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J., ed. (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. & Macpherson, J. M.. (2004). The Decision to Privatize as an Economic Policy Idea: Epistemic Communities, Palace Wars, and Diffusion. Fontainebleau: INSEAD, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D., ed. (1983). International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1975). Die Weltgesellschaft. In Luhmann, N., Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie Sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1986). The Sources of Social Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeely, C. L. (1995). Constructing the Nation-State: International Organization and Prescriptive Action, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. (1988). Society Without Culture: A Nineteenth Century Legacy. In Ramirez, F., ed., Rethinking the Nineteenth Century. New York, NY: Greenwood, pp. 193–201.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. (1999). The Changing Cultural Content of the Nation-State: A World Society Perspective. In Steinmetz, G., ed., State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 123–43.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. (2008). Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., & Sahlin, K., eds., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 790–812.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F., & Soysal, Y.. (1992). World Expansion of Mass Education, 1870–1970. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 128–49.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B.. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–63.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. & Jepperson, R.. (2000). The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–20.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M. S. & Fein, L. C.. (1999). The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 653–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizruchi, M. S., Stearns, L. B., & Marquis, C.. (2006). The Conditional Nature of Embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 310–33.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1992). The Lever of Riches, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moon, H. & Wotipka, C. M.. (2006). The World-Wide Diffusion of Business Education, 1881–1999. In Drori, G., Meyer, J., & Hwang, H., eds., Globalization and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–36.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History, New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
North, D. C. & Thomas, R. P.. (1973). The Rise of the Western World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. M., eds. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ramirez, F. O., Soysal, Y., & Shanahan, S.. (1998). The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women’s Suffrage. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 735–45.Google Scholar
Ramirez, F. O. & Wotipka, C. M.. (2001). Slowly but Surely? The Global Expansion of Women’s Participation in Science and Engineering Fields of Study, 1972–92. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 231–51.Google Scholar
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rose, N. & Miller, P.. (1992). Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.Google Scholar
Sahlin-Andersson, K. & Engwall, L., eds. (2002). The Expansion of Management Knowledge, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schofer, E. & Meyer, J. W.. (2005). The World-Wide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2006). Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory. Theory and Society, Forthcoming. Stanford, CA: Dept. of Sociology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Soysal, Y. (1994). Limits of Citizenship, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing Social Theories, New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1997). On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (2001). When Formality Works, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, G., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F., & Boli, J.. (1987). Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. 1836 (1969). Democracy in America. Maier, J. P., ed., trans. G. Lawrence. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1990). Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, K. & Wotipka, C. M.. (2004). Global Civil Society and the International Human Rights Movement. Social Forces, 83(2), 587–620.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1974). Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Vol. I of The Modern World-System. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. (1994). The Social Meaning of Money, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×