Book contents
- The Informal Regulation of Criminal Markets in Latin America
- The Informal Regulation of Criminal Markets in Latin America
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Informal Regulation of Criminal Markets in Latin America
- 2 A Theory of Drug Market Regulation
- 3 Particularistic Confrontation
- 4 Particularistic Negotiation
- 5 Coordinated Protection
- 6 Coordinated Coexistence
- 7 Regulation of Criminal Markets in Weak Institutional Contexts
- Book part
- References
- Index
2 - A Theory of Drug Market Regulation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 August 2022
- The Informal Regulation of Criminal Markets in Latin America
- The Informal Regulation of Criminal Markets in Latin America
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Informal Regulation of Criminal Markets in Latin America
- 2 A Theory of Drug Market Regulation
- 3 Particularistic Confrontation
- 4 Particularistic Negotiation
- 5 Coordinated Protection
- 6 Coordinated Coexistence
- 7 Regulation of Criminal Markets in Weak Institutional Contexts
- Book part
- References
- Index
Summary
This chapter deploys the book’s theoretical framework, which connects political competition, police autonomy and informal regulation of illicit markets. While the electoral costs of police corruption and violence can motivate politicians to reduce police autonomy, political fragmentation and turnover condition whether and how they can achieve this objective. Fragmentation may obstruct policy implementation but also inhibit politicians from centralizing police rent extraction, while turnover impedes sustaining policies that reduce police autonomy over time. Police autonomy will shape how the police regulate drug markets. With greater autonomy police broker particularistic negotiations with, or engage in unbridled violence, or particularistic confrontation, against dealers and traffickers. When politicians reduce police autonomy through politicization, they capture rents from criminal activities and produce coordinated protection rackets, defined by high corruption but also lower violence on both sides. Finally, professionalized police forces regulate drug trafficking through coordinated coexistence regimes, brokering informal agreements that limit violence by both police and criminals.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022