Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:48:02.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

67 - Epigenetics and ART

from PART III - ASSISTED REPRODUCTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

By
Martine De Rycke
Edited by
Botros R. M. B. Rizk ,
Juan A. Garcia-Velasco ,
Hassan N. Sallam  and
Antonis Makrigiannakis
Botros R. M. B. Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Juan A. Garcia-Velasco
Affiliation:
Rey Juan Carlos University School of Medicine,
Hassan N. Sallam
Affiliation:
University of Alexandria School of Medicine
Antonis Makrigiannakis
Affiliation:
University of Crete
Get access

Summary

SAFETY OF ART

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are increasingly used worldwide to overcome infertility problems, and it has been estimated that more than one million children have been born relying on these techniques. ART births now account for 1–3 percent of all births in developed countries. ART have considerably evolved since the beginning, and now they include controlled ovarian stimulation, (immature) gamete retrieval and manipulation, standard in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), (extended) embryo culture, freezing/thawing of embryos, embryo biopsy in cases of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and more recently in vitro maturation of oocytes and techniques of cryopreservation of testicular/ovarian tissues. There has been concern about the health of the children conceived ever since the birth of the first IVF baby in 1978 (1) and certainly after the introduction of the more invasive ICSI procedure in the early 1990s. The safety aspect has been addressed in various epidemiological studies of children conceived by ART as well as experimental studies. The follow-up studies including a review by Rizk et al. of the major congenital anomalies in the first 1,000 babies conceived by IVF have shown that generally ART-conceived children are as healthy as naturally conceived children (1), except that ART may increase the risk of a few outcomes. There is accumulating evidence of an increase in chromosomal abnormalities in ICSI children, as well as evidence for an increase in malformation rate and in the number of singleton children with a low birth weight in the IVF/ICSI population compared to the general population.

Keywords

assisted reproductive technologychromatin structureepigenetic mechanismsepigenetic reprogramminghistone modificationshuman epidemiologicaldatagenomic imprinting
Type
Chapter
Information
Infertility and Assisted Reproduction , pp. 677 - 683
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rizk, B, Doyle, P, Tan, SL et al. Perinatal outcome and congenital malformations in in-vitro fertilization babies from the Bourn-Hallam group. Hum Reprod 1991;6(9):1259–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viewpoints and reviews on epigenetics. Science 2001;293: 1063–103.
Cosgrove, MS, Boeke, JD, Wolberger, C. Regulated nucleosome mobility and the histone code. Struct Mol Biol 2004;11:1037–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, J, Solter, D. Inability of mouse blastomere nuclei transferred to enucleated zygotes to support development in vitro. Science 1984;226:1317–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, SC, Surani, MA, Norris, ML. Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development. Nature 1984;311:374–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattanach, BM, Kirk, M. Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice. Nature 1985;315:496–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horsthemke, B, Buiting, K. Imprinting defects on human chromosome 15. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006;113:292–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weksberg, R, Shuman, C, Smith, AC. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2005;137:12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenisch, R, Bird, A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Gen 2003;33:245–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucifero, D, Chaillet, JR, Trasler, JM. Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:3–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerjean, A, Couvert, P, Heams, T et al. In vitro follicular growth affects oocyte imprinting establishment in mice. Eur J Hum Genet 2003;11:493–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borghol, N, Lornage, J, Blachere, T, Sophie Garret, A, Lefevre, A. Epigenetic status of the H19 locus in human oocytes following in vitro maturation. Genomics 2006;87:417–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khosla, S, Dean, W, Reik, W, Feil, R. Culture of preimplantation embryos and its long-term effects on gene expression and phenotype. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:419–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK, Hewitt, EA, Lane, M. Sequential media used in human IVF do not affect imprinting of the H19 gene in mouse blastocysts. Fertil Steril 2003;80 (Suppl. 3):S256.Google Scholar
Young, , Fernandes, K, McEvoy, TG, Butterwith, SC, Gutierrez, CG, Carolan, C, Broadbent, PJ, Robinson, JJ, Wilmut, I, Sinclair, KD. Epigenetic change in IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth after sheep embryo culture. Nat Genet 2001;27:153–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, GF, Burger, J, Lip, V, Mau, UA, Sperling, K, Wu, BL, Horsthemke, B. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71:162–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orstavik, KH, Eiklid, K, Hagen, CB, Spetalen, S, Kierulf, K, Skjeldal, O, Buiting, K. Another case of imprinting defect in a girl with Angelman syndrome who was conceived by intracytoplasmic semen injection. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:218–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, RM, Williams, CJ. The science of ART. Science 2002;296:2188–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, M, Katalinic, A, Gross, S, Sutcliffe, A, Varon, R, Horsthemke, B. Increased prevalence of imprinting defects in patients with Angelman syndrome born to subfertile couples. J Med Genet 2005;42:289–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeBaun, MR, Niemitz, EL, Feinberg, AP. Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:156–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maher, ER, Brueton, , Bowdin, SC, Luharia, A, Cooper, W, Cole, TR, Macdonald, F, Sampson, JR, Barratt, CL, Reik, W, Hawkins, MM. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (ART). J Med Genet 2003;40:62–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gicquel, C, Gaston, V, Mandelbaum, J, Siffroi, JP, Flahault, A, Bouc, Y. In vitro fertilization may increase the risk of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome related to the abnormal imprinting of the KCN1OT gene. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:1338–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, J, Oke, K, Breheny, S, Algar, E, J Amor, D.Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and IVF: a case-control study. Am J Hum Genet 2004;75:526–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, AS, Moley, KH, Wangler, M, Feinberg, AP, Debaun, MR. Association between Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproductive technology: a case series of 19 patients. Fertil Steril 2005;83:349–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ertzeid, G, Storeng, R. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod 2001;16:221–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, W, Haaf, T. Aberrant methylation patterns at the two-cell stage as an indicator of early developmental failure. Mol Reprod Dev 2002;63:329–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marques, CJ, Carvalho, F, Sousa, M, Barros, A. Genomic imprinting in disruptive spermatogenesis. Lancet 2004;363:1700–02.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gosden, R, Trasler, J, Lucifero, D, Faddy, M. Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology. Lancet 2003;361:1975–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, P, Bunch, KJ, Beral, V, Draper, GJ. Cancer incidence in children conceived with assisted reproduction technology. Lancet 1998;352:452–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruinsma, F, Venn, A, Lancaster, P, Speirs, A, Healy, D. Incidence of cancer in children born after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:604–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klip, H, Burger, CW, Kraker, J, Leeuwen, FE; OMEGA-project group. Risk of cancer in the offspring of women who underwent ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2451–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner-Geva, L, Toren, A, Chetrit, A, Modan, B, Mandel, M, Rechavi, G, Dor, J. The risk for cancer among children of women who underwent in vitro fertilization. Cancer 2000;88:2845–7.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moll, AC, Imhof, SM, Schouten-van Meeteren, AY, Leeuwen, FE. In-vitro fertilisation and retinoblastoma. Lancet 2003;361:1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradbury, BD, Jick, H. In vitro fertilization and childhood retinoblastoma. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004;58:209–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidegaard, O, Pinborg, A, Andersen, AN. Imprinting diseases and IVF: Danish National IVF cohort study. Hum Reprod 2005;20:950–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×