Book contents
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Early Indo-European and the Origin of Pastoralism
- Part II Migratory Processes and Linguistic Dispersals between Yamnaya and the Corded Ware
- Part III The Cultural and Linguistic Significance of Bell Beakers along the Atlantic Fringe
- Part IV The Bronze Age Chariot and Wool Horizons
- 14 Relative and Absolute Chronologies of the Chariot Complex in Northern Eurasia and Early Indo-European Migrations
- 15 Indo-European and Indo-Iranian Wagon Terminology and the Date of the Indo-Iranian Split
- 16 Fire and Water: The Bronze Age of the Southern Urals and the Rigveda
- 17 Wool Fibers of the Northern Eurasian Bronze Age: The Cultural and Geographical Contexts
- 18 An Archaeolinguistic Approach to Indo-European Wool Terminology
- Part V Kinship Systems, Marriage, Fosterage, Free, and Unfree
- Concluding Reflections
- Index
- References
14 - Relative and Absolute Chronologies of the Chariot Complex in Northern Eurasia and Early Indo-European Migrations
from Part IV - The Bronze Age Chariot and Wool Horizons
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2023
Book contents
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Early Indo-European and the Origin of Pastoralism
- Part II Migratory Processes and Linguistic Dispersals between Yamnaya and the Corded Ware
- Part III The Cultural and Linguistic Significance of Bell Beakers along the Atlantic Fringe
- Part IV The Bronze Age Chariot and Wool Horizons
- 14 Relative and Absolute Chronologies of the Chariot Complex in Northern Eurasia and Early Indo-European Migrations
- 15 Indo-European and Indo-Iranian Wagon Terminology and the Date of the Indo-Iranian Split
- 16 Fire and Water: The Bronze Age of the Southern Urals and the Rigveda
- 17 Wool Fibers of the Northern Eurasian Bronze Age: The Cultural and Geographical Contexts
- 18 An Archaeolinguistic Approach to Indo-European Wool Terminology
- Part V Kinship Systems, Marriage, Fosterage, Free, and Unfree
- Concluding Reflections
- Index
- References
Summary
Linking the distribution of wheeled transport to the evolution of language is a strategy often employed to locate the Indo-European (IE) motherland and trace the formation of various Indo-European languages in different parts of the Old World. The underlying assumption is that archaeological assemblages that are separate in space but similar in appearance represent people speaking dialects of the same language. The chronology, sources, and spatiality of the IE migrations, however, remain topics of heated discussion. Specifically, researchers disagree on which early archaeological phenomenon represents the source of early IE migration (Grigoriyev 2002; Anthony 2007; Allentoft et al. 2015; Klejn et al. 2017).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Indo-European Puzzle RevisitedIntegrating Archaeology, Genetics, and Linguistics, pp. 247 - 256Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Agapov, S. A. 2010. Khvalynsk Copper Age cemeteries and Khvalynsk Copper Age cultures. The research of materials. Samara: Ofort Press.Google Scholar
Allentoft, M. E., et al. 2015. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522: 167–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ammerman, A. J., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L.. 1984. The Neolithic transition and the genetics of populations in Europe. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreeva, M. V. 2009. Traditsii i novatsii v pogrebal’nom obryade katakombn’íkh plemen severo-vostochnogo Predkavkaz’ya [Traditions and innovations in the funeral ceremony of the Catacomb tribes in northeast Ciscaucasia]. Kratkiye soobshcheniya Instituta arheologii 223: 101–115.Google Scholar
Anthony, D. W. 2007. The horse, the wheel, and language : How Bronze-Age riders from the Eurasian steppes shaped the modern world. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anthony, D. W. 1990. Migration in archaeology: The baby and the bathwater. American Anthropologist 92: 895–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, D. W., & Vinogradov, N. B.. 1995. Birth of the chariot. Archaeology 48: 36–41.Google Scholar
Brownrigg, G. 2006. Horse control and the bit. In: Olsen, S. L., Grant, S., Choyke, A. M., & Bartosiewicz, L. (eds.), Horses and humans: The evolution of human-equine relationships, 165–171. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Chechushkov, I. V., & Epimakhov, A. V.. 2018. Eurasian Steppe chariots and social complexity during the Bronze Age. Journal of World Prehistory 31: 435–483.Google Scholar
Chechushkov, I. V., Epimakhov, A. V., & Bersenev, A. G.. 2018. Early horse bridle with cheekpieces as a marker of social change: An experimental and statistical study. Journal of Archaeological Science 97: 125–136.Google Scholar
Chernykh, E. N. 1992. Ancient metallurgy in the USSR: The Early Metal Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chernykh, E. N. 2008. The “steppe belt” of stockbreeding cultures in Eurasia during the Early Metal Age. Trabajos de Prehistoria 65: 79–93.Google Scholar
Davison, K., Dolukhanov, P. M., Sarson, G. R., Shukurov, A., & Zaitseva, G. I.. 2009. Multiple sources of the European Neolithic: Mathematical modelling constrained by radiocarbon dates. Quaternary International 203: 10–18.Google Scholar
Dergachev, V. A. 2007. O skipetrakh, o loshadyakh, o voyne [On scepters, horses, and war]. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya.Google Scholar
Gak, E. I., Antipina, E. E., Lebedeva, E. Y., & Kaiser, E.. 2019. The economic pattern of the Middle Don Catacomb culture settlement of Rykan-3. Russian Archaeology 2: 19–34.Google Scholar
Gening, V. F. 1977. Mogilnik Sintashta i Problema Rannikh Indoiranskikh Plemyen [The Sintashta cemetery and the problem of Early Indo-Iranian migration]. Soviet Archaeology 4: 53–73.Google Scholar
Gorotsov, V. A. 1927. Bronzovyy vek na territorii SSSR [The Bronze Age on the territory of the USSR]. In: Shmidt, O. U. (ed.) Great Soviet encyclopedia, 610–626. Moscow: Great Soviet Encyclopedia.Google Scholar
Hanks, B. K., Epimakhov, A. V., & Renfrew, C.. 2007. Towards a refined chronology for the Bronze Age of the Southern Urals, Russia. Antiquity 81: 352–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izbitser, E. 2017. “Arba” models and a burial with wagons from Kurgan 9 of the Tri Brata I Cemetery. In: Vishnyatsky, L. B. (ed.), Ex Ungue Leonem, 130–138. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoria.Google Scholar
Kantorovich, A. R., Maslov, V. Y., & Petrenko, V. G.. 2013. Pogrebeniya maykopskoy kul’tury kurgana 1 mogil’nika Mar’inskaya-5 [Burials of the Maykop culture of the Maryinskaya-5 Cemetery, Kurgan 1]. In Belinskiy, A. B. (ed.), Materialy po izucheniyu istoriko-kul’turnogo naslediya Severnogo Kavkaza, 71–108. Moscow: Pamyatniki istoricheskoy mysli.Google Scholar
Klejn, L. S., Haak, W., Lazaridis, I., Patterson, N., Reich, D., Kristiansen, K.., Sjögren, K.-G., Allentoft, M., Sikora, M., Willerslev, E.. 2017. Discussion: Are the origins of Indo-European languages explained by the migration of the Yamnaya culture to the west? European Journal of Archaeology 21: 1–15.Google Scholar
Korenevskiy, S. N., Belinskiy, A. B., & Kalmykov, A. A.. 2007. Bol’shoy Ipatovskiy kurgan na Stavropol’ye [The Great Mound of Ipatovsk in Stavropol Region]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Korobkova, G. F., & Shaposhnikova, O. G.. 2005. Poseleniye Mikhaylovka - etalonnyy pamyatnik drevneyamnoy kul’tury [The settlement of Mikhailovka as a reference site of the Pit Grave culture]. Saint Petersburg: Evropeiskyi Dom.Google Scholar
Littauer, M. A., & Crouwel, J. H.. 1979. Vehicles and ridden animals in the Ancient Near East. Leiden & Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
Litvinenko, R. O. 2016. Kolisnyy transport u pokhovalʹniy paradyhmi kulʹtur postkatakombnoho bloku [Wheeled transport in the burial paradigm of post-Catacomb cultures]. In: Marina, Z. P. (ed.), Arheologiya ta etnologiyaa pivdnya Shidnoi Evropi, 129–140. Dnipro: Lira.Google Scholar
Matveyev, A. V., Volkov, Y. N., & Kostomarova, Y. V.. 2007. Materialy novykh raskopok Khripunovskogo mogil’nika [New material on the Khripunovskiy cemetery]. In: Vokhmettzhev, M. P. (ed.) Problemy arkheologii: Ural i Zapadnaya Sibir’ (k 70-letiyu T.M. Potemkinoy), 108–113. Kurgan: Izdatelstvo Kurganskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Mimokhod, R. A. 2011. Radiocarbon chronology of post-Catacomb cultural units. Kratkie soobsheniya Instituta Arkheologii 263, 28–53.Google Scholar
Morgunova, N. L. 2014. Priuralskaya gruppa pamyatnikov v sisteme Volzhsko-Uralskogo varianta Yamnoyi kulturno-istoricheskoyi oblasti [The South Ural group of the Volga-Ural variant of the Yamnaya cultural and historical community]. Orenburg: Izdatelstvo OGPU.Google Scholar
Munchaev, R. M. 1973. Bronzovyye psalii maykopskoy kul’tury i problema voznik noveniya konevodstva na Kavkaze [Maikop culture bronze cheekpieces and the problem of horse breeding in the Caucasus], In: Munchaev, R. M. & Markovin, V. I. (eds.), Kavkaz i Vostochnaya Yevropa v drevnosti, 71–77. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Naumov, I. N. 2002. Khronologicheskiye ramki nachal’nykh etapov rasprostraneniya domashney loshadi i navykov yeye domestikatsii v povolzhsko-donskikh stepyakh [Chronological limits of the initial stages of spreading of the horse and horse domestication practice in the Volga-Don Steppes]. Lower Volga Archaeological Bulletin 5: 11–23.Google Scholar
Pustovalov, S. Z. 2000. The “Tjagunova Mogila” burial mound and the problem of wheeled transport of the Pit Grave and Catacomb cultures epoch in Eastern Europe. Stratum Plus 2: 296–321.Google Scholar
Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Blackwell, P. G., Ramsey, C. B., Buck, C. E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., & Friedrich, M.. 2013. IntCal13 and marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55: 1869–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shishlina, N. I., Fernandez, R.. 2016. Radiouglerodnoye datirovaniye parnykh obraztsov iz zakhoroneniy kurgana 2 Lipetskogo mogil’nika [Radiocarbon dating of paired samples from graves of Kurgan 2 of the Lipetsk Cemetery]. Lipetskiy kurgan – pamyatnik elity dono-volzhskoy abashevskoy kul’tury: monografiya, 53–54. Lipetsk: Novyi Vzglyad.Google Scholar
Shishlina, N. I., Kovalev, D. S., Ibragimova, E. R.. 2014. Catacomb culture wagons of the Eurasian steppes, Antiquity 88: 378–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shishlina, N. I., Skorobogatov, A. M., Kaiser, E., Usachuk, A. N.. 2015. Radiouglerodnoye datirovaniye parnykh obraztsov iz mogil’nika Rozhdestveno: rezul’taty analiza i obsuzhdeniye [Radiocarbon dating of paired samples from the Rozhdestvensky cemetery: Analysis of results and discussion]. Bulletin of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences 17, 262–72.Google Scholar
Usmanova, E. R., Chechushkov, I. V., Kosintsev, P. A., Suslov, A. S., & Lachkova, M. K.. 2018. Loshad’ v dukhovnoy kul’ture i sotsial’nom ustroystve naseleniya uralo-kazakhstanskikh stepey (po materialam mogil’nika Novoil’inovskiy II) [The horse in spiritual culture and social structure in the Ural–Kazakhstan steppes (on materials from the Novoilinovsky II cemetery)]. In: Zdanovich, D. G. (ed.), Stepnaya Evraziya v epokhu bronzy: kul’tury, idei, tekhnologii, 198–215. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet.Google Scholar
Valchak, S. B. 2009. Konskoye snaryazheniye v pervoi treti I-go tys. do n.e. na yuge Vostochnoy Evropy [The horse harness of the first millenia BC in the south of Eastern Europe]. Moscow: Taus.Google Scholar
Zeleneyev, Y. A., & Yudin, A. I.. 2010. Kurgan u sela Dubovyi Gai [The Kurgan near the village of Dubovyi Gai]. In: Yudin, A. I. (ed.), Arkheologicheskiye pamyatniki Saratovskogo Pravoberezh’ya: ot ranney bronzy do srednevekov’ya, 134–155. Saratov: Izd-vo “Nauchnaya kniga.”Google Scholar