Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:55:05.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - European Prehistory between Celtic and Germanic: The Celto-Germanic Isoglosses Revisited

from Part III - The Cultural and Linguistic Significance of Bell Beakers along the Atlantic Fringe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2023

By
Paulus van Sluis ,
Anders Richardt Jørgensen  and
Guus Kroonen
Edited by
Kristian Kristiansen ,
Guus Kroonen  and
Eske Willerslev
Kristian Kristiansen
Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden
Guus Kroonen
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Eske Willerslev
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

Recent advances in the field of palaeogenomics have revealed that at the onset of the Late Neolithic, Europe was characterized by a major cultural and genetic transformation triggered by multiple population movements from the Pontic–Caspian steppe. Corded Ware populations show a large-scale introduction of Yamnaya steppe ancestry across the entire archaeological horizon (Allentoft et al. 2015; Haak et al. 2015; Malmström 2019). The emergence of the Bell Beaker burial identity in the early third millennium BCE was similarly accompanied by a dramatic genetic turnover, at least in Northwestern Europe (Olalde et al. 2018). These population changes call for the integration of genetic evidence into existing models for the linguistic Indo-Europeanization of Europe (cf. Kristiansen et al. 2017).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
Integrating Archaeology, Genetics, and Linguistics
 , pp. 193 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Douglas Q. 2013. A dictionary of Tocharian B, revised and greatly enlarged (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 10). Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
ALEW = Hock, Wolfgang, Fecht, Rainer, Feulner, Anna Helene, Hill, Eugen, & Wodtko, Dagmar S.. 2019. Altlitauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (ALEW).Google Scholar
Allentoft, Morten E., Sikora, Martin, Sjögren, Karl-Göran, Rasmussen, Simon, Rasmussen, Morten, Stenderup, Jesper, Damgaard, Peter B., et al. 2015. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522(7555): 167–172.Google Scholar
Artursson, M. 2013. Ships in stone: Ship-like stone settings, war canoes and sailing ships in Bronze Age southern Scandinavia. In: Bergerbrant, S. & Sabatini, S. (ed.), Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen (British Archaeological Reports International Series), 499–504. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birkhan, Helmut. 1967. Das gallische Namenelement *cassi- und die germanisch-keltische Kontaktzone. In: Meid, Wolfgang (ed.) Beiträge zur Indogermanistik und Keltologie: Julius Pokorny zum 80. Geburtstag gewidmet (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 13), 115–45. Innsbruck: Sprachwissenschaftliches Institut der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Birkhan, Helmut. 1970. Germanen und Kelten bis zum Ausgang der Römerzeit: der Aussagewert von Wörtern und Sachen für die frühesten Keltisch-Germanischen Kulturbeziehungen (Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschiften, philosophisch-historische Klasse: Sitzungsberichte 272). Vienna: Kommissionsverlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Birkhan, Helmut. 1999. Ein Strauß nicht durchwegs bekömmlicher Kräuter aus dem keltischen und germanischen Altertum: Wort- und Sachkundliches zu einigen Pflanzen. In: Anreiter, P., Erszebét, J. (ed.), Studia celtica et indogermanica: Festschrift für Wolfgang Meid zum 70. Geburtstag, 43–52. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Birkhan, Helmut. 2012. Keltisches in germanischen Runennamen? In: Bammesberger, A., Waxenberger, A. & G. (ed.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen: Akten der Tagung in Eichstätt vom 20. bis 24. Juli 2003 (Ergänzungsbände zum Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde), 80–100. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bjorvand, Harald, & Lindeman, Frederik O.. 2000. Våre arveord: Etymologisk ordbok. Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar
Blöndal Magnússon, Á. 1989. Íslensk Orðsifjabók. Reykjavik: Orðabók Háskólans.Google Scholar
Bomhard, Allan. 2014. Hittite pa-ak-nu-. Journal of Indo-European Studies 42: 291–93.Google Scholar
Boutkan, Dirk. F. H. 2003. On Gothic magaþ ~ Old Frisian megith and the form of some North European substratum words in Germanic. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 58: 11–28.Google Scholar
Boutkan, Dirk F. H., & Kossmann, Maarten G.. 2001. On the etymology of “silver.” NOWELE : North-Western European Language Evolution 38: 3–15.Google Scholar
Brumlich, Markolf. 2005. Schmiedegräber der älteren vorrömischen Eisenzeit in Norddeutschland. Ethnogr.-Arch. Zeitschr. 46(2): 189–220.Google Scholar
Caudullo, G., Welk, E., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. 2017. Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data in Brief 12: 662–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, Johnny. 2007. Etymological dictionary of the Iranian verb (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 2). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cleary, Kerry, & Gibson, Catriona. 2019. Connectivity in Atlantic Europe during the Bronze Age (2800-800 BC). In: Cunliffe, B. & Koch, J. T. (ed.), Exploring Celtic origins: New ways forward in archaeology, linguistics, and genetics (Celtic Studies Publications XXII), 80–116. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, Barry, & Koch, John T.. (ed.). 2019. Exploring Celtic origins: New ways forward in archaeology, linguistics, and genetics (Celtic Studies Publications 22). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
de Bernardo Stempel, Patrizia. 2001. Gotisch in-weitiþ guþ und gallisch ande-díon uēdiíu-mi (Chamalières, Z. 1 ). Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 114: 164–170.Google Scholar
De Bhaldraithe, Tomás. 1981. Varia I. Ériu 32: 149–152.Google Scholar
Demiraj, Bardhyl. 1997. Albanische Etymologien (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 7). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Dinneen, Patrick S. 1904. Foclóir Gaedhilge agus Béarla. An Irish-English dictionary. Dublin: Irish Text Society.Google Scholar
Ebel, H. 1861. Die stellung des celtischen. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Sprachforschung 2: 137–194.Google Scholar
EDHIL = Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2007. Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 5). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
eDIL = 2019. An electronic dictionary of the Irish language. Accessed July 29, 2021. www.dil.ie.Google Scholar
EDLI = Vaan, Michiel de. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 7). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
EDPC = Matasović, Ranko. 2009. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Celtic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 9). Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
EDPG = Kroonen, Guus. 2013. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 11). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Antoine, Fages, et al. 2019. Tracking five millennia of horse management with extensive ancient genome time series. Cell 177(6): 1419–1435.e31.Google Scholar
Falileyev, Alexander. 2000. Etymological glossary of Old Welsh (Buchreihe der Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 18). Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleuriot, Léon. 1964. Dictionnaire des gloses en vieux breton (Collection linguistique 62). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. 1962–1965. Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
French, Katherine E. 2017. Palaeoecology and GIS modeling reveal historic grasslands as “hotspots” of biodiversity and plant genetic resources. Journal of Ethnobiology 37: 581–600.Google Scholar
Gnesin, G. G., 2016. Iron Age: Origin and evolution of ferrous metallurgy. Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics 55: 114–123.Google Scholar
Haak, Wolfgang, Lazaridis, Iosif, Patterson, Nick, Rohland, Nadin, Mallick, Swapan, Llamas, Bastien, et al. 2015. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature 522: 207–211.Google Scholar
Heidermanns, Frank. 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive (Studia Linguistica Germanica 33). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heinertz, N. Otto. 1915. Friesisches. Indogermanische Forschungen 35: 304–335.Google Scholar
Hellquist, Elof. 1922. Svensk etymologisk Ordbok. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Hill, Eugen. 2002. Ein germanisch-keltisches Suffix für Nominalabstrakta. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 62: 39–70.Google Scholar
Hill, Eugen. 2012. Die Entwicklung von *u vor unsilbischem *i in den indogermanischen Sprachen Nord- und Mitteleuropas: die Stammsuppletion bei u-adjektiven und das Präsens von “sein.” NOWELE 64/65: 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. G., Halstead, P., Wilson, P. J., & Davis, S.. 1999. Functional interpretation of archaeobotanical data: Making hay in the archaeological record. Veget. Hist. Archaebot. 8: 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, Hyllested. 2010. The precursors of Celtic and Germanic. In: Jamison, S. W., Melchert, H. C., Vine, B. H, & Mercado, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference: Los Angeles, October 30th and 31st, 2009, 107–28. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Hyllested, Adam. 2014. Word exchange at the gates of Europe: Five millenia of language contact. PhD diss., University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
IEW = Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Irslinger, Britta. 2002. Abstrakta mit Dentalsuffixen im Altirischen. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Iversen, Rune, & Kroonen, Guus. 2017. Talking Neolithic: Linguistic and archaeological perspectives on how Indo-European was implemented in southern Scandinavia. American Journal of Archaeology 121: 511–525.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth Hurlstone. 1953. Language and History in Early Britain: A chronological survey of the Brittonic languages, first to twelfth century A.D. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Johannsen, Jens Winter. 2016. Heavy metal: Lead in Bronze Age Scandinavia. Fornvännen 111: 153–161.Google Scholar
Johnston, Robert. 2013. Bronze Age fields and land division. In: Fokkens, H. & Harding, A. F. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age, 311–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Anders Richardt. 2006. Etymologies to go: Some further reflexes of Celtic *keng-. Keltische Forschungen 1: 59–71.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1913. Urgermanisch: Vorgeschichte der altgermanischen Dialekte. Strassburg: Verlag von Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Ko = Koch, John T.. 2018. Rock art and Celto-Germanic vocabulary: Shared iconography and words as reflections of Bronze Age contact. Adoranten: 1–16.Google Scholar
Koch, John T. 2020. Celto-Germanic: Later prehistory and Post-Proto-Indo-European vocabulary in the north and west. Aberystwyth: Canolfan Uwchefrydiau Cymreig a Cheltaidd Prifysgol Cymru.Google Scholar
KPV = Schumacher, Stefan. 2004. Die keltischen Primärverben: ein vergleichendes, etymologisches und morphologisches Lexikon. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Kr = Krahe, Hans. 1954. Sprache und Vorzeit. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Kristian, et al. 2017. Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity 91(356): 334–347.Google Scholar
Kroonen, Guus. 2011. The Proto-Germanic n-stems. A study in diachronic morphophonology (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 18). Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroonen, Guus. 2012. Non-Indo-European root nouns in Germanic: Evidence in support of the Agricultural Substrate. In: Grünthal, Riho & Kallio, Petri (ed.), A linguistic map of prehistoric Northern Europe, 239–260. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Google Scholar
L = Lane, Geo. S.. 1933. The Germano-Celtic Vocabulary. Language 9: 244–246.Google Scholar
LEIA = Vendryes, Joseph, Bachallery, Édouard, & Lambert, Pierre-Yves. 1959–1996. Lexique étymologique de l’irlandais ancien. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Lidén, Evald. 1891. Etymologien. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 15: 507–522.Google Scholar
LIV² = Rix, Helmut, Kümmel, Martin, Zehnder, Thomas, Lipp, Reiner, & Schirmer, Briggite. 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben, 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludweig Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Lubotsky, Alexander M. 1988. On the system of nominal accentuation in Sanskrit and Indo-European (Memoirs of the Kern Institute 4). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie. 1988. Expressivität und Lautgesetz im Germanischen (Monographien zur Sprachwissenschaft 15). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Lull, Vicente, Micó, Roberto, Herrada, Christina Rihuete, & Risch, Roberto. 2014. The social value of silver in El Argar. In: Meller, Harald, Risch, Roberto, & Pernicka, Ernst (ed.), Metalle der Macht – frühes Gold und Silber (Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 11/2), 557–576. Halle: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt, Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P. 1989. In search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, archaeology and myth. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P., 2016. Archaeology and language shift in Atlantic Europe. In: Koch, John T. & Cunliffe, Barry W. (ed.), Celtic from the West 3: Atlantic Europe in the Metal Ages: Questions of Shared Language (Celtic Studies Publications 19), 387–406. Oxford: Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallory, James P., & Huld, Martin. 1984. Proto-Indo-European ‘silver’. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 97(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Marstrander, Carl. 1910. Hibernica. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 7: 357–418.Google Scholar
Marstrander, Carl. 1915. Bidrag til det norske sprogs historie i Irland (Skrifter Norske videnskaps-akademi i Oslo. II-Hist.-filos. klasse 5). Kristiania: I kommission hos J. Dybwad.Google Scholar
McClatchie, Meriel. 2018. Barley, rye, and oats. In: Varela, Sandra L. López (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, 1–4. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
McManus, Damian. 1991. A guide to Ogam. Maynooth: An Sagart.Google Scholar
Meller, Harald. 2019. Princes, armies, sanctuaries: The emergence of complex authority in the central German Únětice culture. Acta Archaeologica 90: 39–79.Google Scholar
Neumann, Günter. 1961. Hethitische Etymologien. III. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 77: 76–81.Google Scholar
Noble, Gordon. 2017. Woodland in the Neolithic of Northern Europe: The forest as ancestor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, William. 2016. Language shift and political context in Bronze Age Ireland: Some implications of hill fort chronology. In: Koch, John T. & Cunliffe, Barry (ed.), Celtic from the West 3: Atlantic Europe in the metal ages: Questions of shared language (Celtic Studies Publications 19), 219–246. Oxford: Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oettinger, Norbert. 1997. Grundsätzliche Überlegungen Zum Nordwest-Indogermanischen. Incontri Linguistici 20: 93–111.Google Scholar
Oettinger, Norbert. 1999. Zum nordwest-indogermanischen Lexikon (mit einer Bemerkung zum hethitischen Genitiv auf -l). In: Anreiter, P. & Erszebét, J. (ed.), Studia celtica et indogermanica: Festschrift für Wolfgang Meid zum 70. Geburtstag, 261–267. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Olalde, Iñigo, Brace, Selina, Allentoft, Morten E., Armit, Ian, Kristiansen, Kristian, Booth, Thomas, et al. 2018. The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe. Nature 555(7695): 190–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orel, Vladimir. 1998. Albanian etymological dictionary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Panaino, Antonio. 2016. Later Avestan maɣauua- (?) and the (mis)adventures of a “pseudo-ascetic.” In: Redard, C. (ed.), Des Contrées Avestiques à Mahabad, via Bisotun. Etudes Offertes En Hommage à Pierre Lecoq, 167–186. Neuchâtel: Recherches et Publications.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1913. Vergleichende Grammatik der keltischen Sprachen II. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Pl = Polomé, Edgar C.. 1983. Celto-Germanic isoglosses (revisited). Journal of Indo-European Studies 11: 281–298.Google Scholar
Pr = Porzig, Walter. 1974. Die Gliederung des indogermanischen Sprachgebiets. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Pronk-Tiethoff, Saskia Elisabeth. 2012. The Germanic loanwords in Proto-Slavic: Origin and accentuation. PhD diss., Leiden University.Google Scholar
Pryor, Francis. 2010. The making of the British landscape: How we have transformed the land, from prehistory to today. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Riecke, Jörg. 1996. Die schwachen jan-Verben des Althochdeutschen: Ein Gliederungsversuch (Studien zum Althochdeutschen 32). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Robinson, Patrick. 1986. Trees as fodder crops. In: Cannell, M. G. R. & Jackson, J. E. (ed.), Attributes of trees as crop plants, 281–296. Penicuik: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, NERC.Google Scholar
Rübekeil, Ludwig. 2001. Einige Bemerkungen zur Wortfamilie um germ. *hatis-. In: Brogyányi, B. (ed.), Germanisches Altertum und christliches Mittelalter: Festschrift für Heinz Klingenberg zum 65. Geburtstag, 239–294. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar
Rusu, Mircea. 1969. Das keltische Fürstengrab von Ciumeşti in Rumänien. Germania 50: 267–300.Google Scholar
Sahlgren, G. F. Jöran. 1953. Ortnamnet Nymden och lat. nemus. Namn och Bygd: Tidskrift för nordisk ortnamnsforskning 41: 46–50.Google Scholar
SBCHP = Schrijver, Peter C. H.. 1995. Studies in British Celtic historical phonology (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 5). Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schm = Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1991. The Celts and the ethnogenesis of the Germanic people. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 104: 129–152.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter C. H. 1997. Animal, vegetable and mineral: Some Western European substratum words. In: Lubotsky, A. (ed.), Sound law and analogy (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 9), 293–314. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter C. H. 2003. The etymology of Welsh chwith and the semantics and morphology of PIE *k(w)sweibh-. In: Russell, Paul (ed.), Yr Hen Iaith: Studies in Early Welsh, 1–24. Aberystwyth: Celtic Studies Publications.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter C. H. 2004. Apes, dwarfs, rivers and Indo-European internal derivation. In: Hyllested, Adam & Rasmussen, Jens Elmegård (ed.), Per aspera ad asteriscos: Studia Indogermanica in honorem Jens Elmegård Rasmussen sexagenarii Idibus Martiis anno MMIV, 507–511. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter C. H. 2016. Sound change, the Italo-Celtic linguistic unity, and the Italian homeland of Celtic. In: Koch, John T. & Cunliffe, Barry (ed.), Celtic from the West 3: Atlantic Europe in the metal ages: Questions of shared language (Celtic Studies Publications 19), 489–502. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Schu = Schumacher, Stefan. 2007. Die Deutschen und die Nachbarstämme: Lexikalische und strukturelle Sprachkontaktphänomene entlang der keltisch-germanischen Übergangszone. Keltische Forschungen 2: 167–208.Google Scholar
Seebold, Elmar. 1970. Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben (Janua Linguarum Series Practica 85). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, Patrick., 2020. An alternative to “Celtic from the East” and “Celtic from the West.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 30(3): 1–19.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 1998. Study in red. Die Sprache: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 40: 202–223.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 2009. The Proto-Germanic shift *ā>*ō and early Germanic linguistic contacts. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 122: 268–83.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 2011. Lack of syncope and other nichtlautgesetzlich vowel developments in OIr. consonant-stem nouns. Animacy rearing its head in morphology? In: Krisch, Thomas & Lindner, Thomas (ed.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog. Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg, 556–565. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 2015. The language of the poems of blathmac. In: Ó Riain, Pádraig (ed.), The poems of Blathmac son of Cú Brettan: Reassessments (Irish Texts Society Subsidiary Series 27), 47–103. London: Irish Texts Society.Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 2018. The stars look very different today. Ériu 68: 29–54.Google Scholar
Stika, Hans-Peter, & Heiss, Andreas G.. 2013. Plant cultivation in the Bronze Age. In: Fokkens, H. & Harding, A. F. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age, 348–369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Whitley. 1901. Irish etymologies. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 3: 467–473.Google Scholar
Thier, Katrin. 2011. Language and technology: Some examples from seafaring (Germanic and Celtic). Transactions of the Philological Society 109: 186–199.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Nick. 2013. Warfare in the European Bronze Age. In: Fokkens, H. & Harding, A. F. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age, 234–247. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Reinhold. 1923. Baltisch-Slavisches Wörterbuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Van der Vaart-Verschoof, Sasja. 2017. Fragmenting the chieftain: A practice-based study of Early Iron Age Hallstatt C elite burials in the Low Countries (Papers on Archaeology of the Leiden Museum of Antiquities 15A). Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Van Windekens, Albert Joris. 1941. Lexique étymologique des dialectes tokhariens (Bibliothèque du Muséon 11). Louvain: Bureaux du Muséon.Google Scholar
Wadstein, Elis. 1895. Bidrag till tolkning och belysning av skalde- ock Edda-dikter. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 11: 64–92.Google Scholar
Williams, Alan R., 1980. The manufacture of mail in medieval Europe: A technical note. Gladius 15: 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wissmann, Wilhelm. 1961. Ahd. seffo. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 77: 81.Google Scholar
Wright, John. 2016. A natural history of the hedgerow: And ditches, dykes and dry stone walls. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Zair, N. 2013. Lat. glārea ‘gravel.’ Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 126: 280–286.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×