Part I - Multidisciplinary Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 June 2019
Summary
Political science does not offer a distinct subdiscipline to address the subject of energy. Insofar as political science has addressed energy, it has focused on issues often neglected by other disciplines, notably the role of geopolitics and international relations, and the domestic politics of resource-rich states. Apart from the different subfields, we examine different approaches including realism, constructivism, liberalism and Marxism. The rise and fall and rise again of academic articles on energy in leading political science journals is reviewed and linked to exogenous forces such as the price of oil. Two distinct energy topics which have received attention are nuclear power and the oil crises of 1973–79 because of their wider geopolitical ramifications. Perhaps the most prominent or consistent thread through studies of the politics of energy is the question of energy security or energy independence. Finally, in recent years, energy has increasingly emerged as a focus for study in environmental politics and climate change politics in particular.
Keywords
political scienceenergy policyjournalsinternational relationsinstitutionsenergy securityclimate policypublic goodsmarket failuresclimate changemissing marketsdistributional justiceclimate changeenergy justicefrackinginductive risknon-identityprecautionary principlepublic theologyreligionethicsChristianityhuman flourishingnaturesocial justiceenvironmental subsidiarity flourishingnaturesocial justiceenvironmental subsidiarityethnographyenergy anthropologypowerconsumptionsocietymaterial culturedigital technologyhistoryhistoriographyenergyevidencecomplexitypredictionpolicycollaborationleadershiptrustwind turbinessizedevelopment costfactory investmentenergy lawfrackingClean Power Planlocal content requirementsfeed-in-tariff schemesenergy transitions
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- In Search of Good Energy Policy , pp. 23 - 98Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ansolabehere, S. & Konisky, D.M. (2014). Cheap and Clean: How Americans Think about Energy in the Age of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bernauer, T. & Koubi, V. (2009). Effects of Political Institutions on Air Quality. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1355–1365.Google Scholar
Coates Ulrichsen, K. (2011). Insecure Gulf: The End of Certainty and the Transition to the Post-Oil Era. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Crystal, J. (1990). Oil and Politics in the Gulf: Rulers and Merchants in Kuwait and Qatar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckersley, R. (2004). The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farhar, B.C., Unseld, C.T., Vories, R., Crews, R. (1980). Public Opinion about Energy. Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 5, 141–172.Google Scholar
Gillies, A. (2010). Reputational Concerns and the Emergence of Oil Sector Transparency as an International Norm. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1): 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R.E. (2011). ‘The State of the Discipline, the Discipline of the State’ in R.E. Goodin, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, pp. 1–84.Google Scholar
Hird, J.A. (1990). Superfund Expenditures and Cleanup Priorities: Distributive Politics or the Public Interest? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9: 455–483. doi:10.2307/3325258Google Scholar
Hughes, L. & Lipscy, P.Y. (2013). The Politics of Energy. Annual Review of Political Science, 16:1, 449–469.Google Scholar
Joskow, P.L. & Schmalensee, R. (1998). The Political Economy of Market‐Based Environmental Policy: The U.S. Acid Rain Program. Journal of Law and Economics 41:1, 37–84.Google Scholar
Karl, T.L. (1997). The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keman, H. & Woldendorp, J.J. (Eds.) (2016). Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Kennan, G.F. (1982). Nuclear Delusion: Soviet-American Relations in the Atomic Age. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1978). The International Energy Agency: State Influence and Transgovernmental Politics. International Organization, 32(4): 929–951.Google Scholar
Lieberthal, K. & Oksenberg, M. (1986). Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Energy Development, Washington, D.C.: US Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration.Google Scholar
Powell, R. (1991). Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory. American Political Science Review, 85(04), 1303–1320.Google Scholar
Victor, D.G., Jaffe, A.M., Hayes, M.H. (2006). Natural Gas and Geopolitics: From 1970 to 2040. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review, 88(2): 384–396.Google Scholar
Anaya, K.L. and Pollitt, M.G., 2015. ‘Options for Allocating and Releasing Distribution System Capacity: Deciding between Interruptible Connections and Firm DG Connections’, Applied Energy, 144, 96–105. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.043Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. and Debreu, G., 1954. ‘Existence of Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy’, Econometrica, 22, 265–290.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H., 1960. ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, The Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1–44.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. and Stern, N.H., 1986. ‘Optimally Uniform Commodity Taxes, Taste Differences and Lump-Sum Grants’, Economics Letters, 20, 263–266.Google Scholar
Diamond, P.A. and Mirrlees, J.A., 1971. ‘Optimal Taxation and Public Production, Part 1. Production Efficiency’, American Economic Review, 611, 8–27.Google Scholar
Dolphin, G., Pollitt, M., and Newbery, D., 2016. ‘The Political Economy of Carbon Pricing: A Panel Analysis’, EPRG 1627, at www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/1627-Text.pdf.Google Scholar
EPA. 2016. Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866, US Environmental Protection Agency, at www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016–12/documents/sc_co2_tsd_august_2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Farrell, J., 1987. ‘Information and the Coase Theorem’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 113–129.Google Scholar
Gollier, C. and Weitzman, M.L., 2010. ‘How Should the Distant Future Be Discounted When Discount Rates Are Uncertain?’, Econ Lett 107(3): 350–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, M.G. and Newbery, D.M., 2008. ‘Pricing Carbon for Electricity Generation: National and International Dimensions’, ch. 11, pp. 278–313 in Delivering a Low Carbon Electricity System: Technologies, Economics and Policy, Grubb, M., Jamasb, T., Pollitt, M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, G., 1968. ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162, Issue 3859, 1243–1248. DOI:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., and Gintis, H. (2004). Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
HMT, 2011. Budget 2011, Stationary Office, HC 836, at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130105112918/http://cdn.hm-treasury.gov.uk/2011budget_complete.pdf.Google Scholar
Newbery, D.M., 1997. ‘Optimal Tax Rates and Tax Design during Systemic Reform’, Journal of Public Economics, 63(2), 177–206.Google Scholar
Newbery, D.M., 2016. ‘Policies for decarbonizing a liberalized power sector’, Economics: the Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 12 (2018–40). http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-40.Google Scholar
Newbery, D., 2018. Evaluating the case for supporting renewable electricity, Energy Policy, 120, 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.029.Google Scholar
Newbery, D.M., 2018. ‘What Future(s) for Liberalized Electricity Markets: Efficient, Equitable or Innovative?’ The Energy Journal, 39(1), 1–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.1.dnewCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D., 2007. ‘A Review of the “Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change”’, Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 686–702, at www.jstor.org/stable/27646843.Google Scholar
Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., and Kuilen, G. V. D., 2004. ‘Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis’. Experimental Economics, 7(2): 171–188. DOI:10.1023/B:EXEC.0000026978.14316.74Google Scholar
Sijm, J., Neuhoff, K., and Chen, Y., 2006. ‘CO2 Cost Pass-through and Windfall Profits in the Power Sector’, Climate Policy, 6(1), 49–72. DOI:10.1080/14693062.2006.9685588Google Scholar
Stern, N., 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M., 1998. ‘Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3): 201–208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1052.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M., 2012. ‘The Ramsey Discounting Formula for a Hidden-State Stochastic Growth Process’, Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 53(3): 309–321.Google Scholar
Bell, Colin, Chaplin, Jonathan and White, Robert (eds.) (2013) Living Lightly, Living Faithfully: Religions and the Future of Sustainability. Cambridge: Faraday Institute/KLICE.Google Scholar
Billingham, Paul and Chaplin, Jonathan (forthcoming 2019) ‘Law, Religion and Public Reasoning’. In Handbook of the Interdisciplinary Study of Law and Religion, edited by Doe, Norman, Sandberg, Russell, Kane, Bronach and Roberts, Caroline. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Chaplin, Jonathan (2015) ‘Laudato Si’: Structural Causes of the Ecological Crisis’, Comment (24 September and 1 October).Google Scholar
Chaplin, Jonathan (2016) ‘The Global Greening of Religion’, Palgrave Communications Comment 2 art. no 19047 (July 2016), doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.47.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Mark (2015) Transdisciplinary Solutions for Sustainable Development: From planetary management to stewardship. Abingdon, Oxon: Earthscan/Routledge.Google Scholar
Clingerman, Forrest and O’Brian, Kevin J. (2017), ‘Is climate change a new kind of problem? The role of theology and imagination in climate ethics’. Wiley’s Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8 (September/October), 1–10, accessed 6 December 2017. (WIREs Clim Change 2017, 8:e480. doi:10.1002/wcc.480)Google Scholar
Alliance, Cornwall (2009) An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming, http://cornwallalliance.org/2009/05/evangelical-declaration-on-global-warming/, accessed 15 April 2016.Google Scholar
Evangelical Environmental Network (2006) Evangelical Declaration on the Care of Creation, https://creationcare.org/creation-care-resources/evangelical-declaration-on-the-care-of-creation/, accessed 15 April 2016.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Richard S. (ed.) (2006) Oxford Handbook on Religion and Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Graham, Elaine (2013) Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Public Theology in a Post-Secular Age. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Halpert, J. (2012) ‘Judaism and Climate Change’. Yale Climate Connections 29 February 2012, www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2012/02/judaism-and-climate-change/, accessed 15 April 2016.Google Scholar
Hancock, Rosemary (2015) ‘“Islamic” Environmentalism in Great Britain’, in Peace, Timothy (ed.), Muslims and Political Participation in Britain. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 103–123.Google Scholar
Hancock, Rosemary (2018) Islamic Environmentalism: Activism in the United States and Great Britain. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
IICCS (Islamic International Climate Change Symposium) (2015) Islamic Declaration on Global Climate Change, http://islamicclimatedeclaration.org/islamic-declaration-on-global-climate-change/, accessed 15 April 2016.Google Scholar
McKibben, Bill (2010) Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough Planet. New York: St Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
McKibben, Bill (2012) ‘Preface – the challenge of sustainability’. In Bell, Colin, Chaplin, Jonathan and White, Robert, eds (2013) Living Lightly, Living Faithfully: religions and the future of sustainability. Cambridge: Faraday Institute/KLICE: 21–29.Google Scholar
Nagle, John Copeland (2010) Law’s Environment: How the law shapes the places we live. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Northcott, Michael (2013) A Political Theology of Climate Change. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Oelschlaeger, M. (1994) Caring for Creation: An Ecumenical Approach to the Environmental Crisis. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar
Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies/Bhumi Project (2015) Bhumi Devi Ki Jai! A Hindu Declaration on Climate Change, www.hinduclimatedeclaration2015.org/english, accessed 15 April 2016.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Michael (2010) ‘Green Values in Communities: how and why to engage individuals with decarbonisation targets’. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper No. 398.Google Scholar
Francis, Pope (2015) Laudato Si’: On Care for our Common Home, http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html, accessed 15 April 2016 http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html, accessed 15 April 2016.Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark (2008) The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
St. John’s College, Cambridge (2014) ‘Partha Dasgupta leads appeal to religion for “mass mobilisation” on environmental change’, www.joh.cam.ac.uk/partha-dasgupta-leads-appeal-religion-mass-mobilisation-environmental-change, accessed 18 April 2016.Google Scholar
Weatherley-Singh, Janice, Branco, Tiago and Felgueiras, (2016) ‘The greening of the EU? A Christian assessment of the EU’s environmental policies for biodiversity and nature’, in Chaplin, Jonathan and Wilton, Gary (eds), God and the EU: Faith in the European Project (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 230–250.Google Scholar
White, Lynn (1967) ‘The historical roots of our ecologic crisis’, Science 155 (3767): 1203–1207.Google Scholar
Alexander, C., Buchli, V. & Humphrey, C. eds., 2007. Urban Life in Post-Soviet Asia, Abingdon, Oxon.; New York, NY: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, D., 2011. ‘Energopolitics and the Anthropology of Energy’, Anthropology News, 52(5): 5–7.Google Scholar
Collier, S.J., 2012. Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Social Modernity, Biopolitics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, K. & Calo, R., 2016. ‘There Is a Blind Spot in AI Research’, Nature, 538(7625): 311–313.Google Scholar
Gram-Hanssen, K., 2007. ‘Teenage Consumption of Cleanliness: How to Make It Sustainable?’ Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 3(2): 15–23.Google Scholar
Howe, C. & Boyer, D., 2016. ‘Aeolian Extractivism and Community Wind in Southern Mexico’, Public Culture, 28(2 (79)): 215–235.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C., 2005. ‘Ideology in Infrastructure: Architecture and Soviet Imagination’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 11: 39–58.Google Scholar
Johnson, C., 2016. ‘District Heating as Heterotopia: Tracing the Social Contract through Domestic Energy Infrastructure in Pimlico, London’, Economic Anthropology, 3(1): 94–105.Google Scholar
National Research Council, 1980. Energy Choices in a Democratic Society: The Report of the Consumption, Location, and Occupational Patterns Resource Group, Synthesis Panel of the Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Pink, S. & Leder Mackley, K., 2012. ‘Video and a Sense of the Invisible: Approaching Domestic Energy Consumption through the Sensory Home’, Sociological Research Online, 17(1): 3Google Scholar
Polanyi, K., 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (2nd ed.), Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Rolston, J.S., 2013. ‘The Politics of Pits and the Materiality of Mine Labor: Making Natural Resources in the American West’, American Anthropologist, 115(4): 582–594.Google Scholar
Singh, A. et al., 2017. ‘Towards an Ethnography of Electrification in Rural India: Social Relations and Values in Household Energy Exchanges’, Energy Research & Social Science, 30: 103–115.Google Scholar
Strengers, Y., 2008. ‘Smart Metering Demand Management Programs: Challenging the Comfort and Cleanliness Habitus of Households’, Energy, 35(4): 9–16.Google Scholar
Wilhite, H., 2008. ‘New Thinking on the Agentive Relationship between End-Use Technologies and Energy-Using Practices’, Energy Efficiency, 1(2): 121–130.Google Scholar