Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Foreword
- List of Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Overview
- Part II Organizational Arrangements: Purchasing Health Services
- Part III Optimal Health Workers Contracts
- Part IV Managing Doctors and Nurses
- Part V Health Service Consumer Behaviour
- APPENDIX
- Health Equity Funds Implemented by URC and Supported by USAID
- Index
Health Equity Funds Implemented by URC and Supported by USAID
from APPENDIX
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Foreword
- List of Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Overview
- Part II Organizational Arrangements: Purchasing Health Services
- Part III Optimal Health Workers Contracts
- Part IV Managing Doctors and Nurses
- Part V Health Service Consumer Behaviour
- APPENDIX
- Health Equity Funds Implemented by URC and Supported by USAID
- Index
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Cambodia has been experimenting with health equity funds (HEFs) for almost a decade. University Research Co., LLC (URC) has been supporting the implementation of HEFs since 2003 as part of the “Health Systems Strengthening in Cambodia” (USAID-HSSC 2002–08) and the “Better Health Services” (URC-BHS 2009–13) projects funded by USAID. HEFs are a pro-poor health financing scheme, operated by national NGOs, which identify the poor households in an area and then provide financial support to those poor in procuring public health services. This is done by purchasing health services on behalf of these poor, providing them with reimbursements for transport to health facilities, and providing the patients’ caretakers with money to cover food expenses.
Since their first introduction, the number of HEFs has increased significantly. Figure A.1 illustrates this growth, showing that of the thirty-two HEF schemes in place by 2007, half are two years old or less. Some HEF schemes have not run continuously since implementation and several schemes have changed donors. For simplicity, colours represent current donor and breaks are not shown.
HEF schemes are popular with many stakeholders. Almost all poor people using the scheme report that they appreciate the assistance and say they would use the same service again in the future (MoH Monitoring Group Reports 2007 and 2008). Moreover, many public health service providers welcome the HEF scheme in their facility because it generates regular income for their facility and staff.
Cambodia's public health system is managed by the Ministry of Health, with authority delegated to twenty-four provincial and municipal health departments (PHDs), which are further divided into seventy-six operational districts (ODs). Each of these ODs operates public health centres and most manage a district referral hospital. The PHD manages a provincial referral hospital and the central MoH manages tertiary national referral hospitals.
Cambodia's public health service is underutilized. Those who can afford to frequently use private services, while the poor, who in many cases would like to use public health services, are prevented by a variety of barriers. HEFs are meant to help remove the barriers so that the poor can use public health services to the same extent as the non-poor.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Improving Health Sector PerformanceInstitutions, Motivations and Incentives - The Cambodia Dialogue, pp. 387 - 419Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2011