Book contents
- Hyper-active Governance
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Public Policy
- Hyper-active Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introducing Hyper-active Governance
- Part II Hyper-active Governance in Practice
- Part III Theorising Hyper-active Governance
- Book part
- Notes
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 June 2019
Book contents
- Hyper-active Governance
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Public Policy
- Hyper-active Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introducing Hyper-active Governance
- Part II Hyper-active Governance in Practice
- Part III Theorising Hyper-active Governance
- Book part
- Notes
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Hyper-active GovernanceHow Governments Manage the Politics of Expertise, pp. 238 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D. and Zangl, B. 2016. Two logics of indirect governance: Delegation and orchestration. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 719–729.Google Scholar
ABC News, 2010. Murray-Darling boss resigns. 7 December. www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2010/12/07/3086645.htm, accessed 10 February 19.Google Scholar
Abelson, J. and Collins, P. 2009. Media hyping and the ‘Herceptin access story’: An analysis of Canadian and UK newspaper coverage. Healthcare Policy, 4(3), e113–e128.Google Scholar
Abraham, J. 2009. Partial progress: Governing the pharmaceutical industry and the NHS, 1948–2008. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 34(6), 931–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACTO. 2016a. Coordinating Office for Indigenous Affairs. www.otca.info/portal/coordenacao-interna.php?p=otca&coord=3, accessed 10 February 2019.Google Scholar
ACTO. 2016b. Newsletter: Forum will discuss the health situation of isolated indigenous peoples and in initial contact. www.otca.info/portal/noticia-interna.php?id=706, accessed 10 February 2019.Google Scholar
Adam, B. 2003. Comment on ‘social acceleration’ by Hartmut Rosa, Constellations, 10(1), 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adey, P. and Anderson, B. 2011. Event and anticipation: UK civil contingencies and the space–times of decision. Environment and Planning – Part A, 43(12), 2878–2899.Google Scholar
Agell, J., Calmfors, L. and Jonsson, G. 1996. Fiscal policy when monetary policy is tied to the mast. European Economic Review, 40(7), 1413–1440.Google Scholar
Alberta Emergency Management Act, 2000. www.qp.alberta.ca/1266.cfm?page=E06P8.cfm&leg_type=Acts&isbncln=9780779750139, accessed 5 December 2016.Google Scholar
Allsop, J., Jones, K. and Baggott, R. 2004. Health consumer groups in the UK: A new social movement? Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(6), 737–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C. K., Trondal, J. and Øgård, M. (eds). 2017. Governance in Turbulent Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aquina, H. and Bekke, H. 1993. Governance in interaction. In Kooiman, J. (ed). Modern Governance, London: SAGE, 159–172.Google Scholar
Arbuthnot, K. 2008. A command gap? A practitioner’s analysis of the value of comparisons between the UK’s military and emergency services’ command and control models in the context of UK resilience operations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(4), 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Chief Police Officers, 2002. Emergency Procedures Manual. London: ACPO.Google Scholar
Bache, I. and Flinders, M. 2004. Multi-level governance and the study of the British state. Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 31–51.Google Scholar
Bache, I., Reardon, L., Bartle, I., Marsden, G. and Flinders, M. 2015. Symbolic meta-policy: (Not) tackling climate change in the transport sector. Political Studies, 63(4), 830–851.Google Scholar
Bader, V. 2014. Sciences, politics, and associative democracy: Democratizing science and expertizing democracy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(4), 420–441.Google Scholar
Baekkeskov, E. and Rubin, O. 2014. Why pandemic response is unique: Powerful experts and hands-off political leaders. Disaster Prevention and Management, 23(1), 81–93.Google Scholar
Bakir, C. 2009. The governance of financial regulatory reform: The Australian experience. Public Administration, 87(4), 910–922.Google Scholar
Bakir, C. 2015. Bargaining with multinationals: Why state capacity matters. New Political Economy, 20(1), 63–84.Google Scholar
Bakker, M. 2006. Transboundary River Floods: Vulnerability of Continents, International River Basins and Countries, DPhil, Oregon State University, http://dspace-ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/3821/Dissertation_complete_signed_16Jan07.pdf?sequence=1, accessed 10 February 2019.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2009a. Asset Purchase Facility. 29 January, available from: www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/apfchancellorletter090129.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2009b. RE: Asset Purchase Facility, 29 January, available from: www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/apfgovletter090129.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2009c. Asset Purchase Facility. 3 March, available from: www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/chancellorletter050309.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2009d. Asset Purchase Facility. 6 August. www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/govletter090806.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2009e. RE: Asset Purchase Facility. 6 August, available form www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/chancellorletter060809.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2009f. Asset Purchase Facility. 5 November: available from www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/govletter091105.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2009g. Extending Asset Purchase Facility. 5 November: available from www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/chancellorletter051109.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2011a. Extension of Asset Purchase Facility. 6 October: available from www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/chancellorletter061011.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2011b. Extension of Asset Purchase Facility. 6 October: available from www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/govletter111006.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2011c. Asset Purchase Facility. 29 November: available from www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/govletter111129.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2012a. Asset Purchase Facility. 9 February: available from www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/govletter120209.PDF, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2012b. Extension of Asset Purchase Facility. 9 February available from: www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/chancellorletter090212.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2012c. Asset purchase Facility. 5 July, available from: www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/govletter120705.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Bank of England. 2012d. Transfer of excess cash from the Asset Purchase Facility to HM Treasury. 9 November: available from www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/Documents/pdf/chancellorletter091112.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Banting, K. G. 1979. Poverty, Politics and Policy: Britain in the 1960s. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barker, A., and Peters, B. G. (eds). 1993. Advising West European Governments: Inquiries, Expertise and Public Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. 2016. Accountability and global governance: The view from paternalism. Regulation & Governance, 10(2), 134–148.Google Scholar
Bartfai, T. and Lees, G. V. 2013. The Future of Drug Discovery: Who Decides Which Diseases to Treat?. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D. and Mortensen, P. B. 2014. Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In Sabatier, P. and Weible, C. (eds). Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd edn, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge, 59–103.Google Scholar
BBC News. Woman gets cancer drug in U-turn, 9 November 2005. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/staffordshire/4421570.stm, accessed 10 February 2019.Google Scholar
BBC News. 15 November 2005. Mother refused breast cancer drug. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/staffordshire/4417076.stm, accessed 5 December 2016.Google Scholar
BBC News. 15 February 2006. Woman loses Herceptin court bid. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4715430.stm, accessed 5 October 2012.Google Scholar
BBC News. 15 June 2007a. Workers trapped as river floods. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/6756637.stm, accessed 1 December 2013.Google Scholar
BBC News. 15 June 2007b. Weather disrupts train services. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/6755461.stm, accessed 1 December 2013.Google Scholar
BBC News. 15 June 2007c. Town flooded twice in five days. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6758569.stm, accessed 1 December 2013.Google Scholar
BBC News. 15 June 2007d. Homes and transport hit by floods. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6755571.stm, accessed 1 December 2012.Google Scholar
BBC News. 16 June 2007. Houses evacuated after flooding. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/6759791.stm, accessed 1 December 2012.Google Scholar
BBC News. 29 June 2007. Flashes of kindness in the floods. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6255522.stm, accessed 1 December 2012.Google Scholar
BBC News. 4 July 2007. Flood-hit Hull a ‘forgotten city’. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/humber/6270236.stm, accessed 1 December 2013.Google Scholar
BBC News. 22 July 2007. You’ve got to show the blitz spirit. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6910784.stm, accessed 1 December 2012.Google Scholar
BBC Panorama. 7 February 2006. Wanting the wonder drug. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/4670232.stm, accessed 28 September 2012.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 1987. The anthropological shock: Chernobyl and the contours of the risk society. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 153–165.Google Scholar
Bell, D. 1965. The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A. 2009. Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A. 2015. Masters of the Universe, Slaves of the Market. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. and Lane, J. E. 1990. Public policy in a principal–agent framework. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 339–352.Google Scholar
Berry, C. and Hay, C. 2016. The great British ‘rebalancing’ act: The construction and implementation of an economic imperative for exceptional times. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
Bevir, M. 2004. Governance and interpretation: What are the implications of postfoundationalism?. Public Administration, 82(3), 605–625.Google Scholar
Boswell, J. 2014. ‘Hoisted with our own petard’: Evidence and democratic deliberation on obesity. Policy Sciences, 47(4), 345–365.Google Scholar
Boswell, J. 2018. Keeping expertise in its place: understanding arms-length bodies as boundary organizations. Policy & Politics, 46(3), 485–501.Google Scholar
Boswell, J. and Corbett, J. 2015. Embracing impressionism: Revealing the brush strokes of interpretive research. Critical Policy Studies, 9(2), 216–225.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. 2007. Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.Google Scholar
Bovens, M., Schillemans, T. and Hart, P. T. 2008. Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–242.Google Scholar
Bradford Telegraph and Argus. 15 June 2007, Man saved in floods chaos, www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/1476203.man-saved-in-floods-chaos/, accessed 10 February 2019.Google Scholar
Brint, S. 1996. In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, M. B. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, M. B. 2015. Politicizing science: Conceptions of politics in science and technology studies. Social Studies of Science, 45(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
Burnham, P. 2001. New Labour and the politics of depoliticisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3(2), 127–149.Google Scholar
Burnham, P. 2014. Depoliticisation: Economic crisis and political management. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 189–206.Google Scholar
Busfield, J. 2010. ‘A pill for every ill’: Explaining the expansion in medicine use. Social Science & Medicine, 70(6), 934–941.Google Scholar
Busuioc, M. and Lodge, M. 2016. The reputational basis of public accountability. Governance, 29(2), 247–263.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office. 2004b. The Lead Government Department and Its Role – Guidance and Best Practice, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Cairney, P. 2016. The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Capano, G., Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. 2015. Bringing governments back in: Governance and governing in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(4), 311–321.Google Scholar
Carlsson, P. 2004. Health technology assessment and priority setting for health policy in Sweden. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 20(1), 44–54.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D. 2014. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
CDEMA. 2016. What is CDEMA?, www.cdema.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=89&Itemid=79, accessed 5 December 2016.Google Scholar
Chhotray, V. and Stoker, G. 2008. Governance Theory and Practice: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. G. and Yesilkagit, K. 2006. Delegation and specialization in regulatory administration: A comparative analysis of Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands. In Christensen, T. and Laegried, P. (eds). Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State. Basingstoke: Edward Elgar, 203–234.Google Scholar
Christie, A., McLachlan, H. and Swales, J. 2008. Scotland, devolution and justice. Scottish Affairs, 65(1), 107–128.Google Scholar
Collier, S. J. and Lakoff, A. 2015. Vital systems security: Reflexive biopolitics and the government of emergency. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(2), 19–51.Google Scholar
Collins, H. and Evans, R. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. and Evans, R. 2008. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Connell, D. and Grafton, R. 2011. Water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin, Water Resources Research, 47, W00G03, doi:10.1029/2010WR009820.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. 2015. Being Political: Leadership and Democracy in the Pacific Islands. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. 2016. Diagnosing the problem of anti-politicians: A review and an agenda. Political Studies Review, 14(4), 534–543.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. and Howard, C. 2016. Why perceived size matters for agency termination. Public Administration, 95(1), 196–213.Google Scholar
Coulthard, T., Frostick, L., Hardcastle, H., Jones, K., Rogers, D., Scott, M. and Bankoff, G. 2007a. The June 2007 Floods in Hull: Final Report, 21 November. Available from: http://www2.hull.ac.uk/science/pdf/geogfloodsinhull3.pdf, accessed 2 December 2012.Google Scholar
Coulthard, T., Frostick, L., Hardcastle, H., Jones, K., Rogers, D., Scott, M. and Bankoff, G. 2007b. The June 2007 Floods in Hull: Interim Report, 21 November, www.coulthard.org.uk/downloads/floodsinhull1.pdf, accessed 2 December 2012.Google Scholar
Cukierman, A., Web, S. B. and Neyapti, B. 1992. Measuring the independence of central banks and its effect on policy outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review, 6(3), 353–398.Google Scholar
Cultural Flows. 2016. About the Project. http://culturalflows.com.au/~culturalflowscom/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16&Itemid=125, accessed 7 December 2016.Google Scholar
Dahlström, C., Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds). 2011. Steering from the Centre: Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Daily Mail. 19 September 2005. Cancer victim sues NHS for wonder drug. www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-362828/Cancer-victim-sues-NHS-wonder-drug.html, accessed 28 September 2012.Google Scholar
Daily Mail6 February 2006. Mother begins fight for cancer drug. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-376273/Mother-begins-fight-cancer-drug.html, accessed 28 September 2012.Google Scholar
Daniell, K. 2011. Enhancing collaborative management in the Basin. In Connell, R. and Grafton, R. (eds). Basin Futures. Canberra: ANU E Press, 413–438.Google Scholar
Davies, J. S., 2011. Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Davies, J. S. and Spicer, A. 2015. Interrogating networks: Towards an agnostic perspective on governance research. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 223–238.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. University Park: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
DEWHA. 2009. A framework for determining commonwealth environmental watering actions. DEWHA Canberra.Google Scholar
Department of Health. 2005. Hewitt fast-tracks cancer drug to save 1000 lives, 5 October, Press release.Google Scholar
Dincer, N. and Eichengreen, B. 2013. Central bank transparency and independence: Updates and new measures. WP 2013-21. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2579544.Google Scholar
Dincer, N. and Eichengreen, B. 2014. Central bank transparency and independence: Updates and new measures. International Journal of Central Banking, 10(1), 189–259.Google Scholar
Dommett, K. and Flinders, M. 2015. The centre strikes back: Meta‐governance, delegation, and the core executive in the United Kingdom, 2010–14. Public Administration, 93(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Dommett, K. and Skelcher, C. 2014. Opening the black box of administrative reform: A strategic-relational analysis of agency responses to termination threats. International Public Management Journal, 17(4), 540–563.Google Scholar
Douglas, H. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnová, A. and Just, P. 2014. Societies in conflict: Experts, publics and democracy. The 8th International Conference in Interpretive Policy Analysis, Vienna, July 2013. Critical Policy Studies, 8(4), 375–378.Google Scholar
Dyer, C. 2006. Patient takes her fight for Trastuzumab to the High Court. British Medical Journal, 332, 320.Google Scholar
Eaton, L. 2005. Health economist cautions against new cancer drug. British Medical Journal, 331, 1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgie, R. 2006. Why do governments delegate authority to quasi‐autonomous agencies? The case of independent administrative authorities in France. Governance, 19(2), 207–227.Google Scholar
Elgie, R. and McMenamin, I. 2005. Credible commitment, political uncertainty or policy complexity? Explaining variations in the independence of non-majoritarian institutions in France. British Journal of Political Science, 35(3), 531–548.Google Scholar
Elston, T. 2014. Not so ‘arm’s length’: Reinterpreting agencies in UK central government. Public Administration, 92(2), 458–476.Google Scholar
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Select Committee. 2006a. The Environment Agency Volume I, HC 780-I. London: TSO.Google Scholar
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Select Committee. 2006b. The Environment Agency Volume II, HC780–11. London: TSO.Google Scholar
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Select Committee. 2008a, Flooding, Volume I, HC 49-I. London: TSO.Google Scholar
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Select Committee. 2008b. Flooding, Volume II, HC 49-II. London: TSO.Google Scholar
Esmark, A. 2016. Maybe it is time to rediscover technocracy? An old framework for a new analysis of administrative reforms in the governance era. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 501–516.Google Scholar
Ettelt, S., Mays, N., Chevreul, K., Nikolentzos, A., Thomson, S. and Nolte, E. 2010. Involvement of Ministries of Health in health service coverage decisions: Is England an aberrant case?, Social Policy & Administration, 44(3), 225–243.Google Scholar
European Central Bank. 2016. Introducing Directorate General Research. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016. Netherlands – Disaster management structure. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/civil_protection/vademecum/nl/2-nl-1.html, accessed 5 December 2016.Google Scholar
FEMA. 2013. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. Available at: www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1383153669955-21f970b19e8eaa67087b7da9f4af706e/stafford_act_booklet_042213_508e.pdf, accessed 5 December 2016.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1990. The Anti-Politics Machine. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fernández-Albertos, J. 2015. The politics of Central Bank independence. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 217–237.Google Scholar
Fire Brigades Union. 2008. Lessons of the 2007 Floods: The Perspective of Fire Crews, June, Kingston: Fire Brigades Union.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. 2009. Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. 2008. Delegated Governance and the British State: Walking without Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. and Buller, J. 2006. Depoliticisation: Principles, tactics and tools. British Politics, 1(3), 293–318.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. and Moon, D. S. 2011. The problem of letting go: The ‘Big Society’, accountable governance and ‘the curse of the decentralizing minister’. Local Economy, 26(8), 652–662.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. and Tonkiss, K. 2016. From ‘poor parenting’ to micro-management: Coalition governance and the sponsorship of arm’s-length bodies in the United Kingdom, 2010–13. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(3), 490–515.Google Scholar
Flinders, M., Wood, M. and Cunningham, M. 2016. The politics of co-production: Risks, limits and pollution. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 12(2), 261–279.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.Google Scholar
Franklin, M. and Karvelas, P. 2010. Reality hits in Murray blueprint, The Weekend Australian, 9–10 October.Google Scholar
Frayssinet, F. 2014. It takes more than two to tango – Or to clean up Argentina’s Riachuelo River, 13 August, Tierramerica, available at: www.ipsnews.net/2014/08/it-takes-more-than-two-to-tango-or-to-clean-up-argentinas-riachuelo-river/, accessed on 1 December 2016.Google Scholar
Frayssinet, F. 2015. How to fix environmental woes in Buenos Aires shantytown, 18 September, Terramerica, available at: www.ipsnews.net/2015/09/how-to-fix-environmental-woes-in-buenos-aires-shantytown/, accessed on 7 December 2016.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl. 1958. Authority, reason, and discretion. In Friedrich, Carl (ed). Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 28–48.Google Scholar
Gabe, J., Chamberlain, K., Norris, P., Dew, K., Madden, H. and Hodgetts, D. 2012. The debate about the funding of Herceptin: A case study of ‘countervailing powers’. Social Science & Medicine, 75(12), 2353–2361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrick, D., Bark, R., Connor, J. and Banerjee, O. 2012. Environmental water governance in federal rivers: Opportunities and limits for subsidiarity in Australia’s Murray–Darling River. Water Policy, 14(6), 915–936.Google Scholar
Garriga, A. C. 2016. Central Bank independence in the World: A new data set. International Interactions, 42(5), 849–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, N., Leonard-Milsom, L. and Montgomery, J. 2011. Climate change, flooding and the media in Britain, Public Understanding of Science, 20(3), 422–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, A. and Bennett, A. 2005. Case studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. 1999. What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity, 31(3), 357–393.Google Scholar
Gilardi, F. 2009. Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, G. and McCarthy, J. 2001. Personalized medicine: Revolutionizing drug discovery and patient care. Trends in Biotechnology, 19(12), 491–496.Google Scholar
Glenn, T. 2012. Matanza-Riachuelo River Basin: A case study in watershed governance, CE 397 transboundary water resources.Google Scholar
Gratschew, M. 2006. Sweden: Governmental in form independent in practice; A decentralized election management system, Case Study: Electoral Management Design, the International IDEA Handbook, 166–170.Google Scholar
Greve, C., Flinders, M. and Van Thiel, S. 1999. Quangos – What’s in a name? Defining quangos from a comparative perspective. Governance, 12(2), 129–146.Google Scholar
Grube, D. C. and Howard, C. 2016. Is the Westminster system broken beyond repair?. Governance, 29(4), 467–481.Google Scholar
GWP and INBO. 2009. A Handbook for Integrated Water Resources Management in Basins, Sweden: Global Water Partnership.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. A. 2009. Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. and Uitermark, J. 2008. Performing authority: Discursive politics after the assassination of Theo van Gogh. Public Administration, 86(1), 5–19.Google Scholar
Halachmi, A. 2014. Accountability overloads. In Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. and Schillemans, T. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 275–296.Google Scholar
Hardie, I. and Howarth, D. (eds). 2013. Market-Based Banking and the International Financial Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. 2009. Co-optation, commodification and the medical model: Governing UK medicine since 1991. Public Administration, 87(2), 184–197.Google Scholar
Hartley, J., Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2013. Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830.Google Scholar
Hartlyn, J., McCoy, J. and Mustillo, T. M. 2008. Electoral governance matters explaining the quality of elections in contemporary Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 73–98.Google Scholar
Hay, C. 2002. Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hay, C. 2011. Pathology without crisis? The strange demise of the Anglo‐liberal growth model. Government and Opposition, 46(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Hay, C. 2016. Good in a crisis: The ontological institutionalism of social constructivism. New Political Economy, 21(6), 520–535.Google Scholar
Head, B. W. 2013. Evidence‐based policymaking – Speaking truth to power?. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(4), 397–403.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S. 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740.Google Scholar
Herbst, S. 2003. Political authority in a mediated age. Theory and Society, 32(4), 481–503.Google Scholar
Hind, D., Wailoo, A. and Sutcliffe, P. 2011. Demands for ‘off-licence’ access to Trastuzumab (Herceptin): Content analysis of UK newspaper articles, Health Expectations, 14(1), 38–47.Google Scholar
Hinterleitner, M, 2015. Reconciling perspectives on blame avoidance behaviour. Political Studies Review, 15(2), 243–254.Google Scholar
HMSO. Civil Contingencies Act 2004 (c.36) London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hodson, D. and Mabbett, D. 2009. UK economic policy and the global financial crisis: paradigm lost? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(5), 1041–1061.Google Scholar
Holst, C. and Gornitzka, Å. 2015. The expert-executive nexus in the EU: An introduction. Politics and Governance, 3(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 2002. The risk game and the blame game. Government and Opposition, 37(1), 15–37.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 2010. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C., Jennings, W. and Copeland, P. 2015. Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: Reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy. Public Administration.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. 1999. Policy analysis, science and politics: From ‘speaking truth to power’to ‘making sense together’. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 201–210.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. 2005. Rethinking the science-policy nexus: From knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis & Praxis, 3(3), 199–215.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. 2009. Scientific advice and public policy: Expert advisers’ and policymakers’ discourses on boundary work. Poiesis & Praxis, 6(3–4), 235–263.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. 2012. The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making. International Political Science Review, 33(5), 539–555.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. 2016. Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301–313.Google Scholar
INBO. 2014. First International Environment Forum for Basin Organizations Towards Sustainable Freshwater Governance, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 26–28 November.Google Scholar
James, T. S. 2010. Electoral modernisation or elite statecraft: Electoral administration in the United Kingdom 1997–2007. British Politics, 5(2), 179–201.Google Scholar
James, T. S. 2012. Elite Statecraft and Election Administration: Bending the Rules of the Game?. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. 1996. Beyond epistemology: Relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Social Studies of Science, 26(2), 393–418.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. 2003. (No?) Accounting for expertise. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 157–162.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (ed). 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 1997. Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance. Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 561–581.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 2003. Governance and meta-governance: On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In Bang, H. (ed). Governance as Social and Political Communication, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 101–16.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. 2009. Complexity, structured chaos and the importance of information management for mobile computing in the UK floods of 2007. Mobile Response, 1–11.Google Scholar
Kalt, J. P. and Zupan, M. A. 1990. The apparent ideological behavior of legislators: Testing for principal – agent slack in political institutions. The Journal of Law & Economics, 33(1), 103–131.Google Scholar
Keefer, P. and Stasavage, D. 2003. The limits of delegation: Veto players, central bank independence, and the credibility of monetary policy. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 407–423.Google Scholar
Keidan, J. 2007. Sucked into the Herceptin maelstrom. British Medical Journal, 334, 18.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. 2010. Murray–Darling guide fails to sufficiently consider human cost, says Simon Crean, The Australian, 15 October.Google Scholar
Kettell, S. and Kerr, P. 2008. One year on: The decline and fall of Gordon Brown. British Politics, 3(4), 490–510.Google Scholar
Kisby, B. 2010. Interpreting facts, verifying interpretations: Public policy, truth and evidence. Public Policy and Administration, 0952076710375784.Google Scholar
Knowles, C. 2011a. Speech to the sustaining rural communities conference, Narrabri, 6 April.Google Scholar
Knowles, C. 2011b. Chair’s comments at Griffith Consultation Meeting on Draft Plan, Griffith, 15 December.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. (ed). 1993. Modern Governance: New Government–Society Interactions. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Korinek, R. L. and Veit, S. 2015. Only good fences keep good neighbours! The institutionalization of ministry–agency relationships at the science–policy nexus in german food safety policy. Public Administration, 93(1), 103–120.Google Scholar
Krick, E. 2015. Negotiated expertise in policy-making: How governments use hybrid advisory committees. Science and Public Policy, 42(4), 487–500.Google Scholar
The Lancet. 2005. Editorial: Herceptin and early breast cancer: A moment for caution, 15 November, 366(9498), 1673.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1993. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, F. E. 2002. Can parties police themselves? Electoral governance and democratization. International Political Science Review, 23(1), 29–46.Google Scholar
Lepore, J. 2016. The party crashers: Is the new populism about the message or the medium? New Yorker. 2 February.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, D. (ed). 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 2003. Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. 1999. Australian democracy: Modifying majoritarianism?. Australian Journal of Political Science, 34(3), 313–326.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.Google Scholar
Littlejohns, P. 2001. The relationship between NICE and the National R&D Programme. In Baker, M. and Kirk, S. (eds). Research and Development for the NHS, 3rd edn,. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press, 39–58.Google Scholar
Lopez-Pintor, R. 2000. Electoral Management Bodies as Institutions of Governance. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
Lynas, M. 2015. Even in 2015, the public doesn’t trust scientists. Washington Post, available at: www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/01/30/even-in-2015-the-public-doesnt-trust-scientists/?utm_term=.82ef6ca96271 accessed 29 November 2016.Google Scholar
Maasen, S. and Weingart, P. (eds). 2006. Democratization of expertise?: exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Maggetti, M. and Papadopoulos, Y. 2016. The principal–agent framework and independent regulatory agencies. Political Studies Review, 1478929916664359.Google Scholar
Majone, G. 1989. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Majone, G. 1998. Europe’s ‘democratic deficit’: The question of standards. European Law Journal, 4(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
Majone, G. 1999. The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems. West European Politics, 22(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Majone, G. 2001. Nonmajoritarian institutions and the limits of democratic governance: A political transaction-cost approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, 157(1), 57–78.Google Scholar
Mallaby, S. 2016. The cult of the expert – And how it collapsed, Guardian, available at: www.theguardian.com/business/2016/oct/20/alan-greenspan-cult-of-expert-and-how-it-collapsed, accessed 29 November 2016.Google Scholar
Marcussen, M. 2006. Institutional transformation? The scientization of central banking as a case study. In Christensen, T. and Laegreid, P. (eds). Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Marinetto, M. 2003. Governing beyond the centre: A critique of the Anglo-governance school. Political Studies, 51(3), 592–608.Google Scholar
Marsh, D., 2011. The new orthodoxy: The differentiated polity model. Public Administration, 89(1), 32–48.Google Scholar
Marsh, D., Richards, D. and Smith, M. 2003. Unequal plurality: Towards an asymmetric power model of British politics. Government and Opposition, 38(3), 306–332.Google Scholar
Matthews, F. M. 2013. Complexity, Fragmentation, and Uncertainty: Government Capacity in an Evolving State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G. and Weingast, B. R. 1987. Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 3(2), 243–277.Google Scholar
McMaster, R. and Baber, C. 2012. Multi-agency operations: Cooperation during flooding. Applied Ergonomics, 43(1), 38–47.Google Scholar
MDBA. 2009a. Lock 1 to close for repairs, upgrade. Press Release, 23 January 2009, available at: www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/mr/lock1_to_close_for_repairs, accessed 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
MDBA. 2009b. Native Fish Awareness Week starts 25 May. Press Release, 22 May 2009, available at: www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/mr/mr_nativefish_awareness_week, accessed 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
MDBA. 2009c. First meeting of new authority. Press Release, 1 June 2009, available at: www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/mr/mr-first-meeting-of-authority, accessed 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
MDBA. 2009d. Despite good winter rains, Southern Basin still in the grip of record drought. Press Release, 6 August 2009, available at: www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/mr/mr-drought-update-august09, accessed 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
MDBA. 2010d. Red alert extended for Murray River. Press Release, 15 February 2010, available at: www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/ mr/mr-red-alert-extended-for-murray-river, accessed 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
MDBA. 2010e. Native Fish Awareness Week hooks Basin River communities, 29 October 2010, available at: www.mdba.gov.au/ media-pubs/mr/native-fish-awareness-week-hooks-basin-river-communities, accessed 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
MDBA. 2011e. MDBA and states work together on the draft Basin Plan. Press Release, 11 August 2011, available at: www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/mr/mdba-and-states-work-together-draft-basin-plan, accessed 3 April 2015.Google Scholar
MDBA. 2012a. Fish Poster, available at: www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/publications/fish-poster, accessed 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
MDBA. 2012b. Frog and Reptile Poster, available at: www.mdba.gov.au/media-pubs/publications/frog-and-reptile-poster, accessed 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
Miller, G. J. 2005. The political evolution of principal-agent models. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 203–225.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2014. Unit for Democracy, Language Affairs and Fundamental Rights. Available at: https://oikeusministerio.fi/en/fundamental-and-human-rights, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation. 2014. About the Ministry. Available at: www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/kmd/min/id509/, December 2016.Google Scholar
Ministry for Economic Affairs and the Interior. 2016. Elections and Referenda in Denmark. Available at: http://elections.sim.dk, accessed 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Moharra, M. 2008. EUnetHTA Handbook on HTA Capacity Building, Barcelona: Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P. B. 2013. Public sector reform and blame avoidance effects. Journal of Public Policy, 33(2), 229–253.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. 2012. Extra‐network organizational reputation and blame avoidance in networks: The Hurricane Katrina Example. Governance, 25(4), 567–588.Google Scholar
Mozaffar, S. and Schedler, A. 2002. The comparative study of electoral governance – Introduction. International Political Science Review, 23(1), 5–27.Google Scholar
MRC. 2016a. About MRC, available at: www.mrcmekong.org/about-mrc/, accessed on 7 December 2016.Google Scholar
MRC. 2016b, MRC Transboundary Dialogue, Issue 6, available at: www.mrcmekong.org/news-and-events/newsletters/mrc-transboundary-dialogue-issue5-2/, accessed 10 February 2019.Google Scholar
Murphy, B. 2007. Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management, Natural Hazards, 41(2), 297–315.Google Scholar
NaDMA. 2016. Mission, available at: www.gov.gd/departments/nadma.html, accessed 5 December 2016.Google Scholar
Neal, R., Bell, S. and Wilby, J. 2011. Emergent disaster response during the June 2007 floods in Kingston upon Hull, UK. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 4(3), 260–269.Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. 1975. The political impact of technical expertise. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 35–54.Google Scholar
Newdick, C. 2006. Exceptional circumstances – Access to low priority treatments after the Herceptin case, Clinical Ethics, 1(4), 205–208.Google Scholar
NICE. 2002. Guidance on the Use of Trastuzumab for the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer, Technology Appraisal Guidance – No.34, London: NICE.Google Scholar
NICE. 2005a. Partners Council meeting minutes, 10 November, Mid City Place, High Holborn, London.Google Scholar
NICE. 2005b. NICE to issue faster drugs advice for the NHS. Press Release, 3 November.Google Scholar
NICE. 2006b. Trastuzumab for the adjuvant treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: Decision of the Panel, London: NICE.Google Scholar
NICE. 2006c. Trastuzumab for the adjuvant treatment of early stage HER2-positive breast cancer, NICE technology appraisal guidance 107, London: NICE.Google Scholar
NICE. 2008. Response to the Health Select Committee’s report on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 19 March, available at: www.nice.org.uk/media/AD8/F1/ITEM8NICEResponseToTheReportOfThe_HSC.pdf, accessed 5 October 2012.Google Scholar
Norris, P., Martinez i Coma, F., Nai, A. and Grömping, M. 2016. The Electoral Integrity Project: The Year in Elections, 2015. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. P. (ed). 2010. The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Transnational Corporations Review, 2(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Overman, S. and Van Thiel, S. 2016. Agencification and public sector Performance: A systematic comparison in 20 countries. Public Management Review, 18(4), 611–635.Google Scholar
Pan American Health Organization. 2012. Health Technology Assessment and Incorporation into Health Systems, 28th Pan American Sanitary Conference 64th Session of the Regional Committee, Washington, DC, USA, 17–21 September.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. 2007. Problems of democratic accountability in network and multilevel governance. European Law Journal, 13(4), 469–486.Google Scholar
Pearce, T. and Fortune, J. 1995. Command and control in policing: A systems assessment of the gold, silver and bronze structure, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 3(3), 181–187.Google Scholar
Penning-Rowsell, E., Johnson, C. and Tunstall, S. 2006. ‘Signals’ from pre-crisis discourse: Lessons from UK flooding for global environmental policy change?, Global Environmental Change, 16(4), 323–339.Google Scholar
Peruzzotti, E. 2011. The ‘societalization’ of horizontal accountability: Rights advocacy and the Defensoria del Pueblo in Argentina. In Goodman, R. and Pegram, T. (eds). National Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change: Assessing National Human Rights Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 243–69.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. 2015. Policy capacity in public administration. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 219–228.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. 1998. Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243.Google Scholar
Petersen, A. 2006. The genetic conception of health: Is it as radical as claimed? Health, 10(4), 481–500.Google Scholar
Pitt, M. 2008. The Pitt Review: Lessons Learned from the 2007 Floods, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Price, S. 1997. Political business cycles and macroeconomic credibility: A survey. Public Choice, 92(3–4), 407–427.Google Scholar
Princen, S. 2007. Agenda-setting in the European Union: A theoretical exploration and agenda for research. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
Provan, K. G. and Kenis, P. 2008. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. 1977. Elite transformation in advanced industrial societies: An empirical assessment of the theory of technocracy. Comparative Political Studies 10(3), 383–412.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. 2011. Everyday Life in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rittel, H. W. and Webber, M. M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. 2011. The Logic of Discipline: Global Capitalism and the Architecture of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roche, . 2005a. Herceptin improves survival for the first time in women with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, press release, 25 April, www.roche.com/med-cor-2005-04-26, accessed 5 October 2012.Google Scholar
Romelli, D. 2014. Regulatory Reforms and Central Bank Independence. Mimeo, Department of Economics, ESSEC Business School.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. 2003. Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. Constellations, 10(1), 3–33.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. 2005. The speed of global flows and the pace of democratic politics, New Political Science, 27(4), 445–459.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. 2013. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. and Scheuerman, W. E. 2009. High-Speed Society: Social Acceleration. Power, and Modernity, University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Rose, N. 1993. Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22(3), 283–299.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. 1998. The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, P., Stanton, N., Jenkins, D. and Walker, G. 2011. Coordination during multi-agency emergency response: Issues and solutions, Disaster Prevention and Management, 20(2), 140–158.Google Scholar
Sampietro-Colom, L., Asua, J., Briones, E. and Gol, J. 2009. History of health technology assessment: Spain. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(S1), 163–173.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W. 2004. Liberal Democracy and the Social Acceleration of Time. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. 1993. Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Sidney, M. 2009. What is next for policy design and social construction theory? Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 103–119.Google Scholar
Scholte, J. A. 2004. Globalization and governance: From statism to polycentricity, GSGR Working Paper No. 130/04.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. 1997. The problems of independent agencies in the United States and the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 276–277.Google Scholar
Shaw, R. and Eichbaum, C. 2014. Ministers, minders and the core executive: Why ministers appoint political advisers in Westminster contexts. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(3), 584–616.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L. 2010. The Advisers: Scientists in the Policy Process. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Snowden, A. 2012. Submission on the Murray–Darling Basin Plan, 15 April, available from: https://mdweb.mdba.gov.au/%28S%28fptncjoo0wlhgtnhyl0rjf4n%29%29/SubmitterFeedback.aspx, accessed 1 August 2016.Google Scholar
Sobol, M. 2016. Principal–agent analysis and pathological delegation: The (almost) untold story. Governance, 29(3), 335–350.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. 2006. Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98–114.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2009. Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.Google Scholar
Steffek, J. 2015. The output legitimacy of international organizations and the global public interest. International Theory, 7(2), 263–293.Google Scholar
Stevens, A., Milne, R. and Burls, A. 2003. Health technology assessment: history and demand. Journal of Public Health, 25(2), 98–101.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Stucki, I. 2016. Arguing about smoking bans: The role of evidence in the social construction of conflicting policy ideas. Critical Policy Studies, 11(4), 1–22.Google Scholar
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. 2010. Reflection in the shadow of blame: When do politicians appoint Commissions of Inquiry? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 613–634.Google Scholar
The Sun. 29 September 2005. Breast Cancer Campaign, available from: www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/woman/health/225734/Breast-Cancer-Campaign.html, accessed 18 September 2012.Google Scholar
The Sun20 October 2005. Health chiefs refuse drug, available from: www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/226551/Health-chiefs-refuse-drug.html, accessed 28 September 2012.Google Scholar
Sylves, R. 2015. Disaster Policy and Politics: Emergency Management and Homeland Security: Emergency Management and Homeland Security, 2nd edn, Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Tansey, O. 2007. Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probablity sampling, Political Science and Politics, 40(4), 765–772.Google Scholar
Telegraph. 20 October 2005. Local health body to pay for unlicensed cancer ‘wonder drug’, www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1501017/Local-health-body-to-pay-for-unlicensed-cancer-wonder-drug.html, accessed 28 September 2012.Google Scholar
Telegraph16 February 2006. Cancer case mother loses battle for NHS to pay for drug, Available from: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510600/Cancer-case-mother-loses-battle-for-NHS-to-pay-for-drug.html, accessed 5 October 2012.Google Scholar
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. and Sørensen, E. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoest, K., Van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G., and Lægreid, P. (eds). 2012. Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vibert, F. 2007. The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. 1984. The perdurability of the politics–administration dichotomy. In Rabin, J. and Bowman, S. (eds). Politics and Administration, New York: Marcel Dekker, 219–233.Google Scholar
Wallis, P. and Ison, R. 2011. Appreciating institutional complexity in water governance dynamics, Water Resources Management, 25(15), 4081–4097.Google Scholar
Waterman, R. W. and Meier, K. J. 1998. Principal-agent models: An expansion?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 173–202.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. 1986. The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(04), 371–398.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 2009. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Trans. and ed. by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weible, C. M. 2008. Expert‐based information and policy subsystems: A review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615–635.Google Scholar
Weingart, P. 1982. The scientific power elite – A chimera; The de-institutionalization and politicization of science. In Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 71–87.Google Scholar
Weingart, P. 1999. Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 151–161.Google Scholar
Wells, J. and Cheong-Leen, C. 2006. Appeal in Respect of the Final Appraisal Determination: Trastuzumab for the Adjuvant Treatment of Early-Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Newbury and Community PCT.Google Scholar
Wesselink, A., Colebatch, H. and Pearce, W. 2014. Evidence and policy: discourses, meanings and practices. Policy Sciences, 47(4), 339.Google Scholar
WHO. 2014. Health intervention and technology assessment in support of universal health coverage, 24 May, available at: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA67/A67_R23-en.pdf, accessed on 3 January 2016.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. 1966. The political economy of efficiency: Cost-benefit analysis, systems analysis, and program budgeting. Public Administration Review, 292–310.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. 2005. Trastuzumab for early breast cancer raises important issues, British Medical Journal, 331, 1023.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. and Schliebs, M. 2010. ‘Huge cost’ in returning water to Murray– Darling river system. The Australian, 8 October 2010.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. 1887. The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222.Google Scholar
Windsor Report. 2011. Of Drought and Flooding Rains. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Regional Australia Report, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Wood, M. 2015a. Beyond accountability: Political legitimacy and delegated water governance in Australia. Public Administration, 93(4), 1012–1030.Google Scholar
Wood, M. 2015b. Depoliticisation, resilience and the Herceptin post-code lottery crisis: Holding back the tide. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17(4), 644–664.Google Scholar
Wood, M. 2016. Politicisation, depoliticisation and anti-politics: Towards a multilevel research agenda. Political Studies Review, 14(4), 521–533.Google Scholar
Wood, M. and Flinders, M. 2014. Rethinking depoliticisation: Beyond the governmental. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 151–170.Google Scholar
Wu, X., Ramesh, M. and Howlett, M. 2015. Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171.Google Scholar
Yanow, D. 2007. Interpretation in policy analysis: On methods and practice. Critical Policy Analysis, 1(1), 110–122.Google Scholar
Yesilkagit, K. 2004. Bureaucratic autonomy, organizational culture, and habituation politicians and independent administrative bodies in the Netherlands. Administration & Society, 36(5), 528–552.Google Scholar
Yesilkagit, K. and Christensen, J. G. 2010. Institutional design and formal autonomy: Political versus historical and cultural explanations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 53–74.Google Scholar
Yong, B. and Hazell, R. 2014. Special Advisers: Who They Are, What They Do and Why They Matter. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Young, W., Bond, N., Brookes, J., Gawne, B. and Jones, G.. 2011. Science review of the estimation of an environmentally sustainable level of take for the Murray–Darling Basin. CSIRO, Final Report to the MDBA, November.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, H. 1977. Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. London: Transaction.Google Scholar