Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:22:47.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Institutions for Achieving Human–Wildlife Coexistence

The Case of Large Herbivores and Large Carnivores in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2019

By
John D. C. Linnell  and
Bjørn P. Kaltenborn
Edited by
Beatrice Frank ,
Jenny A. Glikman  and
Silvio Marchini
Beatrice Frank
Affiliation:
Capital Regional District of Victoria Regional Parks
Jenny A. Glikman
Affiliation:
Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global
Silvio Marchini
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo
Get access

Summary

The last 100 years have seen a dramatic increase in distribution and numbers of both large carnivores and large herbivores in Europe in response to increases in forest cover and favourable management / legal regimes. This recovery has created a whole suite of new relationships and interactions between humans and wildlife. On one hand, the herbivores have become valuable game species and objects of wildlife viewing and ecotourism. On the other hand, they are involved in conflicts with humans through vehicle collisions, and damages to crops and forests. Similarly, large carnivores produce mixed results. They are loved and celebrated by some segments of the public, and viewed with fear and as sources of conflict by others. Comparing and contrasting these two species groups we provide an overview of their interactions with humans as a means to gain insight into the nature of human–wildlife coexistence in modern-day Europe. We explore the extent to which institutions at European, national and local levels have been engaged in shaping these relationships. Our central question explores whether the difference between a state of conflict or one of coexistence is determined by objectively measureable impacts, or if it in fact is purely a state of mind.
Type
Chapter
Information
Human–Wildlife Interactions
Turning Conflict into Coexistence
 , pp. 288 - 310
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

14.11 References

Allen, B. L., Allen, L. R., Andrén, H., Ballard, G., Boitani, L., Engem, R. M., Flemming, P. J. S., Ford, A. T., Haswell, P. M., Kowalczyk, R., Linnell, J. D. C., Mech, L. D. & Parker, D. M. (2017). Can we save large carnivores without losing large carnivore science? Food Webs, 12, 64–75.Google Scholar
Apollonio, M., Andersen, R. & Putman, R. (2010). European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Apollonio, M., Belkin, V. V., Borkowski, J., Borodin, O. I., Borowik, T., Cagnacci, F., Danilkin, A. A., Danilov, P., Faybich, A., Ferretti, F., Gaillard, J. M., Hayward, M. W., Heshtaut, P., Heurich, M., Hurynovich, A., Kashtalyan, A., Kerley, G. I. H., Kjellander, P., Kowalczyk, R., Kozorez, A., Matveytchuk, S., Milner, J. M., Mysterud, A., Ozolins, J., Panchenko, D. V., Peters, W., Podgorski, T., Pokorny, B., Rolandsen, C., Ruusila, V., Schmidt, K., Sipko, T. P., Veeroja, R., Velihurau, P. & Yanuta, G. (2017). Challenges and science-based implications for modern management and conservation of European ungulate populations. Mammal Research, 62(3), 209–17.Google Scholar
Bischof, R., Bonenfant, C., Rivrud, I. M., Zedrosser, A., Friebe, A., Coulson, T., Mysterud, A. & Swenson, J. E. (2018). Regulated hunting re-shapes the life-history of brown bears. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 116–23.Google Scholar
Boitani, L. (1995). Ecological and cultural diversities in the evolution of wolf human relationships. In Carbyn, L. N., Fritts, S. H. & Seip, D. R., eds., Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World. Alberta: Canadian Circumpolar Institute, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Boitani, L. & Ciucci, P. (2009). Wolf management across Europe: Species conservation without boundaries. In Musiani, M., Boitani, L. & Paquet, P. C., eds., A New Era for Wolves and People: Wolf Recovery, Human Attitudes, and Policy. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, pp. 15–40.Google Scholar
Breitenmoser, U. (1998). Large predators in the Alps: The fall and rise of man’s competitors. Biological Conservation, 83, 279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagnacci, F., Focardi, S., Ghisla, A., van Moorter, B., Merrill, E. H., Gurarie, E., Heurich, M., Mysterud, A., Linnell, J., Panzacchi, M., May, R., Nygard, T., Rolandsen, C. & Hebblewhite, M. (2016). How many routes lead to migration? Comparison of methods to assess and characterize migratory movements. Journal of Animal Ecology, 85, 54–68.Google Scholar
Carter, N. H. & Linnell, J. D. C. (2016). Co-adaptation is key to coexisting with large carnivores. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 575–8.Google Scholar
Chapron, G., Kaczensky, P., Linnell, J. D. C., von Arx, M., Huber, D., Andrén, H., López-Bao, J. V., Adamec, M., Álvares, F., Anders, O., Balčiauskas, L., Balys, V., Bedő, P., Bego, F., Blanco, J. C., Breitenmoser, U., Brøseth, H., Bufka, L., Bunikyte, R., Ciucci, P., Dutsov, A., Engleder, T., Fuxjäger, C., Groff, C., Holmala, K., Hoxha, B., Iliopoulos, Y., Ionescu, O., Jeremić, J., Jerina, K., Kluth, G., Knauer, F., Kojola, I., Kos, I., Krofel, M., Kubala, J., Kunovac, S., Kusak, J., Kutal, M., Liberg, O., Majić, A., Männil, P., Manz, R., Marboutin, E., Marucco, F., Melovski, D., Mersini, K., Mertzanis, Y., Mysłajek, R. W., Nowak, S., Odden, J., Ozolins, J., Palomero, G., Paunović, M., Persson, J., Potočnik, H., Quenette, P.-Y., Rauer, G., Reinhardt, I., Rigg, R., Ryser, A., Salvatori, V., Skrbinšek, T., Stojanov, A., Swenson, J. E., Szemethy, L., Trajçe, A., Tsingarska-Sedefcheva, E., Váňa, M., Veeroja, R., Wabakken, P., Wölfl, M., Wölfl, S., Zimmermann, F., Zlatanova, D. & Boitani, L. (2014). Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science, 346, 1517–19.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D., Huber, D. & Servheen, C. (2002). Bear reintroductions: Lessons and challenges. Ursus, 13, 335–46.Google Scholar
Czanyi, S., Carranza, J., Pokorny, B., Putman, R. & Ryan, M. (2014). Valuing ungulates in Europe. In Putman, R. & Apollonio, M., eds., Behaviour and Management of European Ungulates. Dunbeath: Whittles Publishing, pp. 13–45.Google Scholar
Duncan, C., Nilsen, E. B., Linnell, J. D. C. & Pettorelli, N. (2015). Life history attributes and resource dynamics determine intraspecific home range sizes in Carnivora. Remote Sensing in Ecology & Conservation, 1, 39–50.Google Scholar
European Environmental Agency (EEA). (2012). Protected Areas in Europe – An Overview. European Environmental Agency Report 5/2012, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Fischer, A., Kerezi, V., Arroyo, B., Mateos-Delibes, M., Tadie, D., Lowassa, A., Krange, O. & Skogen, K. (2013). (De)legitimising hunting: Discourses over the morality of hunting in Europe and eastern Africa. Land Use Policy, 32, 261–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A., Sandström, C., Delibes-Mateos, M., Arroyo, B., Tadie, D., Randall, D., Hailu, F., Lowassa, A., Msuha, M., Kerezi, V., Reljic, S., Linnell, J. & Majić, A. (2013). On the multifunctionality of hunting: An institutional analysis of eight cases from Europe and Africa. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 56, 531–52.Google Scholar
Fonseca, C., Torres, R. T., Santos, J. P. V., Vingada, J. & Apollonio, M. (2014). Challenges in the management of cross-border populations of ungulates. In Putman, R. & Apollonio, M., eds., Behaviour and Management of European Ungulates. Dunbeath: Whittles Publishing, pp. 192–207.Google Scholar
Frank, B. (2016). Human–wildlife conflicts and the need to include tolerance and coexistence: An introductory comment. Society & Natural Resources, 29, 738–43.Google Scholar
Hiedanpää, J. (2013). Institutional misfits: Law and habits in Finnish wolf policy. Ecology & Society, 18(1), art. 24.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, K. S. & Linnell, J. D. C. (2016). Perceptions of environmental justice and the conflict surrounding large carnivore management in Norway: Implications for conflict management. Biological Conservation, 203, 197–206.Google Scholar
Kaltenborn, B. P., Andersen, O. & Gundersen, V. (2014). The role of wild reindeer as a flagship species in new management models in Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography, 68, 168–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenborn, B. P., Andersen, O. & Linnell, J. D. C. (2013). Is hunting large carnivores different from hunting ungulates? Some judgments made by Norwegian hunters. Journal for Nature Conservation, 21, 326–33.Google Scholar
Kaltenborn, B. P., Hongslo, E., Gundersen, V. & Andersen, O. (2015). Public perceptions of planning objectives for regional level management of wild reindeer in Norway. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 58, 819–36.Google Scholar
Kaltenborn, B., Mehmetoglu, M. & Gundersen, V. (2017). Linking social values of wild reindeer to planning and management options in southern Norway. Arctic, 70, 129–40.Google Scholar
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Kok, M. T. J., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J. & Termeer, C. (2017). Mainstreaming biodiversity in economic sectors: An analytical framework. Biological Conservation, 210, 145–56.Google Scholar
Knott, E. J., Bunnefeld, N., Huber, D., Reljic, S., Kerezi, V. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2014). The potential impacts of changes in bear hunting policy for hunting organisations in Croatia. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 60, 85–97.Google Scholar
Krange, O., Odden, J., Skogen, K., Linnell, J. D. C., Stokland, H. B., Vang, S. & Mattisson, J. (2016). Evalueringav regional rovviltforvaltning. NINA Rapport, 1268, 1.Google Scholar
Kuijper, D. P. J., Sahlen, E., Elmhagen, B., Chamaille-Jammes, S., Sand, H., Lone, K. & Cromsigt, J. (2016). Paws without claws? Ecological effects of large carnivores in anthropogenic landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283(1841), 20161625.Google Scholar
Langbein, J., Putman, R. & Pokorny, B. (2011). Traffic collisions involving deer and other ungulates in Europe and available measures for mitigation. In Putman, R., Apollonio, M. & Andersen, R., R., eds., Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–59.Google Scholar
Linnell, J. D. C. (2015). Defining scales for managing biodiversity and natural resources in the face of conflicts. In Redpath, S. M., Guitiérrez, R. J., Wood, K. A. & Young, J. C., eds., Conflicts in Conservation: Navigating towards Solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–18.Google Scholar
Linnell, J. D. C. & Boitani, L. (2012). Building biological realism into wolf management policy: The development of the population approach in Europe. Hystrix, 23, 80–91.Google Scholar
Linnell, J. D. C., Breitenmoser, U., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Odden, J. & von Arx, M. (2009). Recovery of Eurasian lynx in Europe: What part has reintroduction played? In Hayward, M. W. & Somers, M. J., eds., Reintroduction of Top-Order Predators. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 72–91.Google Scholar
Linnell, J. D. C., Kaczensky, P., Wotschikowsky, U., Lescureux, N. & Boitani, L. (2015). Framing the relationship between people and nature in the context of European nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 29, 978–85.Google Scholar
Linnell, J. D. C., Salvatori, V. & Boitani, L. (2008). Guidelines for Population Level Management Plans for Large Carnivores in Europe. A Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe report prepared for the European Commission (contract 070501/2005/424162/MAR/B2).Google Scholar
Linnell, J. D. C., Trouwborst, A. & Fleurke, F. M. (2017). When is it acceptable to kill a strictly protected carnivore? Exploring the legal constraints on wildlife management within Europe’s Bern Convention. Nature Conservation, 21, 129–57.Google Scholar
Linnell, J. D. C. & Zachos, F. E. (2011). Status and distribution patterns of European ungulates: Genetics, population history and conservation. In Putman, R., Apollonio, M. & Andersen, R., eds., Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 12–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundmark, C. & Matti, S. (2015). Exploring the prospects for deliberative practices as a conflict-reducing and legitimacy-enhancing tool: The case of Swedish carnivore management. Wildlife Biology, 21, 147–56.Google Scholar
Lundmark, C., Matti, S. & Sandström, A. (2014). Adaptive co-management: How social networks, deliberation and learning affect legitimacy in carnivore management. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 60, 637–44.Google Scholar
Mace, G. M. (2014). Whose conservation? Science, 345, 1558–60.Google Scholar
Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L., Sullivan, L. & Dietsch, A. M. (2017). Values, trust, and cultural backlash in conservation governance: The case of wildlife management in the United States. Biological Conservation, 214, 303–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mysterud, A. (2010). Still walking on the wild side? Management actions as steps towards ‘semi-domestication’ of hunted ungulates. Journal of Animal Ecology, 47, 920–5.Google Scholar
Oriol-Cotterill, A., Valeix, M., Frank, L. G., Riginos, C. & Macdonald, D. W. (2015). Landscapes of coexistence for terrestrial carnivores: The ecological consequences of being downgraded from ultimate to penultimate predator by humans. Oikos, 124, 1263–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowska, E. H., Roberge, J. M., Blicharska, M. & Mikusinski, G. (2016). Gaps in ecological research on the world’s largest internationally coordinated network of protected areas: A review of Natura 2000. Biological Conservation, 200, 216–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellikka, J. & Sandström, C. (2011). The role of large carnivore committees in legitimising large carnivore management in Finland and Sweden. Environmental Management, 48, 212–28.Google Scholar
Phalan, B., Onial, M., Balmford, A. & Green, R. E. (2011). Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: Land sharing and land sparing compared. Science, 333, 1289–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putman, R. (2011). A review of the various legal and administrative systems governing management of large herbivores in Europe. In Putman, R., Apollonio, M & Andersen, R., eds., Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–79.Google Scholar
Redpath, S. M., Linnell, J. D. C., Festa-Bianchet, M., Boitani, L., Bunnefeld, N., Dickman, A., Gutierrez, R. J., Irvine, R. J., Johansson, M., Majic, A., McMahon, B. J., Pooley, S., Sandstrom, C., Sjolander-Lindqvist, A., Skogen, K., Swenson, J. E., Trouwborst, A., Young, J. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2017). Don't forget to look down: Collaborative approaches to predator conservation. Biological Reviews, 92, 2157–63.Google Scholar
Redpath, S. M., Young, J., Evely, A., Adams, W. M., Sutherland, W. J., Whitehouse, A., Amar, A., Lambert, R. A., Linnell, J. D. C., Watt, A. & Gutierrez, R. J. (2013). Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 100–9.Google Scholar
Reimoser, F. & Putman, R. (2011). Impacts of wild ungulates on vegetation: Costs and benefits. In Putman, R., Apollonio, M. & Andersen, R., eds., Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 144–91.Google Scholar
Sandström, A. & Lundmark, C. (2016). Network structure and perceived legitimacy in collaborative wildlife management. Review of Policy Research, 33, 442–62.Google Scholar
Sandström, C., DiGasper, S. W. & Ohman, K. (2013). Conflict resolution through ecosystem-based management: The case of Swedish moose management. International Journal of the Commons, 7, 549–70.Google Scholar
Sandström, C., Pellikka, J., Ratamäki, O. & Sande, A. (2009). Management of large carnivores in Fennoscandia: New patterns of regional participation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14, 37–50.Google Scholar
Schwerdtner, K. & Gruberb, B. (2007). A conceptual framework for damage compensation schemes. Biological Conservation, 134, 354–60.Google Scholar
Skogen, K. & Krange, O. (2003). A wolf at the gate: The anti-carnivore alliance and the symbolic construction of community. Sociologia Ruralis, 43, 309–25.Google Scholar
Skogen, K., Krange, O. & Figari, H. (2017). Wolf Conflicts: A Sociological Study. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Storie, J. T. & Bell, S. (2017). Wildlife management conflicts in rural communities: A case-study of wild boar (Sus scrofa) management in ErgluNovads, Latvia. Sociologia Ruralis, 57, 64–86.Google Scholar
Sykes, N. & Putman, R. (2014). Management of ungulates in the 21st century: How far have we come? In Putman, R. & Apollonio, M., eds., Behaviour and Management of European Ungulates. Dunbeath: Whittles Publishing, pp. 267–89.Google Scholar
Trouwborst, A. (2015). Law and conservation conflicts. In Redpath, S. M, Gutiérrez, R. J., Wood, K. A. & Young, J. C., eds., Conflicts in Conservation: Navigating towards Solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 108–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsiafouli, M. A., Apostolopoulou, E., Mazaris, A. D., Kallimanis, A. S., Drakou, E. G. & Pantis, J. D. (2013). Human activities in Natura 2000 sites: A highly diversified conservation network. Environmental Management, 51, 1025–33.Google Scholar
Zabel, A., Bostedt, G. & Engel, S. (2014). Performance payments for groups: The case of carnivore conservation in northern Sweden. Environmental & Resource Economics, 59, 613–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×