Development as freedom: individual freedom as a social commitment

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808395.011

9 - Development as freedom: individual freedom as a social commitment

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2011

Edited by

Shiban Khan and

Heiko Spitzeck: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Michael Pirson: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wolfgang Amann: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Shiban Khan: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Ernst von Kimakowitz: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Bertrand Russell, who was a firm atheist, was once asked what he would do if, following his death, he were to encounter God after all. Russell is supposed to have answered, “I will ask him: God Almighty, why did you give so little evidence of your existence?” Certainly the appalling world in which we live does not – at least on the surface – look like one in which an all-powerful benevolence is having its way. It is hard to understand how a compassionate world order can include so many people afflicted by acute misery, persistent hunger, and deprived and desperate lives, and why millions of innocent children have to die each year from lack of food, or medical attention, or social care.

This issue, of course, is not new, and it has been a subject of some discussion among theologians. The argument that God has reasons to want us to deal with these matters ourselves has had considerable intellectual support. As a nonreligious person, I am not in a position to assess the theological merits of this argument. But I can appreciate the force of the claim that people themselves must have responsibility for the development and change of the world in which they live. One does not have to be either devout or nondevout to accept this basic connection. As people who live – in a broad sense – together, we cannot escape the thought that the terrible occurrences that we see around us are quintessentially our problems.

Type: Chapter
Information: Humanism in Business , pp. 156 - 174

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808395.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aristotle, . 1980. The Nicomachean Ethics (revised edition), trans. Ross, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, I (6): 7.Google Scholar

Barro, R. 1996. Getting It Right: Markets and Choices in a Free Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Barro, R. and Lee, J-W. 1993. “Losers and Winners in Economic Growth.” Working Paper 4341. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Bauer, P. 1957. Economic Analysis and Policy in Underdeveloped Countries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, P. 1971. Dissent on Development. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. 1981. “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10: 283–345.Google Scholar

Earls, F. and Carlson, M. 1993. “Toward Sustainable Development for the American Family,” Daedalus 122: 93–121.Google Scholar

Earls, F. and Carlson, M. 1996. Promoting Human Capability as an Alternative to Early Crime. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. 1996. “In Pursuit of Fairness,” New York Review of Books 43(14), September 19, 40–4.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. 1976. Essays in Ethics, Social Behavior and Scientific Explanation. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayek, F. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Lewis, W. A. 1955. The Theory of Economic Growth. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1844. The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. Reprinted 1959. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1875. Critique of the Gotha Programme. Reprinted 1970. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Marx, K and Engels, F. 1846. The German Ideology. Reprinted 1932. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

McLellan, D. 1977. Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Mill, John S. 1859. On Liberty. Republished 1974, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Mill, John S. 1869. The Subjection of Women.

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Roemer, J. 1996. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rothschild, E. 1998. “Condorcet and Adam Smith on Education and Instruction,” in Rorty, A. O. (ed.). Philosophers on Education. London: Routledge, pp. 209–26.Google Scholar

Sala-i-Martin, X. 1994. “Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence.” Discussion Paper 1075. London: CEPR.

Sen, A. (forthcoming). Freedom, Social Choice, and Responsibility: Arrow Lectures and Other Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sen, A. 1980. “Equality of What?” in McMurrin, S. (ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Sen, A. 1982. Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Blackwell and Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press; republished 1997 Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 352–72.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1982. “The Right Not to Be Hungry,” in Floistad, G. (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy 2. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 343–60.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1983. “Development: Which Way Now?” Economic Journal 93: 745–62. Reprinted in Sen, A. 1984/1997. Resources, Values and Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1985a. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1985b. “Well Being, Agency, and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984,” Journal of Philosophy 82(4): 169–221.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1987. “The Standard of Living,” in Hawthorn, G. (ed.). Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1990a. “Justice: Means versus Freedoms,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(2): 111–21.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1990b. “Individual Freedom as a Social Commitment,” New York Review of Books 37(10): June 16, 49–55.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1993. “Capability and Well Being,” in Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (eds.), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 30–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1995. “Gender Inequality and Theories of Justice,” in Nussbaum, M. and Glover, J. (eds.), Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 259–73.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1997. “Justice and Assertive Incompleteness.” Mimeograph, Harvard University.

Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, A. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Revised edition, 1790. Republished 1976, Raphael, D. and Macfie, A. (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Republished 1976, Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S. (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tilly, C. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar