The retail investor and the EC

Niamh Moloney

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511674808.002

1 - The retail investor and the EC

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2010

Niamh Moloney

Show author details

Niamh Moloney: Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The importance of the retail markets

This book examines the nature of retail investor protection. It considers the protections which do, and those which should, apply to individual, private investors who purchase investment products, take investment advice, carry out direct trading and, overall, engage in short-term speculation or long-term savings through market-based instruments.

Its case study is the massive EC regulatory regime for the retail investment markets. This regime has grown exponentially in recent years and now dictates the nature of retail investor protection ‘on the books’ for the twenty-seven Member States of the European Union. But, as discussed throughout the book, retail market protection is not simply a function of ‘law on the books’. Effective retail market protection depends heavily on ‘law in action’. And ‘law in action’, in terms of, for example, innovative supervisory strategies, product design initiatives, retail market research, investor redress and investor education, is largely the preserve of the Member States. The book's main case study for domestic ‘law in action’ is the UK and the Financial Services Authority's increasingly strenuous efforts in the retail markets. But the book adopts a generally comparative approach, drawing on international experience and experience in the other Member States.

Why consider the retail markets and retail market regulatory design? As discussed in chapter 2, the financial crisis has wreaked destruction on household market savings; it calls for careful consideration of the role of regulation in the retail markets.

Type: Chapter
Information: How to Protect Investors
Lessons from the EC and the UK
, pp. 1 - 44

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511674808.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R., ‘Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Savings Plans’ (2001) 91 American Economic Review79CrossRef Google Scholar

,International Organization of Securities Commissions, Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation (IOSCO, 2008), p. 1Google Scholar

Moloney, N., EC Securities Regulation (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Moloney, N., ‘Confidence and Competence: The Conundrum of EC Capital Markets Law’ (2004) 4 Journal of Corporate Law Studies1CrossRef Google Scholar

Haythornthwaite, R., ‘Better Regulation in Europe’ in Weatherill, S. (ed.), Better Regulation (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2007), p. 19Google Scholar

MacNeill, I., An Introduction to the Law on Financial Investment (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 59–78, 91–135 and 165–85Google Scholar

Lomnicka, E., ‘Collective Investment Schemes’ in Blair, W. and Walker, G. (eds.), Financial Services Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 659Google Scholar

Benjamin, J., Financial Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 211–12Google Scholar

Corragio, V. and Franzosi, A., Household Portfolio and Demand for Equity: An International Comparison (Blt Notes No. 19, Borsa Italiana, 2008), p. 26Google Scholar

Coggan, P., ‘Disillusioned Followers Desert Cult of Equity’, Financial Times, 21 February 2003, p. 10Google Scholar

Bondt, W., ‘The Values and Beliefs of European Investors’ in Cetina, K. Knorr and Preda, A., The Sociology of Financial Markets (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 163, p. 169Google Scholar

Elst, C., ‘The Equity Markets, Ownership Structures and Control: Towards an International Harmonization’ in Hopt, K. and Wymeersch, E. (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 3)Google Scholar

Blundell, R. and Smith, J., ‘Understanding Differences in Household Financial Wealth Between the US and Great Britain’ (2003) 38 Journal of Human Resources241, 259Google Scholar

Ertürk, I., Froud, J., Solari, S. and Williams, K., The Reinvention of Prudence: Household Savings, Financialization, and Forms of Capitalism (University of Manchester, Centre for Research on SocioCultural Change, 2005), pp. 10–11Google Scholar

Alemanni, B. and Franzosi, A., Portfolio and Psychology of High Frequency Online Traders: Second Report on the Italian Market (Blt No. 16, Borsa Italiana, 2006)Google Scholar

Bank, Deutsche, Retail Certificates: A German Success Story (Deutsche Bank Research, EU Monitor43, 2007)Google Scholar

Biais, B., Declerck, F., Dow, J., Portes, R. and von-Thadden, E.-L.), European Corporate Bond Markets: Transparency, Liquidity and Efficiency (CEPR, 2006), p. 32Google Scholar

Karmel, R., ‘Reconciling Federal and State Interests in Securities Regulation in the US and Europe’ (2003) 28 Brooklyn Journal of International Law495Google Scholar

Gray, J. and Hamilton, J., Implementing Financial Regulation: Theory and Practice (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2006), p. 192Google Scholar