Book contents
- How Insurgency Begins
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
- How Insurgency Begins
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Rethinking How Armed Conflicts Begin
- Part II Uganda and Beyond
- 3 Context and Initial Conditions
- 4 The Rebels
- 5 Civilians
- 6 The State
- Part III Implications
- Book part
- References
- Index
- Series page
6 - The State
from Part II - Uganda and Beyond
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
- How Insurgency Begins
- Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics
- How Insurgency Begins
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Rethinking How Armed Conflicts Begin
- Part II Uganda and Beyond
- 3 Context and Initial Conditions
- 4 The Rebels
- 5 Civilians
- 6 The State
- Part III Implications
- Book part
- References
- Index
- Series page
Summary
This chapter examines evidence for the book’s arguments about the state’s behavior related to deterring and defeating new rebel groups. It shows that by developing institutions through which the central government learned fine-grained information about threats emanating from its territory, the post-1986 Ugandan state gradually gained an informational advantage relative to would-be insurgents. These institutions enabled the state to identify incipient insurrections and to “nip them in the bud” before they gained substantial military capacity. Extensive evidence from interviews with former rebel leaders, government intelligence officials, and civilians shows that the state’s ability to collect information about internal threats was an important component of prospective rebels’ calculations of whether or not to organize violence. This chapter’s focus on Uganda presents a rare opportunity to observe a transition from state fragility to relative stability. It also discusses the relevance of these arguments to other African countries.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- How Insurgency BeginsRebel Group Formation in Uganda and Beyond, pp. 176 - 202Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020