Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:47:20.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - From Tool to Poem

The Emergence of the Antagonism between Technics and Poetry in Heidegger’s Work

from I - Literature and Poetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Andrew Benjamin
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

If in Sein und Zeit Martin Heidegger famously discusses the sense of the possibilities of existence that can arise from a minor incident in the tool-shed – for example, the notorious remarks concerning ‘the broken hammer’ – he barely mentions art at all. Yet, over the subsequent decade, he becomes more and more attentive to the role that the work of art might play in the realm of thinking, and, above all, of poetry in particular as a way to outflank the deleterious forgetting-of-the-forgetting-of-the-meaning-of-being by the metaphysical tradition that has culminated in our own epoch of the worldwide reign of technology. In our time (if not only in our time), the ancient division between technē and poiesis has metastasized to the point where nothing escapes the enframing essence of modern technology … except, perhaps, something that poetry harbours that is irreducible to such an essence. This chapter takes up the question of the development of Heidegger’s doctrines on technology and poetry by examining two key moments: Being and Time and “The Origin of the Work of Art.” In doing so, the chapter reconstructs a processual “logic” to Heidegger’s turn that links these apparently different doctrines through the figure of the broken tool becoming poetry.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio. The Use of Bodies. Translated by Kotsko, Adam (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Alfano, Mark. ‘Digital Humanities for History of Philosophy: A Case Study on Nietzsche.’ In Levenberg, L. et al. (eds.), Research Methods for the Digital Humanities (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).Google Scholar
Allen, William. Ellipsis: Of Poetry and the Experience of Language after Heidegger, Hölderlin and Blanchot (Buffalo: SUNY, 2007).Google Scholar
Badiou, A. The Age of the Poets. Translated by Bosteels, B., introduction by Apter, E. and Bosteels, B. (London: Verso, 2014).Google Scholar
Beistegui, Miguel de. Heidegger & the Political (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Crompton, C. et al. (eds.). Doing More Digital Humanities: Open Approaches to Creation, Growth, and Development (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. Speaking against Number: Heidegger, Language and the Politics of Calculation (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Gold, M. K. and Klein, L. F. (eds.). Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019 (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Macqaurrie, John and Robinson, Edward (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Elucidations of Hölderlin’s Poetry. Translated by Hoeller, K. (New York: Humanity Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Off the Beaten Track. Edited and translated by Young, Julian and Haynes, Kenneth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Ponderings II–VI: Black Notebooks 1931–1938. Translated by Rojcewicz, Richard (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. Heidegger, Art and Politics: The Fiction of the Political. Translated by Turner, C. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Lagerkvist, A. (ed.). Digital Existence: Ontology, Ethics and Transcendence in Digital Culture (London and New York: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Millar Usiskuin, Jana, Walde, Christine, and Winter, Caroline. ‘Ontologies for Digital Humanists.’ In Crompton, et al., Doing More Digital Humanities, p. 186.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Mark. Heidegger, Aristotle and the Work of Art: Poiesis in Being (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Tucker, Aaron. ‘Beyond “Whiz-Bang”: 3D Printing and Critical Making in the Humanities.’ In Crompton, et al., Doing More Digital Humanities, pp. 119–20.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×