Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:25:23.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2021

Edited by
Sebastian Stein  and
Joshua Wretzel
Sebastian Stein
Affiliation:
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
Joshua Wretzel
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Hegel's Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences
A Critical Guide
 , pp. 293 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. (2002). Aesthetic Theory. Trans. R. Hullot-Kentor. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Alznauer, M. (2015). Hegel’s Theory of Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K. (1990). “Kant, Fichte, and Short Arguments to Idealism,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 72(1), pp. 63–85.Google Scholar
Ameriks, K. (2000). Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. (2006). The Treatise on the Divine Nature: Summa Theologiae I, 1–13. Trans. B. J. Shanley. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols. Edited by Barnes, J.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. C. (2008). “Introduction: The Puzzling Hegel Renaissance,” in Beiser, F. C., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (1998). “Hegel at the Court of the Ashanti,” in Barnett, S., ed. Hegel after Derrida. New York: Routledge, pp. 41–63.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2000). “With What Must the Philosophy of World History Begin? On the Racial Basis of Hegel’s Eurocentrism,” Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 22(2), pp. 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, C. (1980). “Property and Possession: Two Replies to Locke – Hume and Hegel,” in Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W., eds. Property. New York: New York University Press, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
Berthold-Bond, D. (1995). Hegel’s Theory of Madness. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Biard, J., et al. (1987). Introduction à la lecture de la Science de la Logique de Hegel, vol. 3: La doctrine du Concept. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Bonsiepen, W. (1997). Die Begründung einer Naturphilosophie bei Kant, Schelling, Fries und Hegel: Mathematische versus spekulative Naturphilosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1990). “Filling in Space,” Analysis, 50(2), pp. 62–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, B. (2013). Hegel and the Metaphysics of Absolute Negativity. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, K. (2011). Idealism without Limits: Hegel on the Problem of Objectivity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, K. (2016). “Hegel on Translating Representations: Rethinking the Task of Philosophy,” in Fonnesu, L. and Ziglioli, L., eds. System und Logik bei Hegel. Hildesheim: Olms, pp. 43–61.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. (2004). “Taking the System Seriously: Themes in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. (2007). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. ed. (2012a). “Hegel and the Unified Theory of Punishment,” in Brooks, T., ed. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, T., ed. (2012b). Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. (2012c). Punishment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. (2013). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right, 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. (2016). “In Defence of Punishment and the United Theory of Punishment: A Reply,” Criminal Law and Philosophy, 10, pp. 629–38.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. (2017a). “Hegel on Crime and Punishment,” in Brooks, T. and Stein, S., eds. Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 202–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, T. (2017b). “Hegel’s Philosophy of Law,” in Moyar, D., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 453–74.Google Scholar
Brooks, T., and Nussbaum, M. C., eds. (2015). Rawls’s Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, T., and Stein, S., eds. (2017). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brumbaugh, R. S. 1954. Plato’s Mathematical Imagination: The Mathematical Passages in the Dialogues and Their Interpretation. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Buchwalter, A. (2009). “Is Hegel’s Philosophy of History Eurocentric?,” in Dudley, W, ed. Hegel and History. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 87–110.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. W. (2006). The Logic of Hegel’s Logic: An Introduction. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, L. (2009). The Faces of Intellectual Disability: Philosophical Reflections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, L., and Kittay, E. F., eds. (2010). Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ciavatta, D. (2005). “Hegel on Owning One’s Body,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Clare, E. (2017). Brilliant Imperfection: Grappling with Cure. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. E. (1971). “Hegel’s Theory of Punishment,” in Pelczynski, Z. A., ed. Hegel’s Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–67.Google Scholar
Corti, L. (2016). “Conceptualism, Non-conceptualism, and the Method of Hegel’s Psychology,” in S. Herrmann-Sinai and L. Ziglioli, eds. Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 228–50.Google Scholar
Cramer, K. (1999). “Peripetien der Ontologie – Wolff, Kant, Hegel,” in Bubner, R., ed. Die Weltgeschichte – das Weltgericht? Stuttgart: Klett Cotta, pp. 176–207.Google Scholar
De Laurentiis, A. (2014). “Race in Hegel: Text and Context,” in Egger, M, ed. Philosophie nach Kant: Neue Wege zum Verständnis von Kants Transzendental- und Moralphilosophie. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 591–624.Google Scholar
DellaRocca, M. (2008). Spinoza. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Desmond, W. (1986). Art and the Absolute: A Study of Hegel’s Aesthetics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Desmond, W. (1992). Beyond Hegel and Dialectic: Speculation, Cult, and Comedy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Desmond, W. (2017). Hegel’s God: A Counterfeit Double? Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeVries, W. (1988). Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
DeVries, W. (2016). “Hegel’s Account of the Presence of Space and Time in Sensation, Intuition, and the World: A Sellarsian View,” in Herrmann-Sinai, S. and Ziglioli, L., eds. Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 214–27.Google Scholar
Dryden, J. (2013). “Hegel, Feminist Philosophy, and Disability: Rereading Our History,” Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(4), http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3868/3407 (accessed 9 February 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryden, J. (2016). “Digestion, Habit, and Being at Home: Hegel and the Gut as Ambiguous Other,” PhaenEx, 11(2), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Düsing, K. (2016). Das Problem der Subjektivität in Hegels Logik. Hamburg: Meiner. (First published Bonn: Bouvier, 1976.)Google Scholar
Fackenheim, E. L. (1970). The Religious Dimension in Hegel’s Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Falk, H. P. (1983). Das Wissen in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. (2019). Thinking and the I: Hegel and the Critique of Kant. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuerbach, L. (1959). Grundsätze der Philosophie der Zukunft, in Sämtliche Werke, Vol. 2. Edited by Bolin, W. and Jodl, F.. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstadt: Frommann.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1971a). Die Wissenschaftslehre (1804), in Fichtes Werke, Vol. 10. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1971b). Einige Vorlesungen über die Bestimmung des Gelehrten, 1794, in Fichtes Werke, Vol. 6. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1971c). System der Sittenlehre nach den Principien der Wissenschaftslehre, 1798, in Fichtes Werke, Vol. 4. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1971d). Zweite Einleitung in die Wissenschaftslehre (1797), in Fichtes Werke, Vol. 1. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1988). Early Philosophical Writings. Trans. and edited by Breazeale, D.. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (2005a). The Science of Knowing: J. G. Fichte’s 1804 Lectures on the Wissenschaftslehre. Trans. W. E. Wright. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (2005b). The System of Ethics. Trans. and edited by Breazeale, D. and Zöller, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ficara, E. (2019). “Empowering Forms: Hegel’s Conception of ‘Form’ and ‘Formal.’” in Bubbio, P. D., De Cesaris, A., Pagano, M., and Weslati, H., eds. Hegel, Logic and Speculation. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1962). Hegel: A Re-examination. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Fisher, Q. A. “Being-Together: An Essay on the First-Person Plural,” Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Foley, R. (2008). “Plato’s Undividable Line: Contradiction and Method in Republic VI,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, E. (2012). The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fossa, J. A., and Erickson, G. W. (2005). “The Divided Line and the Golden Mean,” Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática, 5(9), pp. 59–77.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1980). Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Trans. H. Kaal. Edited by McGuinness, B.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F. (1999). “Die Ontologie und ihr Schicksal in der Philosophie Hegels. Kantkritik in Fortsetzung kantischer Gedanken,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 210, pp. 465–84.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F. (2003). Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F., Horstmann, R. P., and Theunisen, M. (1980). Kritische Darstellung der Metaphysik: Eine Diskussion über Hegels Logik. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Furlotte, W. (2018). The Problem of Nature in Hegel’s Final System. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gaiger, J. (2006). “Catching Up with History: Hegel and Abstract Painting,” in Deligiorgi, K, ed. Hegel: New Directions. Chesham: Acumen, pp. 159–76.Google Scholar
Gerhard, M. (2015). Hegel und die logische Frage. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gethmann-Siefert, A. (1991). “Ästhetik oder Philosophie der Kunst: Die Nachschriften und Zeugnisse zu Hegels Berliner Vorlesungen,” Hegel-Studien, 26, pp. 92–110.Google Scholar
Gethmann-Siefert, A. (1992). “Das ‘moderne’ Gesamtkunstwerk: Die Oper,” in Gethmann-Siefert, A, ed. Phänomen versus System: Zum Verhältnis von philosophischer Systematik und Kunsturteil in Hegels Berliner Vorlesungen über Ästhetik oder Philosophie der Kunst. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 165–230.Google Scholar
Gethmann-Siefert, A. (2000). “Die Kunst (§§556–563): Hegels systematische Begründung der Geschichtlichkeit der Kunst,” in Drüe, H et al., eds. Hegels “Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften” (1830): Ein Kommentar zum Systemgrundriß. Franfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 317–74.Google Scholar
Gethmann-Siefert, A. (2005). “Die systematische Bestimmung der Kunst und die Geschichtlichkeit der Künste: Hegels Vorlesung über ‘Aestheticen sive philosophiam artis’ von 1826,” in Hegel, G., Philosophie der Kunst: Vorlesung von 1826. Edited by Gethmann-Siefert, A, Kwon, J.-I, and Berr, K. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 9–44.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. B. (1955). “Plato’s Mathematical Imagination,” Review of Metaphysics, 9, pp. 57–70.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, H. (1997). “Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness,” in Reath, A., Herman, B., and Korsgaard, C. M., eds. Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 329–60.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, H. (2001). “Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes,” in Watkins, E., ed. Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
Greene, M. (1972). Hegel on the Soul: A Speculative Anthropology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Haase, M. (2016). “Three Forms of the First Person Plural,” in Abel, G and Conant, J, eds. Rethinking Epistemology, Vol. 1. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 229–56.Google Scholar
Hackenesch, C. (2000). “Die Wissenschaft der Logik (§§ 19–244),” in Drüe, H et al., eds. Hegels “Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften” (1830): Ein Kommentar zum Systemgrundriß. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 87–138.Google Scholar
Halbig, C. (2002). Objektives Denken: Erkenntnistheorie und Philosophy of Mind in Hegels System. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. (2005). Hegel und der spätantike Neuplatonismus: Untersuchungen zur Metaphysik des Einen und des Nous in Hegels spekulativer und geschichtlicher Deutung. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. (2006). Der Aufstieg zum Einen: Untersuchungen zu Platon und Plotin. Munich: Saur.Google Scholar
Harris, E. E. (1983). An Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. (1972). “Hegel: A Non-metaphysical View,” in MacIntyre, A., ed. Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 101–24.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. (1999). Hegel’s Logic. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heath, T. (1921). A History of Greek Mathematics. Volume 1, From Thales to Euclid. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heath, T. (1949). Mathematics in Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1894). Philosophy of Mind (Volume 3 of Hegel’s Encyclopedia). Trans. W. Wallace. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1956). The Philosophy of History. Trans. J. Sibree. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1968). Philosophy of Nature (Volume 2 of Hegel’s Encyclopedia). Volume 1. Trans. M. J. Petry. London: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1968–). Gesammelte Werke. Edited by the Rheinisch-Westfälische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Science of Logic. Trans. A. V. Miller. Amherst: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature, Part Two of the Encyclopædia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830). Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970–1). Werke. Edited by Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind: Part Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830). Trans. W. Wallace, together with the Zusätze in Boumann’s text (1845), trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, 2 vols. Trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1984). Lectures on the Philosophy of World History: Introduction. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1986). The Philosophical Propadeutic. Trans. A. V. Miller. Edited by M. George and A. Vincent. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1988a). Introduction to the Philosophy of History. Trans. L. Rauch. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1988b). Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: One Volume Edition, The Lectures of 1827. Trans. R. F. Brown, P. C. Hodgson, and J. M. Stewart, with the assistance of H. S. Harris. Edited by P. C. Hodgson. Berkeley: The University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1990a). Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline and Critical Writings. Edited by Behler, E.. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1990b). Lectures on the History of Philosophy: The Lectures of 1825–1826: Volume III Medieval and Modern Philosophy. Trans. R. F. Brown, J. M. Stewart, and H. S. Harris. Edited by Brown, R. F.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991a). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Edited by Wood, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991b). The Encyclopedia Logic. Trans. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991c). Science of Logic. Trans. A. V. Miller. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1992). Vorlesungen über Logik und Metaphysik. Heidelberg 1817. Co-written by Good, F. A.. (Vorlesungen. Ausgwählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte, Vol. 11). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1994). Hegels Vorlesungen über die Philosophie des Geistes 1827/28. Edited by Hespe, F. and Tuschling, B., with an introduction by Tuschling, B.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995a). Lectures on Natural Right and Political Science: The First Philosophy of Right. Trans. J. M. Stewart and P. C. Hodgson. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995b). Lectures on the History of Philosophy, 3 volumes, volume 3 Medieval and Modern Philosophy. Trans. E. S. Haldane and F. H. Simson, with introduction by Beiser, F. C.. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2001). Vorlesungen über die Logik. Berlin 1831. Nachgeschrieben von Karl Hegel, in Vorlesungen: Ausgewählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte, Vol. 10. Edited by Rameil, U. in collaboration with Lucas, H.-C.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2002a). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Natur. Berlin 1819/20. Co-written by Ringier, Johann Rudolf. (Vorlesungen. Ausgewählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte, Vol. 16). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2002b). Vorlesung über Naturphilosophie. Berlin 1821/22. Postscript von Uexküll, Boris. Edited by Marmasse, G. and Posch, T.. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2003). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Kunst: 1823. Edited by Gethmann-Siefert, A. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2004). Philosophie der Kunst oder Ästhetik: Nach Hegel, im Sommer 1826; Mitschrift Friedrich Carl Hermann Victor von Kehler. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2006). Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825–6. Volume II: Greek Philosophy. Trans. R. F. Brown and J. M. Stewart with the assistance of H. S. Harris. Edited by Brown, R. F.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2007a). Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: Volume I: Introduction and the Concept of Religion. Trans. R. F. Brown, P. C. Hodgson, and J. M. Stewart. Edited by Hodgson, P. C. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2007b). Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit 1827–8. Translated by R. R. Williams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2007c). Philosophy of Mind (Part III of the Encyclopædia of the Philosophical Sciences). Trans. W. Wallace and A. V. Miller, revised by Inwood, M. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2007d). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Natur. Berlin 1825/26. Co-written by Dove, Heinrich Wilhelm. (Vorlesungen. Ausgewählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte, Vol. 17). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2008a). Lectures on Logic. Berlin, 1831. Transcribed by Karl Hegel. Trans. C. Butler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2008b). Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. T. M. Knox. Edited and introduction by Houlgate, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010a). Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part One: The Science of Logic. Trans. and edited by Brinkmann, K. and Dahlstrom, D. O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010b). The Science of Logic. Trans. G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2015). Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. 1st ed. Trans. Petry, M. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2017). Vorlesungen zur Ästhetik: Vorlesungsmitschrift Adolf Heimann (1828/1829). Edited by Olivier, A. P. and Gethmann-Siefert., A. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, Brill Deutschland.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2018a). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. T. Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2018b). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. with introduction and commentary by M. Inwood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., and Glockner, H. (1927). Sämtliche Werke. Jubiläumsausgabe. Auf Grund des von Ludwig Boumann [et al.] besorgten Originaldruckes im Faksimileverfahren. Stuttgart: Frommann.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., and Schneider, H. (1995). Vorlesung über Ästhetik: Berlin 1820/21: Eine Nachschrift. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Hotho, H. G., and Gethmann-Siefert, A. (1998). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Kunst: Berlin 1823. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1985). Schelling’s Treatise: On the Essence of Human Freedom. Trans. J. Stambaugh. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Heidemann, D. (2018). “Die Lehre vom Wesen. Zweyter Abschnitt. Die Erscheinung,” in Quante, M and Mooren, N, eds. Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 325–86.Google Scholar
Heidemann, D. (2019). “Hegel: Ein Rationalist?,” in Emundts, D and Sedgwick, S, eds. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism 14. Berlin: DeGruyter, pp. 235–64.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. (1971). “Hegels Theorie über den Zufall,” in Henrich, D., Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Henrich, D., ed. (1986). Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik: Formation und Rekonstruktion. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1986.Google Scholar
Heraclitus (2001). Fragments: The Collected Wisdom of Heraclitus. Trans. B. Haxton. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann-Sinai, S. (2016). “Subjective Action,” in Herrmann-Sinai, S. and Ziglioli, L., eds. Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 127–52.Google Scholar
Herrmann-Sinai, S., and Ziglioli, L. (2016). Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hermanni, F. (2013). “Kritischer Inklusivismus: Hegels Begriff der Religion und seine Theorie der Religionen,” Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosphie, 55(2), pp. 136–60.Google Scholar
Herz-Fischler, R. (1998). A Mathematical History of the Golden Number. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1994). Leviathan, with Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668. Edited by Curley, E.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hodgson, P. C. (2007). Hegel and Christian Theology: A Reading of the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2005). An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth, and History, 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2006). The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2009). “Hegel’s Logic,” in Beiser, F. C., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–34.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2011), “Essence, Reflexion, and Immediacy in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” in Houlgate, S. and Baur, M., eds. A Companion to Hegel. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2015). “Glaube, Liebe, Verzeihung: Hegel und die Religion,” in Hermanni, F, Nonnenmacher, B, and Schick, F, eds. Religion und Religionen im deutschen Idealismus: Schleiermacher – Hegel – Schelling. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 253–74.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2018). “Thought and Being in Hegel’s Logic: Reflections on Hegel, Kant and Pippin,” in Illetterati, L and Menegoni, F, eds. Geist und Geschichte. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, pp. 101–18.Google Scholar
Hutchings, K., and Pulkinnen, T., eds. (2010). Beyond Antigone: Hegel’s Philosophy and Feminist Thought. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Iber, C. (1990). Metaphysik absoluter Relationalität: Eine Studie zu den beiden ersten Kapiteln von Hegels Wesenslogik. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Iber, C. (2002). “Hegels Konzeption des Begriffs,” in Koch, A. F. and Schick, F., eds. G. W. F. Hegel: Wissenschaft der Logik. Berlin: Akademie, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar
Ikäheimo, H. (2017). “Hegel’s Psychology,” in Moyar, D., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 424–49.Google Scholar
Illetterati, L., and Menengoni, F., eds. (2018). Wirklichkeit: Beiträge zu einem Schlüsselbegriff der Hegelschen Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Inwood, M. (2010). A Commentary on Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, W. (1999). “Einleitung,” in Hegel, G. W. F, Wissenschaft der Logik. Erster Band: Die objektive Logik. Zweites Buch: Die Lehre vom Wesen (1813). Edited by Gawoll, H.-J.. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. ix–xxxv.Google Scholar
James, D. (2009). Art, Myth and Society in Hegel’s Aesthetics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jarrett, C. (2009). “Spinoza on Necessity,” in Koistinen, O., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–39.Google Scholar
Kang, S.-J. (1999). Reflexion und Widerspruch: Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche und systematische Untersuchung des Hegelschen Begriffs des Widerspruchs. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1968). Kants Werke. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1969). Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in Kant, I., Gesammelte Schriften. Edited by the der Wissenschaften, Preußische Akademie. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1989). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1991). The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, R. M., and Yeomans, C. (2017). “Math by Pure Thinking: R First and the Divergence of Measures in Hegel’s Philosophy of Mathematics,” European Journal of Philosophy, 25(4), pp. 985–1020.Google Scholar
Kittay, E. (1999). Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knappik, F. (2016). “Hegel’s Essentialism: Natural Kinds and the Metaphysics of Explanation in Hegel’s Theory of ‘the Concept,’” European Journal of Philosophy, 24(4), pp. 760–87.Google Scholar
Koch, A. F. (2003). Der Begriff als die Wahrheit: Zum Anspruch der Hegelschen “subjektiven Logik.” Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Koch, A. F. (2014a). “Subjektivität und Objektivität: Die Unterscheidung des Begriffs,” in Koch, A. F., Schick, F., Vieweg, K., and Wirsing, C., eds. Deutsches Jahrbuch Philosophie: Hegel – 200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 209–21.Google Scholar
Koch, A. F. (2014b). Die Evolution des logischen Raumes: Aufsätze zu Hegels Nichtstandard-Metaphysik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Koch, A. F., and Schick, F., eds. (2002). G. W. F. Hegel: Wissenschaft der Logik. Berlin: Akademie, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar
Koch, A. F., Schick, F., Vieweg, K., and Wirsing, C., eds. (2014). Deutsches Jahrbuch Philosophie: Hegel – 200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. (2010). “The Necessities of Hegel’s Logics,” in Nuzzo, A., ed. Hegel and the Analytic Tradition. London: Continuum, pp. 40–60.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. (2013). The Activity of Being: An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreines, J. (2007). “Between the Bounds of Experience and Divine Intuitions: Kant’s Epistemic Limits and Hegel’s Ambitions,” Inquiry, 50, pp. 306–34.Google Scholar
Kreines, J. (2008). “The Logic of Life: Hegel’s Philosophical Defense of Natural Teleology,” in Beiser, F. C, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 344–77.Google Scholar
Kreines, J. (2015). Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakebrink, B. (1979). Kommentar zu Hegels “Logik” in seiner “Enzyklopädie” von 1830. Band I: Sein und Wesen. Freiburg and Munich: Alber.Google Scholar
Lasserre, F. (1964). The Birth of Mathematics in the Age of Plato. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. A. (2011). Religion, Modernity, and Politics in Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (2007). Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Trans. N. J. Simek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luckner, A., and Ostritsch, S., eds. (2019) Philosophie der Existenz: Aktuelle Beiträge von der Ontologie bis zur Ethik. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Lumsden, S. (2013). “Between Nature and Spirit: Hegel’s Account of Habit,” in Stern, D., ed. Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 121–37.Google Scholar
Mabille, B. (1999). Hegel: L’épreuve de la contingence. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Macherey, P. (2011). Hegel or Spinoza. Trans. S. M. Ruddick. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C. “Our Three Attitudes towards Nature” (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Martin, C. (2012). Ontologie der Selbstbestimmung: Eine operationale Rekonstruktion von Hegels »Wissenschaft der Logik«. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Martin, C. (2014). “Die Idee als Einheit von Begriff und Objektivität,” in Koch, A., ed. 200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 223–42.Google Scholar
Martin, C. (2017a). “Das Logische und der Raum,” in Noller, J., ed. Wozu Metaphysik? Historisch-systematische Perspektiven. Freiburg: Alber, pp. 151–81.Google Scholar
Martin, C. (2017b). “Hegel on Truth and Absolute Spirit,” Idealistic Studies, 47, 191–217.Google Scholar
Martin, C. (2019). “G. W. F. Hegel: Die Verwandlung von Metaphysik in Logik,” in Urbich, J., ed. Metzler Handbuch Ontologie. Darmstadt: Metzler.Google Scholar
Martin, C. (2020). Die Einheit des Sinns: Untersuchungen zur Form des Denkens und Sprechens. Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar
McCarney, J. (2009). Hegel on History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCumber, J. (1990). “Hegel on Habit,” The Owl of Minerva, 21(2), pp. 155–65.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2017). “Why Does It Matter to Hegel That Geist Has a History?,” in Zuckert, R. and Kreines, J., eds. Hegel on Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
McWhorter, L. (1999). Bodies and Pleasures: Foucault and the Politics of Sexual Normalization. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. Y. (2010). “Acosmism or Weak Individuals?: Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(1), pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012). “‘Omnis determinatio est negatio’: Determination, Negation, and Self-Negation in Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel,” in Förster, M and Melamed, Y, eds. Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175–96.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. Y. (2017). The Causes of Our Belief in Free Will: Spinoza on Necessary, “Innate,” yet False Cognition in Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–41.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. D. A. Landes. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Michalko, R. (1999). The Two-in-One: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, P. J., ed. (1996). Feminist Interpretations of Hegel. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Moland, L. (2003). “Inheriting, Earning, and Owning: The Source of Practical Identity in Hegel’s ‘Anthropology,’” Owl of Minerva, 34(2), pp. 139–70.Google Scholar
Molas, A. (2019). “The Compatibility of Hegelian Recognition and Morality with the Ethics of Care,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 50(4), pp. 285–304.Google Scholar
Mowad, N. (2019). Meaning and Embodiment: Human Corporeity in Hegel’s Anthropology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Moyar, D. (2007). “Urteil, Schluss und Handlung: Hegels logische Übergänge im Argument zur Sittlichkeit,” Hegel-Studien, 42, 51–80.Google Scholar
Moyar, D. (2012). “Thought and Metaphysics: Hegel’s Critical Reception of Spinoza,” in Förster, M and Melamed, Y, eds. Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–213.Google Scholar
Moyar, D. (2018). “Die Lehre vom Begriff. Zweiter Abschnitt. Die Objektivität,” in Quante, M. and Mooren, N., eds. Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 559–650.Google Scholar
Mure, G. (1940). An Introduction to Hegel’s Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2018). “The Intellectual Love of God,” in DellaRocca, M., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 295–313.Google Scholar
Ng, K. (2016). “Life and Mind in Hegel’s Logic and Subjective Spirit,” Hegel Bulletin, 39(1), pp. 23–44.Google Scholar
Ng, K. (2019). “Life and the Space of Reasons: On Hegel’s Subjective Logic,” Hegel Bulletin, 40(1), pp. 121–42.Google Scholar
Novakovic, A. (2017). “Hegel’s Anthropology,” in Moyar, D., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 407–23.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (2013). “Anthropology, Geist, and the Soul–Body Relation: The Systematic Beginning of Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit,” in Stern, D, ed. Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (2018). Approaching Hegel’s Logic Obliquely. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Okochi, T. (2008). Ontologie und Reflexionsbestimmungen: Zur Genealogie der Wesenslogik Hegels. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Olshewsky, T. M. (1968). “Aristotle’s Use of Analogia,” Apeiron, 2(2), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Parekh, S. (2009). “Hegel’s New World: History, Freedom, and Race,” in Dudley, W., ed. Hegel and History. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 111–31.Google Scholar
Pelczynski, Z. A. (1964). “An Introductory Essay,” in Hegel, G. W. F, Hegel’s Political Writings. Trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–137.Google Scholar
Peperzak, A. (1987). Selbsterkenntnis des Absoluten. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Peters, J. (2015). Hegel on Beauty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Petry, M. (1970). Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Pillow, K. (2002). “Hegel and Homosexuality,” Philosophy Today, 46 (5, SPEP Supplement), pp. 75–91.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1996). Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2001). Hegel: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2011). “Freedom and Necessity. And Music,” in Honneth, A and Hendrichs, G, eds. Freiheit: Stuttgarter Hegelkongress. Frankfurt: Klostermann, pp. 313–29.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2013). Hegel’s Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (1989). Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2008). Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2014). After the Beautiful: Hegel and the Philosophy of Pictorial Modernism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2019). Hegel’s Realm of Shadows: Logic as Metaphysics in The Science of Logic. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Plato (1997). Complete Works. Edited by Cooper, J. M.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Plevrakis, H. (2018). “Übergang von der Logik in die Natur aus ‚absoluter Freiheit‘? Eine argumentanalytische Rekonstruktion des letzten Satzes der enzyklopädischen Logik Hegels,” Hegel-Studien, 52, pp. 103–38.Google Scholar
Ploucquet, G. (2006). Logik. Edited, translated, and with an introduction by Franz, M.. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1957). Time and Modality: Being the John Locke Lectures for 1955–6 Delivered in the University of Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Quante, M., and Mooren, N., eds. (2018). Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Rademaker, H. (1979). Hegels “Wissenschaft der Logik”: Eine darstellende und erläuternde Einführung. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Rand, S. (2007). “The Importance and Relevance of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Nature,’” The Review of Metaphysics, 61(2), pp. 379–400.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Edited by Herman, B.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Edited by Kelly, E.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Redding, P. (2017). “Findlay’s Hegel: Idealism as Modal Actualism,” Critical Horizons, 18(4), pp. 359–77.Google Scholar
Redding, P. (2018). “Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,” in E. N. Zalta, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/hegel (accessed 10 February 2021).Google Scholar
Redding, P. (2019). “Time and Modality in Hegel’s Account of Judgment,” in Ball, B. and Schuringa, C., eds. The Act and Object of Judgment: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 91–109.Google Scholar
Rohs, P. (1982). Form und Grund: Interpretation eines Kapitels der Hegelschen Wissenschaft der Logik, 3rd ed. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. (2014). The Idea of Hegel’s Science of Logic. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1906). “Review of Symbolic Logic and Its Applications by Hugh MacColl,” Mind, New Series, 15(58), pp. 255–60.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1945). A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rutter, B. (2011). Hegel on the Modern Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1975). Zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie: Münchener Vorlesungen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1982). Philosophische Briefe über Dogmatismus und Kritizismus, in Historisch-kritische Ausgabe F. W. J. Schelling, Vol. I/3. Edited by Buchner, H, Jacobs, W. G, and Pieper., A Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1985). Ausgewählte Schriften. Edited by Frank, M, 6 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (2005). System des transcendentalen Idealismus, in Historisch-kritische Ausgabe F. W. J. Schelling, Vol. I/9-1. Edited by Korten, H and Ziche, P. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (2009). Darstellung meines Systems der Philosophie, in Historisch-kritische Ausgabe F. W. J. Schelling, Vol. I/10. Edited by Durner, M. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Schick, F. (1994). Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik: Metaphysische Letztbegründung oder Theorie logischer Formen? Freiburg and Munich: Alber.Google Scholar
Schick, F. (2012). “Logik, Wirklichkeit und ihre Verwechslung. Schellings Hegel-Kritik,” in Hermanni, F., ed. “Der Anfang und das Ende aller Philosophie ist – Freiheit!”: Schellings Philosophie in der Sicht neuerer Forschung. Tübingen: Attempto, pp. 383–401.Google Scholar
Schick, F. (2018). “Die Lehre vom Begriff. Erster Abschnitt. Die Subjectivität,” in Quante, M. and Mooren, N., eds. Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 457–558.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. J. (1997). G. W. F. Hegel: “Wissenschaft der Logik – Die Lehre vom Wesen.” Ein einführender Kommentar. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Schmidt am Busch, H.-C. (2010). “What Does It Mean to ‘Make Oneself into an Object’? In Defense of a Key Notion of Hegel’s Theory of Action,” in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C., eds. Hegel on Action. London: Palgrave, pp. 189–211.Google Scholar
Siebers, T. (2019). “Returning the Social to the Social Model,” in Mitchell, D. T., Antebi, S., and Snyder, S. L., eds. The Matter of Disability: Materiality, Biopolitics, Crip Affect. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 39–47.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (2014). Embodied Virtuosity: Dances from Disability Culture. Emory University YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-qfZA1V7Yo (accessed 14 November 2019).Google Scholar
Speight, A. (2015). “Hegel’s Philosophy of Art,” in Baur, M, ed. Hegel: Key Concepts. London: Routledge, pp. 103–15.Google Scholar
Speight, A. (2019). “Art as a Mode of Absolute Spirit: The Development and Significance of Hegel’s Encyclopaedia Account of the Philosophy of Art,” in Bykova, M. F, ed. Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–42.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. de (1994). Ethics, in A Spinoza Reader. Trans. and edited by E. Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (1992). Hegels analytische Philosophie: Die Wissenschaft der Logik als kritische Theorie der Bedeutung. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Stern, R. (2009). Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. (2018). Hegel’s Interpretation of the Religions of the World: The Logic of the Gods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2018a). “Matter and Form: Hegel, Organicism and the Difference between Women and Men,” in Stone, A., Nature, Ethics and Gender in German Romanticism and Idealism. London: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 191–205.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2018b). Nature, Ethics and Gender in German Romanticism and Idealism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2020). “Hegel and Colonialism,” Hegel Bulletin, 41(2), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Testa, I. (2013). “Hegel’s Naturalism or Soul and Body in the Encyclopedia,” in Stern, D, ed. Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Theunissen, M. (1980). Sein und Schein: Die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Trisokkas, I. (2009). “The Speculative Logical Theory of Universality,” The Owl of Minerva, 40, pp. 141–74.Google Scholar
Trisokkas, I. (2012). Pyrrhonian Scepticism and Hegel’s Theory of Judgement. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Trisokkas, I. (2017). “The Two-Sense Reading of Spinoza’s Definition of Attribute,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(6), pp. 1093–115.Google Scholar
Vinco, R. (2015). “Philosophie ist Gottesdienst: Zum liturgischen Charakter des hegelschen Philosophieren,” in Hermanni, F, Nonnenmacher, B, and Schick, F, eds. Religion und Religionen im deutschen Idealismus: Schleiermacher – Hegel – Schelling. Tübingen:Mohr Siebeck, pp. 233–51.Google Scholar
Wandschneider, D. (2004). “Zur Dialektik des Übergangs von der absoluten Idee zur Natur. Eine Skizze,” in Schneider, H., ed. Sich in Freiheit entlassen: Natur und Idee bei Hegel. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 107–24.Google Scholar
Wandschneider, D. (2016). “Die Entäußerung der Idee zur Natur bei Hegel und ihre ontologische Bedeutung,” in Neuser, W., ed. Natur zwischen Logik und Geschichte: Beiträge zu Hegels Naturphilosophie. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, pp. 61–71.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (2004). Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wendte, M. (2012). “To Develop Relational Autonomy: On Hegel’s View of People with Disabilities,” in Brock, B., ed. Disability in the Christian Tradition: A Reader. Grand Rapids and Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans, pp. 251–85.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1997). Science and the Modern World. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wicks, R. (1993). “Hegel’s Aesthetics: An Overview,” in Beiser, F. C, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 348–77.Google Scholar
Williams, R. R. (2007). “Translator’s Introduction,” in Hegel, G. W. F., Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit 1827–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Williams, R. R. (2017). Hegel on the Proofs and Personhood of God: Studies in Hegel’s Logic and Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, S. (2002). “At Home with Down Syndrome and Gender,” Hypatia, 17(3), pp. 89–117.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (2013). “The Science of Logic,” in De Laurentiis, A. and Edwards, J., eds. The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Wood, A. W. (1990). Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, A. W. (2017). “Method and System in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right,” in Brooks, T. and Stein, S., eds. Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 82–102.Google Scholar
Wretzel, J. (2018). “Organic Imagination as Intuitive Intellect: Self-Knowledge and Self-Constitution in Hegel’s Early Critique of Kant,” European Journal of Philosophy, 26(3), pp. 958–73.Google Scholar
Wretzel, J. I. (2020). “Constraint and the Ethical Agent: Hegel between Constructivism and Realism,” in Gledhill, J. and Stein, S., eds. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 88–106.Google Scholar
Yeomans, C. (2012). Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeomans, C. (2019). “Perspective and Logical Pluralism in Hegel,” Hegel Bulletin, 40(1), pp. 29–50.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Sebastian Stein, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany, Joshua Wretzel, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book: Hegel's <I>Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences</I>
  • Online publication: 07 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592000.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Sebastian Stein, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany, Joshua Wretzel, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book: Hegel's <I>Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences</I>
  • Online publication: 07 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592000.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Sebastian Stein, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany, Joshua Wretzel, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book: Hegel's <I>Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences</I>
  • Online publication: 07 August 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592000.017
Available formats
×