Book contents
- The Handbook of Behavior Change
- The Handbook of Behavior Change
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Sidebars
- Contributors
- 1 Changing Behavior: A Theory- and Evidence-Based Approach
- Part I Theory and Behavior Change
- Part II Methods and Processes of Behavior Change: Intervention Development, Application, and Translation
- Part III Behavior Change Interventions: Practical Guides to Behavior Change
- 31 Attitudes and Persuasive Communication Interventions
- 32 Self-Efficacy Interventions
- 33 Imagery, Visualization, and Mental Simulation Interventions
- 34 Affect-Based Interventions
- 35 Autonomy-Supportive Interventions
- 36 Incentive-Based Interventions
- 37 Monitoring Interventions
- 38 Goal Setting Interventions
- 39 Planning and Implementation Intention Interventions
- 40 Self-Control Interventions
- 41 Habit Interventions
- 42 Economic and Behavioral Economic Approaches to Behavior Change
- 43 Dyadic Behavior Change Interventions
- 44 Social Identity Interventions
- 45 Motivational Interviewing Interventions
- 46 The Science of Behavior Change: The Road Ahead
- Index
- References
43 - Dyadic Behavior Change Interventions
from Part III - Behavior Change Interventions: Practical Guides to Behavior Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2020
Book contents
- The Handbook of Behavior Change
- The Handbook of Behavior Change
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Sidebars
- Contributors
- 1 Changing Behavior: A Theory- and Evidence-Based Approach
- Part I Theory and Behavior Change
- Part II Methods and Processes of Behavior Change: Intervention Development, Application, and Translation
- Part III Behavior Change Interventions: Practical Guides to Behavior Change
- 31 Attitudes and Persuasive Communication Interventions
- 32 Self-Efficacy Interventions
- 33 Imagery, Visualization, and Mental Simulation Interventions
- 34 Affect-Based Interventions
- 35 Autonomy-Supportive Interventions
- 36 Incentive-Based Interventions
- 37 Monitoring Interventions
- 38 Goal Setting Interventions
- 39 Planning and Implementation Intention Interventions
- 40 Self-Control Interventions
- 41 Habit Interventions
- 42 Economic and Behavioral Economic Approaches to Behavior Change
- 43 Dyadic Behavior Change Interventions
- 44 Social Identity Interventions
- 45 Motivational Interviewing Interventions
- 46 The Science of Behavior Change: The Road Ahead
- Index
- References
Summary
Most theories on which behavior change interventions are based focus on individual self-regulation and neglect the influence of the social environment. This chapter highlights theoretical approaches and empirical research on effects of the social environment on behavior change with a focus on dyadic behavior change interventions. Dyadic behavior change comprises “parallel” techniques that can be any individual technique directed at both partners in the dyad; “cross-over” techniques that involve interaction between partners but not necessarily administered with both partners present; and “joint” techniques in which both partners are actively involved. A continuum of individual to dyadic behavior change techniques that address different degrees of involvement of dyad members is provided. Based on the continuum, the chapter reviews dyadic behavior change intervention research and the theories involved. The chapter highlights the need for systematic research in dyadic behavior change and more comprehensive reporting of intervention content and delivery. A step-by-step guide provides guidance on effective implementation of dyadic behavior change interventions based on existing theory and current evidence. Owing to the heterogeneity in content, theoretical background, and empirical results, however, the guide also defines the research gaps and required research on dyadic behavior change to address them.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Handbook of Behavior Change , pp. 632 - 648Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Antonucci, T. C., Akiyama, H., & Takahashi, K. (2004). Attachment and close relationships across the life span. Attachment and Human Development, 6, 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461673042000303136Google Scholar
Arden‐Close, E., & McGrath, N. (2017). Health behaviour change interventions for couples: A systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 22, 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175Google Scholar
Baucom, D. H., Kirby, J. S., & Kelly, J. T. (2010). Couple-based interventions to assist partners with psychological and medical problems. In Hahlweg, K., Grawe-Gerber, M., & Baucom, D. H. (Eds.), Enhancing Couples: The Shape of Couple Therapy to Come (pp. 78–92). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing.Google Scholar
Baucom, D. H., Porter, L. S., Kirby, J. S., & Hudepohl, J. (2012). Couple-based interventions for medical problems. Behavior Therapy, 43, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.008Google Scholar
Berli, C., Bolger, N., Shrout, P. E., Stadler, G., & Scholz, U. (2018). Interpersonal processes of couples’ daily support for goal pursuit: The example of physical activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berli, C., Stadler, G., Inauen, J., & Scholz, U. (2016). Action control in dyads: A randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity in everyday life. Social Science & Medicine, 163, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.003Google Scholar
Best, J. R., Goldschmidt, A. B., Mockus-Valenzuela, D. S., Stein, R. I., Epstein, L. H., & Wilfley, D. E. (2016). Shared weight and dietary changes in parent-child dyads following family-based obesity treatment. Health Psychology, 35, 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000247Google Scholar
Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723Google Scholar
Burkert, S., Scholz, U., Gralla, O., Roigas, J., & Knoll, N. (2011). Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: A randomized-controlled planning intervention. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, J., Darbes, L. A., & Operario, D. (2010). Couples-focused behavioral interventions for prevention of HIV: Systematic review of the state of evidence. AIDS and Behavior, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-008-9471-4Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., & Lewis, M. A. (2002). Health-related social influence: A social ecological perspective on tactic use. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502019004050Google Scholar
Carr, R. M., Prestwich, A., Kwasnicka, D. et al. (2019). Dyadic interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 13, 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1532312Google Scholar
Craddock, E., vanDellen, M. R., Novak, S. A., & Ranby, K. W. (2015). Influence in relationships: A meta-analysis on health-related social control. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1011271Google Scholar
Crepaz, N., Tungol-Ashmon, M. V., Vosburgh, H. W., Baack, B. N., & Mullins, M. M. (2015). Are couple-based interventions more effective than interventions delivered to individuals in promoting HIV protective behaviors? A meta-analysis. AIDS Care, 27, 1361–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2015.1112353Google Scholar
Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (Eds.), Wiley Series on Personality Processes. Social Support: An Interactional View (pp. 319–366). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, S. U., O’Carroll, R. E., & Williams, B. (2016). Form of delivery as a key “active ingredient” in behaviour change interventions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12203Google Scholar
Faseru, B., Richter, K. P., Scheuermann, T. S., & Park, E. W. (2018). Enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8, CD002928. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002928.pub4Google ScholarPubMed
Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, , M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122, 648–673. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039654Google Scholar
Gleason, M. E. J., Iida, M., Bolger, N., & Shrout, P. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203253473Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagger, M. S., & Hardcastle, S. J. (2014). Interpersonal style should be included in taxonomies of behavior change techniques. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I. et al. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348, g1687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687Google Scholar
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7, e1000316.Google Scholar
Inauen, J., Tobias, R., & Mosler, H.‐J. (2014). The role of commitment strength in enhancing safe water consumption: Mediation analysis of a cluster‐randomized trial. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12068Google Scholar
Jackson, S. E., Steptoe, A., & Wardle, J. (2015). The influence of partner’s behavior on health behavior change: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175, 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7554Google Scholar
Keller, J., Fleig, L., Hohl, D. H. et al. (2017). Which characteristics of planning matter? Individual and dyadic physical activity plans and their effects on plan enactment. Social Science and Medicine, 189, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.025Google Scholar
Knoll, N., Hohl, D. H., Keller, J., Schuez, N., Luszczynska, A., & Burkert, S. (2017). Effects of dyadic planning on physical activity in couples: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 36, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000423CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoll, N., Scholz, U., & Ditzen, B. (2019). Social support and family processes. In Revenson, T. A. & Gurung, R. A. R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Health Psychology (pp. 279–289). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., Peters, G.-J. Y. et al. (2016). A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: An intervention mapping approach. Health Psychology Review, 10, 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155Google Scholar
Lewis, M. A., McBride, C. M., Pollak, K. I., Puleo, E., Butterfield, R. M., & Emmons, K. M. (2006). Understanding health behavior change among couples: An interdependence and communal coping approach. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1369–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.006Google Scholar
Lüscher, J., Berli, C., Schwaninger, P., & Scholz, U. (2019). Smoking cessation with smartphone applications (SWAPP): A randomized controlled trial. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Lüscher, J., Stadler, G., Ochsner, S. et al. (2015). Daily negative affect and smoking after a self-set quit attempt: The role of dyadic invisible social support in a daily diary study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20, 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martire, L. M., & Helgeson, V. S. (2017). Close relationships and the management of chronic illness: Associations and interventions. American Psychologist, 72, 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000066Google Scholar
McLean, N., Griffin, S., Toney, K., & Hardeman, W. (2003). Family involvement in weight control, weight maintenance and weight-loss interventions: A systematic review of randomised trials. International Journal of Obesity, 27, 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michie, S., Carey, R. N., Johnston, M. et al. (2018). From theory-inspired to theory-based interventions: A protocol for developing and testing a methodology for linking behaviour change techniques to theoretical mechanisms of action. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52, 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9816-6Google Scholar
Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M. et al. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Lawton, R., Bailey, W., Litman, J., & Molyneaux, V. (2005). Individual and collaborative implementation intentions and the promotion of breast self-examination. Psychology and Health, 20, 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320500183335Google Scholar
Prestwich, A., Conner, M. T., Lawton, R. J., Ward, J. K., Ayres, K., & McEachan, R. R. C. (2012). Randomized controlled trial of collaborative implementation intentions targeting working adults’ physical activity. Health Psychology, 31, 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prestwich, A., Conner, M. T., Lawton, R. J., Ward, J. K., Ayres, K., & McEachan, R. R. C. (2014). Partner- and planning-based interventions to reduce fat consumption: Randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12047Google Scholar
Radtke, T., Luszczynska, A., Schenkel, K., Biddle, S., & Scholz, U. (2018). A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an individual planning intervention with collaborative planning in adolescent friendship dyads to enhance physical activity (TWOgether). BMC Public Health, 18, 911. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5818-6Google Scholar
Rafaeli, E., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2009). Skilled support within intimate relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 1, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00003.xGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, R., Ahluwalia, S. C., Xenakis, L., Apaydin, E., Raaen, L., & Grimm, G. (2017). A systematic review of peer-supported interventions for health promotion and disease prevention. Preventive Medicine, 101, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2015). Responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.001Google Scholar
Richards, E. A., Franks, M. M., McDonough, M. H., & Porter, K. (2017). “Let’s move”: A systematic review of spouse-involved interventions to promote physical activity. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 56, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2017.1415160Google Scholar
Rook, K. S. (1990). Support, companionship, and control in older adults’ social networks: Implications for well-being. In Stephens, M. A., Crowther, J. H., Hobfoll, S. E., & Tennenbaum, D. L. (Eds.), Stress and Coping in Later-Life Families (pp. 437–463). New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Scholz, U., & Berli, C. (2014). A dyadic action control trial in overweight and obese couples (DYACTIC). BMC Public Health, 14, 1321. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, R., Czaja, S. J., McKay, J. R., Ory, M. G., & Belle, S. H. (2010). Intervention taxonomy (ITAX): Describing essential features of interventions. American Journal of Health Behavior, 34, 811–821. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.34.6.15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidman, G., Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2006). Why is enacted social support associated with increased distress? Using simulation to test two possible sources of spuriousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279582Google Scholar
Sniehotta, F. F., Nagy, G., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2006). The role of action control in implementing intentions during the first weeks of behaviour change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X62460Google Scholar
Sullivan, K. T., & Davila, J. (2014). The problem is my partner: Treating couples when one partner wants the other to change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, M. Y., Lasswell, S. M., Lanier, Y., & Miller, K. S. (2014). Impact of parent-child communication interventions on sex behaviors and cognitive outcomes for black/African-American and Hispanic/Latino youth: A systematic review, 1988–2012. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.004Google Scholar
Voils, C. I., Coffman, C. J., Yancy, W. S. et al. (2013). A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of CouPLES: A spouse-assisted lifestyle change intervention to improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Preventive Medicine, 56, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.11.001Google Scholar
Webel, A. R., Okonsky, J., Trompeta, J., & Holzemer, W. L. (2010). A systematic review of the effectiveness of peer-based interventions on health-related behaviors in adults. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 247–253.Google Scholar