Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:22:58.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Motivations That Affect Professional Knowledge in Germany and Austria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

By
Johannes König  and
Martin Rothland
Edited by
Helen M. G. Watt ,
Paul W. Richardson  and
Kari Smith
Helen M. G. Watt
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Paul W. Richardson
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Kari Smith
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Career choice motivation of prospective teachers is supposed to be a significant factor in the admission to and progression in a teacher education program. When asking about the effects of teaching motivations for student teachers who just entered initial teacher education, various indicators of training success can be examined, such as satisfaction with training, self-evaluation of professional development, or teacher education grades. However, there is a lack of empirical studies that link teaching motivations with student teachers’ acquisition of professional knowledge. Exceptions are analyses conducted by König and Rothland (2012) and König and Herzmann (2011), utilising longitudinal datasets of student teachers. They provide evidence that future teachers’ acquisition of general pedagogical knowledge (GPK) as assessed by the TEDS-M test (König et al., 2011) at two timepoints is affected by teaching motivations measured by the FIT-Choice scale (Watt & Richardson, 2007). For example, “job security motivation” showed a positive effect on the learning gain between two occasions of measurement within one academic year during initial teacher education (König & Rothland, 2012). Although such findings enrich the discussion about the meaning and the predictive validity of teaching motivations for future teachers just entering initial teacher education, at least three major questions arise that require further research.

First, findings reported by König and Rothland (2012) and König and Herzmann (2011) are difficult to generalise, since only a single teacher education institution was included in each of these studies. Second, presumably the investigation of student teachers’ acquisition of pedagogical knowledge as a motivational outcome needs more complex modelling that would account for more variables (e.g., teaching motivations at two timepoints). Thirdly, in a time of globalisation, when the discourse on teacher education and the definition of what preservice teachers have to know and be able to do are no longer limited to institutional, regional, or national boundaries, it seems essential to clarify those questions from a comparative perspective.

In our chapter, we will analyse how teaching motivations may affect general pedagogical knowledge (GPK), using data from future teachers in Germany and Austria from the longitudinal study EMW (Change of Teaching Motivations and Acquisition of Pedagogical Knowledge during Initial Teacher Education). Motivations for choosing teaching were measured by the FIT-Choice scale (Watt & Richardson, 2007) and GPK by a paper-and-pencil test derived from TEDS-M (König et al., 2011) at two timepoints.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation , pp. 126 - 161
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Baker, S. R. (2004). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance. Current Psychology, 23, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, J. & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W. et al. (eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project (pp. 25–48). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. Educational Research, 35, 463–82.Google Scholar
Berliner, D. C. (2004). Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromme, R. (1992). Der Lehrer als Experte: zur Psychologie des professionellen Wissens [The Teacher as an Expert: On the Psychology of Professional Knowledge]. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Bromme, R. (2001). Teacher expertise. In Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 15459–65). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Brookhart, S. M. & Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, N. & ten Brinke, S. (1995). Der Einfluss integrativer Lehrerausbildung auf die Unterrichtskompetenz (II) [The influence of integrative teacher education on teaching competence]. Empirische Pädagogik, 9, 289–330.Google Scholar
Brühwiler, Chr. (2001). Die Bedeutung von Motivation in der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerausbildung [The effect of motivation in teacher education]. In Oser, F. & Oelkers, J. (eds.), Die Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildungssysteme. Von der Allrounderbildung zur Ausbildung professioneller Standards (pp. 343–97). Zürich: Rüegger.Google Scholar
Cortina, K. S. & Thames, M. H. (2013). Teacher education in Germany. In Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W. et al. (eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project (pp. 49–62). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delannoy, F., McKenzie, Ph., Wolter, St. & van der Ree, B. (2004). Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Country Note: Austria. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, Values, and Academic Behaviors. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. (eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 105–21). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gassner., O. & Schratz, M. (2000). Austrian teacher education systems. In Paiva-Campos, B. (ed.), Teacher Education Policies in the European Union (pp. 127–36). Lisbon: INAFOP.Google Scholar
König, J. (2013). First comes the theory, then the practice? On the acquisition of general pedagogical knowledge during initial teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(4), 999–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. (2014a). Forschung zum Erwerb von pädagogischem Wissen angehender Lehrkräfte in der Lehrerausbildung [Research on the acquisition of future teachers’ pedagogical knowledge during teacher education]. In Terhart, E., Bennewitz, H. & Rothland, M. (eds.), Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf [Handbook on the Research of the Teacher Profession] (2nd edn., pp. 615–641). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
König, J. (2014b). Designing an International Instrument to Assess Teachers’ General Pedagogical Knowledge (GPK): Review of Studies, Considerations, and Recommendations. Paris: OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/CERI/CD/RD%282014%293/REV1&doclanguage=en.Google Scholar
König, J. & Blömeke, S. (2013). Preparing teachers of mathematics in Germany. In Schwille, J., Ingvarson, L. & Holdgreve-Resendez, R. (eds.), TEDS-M Encyclopaedia. A Guide to Teacher Education Context, Structure and Quality Assurance in 17 Countries: Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M) (pp. 100–115). Amsterdam: IEA.Google Scholar
König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, B. & Hsieh, F.-J. (2011). General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: on the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education, 62 (2), 188–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. & Klemenz, S. (2015). Der Erwerb von pädagogischem Wissen bei angehenden Lehrkräften in unterschiedlichen Ausbildungskontexten: Zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung in Deutschland und Österreich [The acquisition of pedagogical knowledge by future teachers from a comparative perspective: on the effectiveness of teacher education in Germany and Austria]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 18(2), 247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. & Rothland, M. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: effects on general pedagogical knowledge during initial teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J. & Rothland, M. (2013). Pädagogisches Wissen und berufsspezifische Motivation am Anfang der Lehrerausbildung. Zum Verhältnis von kognitiven und nicht-kognitiven Eingangsmerkmalen von Lehramtsstudierenden [Pedagogical knowledge and job-specific motivation at the beginning of teacher training: on the relation between cognitive and non-cognitive enrolment characteristics among students in teacher training]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 59(1), 43–65.Google Scholar
König, J., Rothland, M., Darge, K., Lünnemann, M. & Tachtsoglou, S. (2013). Erfassung und Struktur berufswahlrelevanter Faktoren für die Lehrerausbildung und den Lehrerberuf in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 16 (3), 553–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, J., Rothland, M., Tachtsoglou, S. & Klemenz, S. (2016). Comparing the change of teaching motivations among preservice teachers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland: do in-school learning opportunities matter? International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK) (2009). Information des Sekretariats über die Regelungen des KMK-Beschlusses vom 22.10.1999 ‘Gegenseitige Anerkennung von Lehramtsprüfungen und Lehramtsbefähigungen’ (Stand: 05.02.2009). Bonn: Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.Google Scholar
Künsting, J. & Lipowsky, F. (2011). Studienwahlmotivation und Persönlichkeitseigenschaften als Prädiktoren für Zufriedenheit und Strategienutzung im Lehramtsstudium [Motivation for choosing a teacher education programme and personality traits as predictors for study satisfaction and strategy use]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, L. E. (2008). Student teachers’ achievement goal orientations during teacher studies: antecedents, correlates and outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 438–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, J. (2009). LehrerIn werden in Österreich: Empirische Befunde zum Lehramtsstudium [Becoming a teacher in Austria: empirical findings on teacher education]. Erziehung und Unterricht, 159, 14–33.Google Scholar
Moran, A., Kilpatrick, R., Abbott, L. et al. (2001). Training to teach: motivating factors and implications for recruitment. Evaluation and Research in Education, 15(1), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. O. & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2010). Mplus (Version 7.0) [computer software]. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Posch, P. (2010). Teacher education in Austria. In Karras, K. G. & Wolhuter, C. C. (eds.), International Handbook of Teacher Education World-Wide: Issues and Challenges (Vol. 1, pp. 61–82). Athens: Atrapos.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Structural modelling of nine factors of educational productivity. In Walberg, H. J. (ed.), Advances in Educational Productivity, Vol. 3: Analytic Methods for Educational Productivity (pp. 79–95). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, P. W. & Watt, H. M. G. (2005). ‘I’ve decided to become a teacher’: influences on career change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 475–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, P. W. & Watt, H. M. G. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, P. W. & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Current and future directions in teacher motivation research. In Urdan, T. C. & Karabenick, S. A. (eds.), The Decade Ahead: Applications and Contexts of Motivation and Achievement (Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Vol. 16B, pp. 139–73). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Richardson, P. W. & Watt, H. M. G. (2014). Why people choose teaching as a career: an expectancy-value approach to understanding teacher motivation. In Richardson, P. W., Karabenick, S. A. & Watt, H. M. G. (eds.), Teacher Motivation: Theory and Practice (pp. 3–19). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothland, M. (2014). Warum entscheiden sich Studierende für den Lehrerberuf? Interessen, Orientierungen und Berufswahlmotive angehender Lehrkräften im Spiegel der empirischen Forschung [Why do students choose teaching as a career choice? Interests, orientations, and motivations of future teachers looked at from empirical research]. In Terhart, E., Bennewitz, H. & Rothland, M. (eds.), Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf (pp. 268–310). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Rots, I., Aelterman, A., Devos, G. & Vlerick, P. (2010). Teacher education and the choice to enter the teaching profession: a prospective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1619–29.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U. & Urhahne, D. (2000). Motivationale und volitionale Bedingungen der Studienleistung [Motivational and volitional determinants of academic performance]. In Schiefele, U. & Wild, K.-P. (eds.), Interesse und Lernmotivation. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung, Förderung und Wirkung (pp. 183–205). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, C. (2008). Initial and changing student teacher motivation and commitment to teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. et al. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Conceptual Framework. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Thomson, M. M., Turner, J. E. & Nietfeld, J. L. (2012). A typological approach to investigate the teaching career decision: motivations and beliefs about teaching of prospective teacher candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 479–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Hirn, S. & Schuler, H. (2007a). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the Big Five and academic success at university. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 215, 132–51.Google Scholar
Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Weigand, S. & Schuler, H. (2007b). Die Validität von Schulnoten zur Vorhersage des Studienerfolgs – eine Metaanalyse [Validity of school grades for the prediction of success at university – a meta analysis]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie [German Journal for Educational Psychology], 21, 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R. et al. (1992). The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 167–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408–28.Google Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2012). An introduction to teaching motivations in different countries: comparisons using the FIT-Choice scale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Beyer, B., Trautwein, U. & Baumert, J. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: an international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 791–805.Google Scholar
Weinert, F. E. (2001). A concept of competence: a conceptual clarification. In Rychen, D. S. & Salganik, L. H. (eds.), Defining and Selecting Key Competencies (pp. 45–65). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J. & Wilson, M. R. (1997). ConQuest: Multi-Aspect Test Software [computer programme]. Camberwell, VC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×