Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T04:26:17.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - ESSAY: Model interpretation of climate signals: an application to Asian monsoon climate (Lau)

an application to the Asian monsoon climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Howard A. Bridgman
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, New South Wales
John E. Oliver
Affiliation:
Indiana State University
William Lau
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Numerical modeling is a powerful tool to provide better understanding of the modus operandi, and the prediction of the Earth's climate system. However, a climate model's usefulness is limited by its crude representations of physical processes, most of which we do not understand very well. Since models are only crude approximations of the real system, model results must be validated against observations to ensure reliability. The scarcity of detailed observations for climate processes with the high spatial and temporal resolutions needed for model validation and improvement has been a major impediment for advancement in climate model simulation capability and model predictions.

Climate modeling is an attempt to mimic the evolution of the real climate states, which are described by a vast set of long-term global and regional observations in the atmosphere, ocean and land, from both in situ and satellite observations. Given that there are large uncertainties both in observations and in models, and that even the best model is simply a crude approximation of the real world, models and observations should be used in a synergistic manner for better understanding and for improved prediction. The relationship between observations, climate models, data assimilation, process studies, and climate predictions is shown schematically in Figure 9.1. A climate model consists of a dynamical core represented by governing equations of climate state variables, and physics modules of varying complexity (see next section for further discussion). […]

Type
Chapter
Information
The Global Climate System
Patterns, Processes, and Teleconnections
, pp. 281 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bengtsson, L. and Simmons, A. J., 1983. Medium range weather prediction – operational experience at ECMWF. In Hoskins, B. J. and Pearce, R. P., eds., Large-Scale Dynamical Processes in the Atmosphere. Academic Press, pp. 337–63.Google Scholar
Chang, C. P., Harr, P. and Ju, J., 2001. Possible role of Atlantic circulations on the weakening Indian monsoon rainfall–ENSO relationship. Journal of Climate, 14, 2376–2380.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, J. G., Fjortoft, R. and Neumann, J., 1950. Numerical integration of the barotropic vorticity equation. Tellus, 2, 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S.et al., 2001. A variable-resolution stretched-grid general circulation model: Regional climate simulation. Monthly Weather Review, 129, 453–469.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadgil, S. and Sajani, S., 1998. Monsoon precipitation in the AMIP runs. Climate Dynamics, 14, 659–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, W. L., 1992. AMIP: The atmospheric model intercomparison project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 73, 1962–1970.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, W. L.et al., 1999. An overview of the results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP-I). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80, 29–55.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, P. and Mearns, L. O., 1991. Approaches to simulations of regional climate change: a review. Reviews of Geophysics, 29, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, A., 1977. An experiment in extended range prediction using a general circulation model and including the influence of sea surface temperature anomalies. Beiträge zur Physik der Atmosphare, 50, 25–40.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, A., 1981. Simulation of the Asian summer monsoon by an 11-layer general circulation model. In Lighthill, M. J. and Pearce, R. P., eds., Monsoon Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitson, B. C. and Crane, R. G., 1996. Climate downscaling: techniques and application. Climate Research, 7, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerling, M. P.et al., 2001a. The midlatitude warming during 1998–2000. Geophysical Research Letters, 28, 755–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerling, M. P., Hurrell, J. W., and Xu, T., 2001b. Tropical origin for recent North Atlantic climate change. Science, 292, 90–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, R. N. and Kalnay, E., 1983. Lagged average forecasting, an alternative to Monte Carlo forecasting. Tellus, 35a, 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ju, J. and Slingo, J., 1995. The Asian summer monsoon and ENSO. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 121, 1133–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalnay, E.et al., 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77, 437–471.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, I. S., Jin, K., Wang, B. and Lau, K., 2001a. Intercomparison of the climatological variations of the Asian summer monsoon rainfall simulated by 10 GCMs. Climate Dynamics, 19, 383–395.Google Scholar
Kang, I.-S.et al., 2001b. Intercomparison of GCM simulated anomalies associated with the 1997–98 El Niño. Journal of Climate, 15, 2791–2805.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, R., Sugi, M., Kayahara, T. and Sato, N., 1998. Recent extraordinary cool and hot summers in East Asia simulated by an ensemble climate experiment. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 76, 597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirtman, B. P. and Shukla, J., 2000. Influence of the Asian summer monsoon on ENSO. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 126, 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurti, T. N., Kishtawal, C. M., Shin, D. W. and Williford, C. E., 2000. Improving tropical precipitation forecasts from a multi-analysis superensemble. Journal of Climate, 13, 4217–4227.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, K. K., Rajagopalan, B. and Cane, M. A., 1999. On the weakening relationship between the Indian Monsoon and ENSO. Science, 284, 2156–2159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lattenmaier, D. P., Wood, A. W., Palmer, R. N., Wood, E. F. and Stakhiv, E. Z., 1999. Water resources implications of global warming: A US regional perspective. Climate Change, 43, 537–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, K.-M. and Bua, W., 1998. Mechanism of monsoon–Southern Oscillation coupling: insights from GCM experiments. Climate Dynamics, 14, 759–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, K. M. and Weng, H., 2001. Coherent modes of global SST and summer rainfall over China: an assessment of the regional impacts of the 1997–98 El Nino. Journal of Climate, 14, 1294–1308.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, K. M. and Weng, H. 2002. Recurrent teleconnnection patterns linking summertime precipitation variability over East Asia and North America. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 80, 1309–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, K. M. and Wu, H. T., 2001. Intrinsic modes of coupled rainfall/SST variability for the Asian summer monsoon: a re-assessment of monsoon–ENSO relationship. Journal of Climate, 14, 2880–2895.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, K.-M., Kim, J. H. and Sud, Y., 1996. Intercomparison of hydrologic processes in AMIP GCMs. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77, 2209–2227.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, N. C. and Nath, M. J., 2000. Impact of ENSO on the variability of the Asian-Australian monsoons as simulated in GCM experiments. Journal of Climate, 13, 4287–4309.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, X., Wang, W. C. and Samel, A. N., 2001. Biases in AMIP model simulations of the east China monsoon system. Climate Dynamics, 17, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R. T., 1975. The effects of doubling the CO2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model. Journal of Atmospheric Science, 32, 3–15.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manabe, S., Bryan, K. and Spelman, M. J., 1979. A global ocean-atmosphere climate model with seasonal variation for future studies of climate sensitivity. Dynamic Atmospheres and Oceans, 3, 393–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, T. N., 1993. Extended range atmospheric prediction and the Lorenz model. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 74, 49–66.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, X., Kimot, M., Sumi, A., Numagauti, A. and Matsumoto, J., 2001. Simulation of the 1998 East Asian summer monsoon by the CCSR/NIEW AGCM. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 79, 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J.et al., 2000. Dynamical seasonal prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81, 1593–2606.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, J., Manabe, S. and Holloway, J. L., 1965. Results from a nine-level general circulation model of the atmosphere. Monthly Weather Review, 93, 727–768.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soman, J. K. and Slingo, J., 1997. Sensitivity of Asian summer monsoon to aspects of sea surface temperature anomalies in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 123, 309–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, K. R. and Palmer, T. N., 1996. Interannual tropical rainfall variability in general circulation model simulations associated with the atmospheric model intercomparison project. Journal of Climate, 9, 2727–2750.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanova, L. and Krishnamurti, T. N., 2002. Interpretation of seasonal climate forecast using Brier skill score, the Florida State University superensemble and the AMIP-I data set. Journal of Climate, 15, 537–544.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracton, M., Kalnay, S. and Kalnay, E., 1993. Operational ensemble prediction at the National Meteorological Center: Practical aspects. Weather Forecasting, 8, 379–398.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, H. and Zwiers, F. W., 1999. Statistical Analysis in Climate Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H.-J., Matsuno, T. and Kurihara, Y., 2000. Ensemble hindcast experiments for the flood period over China in 1998 by use of the CCSR/NIES AGCM. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 78, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×