Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T12:23:05.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Civil Society Resistance to Democratic Backsliding

from Part II - Civil Society, Social Media, and Political Messaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2025

Valerie J. Bunce
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Thomas B. Pepinsky
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Rachel Beatty Riedl
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Kenneth M. Roberts
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

This chapter explores the possibilities and dilemmas that civil society actors face in resisting and reversing democratic backsliding through examples from around the world. It examines the conditions that shape civil society activism under backsliding and the roles it has played in containing or reversing autocratization. As it shows, in a number of cases civil society resistance has been critical in restraining and reversing backsliding. But it has been better able to counter backsliding when popular support for the backsliding leader has eroded and the opposition is able to work through institutions rather than having to work against them. As backsliding proceeds, institutional channels for influence deteriorate. As a result, there is a critical window during which civil society resistance stands a better chance of containing backsliding: before electoral processes and institutional constraints on executives are fully captured. Once capture occurs, civil society resistance moves to the much more dangerous and difficult task of confronting rather than preventing dictatorship.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Challenges to Democracy
Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience
, pp. 196 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acemoglu, Daron. 2017. “We Are the Last Defense against Trump.” Foreign Policy, January 18 (https://tinyurl.com/3aecvjet).Google Scholar
Andersen, Kristi. 2022. “Progressive Grassroots Organizing (2016–2020).” In Perry, Luke, ed., The 2020 Presidential Election: Key Issues and Regional Dynamics. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan: 7182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakke, Elisabeth, and Sitter, Nick. 2022. “The EU’s Enfants Terribles: Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe since 2010.” Perspectives on Politics 20, 1: 2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, Amrita. 2021. “Prefiguring Alternatives to Autocratization: Democratic Dissent in Contemporary India.” In Widmalm, Sten, ed., Routledge Handbook of Autocratization in South Asia. London, UK: Routledge: 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Michael W. and Becker, Stefan. 2020. “Democratic Backsliding, Populism, and Public Administration.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3, 1: 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2002. The Revolutionary City: Urbanization and the Global Transformation of Rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 1997. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49, 3: 401429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27, 1: 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, Michael. 2021. “Democratic Backsliding in Poland and Hungary.” Slavic Review 80, 3: 585607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Bernhard, Hicken, Allen, Reenock, Christopher, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2020. “Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection.” Studies in Comparative International Development 55, 4: 126.Google Scholar
Buben, Radek and Kouba, Karel. 2020. “Nicaragua in 2019: The Surprising Resilience of Authoritarianism in the Aftermath of Regime Crisis.” Revista de Ciencia Política 40, 2: 431455.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie J. and Wolchik, Sharon L.. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceban, Elena. 2015. “Democratic Awakening in Macedonia: Expecting the Unexpected.” Journal of Global Politics and Current Diplomacy 3, 1: 2333.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine M. 2016. “Delegative Democracy Revisited: Ecuador under Correa.” Journal of Democracy 27, 3: 109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael et al. 2022. “VDem Dataset v12,” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Dana R. 2019. American Resistance: From the Women’s March to the Blue Wave. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamboa, Laura. 2017. “Opposition at the Margins: Strategies against the Erosion of Democracy in Colombia and Venezuela.” Comparative Politics 49, 4: 457477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamboa, Laura. 2022. Resisting Backsliding: Opposition Strategies against the Erosion of Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2019. “The Institutional Roots of Democratic Backsliding.” The Journal of Politics 81, 1 https://doi.org/10.1086/700653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Guadilla, María Pilar. 2004. “Civil Society: Institutionalization, Fragmentation, Autonomy.” In Ellner, Steve and Hellinger, Daniel, eds., Venezuelan Politics in the Chávez Era. London, UK: Lynne Rienner: 179196.Google Scholar
Giugni, Marco. 1999. “How Social Movements Matter: Past Research, Present Problems, Future Developments.” In Giugni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles, eds., How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press: xiiixxxiii.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. and Tilly, Charles. 2001. “Threat (and Opportunity): Popular Action and State Response in the Dynamics of Contentious Action.” In Aminzade, Ron et al., eds., Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 179194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greskovits, Béla. 2015. “The Hollowing and Backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe.” Global Policy 6: 2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna and Monika, Nalepa. 2022. “How Illiberal Populists Gain and Stay in Power: Programmatic Cohesion and Government Performance.” Unpublished paper (https://tinyurl.com/y8d8ejr5).Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert. 2021. Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A. 2016. “Responding to Radical Populism: Chavismo in Venezuela.” Democratization 23, 2: 242262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurečková, Adéla. 2021. “The End of the Babiš Era? The Czech Republic between the Past and the Future.” Heinrich Boll Stiftung, October 19 (https://tinyurl.com/ttycupme).Google Scholar
Krizsan, Andrea and Roggeband, Conny. 2018. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for Struggles over Democracy in Backsliding States: Gender Equality Policy in Central Eastern Europe.” Politics and Governance 6, 3: 90100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korolczuk, Elżbieta. 2016. “Explaining Mass Protests against Abortion Ban in Poland: The Power of Connective Action.” Zoon politikon 7, 7: 91113.Google Scholar
Laebens, Melis G. and Lührmann, Anna. 2021. “What Halts Democratic Erosion? The Changing Role of Accountability.” Democratization 28, 5: 908928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane Scheppele, Kim. 2018. “Autocratic Legalism.” The University of Chicago Law Review 85, 2: 545584.Google Scholar
Lang, Marissa J. 2020. “‘Nobody Needs Another Pink Hat’: Why the Women’s March Is Struggling for Relevance.” The Washington Post, January 12 (https://tinyurl.com/3nhm2z9v).Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer L. and Somer, Murat. 2019. “Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, 1: 234271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickey, Robert, Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2017. “Is America Still Safe for Democracy: Why the United States Is in Danger of Backsliding.” Foreign Affairs 96, 3: 2029.Google Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2021. “Sources of Resistance to Democratic Decline: Indonesian Civil Society and Its Trials.” Democratization 28, 1: 161178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Ádám C. 2016. “The Taming of Civil Society.” In Magyar, Bálint and Vásárhelyi, Júlia, eds., Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State. Budapest: Central European Press: 559574.Google Scholar
Resnick, Danielle. 2022. “How Zambia’s Opposition Won.” Journal of Democracy 33, 1: 7084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2019. “What Do We Know about Resistance to Democratic Subversion?Annals of Comparative Democratization 17, 1: 47.Google Scholar
Shin, Soon-ok. 2020. “The Rise and Fall of Park Geun-hye: The Perils of South Korea’s Weak Party System.” The Pacific Review 33, 1: 153183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitter, Nick and Bakke, Elisabeth. 2019. “Democratic Backsliding in the European Union.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (https://tinyurl.com/mrxhfswj).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Putnam, Lara, and Tervo, Caroline. 2020. “Citizen Activism and the Democratic Party.” In Skocpol, Theda and Tervo, Caroline, eds., Upending American Politics: Polarizing Parties, Ideological Elites, and Citizen Activists from the Tea Party to the Anti-Trump Resistance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 283316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murat, Somer, McCoy, Jennifer L., and Luke, Russell E.. 2021. “Pernicious Polarization, Autocratization and Opposition Strategies.” Democratization 28, 5: 929948.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2020. “When Polarization Trumps Civic Virtue: Partisan Conflict and the Subversion of Democracy by Incumbents.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 15, 1: 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36, 3: 318340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2024. Democracy’s Resilience to Populism’s Threat: Countering Global Alarmism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Jonas. 2020. “The Turbulent End of an Era in Bolivia: Contested Elections, the Ouster of Evo Morales, and the Beginning of a Transition towards an Uncertain Future.” Revista de Ciencia Política 40, 2: 163186.Google Scholar
Wouters, Ruud. 2019. “The Persuasive Power of Protest: How Protest Wins Public Support.” Social Forces 98, 1: 403426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×