Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:33:52.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - A Group Theoretic Proof of the Torus Theorem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2010

Peter H. Kropholler
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield College, Mile End Road, London El 4NS.
Graham A. Niblo
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Martin A. Roller
Affiliation:
Universität Regensburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Torus Theorem was discovered by Waldhausen and subsequently several authors, including Jaco, Shalen, Johannson and Scott gave proofs of various forms of the Theorem. In its most general form, it identifies a characteristic submanifold within a compact 3-manifold, and provides a canonical decomposition of the 3-manifold into pieces which, according to Thurston's Geometrization Conjecture, admit a geometric structure based on one of eight 3-dimensional geometries. Although Thurston's Conjecture is not at present completely proved, much of it has been proved and it has therefore been clear for several years that the Torus Theorem and its generalizations are of fundamental importance.

The early approaches to proving the Torus Theorem involved quite intricate geometric or topological arguments. Of these, Scott's account [22] and [24] is amongst the most easily digestible and indicates that much of the Theorem depends solely on properties of the fundamental group.

Nowadays any approach to studying a compact 3-manifold M begins by assuming that M is endowed with either a PL or with a smooth structure. It is known that every topological 3-manifold admits both a unique PL and a unique smooth structure, and we shall make no further comment on this part of the theory. A modern approach to the Torus Theorem can begin in one of two ways. Working with the smooth structure, Casson now has a very elegant geometric proof which uses least area surface methods developed by Scott. On the other hand, as we shall demonstrate in this article, one can also work almost entirely with the fundamental group. From this second point of view it is natural to think in terms of the PL structure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×