Book contents
- From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness
- From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Im/politeness between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives: An Overview of the Field
- Part I Concepts and Cultural Norms Underlying Speech Acts
- Part II Concepts and Cultural Norms Underlying Politeness
- 7 Notions of Politeness in Britain and North America
- 8 The Metapragmatics of Consideration in (Australian and New Zealand) English
- 9 A Metapragmatic Aspect of Politeness: With a Special Emphasis on Attentiveness in Japanese
- 10 Discussions on Swiss and German Politeness in Online Sources
- 11 Globalisation and Politeness: A Chinese Perspective
- 12 Emic Conceptualizations of Face (Imagen) in Peninsular Spanish
- Epilogue: Personal Encounters with Politeness Research
- Index
- References
11 - Globalisation and Politeness: A Chinese Perspective
from Part II - Concepts and Cultural Norms Underlying Politeness
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 June 2019
Book contents
- From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness
- From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Im/politeness between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives: An Overview of the Field
- Part I Concepts and Cultural Norms Underlying Speech Acts
- Part II Concepts and Cultural Norms Underlying Politeness
- 7 Notions of Politeness in Britain and North America
- 8 The Metapragmatics of Consideration in (Australian and New Zealand) English
- 9 A Metapragmatic Aspect of Politeness: With a Special Emphasis on Attentiveness in Japanese
- 10 Discussions on Swiss and German Politeness in Online Sources
- 11 Globalisation and Politeness: A Chinese Perspective
- 12 Emic Conceptualizations of Face (Imagen) in Peninsular Spanish
- Epilogue: Personal Encounters with Politeness Research
- Index
- References
Summary
Kádár and Ran’s chapter examines one of the key areas in which Sifianou has enriched politeness research and pragmatics: the relationship between globalisation and politeness. They demonstrate clear differences between academic and lay understandings of the effect of globalisation on politeness, in particular when this issue is examined across cultures. The authors explore the relationship between politeness and globalisation from a Chinese perspective, focusing on popular metadiscursive tendencies that surround politeness and globalisation in Chinese cultural contexts. The metapragmatic phenomena they target are (i) metalexicon/metalanguage: words/expressions that interactants use about im/politeness and ‘globalisation’ and (ii) metadiscourse: discourses on im/politeness and globalisation. Their dataset consists of Chinese online texts, mostly informal news articles and blogs written by Chinese authors. Kádár and Ran provide historical contextualisation for the development of Chinese perceptions of guojihua (‘internationalisation’, a term that is used instead of ‘globalisation’ in the Chinese context) as a beneficial factor for the development of politeness.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of PolitenessMultilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, pp. 280 - 300Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Agha, A. (2007). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4), 335–42.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Dong, J. (2010). Language and movement in space. In Coupland, N., ed., Handbook of Language and Globalization. London: Wiley, pp. 366–85.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, P. and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2014). Conflict management in massive polylogues: a case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics 73, 19–36.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987[1978]). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2000). Styling the worker: gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(3), 323–47.Google Scholar
Chang, W.-L. M. and Haugh, M. (2011). Evaluations of im/politeness of an intercultural apology. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(3), 411–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. (1976). Aspects of Chinese Sociolinguistics: Essays. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2010). A genre approach to the study of im/politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2(1), 46–94.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2015). Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Complexity of Latino Identity. Keynote lecture presented at the 9th International Conference of the Linguistic Politeness Research Group, 1–3 July 2015, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2), 237–57.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F., Ide, S., and Katagiri, Y. (2009). Towards an emancipatory pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 41(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
House, J. (2008). English as a lingua franca in Europe today. In Extra, G. and Gorter, D., eds, Multilingual Europe: Facts and Policies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, L. (2005). Chinese cultural schema of education: implications for communication between Chinese students and Australian educators. Issues in Educational Research 15(1), 17–36.Google Scholar
Ide, S. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 8(2/3), 223–48.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. and Jucker, A. H. (1995). The historical perspective in pragmatics. In Jucker, A. H., ed., Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. and Taavitsainen, I. (2014). Diachronic corpus pragmatics. In Taavitsainen, I., Jucker, A., and Tuominen, J., eds, Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. (2017). Politeness, Impoliteness, and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. and Culpeper, J. (2010). Historical (im)politeness: an introduction. In Culpeper, J. and Kádár, D. Z., eds, Historical (Im)Politeness. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 9–36.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. and Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. and Ran, Y. (2015). Ritual in intercultural contact: a case study of heckling. Journal of Pragmatics 77, 1–55.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (1996). Internationalisation and globalisation: rethinking a curriculum of communication. Comparative Education 32(2), 185–96.Google Scholar
Leung, K. (2008). Chinese culture, modernization, and international business. International Business Review 17(2), 184–7.Google Scholar
Levisohn, J. A. (2010). Negotiating historical narratives: an epistemology of history for history education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 44(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Liu, K. 2004. Globalization and Cultural Trends in China. Manoa: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, J. (1993). Reflexive language and the human disciplines. In Lucy, J., ed. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9–32.Google Scholar
Magistro, E. (2007). Promoting the European identity: politeness strategies in the discourse of the European Union. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 1(1), 51–73.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1989). Politeness and conversational universals: observations from Japanese. Multilingua 8(2/3), 207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. (2010). Globalization, global English, and world English(es): myths and facts. In Coupland, N., ed., Handbook of Language and Globalization. London: Wiley, pp. 31–55.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. and Levy, M. (2006). Politeness in intercultural email communication: Australian and Korean perspectives. Journal of Intercultural Communication 12, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakane, I. (2006). Silence and politeness in intercultural communication in university seminars. Journal of Pragmatics 38(11), 1811–35.Google Scholar
Oakes, L. (2005). From internationalisation to globalisation: language and the nationalist revival in Sweden. Language Problems and Language Planning 29(2), 151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, E. and Suszczyńska, M. (2011). On im/politeness behind the Iron Curtain. In Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Kádár, D. Z., eds, Politeness across Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 194–215.Google Scholar
Pan, Y. and Kádár, D. Z. (2011). Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Parks, M. P. and Floyd, K. (2006). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 1(4), doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.1996.tb00176.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Q. 沈骑 (2011). 全球化的背影下我国外语教育政策研究框架建构 On the construction of a research framework of Chinese foreign language education policy in the context of globalization. 外国语 Journal of Foreign Languages 34(1), 70–7.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1992). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (2010). The announcements in Athens Metro stations: an example of glocalization? Intercultural Pragmatics 7(7), 25–46.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (2013). The impact of globalisation on politeness and impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 55, 86–102.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23, 193–229.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2005). Beyond the micro-level of politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 1(2), 237–62.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (2016). Language Policy and Language Planning: From Nationalism to Globalisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by