Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-r8w4l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-07T18:59:59.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Twelve - A chemical-evolutionary basis for remote sensing of tropical forest diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

By
Gregory P. Asner
Edited by
David A. Coomes ,
David F. R. P. Burslem  and
William D. Simonson
Gregory P. Asner
Affiliation:
Carnegie Institution for Science
David A. Coomes
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
David F. R. P. Burslem
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
William D. Simonson
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of ecology’s fundamental pursuits centres on explaining controls over the distribution of species. Interest in species distributions is also increasing in the context of global change. There is a growing emphasis on providing information to decision-makers on where to protect and restore ecosystems and the species they harbour. Nowhere does this seem more obvious, or more pressing, than in tropical forests. Land-use change continues to strike deep into tropical forest regions, and climate change has come to the forefront in tropical forest conservation and planning. Temperature, precipitation and other climatic factors are shifting in some regions, or they are becoming highly variable (Cox et al. 2004; Williams, Jackson & Kutzbach 2007), and these changes are placing species in novel conditions that will force them to adapt, move or die (Asner, Loarie & Heyder 2010; Loarie et al. 2009).

We currently have few tools for mapping species distributions in tropical forests under these changing conditions, and our ability to monitor distributional changes remains limited despite their critical importance to ecology and conservation. Today, our understanding of species distributions comes from contrasting, and geographically limited, information sources. On the one hand, we have incredibly dense information at small scales of up to 50 hectares or so (Condit et al. 2005; Hubbell & Foster 1986). This information is key to understanding local-scale community patterns (Harms et al. 2001), but sparsely distributed plots cannot resolve ecological and biogeographic processes operating at the scales of long-range dispersal, migration or landscape evolution. On the other hand, we have longer-range, transect-based information on species occurrence, which does not provide the comprehensive inventories required for ecological modelling, although it is critical to basic conservation planning (http://fieldmuseum.org/explore/department/ecco). Emerging satellite-based methods, especially when combined with field observations, are beginning to fill in the geographic void with predictions of community patch-matrix patterns (Higgins et al. 2011; Turner et al. 2003), but current approaches do not constitute direct measurements of species distributions or diversity levels. With mainstream technologies, it is not possible to monitor spatially explicit change in species distributions and biological diversity, which is likely to be non-random over landscape, regional and global scales.

Type
Chapter
Information
Forests and Global Change , pp. 343 - 358
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aber, J. D. & Melillo, J. M. (1991) Terrestrial Ecosystems. Philadephia: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
Ackerly, D. (2009) Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 19699–19706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, A. A. (2007) Macroevolution of plant defense strategies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asner, G., Martin, R. & Suhaili, A. (2012) Sources of canopy chemical and spectral diversity in lowland Bornean forest. Ecosystems, 15, 504–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asner, G. P., Loarie, S. R. & Heyder, U. (2010) Combined effects of climate and land-use change on the future of humid tropical forests. Conservation Letters, 3, 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asner, G. P. & Martin, R. E. (2009) Airborne spectranomics: Mapping canopy chemical and taxonomic diversity in tropical forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asner, G. P. & Martin, R. E. (2011) Canopy phylogenetic, chemical and spectral assembly in a lowland Amazonian forest. New Phytologist, 189, 999–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Ford, A. J., Metcalfe, D. J. & Liddell, M. J. (2009) Leaf chemical and spectral diversity of Australian tropical forests. Ecological Applications, 19, 236–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Knapp, D. E. et al. (2011a) Spectroscopy of canopy chemicals in humid tropical forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 3587–3598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Tupayachi, R. et al. (2011b) Taxonomy and remote sensing of leaf mass per area (LMA) in humid tropical forests. Ecological Applications, 21, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, M. P. (1993) Plant defense, herbivory, and climate change. In Biotic Interactions and Global Change (eds. Kareiva, P. M., Kingsolver, J. G. & Huey, R. B.), pp. 75–94. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R. & Brock, W. A. (2009) Turning back from the brink: Detecting an impending regime shift in time to avert it. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 826–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro-Esau,  K. L., Sanchez-Azofeifa,  G. A. & Caelli, T. (2004) Discrimination of lianas and trees with leaf-level hyperspectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 90, 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ChapinIII, F. S. (1991) Integrated responses of plants to stress. BioScience, 41, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. A., Brown, S., Kicklighter, D. W. et al. (2001) Net primary production in tropical forests: An evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecological Applications, 11, 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coley, P. D. (1983) Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecological Monographs, 53, 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coley, P. D. (1993) Gap size and plant defenses. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coley, P. D. & Barone, J. A. (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 305–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coley, P. D., Kursar, T. A. & Machado, J.-L. (1993) Colonization of tropical rain forest leaves by epiphylls: effects of site and host-plant leaf lifetime. Ecology, 74, 619–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condit, R., Ashton, P., Balslev, H. et al. (2005) Tropical tree alpha-diversity: Results from a worldwide network of large plots. Science, 55, 565–582.Google Scholar
Connell, J. H. (1970) On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. In Dynamics of Population (eds. Den Boer, P. J. & Gradwell, G. R.). Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Cordell, S., Goldstein, G., Meinzer, F. C. & Vitousek, P. M. (2001) Regulation of leaf life-span and nutrient-use efficiency of Metrosideros polymorpha trees at two extremes of a long chronosequence in Hawaii. Oecologia (Berlin), 127, 198–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Collins, M. et al. (2004) Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 78, 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. R. (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia, 78, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Féret, J.-B. & Asner, G. P. (2011) Spectroscopic classification of tropical forest species using radiative transfer modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 2415–2422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féret, J.-B. & Asner, G. P. (2013) Tree species discrimination in tropical forests using airborne imaging spectroscopy. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, P. V. A., Mesones, I. & Coley, P. D. (2004) Herbivores promote habitat specialization by trees in Amazonian forests. Science, 305, 663–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fyllas, N., Patiño, S., Baker, T. et al. (2009) Basin-wide variations in foliar properties of Amazonian forest: phylogeny, soils and climate. Biogeosciences, 6, 2677–2708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, A. H. (1988) Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 75, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, K. E., Condit, R., Hubbell, S. P. & Foster, R. B. (2001) Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. Journal of Ecology, 89, 947–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, M., Ruokolainen, K., Tuomisto, H. et al. (2011) Geological control of floristic composition in Amazonian forests. Journal of Biogeography, 38, 2136–2149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoorn, C., Wesselingh, F. P., ter Steege, H. et al. (2010) Amazonia through time: Andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity. Science, 330, 927–931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubbell, S. P. & Foster, R. B. (1986) Biology, chance, and history and the structure of tropical rainforest tree communities. In Community Ecology (eds. Diamond, J. & Case, T. J.), pp. 314–329. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist, 104, 501–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, P. S. & Nordell, K. O. (1998) Intraspecific variation in nitrogen status and photosynthetic capacity within mountain birch populations. Ecography, 11, 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokaly, R. F., Asner, G. P., Ollinger, S. V., Martin, M. E. & Wessman, C. A. (2009) Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spectroscopy and its application to ecosystem studies. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, S78–S91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kursar, T. A. & Coley, P. D. (2003) Convergence in defense syndromes of young leaves in tropical rainforests. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 31, 929–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kursar, T. A., Dexter, K. G., Lokvam, J. et al. (2009) The evolution of antiherbivore defenses and their contribution to species coexistence in the tropical tree genus Inga. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 18073–18078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latham, R. E. & Ricklefs, R. E. (1993) Global patterns of tree species richness in moist forests: energy-diversity theory does not account for variation in species richness. Oikos, 67, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loarie, S. R., Duffy, P. B., Hamilton, H. et al. (2009) The velocity of climate change. Nature, 462, 1052–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinelli, L. A., Piccolo, M. C., Townsend, A. R. et al. (1999) Nitrogen stable isotopic composition: tropical vs. temperate forests. Biogeochemistry, 46, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascaro, J., Becklund, K. K., Hughes, R. F. & Schnitzer, S. A. (2008) Limited native plant regeneration in novel, exotic-dominated forests on Hawai’i. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, W. J. (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 119–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D. & Muratore, J. F. (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology, 63, 621–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niinemets, U., Tenhunen, J. D., Canta, N. R. et al. (1999) Interactive effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on the acclimation potential of foliage photosynthetic properties of cork oak, Quercus suber, to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Global Change Biology, 5, 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niinemets, U., Valladares, F. & Ceulemans, R. (2003) Leaf-level phenotypic variability and plasticity of invasive Rhododendron ponticum and non-invasive Ilex aquifolium co-occurring at two contrasting European sites. Plant, Cell and Environment, 26, 941–956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parmesan, C. (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37, 637–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, A. G., Ball, J. T., Luo, Y. et al. (1999) The photosynthesis-leaf nitrogen relationship at ambient and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 5, 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. L., Vargas, P. N., Lorenzo, A. et al. (2003) Habitat association among Amazonian tree species: a landscape-scale approach. Journal of Ecology, 91, 757–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poorter, H., Niinemets, U., Poorter, L., Wright, I. J. & Villar, R. (2009) Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytologist, 182, 565–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B. & Ellsworth, D. S. (1997) From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 13730–13734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A., Castro, K., Wright, S. J. et al. (2009) Differences in leaf traits, leaf internal structure, and spectral reflectance between two communities of lianas and trees: Implications for remote sensing in tropical environments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 2076–2088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimel, D. S., Asner, G. P., & Moorcroft, P. R. (2013) Observing changing ecological diversity in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, W. H. (1991) Biogeochemistry, An Analysis of Global Change. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stamp, N. (2003) Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 78, 23–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swetnam, T. W., Allen, C. D. & Betancourt, J. L. (1999) Applied historical ecology: Using the past to manage for the future. Ecological Applications, 9, 1189–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Steege, H., Pitman, N. C. A., Phillips, O. L. et al. (2006) Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia. Nature, 443, 444–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thenkabail, P. S., Enclona, E. A., Ashton, M. S., Legg, C. & De Dieu, M. J. (2004) Hyperion, IKONOS, ALI, and ETM plus sensors in the study of African rainforests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 90, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. R., Asner, G. P. & Cleveland, C. C. (2008) The biogeochemical heterogeneity of tropical forests. Trends in Ecology and the Environment, 23, 424–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsend, A. R., Cleveland, C. C., Asner, G. P. & Bustamante, M. M. C. (2007) Controls over foliar N:P ratios in tropical rain forests. Ecology, 88, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomisto, H., Poulsen, A. D., Ruokolainen, K. et al. (2003) Linking floristic patterns with soil heterogeneity and satellite imagery in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Ecological Applications, 13, 352–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomisto, H., Ruokolainen, K., Kalliola, R. et al. (1995) Dissecting Amazonian biodiversity. Science, 269, 63–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, W., Spector, S., Gardiner, N. et al. (2003) Remote sensing for biodiversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ustin, S. L., Gitelson, A. A., Jacquemoud, S. et al. (2009) Retrieval of foliar information about plant pigment systems from high resolution spectroscopy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, S67–S77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. (1982) Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. American Naturalist, 119, 553–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. (1984) Litterfall, nutrient cycling, and nutrient limitation in tropical forests. Ecology, 65, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. & Howarth, R. W. (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea – How can it occur?Biogeochemistry, 13, 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. & SanfordJr, R. L. (1986) Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Turner, D. R. & Kitayama, K. (1995) Foliar nutrients during long-term soil development in Hawaiian montane rain forest. Ecology, 76, 712–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wake, D. B., Hadly, E. A. & Ackerly, D. D. (2009) Biogeography, changing climates and niche evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 19631–19637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, D. L. (1991) A comparison of spectral reflectance properties at the needle, branch, and canopy level for selected conifer species. Remote Sensing of Environment, 35, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. W., Jackson, S. T. & Kutzbach, J. E. (2007) Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 5738–5742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B. & Westoby, M. (2001) Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Functional Ecology, 15, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M. et al. (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821–827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, N., Hughes, R. F., Cordell, S. et al. (2007) Patterns of primary succession of native and introduced plants in lowland wet forests in Eastern Hawaii. Biotropica, .Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×