Book contents
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications
- Cambridge Aerospace Series
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Gurney Flap
- 3 Vortex Generator
- 4 Roughness
- 5 Polymer
- 6 Biological Techniques
- 7 Jet
- 8 Synthetic Jet
- 9 Plasma Actuator
- 10 Lorentz Force
- 11 Closed-Loop Control
- Index
- References
4 - Roughness
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 December 2018
Book contents
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications
- Cambridge Aerospace Series
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Gurney Flap
- 3 Vortex Generator
- 4 Roughness
- 5 Polymer
- 6 Biological Techniques
- 7 Jet
- 8 Synthetic Jet
- 9 Plasma Actuator
- 10 Lorentz Force
- 11 Closed-Loop Control
- Index
- References
Summary
Roughness is generally used for boundary layer flow control. Some traditional knowledge from the literature is first presented and then recent progress on roughness control is explained. Traditionally, roughness was used as an approach to advance flow transition, however some recent work has found an interesting result that roughness could delay flow transition and thus reduce the friction drag. Roughness also influences the roadmap of bypass transition and the coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer. Since roughness can be made to form very simple configurations and can be easily attached to the object surface, such findings suggest significant potential applications of roughness in engineering.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Flow Control Techniques and Applications , pp. 65 - 93Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Acarlar, M. S. and Smith, C. R. A study of hairpin vortices in a laminar boundary layer. Part 1. Hairpin vortices generated by a hemisphere protuberance. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1987, 175: 1–41Google Scholar
Andersson, P., Brandt, L., Bottaro, A., and Henningson, D. S. On the breakdown of boundary layer streaks. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 428: 29–60Google Scholar
Frohnapfel, B., Jovanovic, J., and Delgado, A. Experimental investigations of turbulent drag reduction by surface-embedded grooves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 590: 107–116Google Scholar
Chwang, A. L. and Dong, Z. N. Viscous Fluid Mechanics (Second Edition). Tsinghua University Press, 2011 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Fransson, J. H. M., Talamelli, A., Brandt, L., and Cossu, C. Delaying transition to turbulence by a passive mechanism. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 96(6): 064501Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 36: 173–196Google Scholar
Hicks, R. M. and Harper, W. R. Jr. A comparison of spherical and triangular boundary-layer trips on a flat plate at supersonic speeds. Technical Memorandum, 1970, NASA-TM-X-2146Google Scholar
Hosseini, S. M., Tempelmann, D., Hanifi, A., and Henningson, D. S. Stabilization of a swept-wing boundary layer by distributed roughness elements. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 718: R1Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A., and Runstadler, P. W. The structure of turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1967, 30(4): 741–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundu, P. K., Cohen, I. M., and Dowling, D. R. Fluid Mechanics (Fifth Edition). Elsevier, 2013Google Scholar
Pan, C., Wang, J. J., Zhang, P. F., and Feng, L. H. Coherent structures in bypass transition induced by a cylinder wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 603: 367–389Google Scholar
Plogmann, B., Würz, W., and Krämer, E. On the disturbance evolution downstream of a cylindrical roughness element. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 758: 238–286Google Scholar
Reibert, M. S., Saric, W. S. Jr., Carrillo, R. B., and Chapman, K. L. Experiments in nonlinear saturation of stationary crossflow vortices in a swept-wing boundary layer. AIAA Paper 1996–0184Google Scholar
Saric, W. S., Carpenter, A. L., and Reed, H. L. Passive control of transition in three-dimensional boundary layers, with emphasis on discrete roughness elements. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2011, 369(1940): 1352–1364Google Scholar
Saric, W. S. Jr., Carrillo, R. B., and Reibert, M. S. Leading-edge roughness as a transition control mechanism. AIAA Paper 1998–0781Google Scholar
Schneider, S. P. Effects of roughness on hypersonic boundary-layer transition. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2008, 45(2): 193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. J., Zhang, C., and Pan, C. Effects of roughness elements on bypass transition induced by a circular cylinder wake. Journal of Visualization, 2011, 14(1): 53–61Google Scholar
Zhang, C., Pan, C., and Wang, J. J. Evolution of vortex structure in boundary layer transition induced by roughness elements. Experiments of Fluids, 2011, 51(5): 1343–1352Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Pan, C., Shen, J. Q., and Wang, J. J. Effect of surface roughness element on near wall turbulence with zero-pressure gradient. Science China-Physics Mechanics & Astronomy, 2015, 58(6): 064702Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. and Wang, Z. J. Effects of surface roughness on separated and transitional flows over a wing. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(3): 593–609Google Scholar