Book contents
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction and Overview
- Part I Gendered Justice
- 1 Commentary on McQuirter v. State
- 2 Commentary on People v. Berry
- 3 Commentary on Coker v. Georgia
- 4 Commentary on Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
- 5 Commentary on State v. Rusk
- 6 Commentary on People v. Wu
- 7 Commentary on Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. Bigfire
- 8 Commentary on Commonwealth v. Blache
- Part II Gender on Trial
6 - Commentary on People v. Wu
from Part I - Gendered Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2022
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction and Overview
- Part I Gendered Justice
- 1 Commentary on McQuirter v. State
- 2 Commentary on People v. Berry
- 3 Commentary on Coker v. Georgia
- 4 Commentary on Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
- 5 Commentary on State v. Rusk
- 6 Commentary on People v. Wu
- 7 Commentary on Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. Bigfire
- 8 Commentary on Commonwealth v. Blache
- Part II Gender on Trial
Summary
In an opinion that made national news, the high court in Maryland reversed the judgment of an intermediate court and upheld the defendant’s conviction for rape. The court explicitly rejected the defendant and intermediate court’s reasoning that consent should be evaluated using a reasonable victim standard. Although the opinion in Rusk is widely cited as a turning point in recognizing sexual violence in nonstranger rape cases, there remained many elements of the opinion that have been the object of feminist criticism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions , pp. 110 - 130Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022