Book contents
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- List of Acknowledgements and Original Places of Publication
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Taciturnity of Aeneas
- Chapter 2 The Reconciliations of Juno
- Chapter 3 Epic Hero and Epic Fable
- Chapter 4 Stat magni nominis umbra: Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus
- Chapter 5 History and Revelation in Virgil’s Underworld
- Chapter 6 Following after Hercules, in Virgil and Apollonius
- Chapter 7 Beginning Sallust’s Catiline
- Chapter 8 Leaving Dido: The Appearance(s) of Mercury and the Motivations of Aeneas
- Chapter 9 Epic Violence, Epic Order: Killings, Catalogues, and the Role of the Reader in Aeneid 10
- Chapter 10 Mea tempora: Patterning of Time in Ovid’s Metamorphoses
- Chapter 11 Interpreting Sacrificial Ritual in Roman Poetry: Disciplines and their Models
- Chapter 12 Tenui … latens discrimine: Spotting the Differences in Statius’ Achilleid
- Chapter 13 On Not Forgetting the ‘Literatur’ in ‘Literatur und Religion’: Representing the Mythic and the Divine in Roman Historiography
- Chapter 14 Virgil’s Tale of Four Cities: Troy, Carthage, Alexandria and Rome
- Chapter 15 First Similes in Epic
- Chapter 16 Fictions of Citizenship in Livy’s History
- Published Works of Denis Feeney
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2021
Introduction by
Book contents
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- List of Acknowledgements and Original Places of Publication
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Taciturnity of Aeneas
- Chapter 2 The Reconciliations of Juno
- Chapter 3 Epic Hero and Epic Fable
- Chapter 4 Stat magni nominis umbra: Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus
- Chapter 5 History and Revelation in Virgil’s Underworld
- Chapter 6 Following after Hercules, in Virgil and Apollonius
- Chapter 7 Beginning Sallust’s Catiline
- Chapter 8 Leaving Dido: The Appearance(s) of Mercury and the Motivations of Aeneas
- Chapter 9 Epic Violence, Epic Order: Killings, Catalogues, and the Role of the Reader in Aeneid 10
- Chapter 10 Mea tempora: Patterning of Time in Ovid’s Metamorphoses
- Chapter 11 Interpreting Sacrificial Ritual in Roman Poetry: Disciplines and their Models
- Chapter 12 Tenui … latens discrimine: Spotting the Differences in Statius’ Achilleid
- Chapter 13 On Not Forgetting the ‘Literatur’ in ‘Literatur und Religion’: Representing the Mythic and the Divine in Roman Historiography
- Chapter 14 Virgil’s Tale of Four Cities: Troy, Carthage, Alexandria and Rome
- Chapter 15 First Similes in Epic
- Chapter 16 Fictions of Citizenship in Livy’s History
- Published Works of Denis Feeney
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Explorations in Latin Literature , pp. 374 - 401Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S.A. 2012. Callimachus in Context: From Plato to the Augustan Poets. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, J. 1973. The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra. New Haven, CT and LondonGoogle Scholar
Ahl, F.M. . 1985. Metaformations: Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, M. von 1964. Silius Italicus: Freiheit und Gebundenheit römischer Epik. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, M. von . 1967. ‘Vergils Geschichtsauffassung in der <<Heldenschau>>’, WS NF 1: 156–82Google Scholar
Allen, D.C. 1970. Mysteriously Meant: The Rediscovery of Pagan Symbolism and Allegorical Interpretation in the Renaissance. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Ampolo, C. 1988. ‘La nascità della città’, in Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A. (eds.), Storia di Roma. Turin. 1.153–80Google Scholar
Anderson, A.R. 1928. ‘Heracles and his successors: a study of a heroic ideal and the recurrence of a heroic type’, HSPh 39: 7–58Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. . 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. . 2002. ‘Vergil’s Italy: Ethnography and Politics in First-Century Rome’, in Levene, D.S. and Nelis, D.P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden. 123–42Google Scholar
Ando, C. . 2015. Roman Social Imaginaries: Language and Thought in Contexts of Empire. TorontoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. . 2016. ‘Making Romans: citizens, subjects, and subjectivity in Republican Empire’, in Lavan, Payne and Weisweiler (2016), 169–86Google Scholar
Appiah, K.A. 2018. The Lies that Bind: Rethinking Identity, Creed, Country, Color, Class, Culture. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Aresi, L. forthcoming. ‘Fama storica e fama poetica: Livio e Ovidio alle prese con il mito di Roma’, Rivista di cultura classica e medioevaleGoogle Scholar
Atkins, J.W. 2013. Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannet, E.T. 1993. Postcultural Theory: Critical Theory after the Marxist Paradigm. Basingstoke and LondonGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1984. La traccia del modello: effetti omerici nella narrazione virgiliana. Pisa = 2015. Homeric Effects in Vergil’s Narrative, tr. I. Marchesi and M. Fox. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1989. ‘Voci e istanze narrative nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio’, MD 23: 55–97Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1996. ‘La guerra di Troia non avrà luogo: il proemio dell’Achilleide di Stazio’, AION(filol) 18: 45–62Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1997a. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley, CA. Translation of Barchiesi (1994)Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1997b. ‘Endgames: Ovid’s Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6’, in Roberts, D.H., Dunn, F.M. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ. 181–208Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 1999. ‘Venus’ masterplot: Ovid and the Homeric Hymns’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999). 112–26Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2000. ‘Rituals in ink: Horace on the Greek lyric tradition’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 167–82Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001a. ‘The crossing’, in Harrison, S.J. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature. Oxford. 142–63Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2001b. Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets, tr. M. Fox and S. Marchesi. LondonGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2002. ‘The uniqueness of the Carmen Saeculare and its tradition’, in Woodman, A.J. and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge. 107–23Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2005a. ‘Masculinity in the 90’s: the education of Achilles in Statius and Quintilian’, in Paschalis, M. (ed.), Roman and Greek Imperial Epic. Rethymnon. 47–75Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. . 2008. ‘Bellum Italicum: l’unificazione dell’Italia nell’Eneide’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Patria diversis gentibus una? Unità politica e identità etniche nell’Italia antica. Atti del convegno internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 20–22 settembre 2007. Pisa. 243–60Google Scholar
Bardon, H. and Verdière, R. (eds.). 1971. Vergiliana: Recherches sur Virgile. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, L. 1986. The Gods Made Flesh: Metamorphosis and the Pursuit of Paganism. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. 2007. ‘The odd couple’ (review of Tombs and Tombs (2007)), The New York Review of Books, 29 March. 4–9Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1997. ‘Romanization: a critical comment’, in Mattingly, D.J. (ed.), Dialogues in Roman Imperialism: Power, Discourse, and Discrepant Experiences in the Roman Empire. Portsmouth, RI. 51–64Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1998. ‘Ars and the man: the politics of art in Virgil’s Aeneid’, CPh 93: 322–42Google Scholar
Bassett, E. 1966. ‘Hercules and the hero of the Punica’, in Wallach, L. (ed.), The Classical Tradition: Literary and Historical Studies in Honor of Harry Caplan. Ithaca, NY. 258–73Google Scholar
Bendlin, A. 2006. ‘Nicht der Eine, nicht die Vielen. Zur Pragmatik religiösen Verhaltens in einer polytheistischen Gesellschaft am Beispiel Roms’, in Kratz, R.G. and Spieckermann, H. (eds.), Götterbilder, Gottesbilder, Weltbilder: Polytheismus and Monotheismus in der Welt der Antike. Tübingen. 2.279–311Google Scholar
Bispham, E. 2007. From Asculum to Actium: The Municipalization of Italy from the Social War to Augustus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Bloch, R. 1972. ‘Héra, Uni, Junon en Italie centrale’, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres: 384–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, E. 1981. The Effects of Divine Manifestation on the Reader’s Perspective in Vergil’s Aeneid. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, M.W. 1975. ‘The problem of the hero in the later medieval period’, in Burns and Reagan (1975). 27–48Google Scholar
Bonjour, M. 1975a. Terre natale: études sur une composante affective du patriotisme romain. ParisGoogle Scholar
Bonjour, M. . 1975b. ‘Les personnages féminins et la terre natale dans l’épisode de Coriolan (Liv., 2, 40)’, REL 53: 157–81Google Scholar
Boyle, A.J. 1972. ‘The meaning of the Aeneid: a critical inquiry. Part 1: Empire and the individual: an examination of the Aeneid’s major theme’, Ramus 1: 63–90Google Scholar
Bradley, G. 2006. ‘Colonization and identity in Republic Italy’, in Bradley, G. and Wilson, J.-P. (eds.), Greek and Roman Colonization: Origins, Ideologies and Interactions. Swansea. 161–87Google Scholar
Brand, C.P. 1965. Torquato Tasso: A Study of the Poet and of his Contribution to English Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.). 2003. Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T.P. Wiseman. ExeterGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, J.N. 2006. ‘Atheism in antiquity’, in Martin, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge. 11–26Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. 1971. ‘The first decade’, in Dorey, T.A. (ed.), Livy. London and Toronto. 1–20Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1987. ‘The palace of the sun in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 211–20Google Scholar
Brown, R. . 1995. ‘Livy’s Sabine women and the ideal of Concordia’, TAPhA 125: 291–319Google Scholar
Bruster, D. 2003. Shakespeare and the Question of Culture: Early Modern Literature and the Cultural Turn. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Phillips, T. (eds.). 2018. Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Burbank, J. and Cooper, F. 2010. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Burck, E. 1964. ‘Aktuelle Probleme der Livius-Interpretation’, Gymnasium Beiheft 4: 21–46Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1983. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. P. Bing. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Burns, N.T. and Reagan, C.J. (eds.). 1975. Concepts of the Hero in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
Busetto, A. 2017. ‘The idea of cosmopolitanism from its origins to the 21st century’, in Cecchet and Busetto (2017). 302–17Google Scholar
Buxton, R.G.A. 1981. ‘Introduction’, in Gordon, R.L. (ed.), Myth, Religion and Society: Structuralist Essays by M. Detienne, L. Gernet, J.-P. Vernant & P. Vidal-Naquet. Cambridge. ix–xviiGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. 2003. Myth and History in Ancient Greece: The Symbolic Creation of a Colony, tr. D.W. Berman. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, L. 2014. Law and Power in the Making of the Roman Commonwealth, tr. L. Kopp. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, F. 2017a. The ‘Birth’ of Italy: The Institutionalization of Italy as a Region, 3rd–1st Century BCE. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, F. . 2017b. ‘Caput mundi: Rome as center in Roman representation and construction of space’, AncSoc 47: 119–57Google Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, F. . 2017c. ‘Alteram loci patriam, alteram iuris: “double fatherlands” and the role of Italy in Cicero’s political discourse’, in Cecchet and Busetto (2017). 259–82Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. and Greenwood, E. 2002. ‘Herodotus as a critic: truth, fiction, polarity’, in Bakker, E.J., de Jong, I.J.F. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden. 351–71Google Scholar
Castelvetro, L. 1570. Aristoteles: Poetica. Vulgarizzata e sposta per Lodovico Castelvetro. VeniceGoogle Scholar
Ceausescu, P. 1976. ‘Altera Roma: histoire d’une folie politique’, Historia 25: 79–108Google Scholar
Cecchet, L. and Busetto, A. (eds.) 2017. Citizens in the Graeco-Roman World: Aspects of Citizenship from the Archaic Period to AD 212. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, J. and Kraus, C.S. (eds.). 2009. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Livy. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.A. 2004. History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Coby, P. 1999. Machiavelli’s Romans: Liberty and Greatness in the Discourses on Livy. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Combet-Farnoux, B. 1980. Mercure romain: le culte public de Mercure et la fonction mercantile à Rome de la République archaïque à l’époque augustéenne. RomeGoogle Scholar
Conington, J. 1881–4. The Works of Virgil, with a Commentary4, rev. H. Nettleship, 3 vols. LondonGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. 2007. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, trans. varii, ed. Segal, C.. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. . 1994a. Latin Literature: A History, tr. J.B. Solodow, rev. D. Fowler and G. Most. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Conte, G.B. . 1994b. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, tr. G.W. Most. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 1991. ‘Rome: history of an anachronism’, in Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. and Emlen, J. (eds.), City-States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy. Ann Arbor, MI. 53–69Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC). LondonGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 1997. ‘Ethnicity as a factor in early Roman history’, in Cornell, T. J. and Lomas, K. (eds.), Gender and Ethnicity in Ancient Italy. London. 9–21Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 2000. ‘The city-state in Latium’, in Hansen, M.H. (ed.), A Comparative Study of Thirty City-State Cultures. Copenhagen. 209–28Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. . 2003. ‘Coriolanus: myth, history and performance’, in Braund and Gill (2003). 73–97Google Scholar
Coudry, M. 2001. ‘Camille: construction et fluctuations de la figure d’un grand homme’, in Coudry and Späth (2001). 47–81Google Scholar
Coudry, M. and Späth, T. (eds.). 2001. L’Invention des grands hommes de la Rome antique/Die Konstruktion der großen Männer Altroms. ParisGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R.W. 2002. ‘In my Beginning is my End’: Origins, Cities, and Foundations in Flavian Epic. Diss. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Croisille, J.M. 1985. ‘Remarques sur l’épisode troyen dans les Métamorphoses d’Ovide (Met., XII–XIII, 1–622)’, in Frécaut, J.M. and Porte, D. (eds.), Journées Ovidiennes de Parménie, Coll. Latomus vol. 189. Brussels. 57–81Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 2000. ‘From Aristophanes to Menander? Genre transformation in Greek comedy’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 115–33Google Scholar
Cyrino, M.S. 1998. ‘Heroes in d(u)ress: transvestism and power in the myths of Herakles and Achilles’, Arethusa 31: 207–41Google Scholar
Dalrymple, W. 2002. White Mughals: Love and Betrayal in Eighteenth-Century India. LondonGoogle Scholar
Davies, J.P. 2004. Rome’s Religious History: Livy, Tacitus and Ammianus on their Gods. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
De Sanctis, G. 1907/1960. Storia dei Romani I–II: la conquista del primato in Italia. Turin1; Florence (1960)2Google Scholar
Dench, E. 2005. Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.). 2000. Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years. LondonGoogle Scholar
Döring, K. 1978. ‘Antike Theorien über die staatspolitische Notwendigkeit der Götterfurcht’, A&A 24: 43–56Google Scholar
Eckstein, A.M. 2009. Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Elftmann, G. 1979. ‘Aeneas in his prime: distinctions in age and the loneliness of adulthood in Vergil’s Aeneid’, Arethusa 12: 175–202Google Scholar
Ellsworth, J.D. 1988. ‘The episode of the Sibyl in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (14.103–56)’, in Hadlich, R.L. and Ellsworth, J.D. (eds.), East Meets West: Homage to Edgar C. Knowlton, Jr. Honolulu: 47–55Google Scholar
Elmer, D.F. 2013. The Poetics of Consent: Collective Decision Making and the Iliad. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Elsner, J. 1991. ‘Cult and sculpture: sacrifice in the Ara Pacis Augustae’, JRS 81: 50–61Google Scholar
Erskine, A. 2001. Troy Between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fanning, M.W. 1933. Maphei Vegii Laudensis De Educatione Liberorum et Eorum Claris Moribus. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. . 1992. ‘Ceres, Liber and Flora: Georgic and anti-georgic elements in Ovid’s Fasti’, PCPhS 38: 39–56Google Scholar
Farney, G.D. 2007. Ethnic Identity and Aristocratic Competition in Republican Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. . 2001. Latin Language and Latin Culture from Ancient to Modern Times. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. . 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Times and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1997. ‘Metamorphosis and sacrifice in Ovid’s Theban narrative’, MD 38: 25–55Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. . 2002. ‘Stepping out of the ring: repetition and sacrifice in the boxing match in Aeneid 5’, in Levene, D.S. and Nelis, D.P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden. 61–79Google Scholar
Flemming, R. 2000. Medicine and the Making of Roman Women: Gender, Nature, and Authority from Celsus to Galen. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, K.F.B. 2014. Finding Italy: Travel, Nation and Colonization in Vergil’s Aeneid. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Flexner, A. 2017. The Usefulness of Useless Knowledge, with a Companion Essay by Robbert Dijkgraaf. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Flower, M.A. 1994. Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fornara, C.W. 1983. The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, G. 1999. Livy and Early Rome: A Study in Historical Method and Judgment. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A. 1982. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. 1987. ‘Vergil on killing virgins’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 185–98Google Scholar
Fowler, D. . 2002. Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura Book Two, Lines 1–332. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R.L. 2004. ‘The Homeric question’, in Fowler, R.L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge. 220–32Google Scholar
Fowler, W.W. 1916. Virgil’s ‘Gathering of the Clans,’ Being Observations on Aeneid VII.601–817. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1949. Review of E.K. Rand et al. (eds.), Servianorum in Vergilii Carmina Commentariorum Editionis Harvardianae II, JRS 39: 145–54Google Scholar
Friedlaender, L. 1919. Darstellungen aus der Sittengeschichte Roms: in der Zeit von August bis zum Ausgang der Antonine9. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1941. ‘Pattern of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius’, AJPh 62: 16–34Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1991. Dionysius and the History of Archaic Rome. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, J.F. 2008. ‘Livy’s Camillus and the political discourse of the late Republic’, JRS 98: 27–52Google Scholar
Gale, M. . 2000. Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. . 2007. ‘Lucretius and previous poetic traditions’, in Hardie, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge. 59–75Google Scholar
Galinsky, G.K. 1972. The Herakles Theme: Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Garner, R. 1990. From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Gasser, F. 1999. Germana Patria: Die Geburtsheimat in den Werken römischer Autoren der späten Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Giardina, A. 1997. ‘L’identità incompiuta dell’Italia romana,’ in L’Italia romana. Storie di un’identità incompiuta. Rome and Bari. 3–116Google Scholar
Gill, C. and Wiseman, T.P. (eds.). 2003. Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. ExeterGoogle Scholar
Gleason, M.W. 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Gödde, S. 2007. ‘οὔ μοι ὅσιόν ἐστι λέγειν: Zur Poetik der Leerstelle in Herodots Ägypten-Logos’, in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R., and Wesselmann, K. (eds.), Literatur und Religion: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, vol. 2. Berlin and New York. 41–90Google Scholar
Gordon, R.L. 1990. ‘The veil of power: emperors, sacrificers and benefactors’, in Beard, M. and North, J. (eds.), Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World. Ithaca, NY. 199–231Google Scholar
Grafton, A.T. and Swerdlow, N.M. 1985. ‘Technical chronology and astrological history in Varro, Censorinus and others’, CQ 35: 454–65Google Scholar
Grafton, A.T. and Swerdlow, N.M. . 1986. ‘Greek chronology in Roman epic: the calendrical date of the fall of Troy in the Aeneid’, CQ 36: 212–18Google Scholar
Gruen, E.S. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E.S. . 2013. ‘Did ancient identity depend on ethnicity? A preliminary probe’, Phoenix 67: 1–22Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1990. ‘Sacrifice, society, and Vergil’s ox-born bees’, in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D.J. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta, GA. 209–23Google Scholar
Habinek, T. . 2005. The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Hallett, J.P. 1984. Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Hammer, D. 2008. Roman Political Thought and the Modern Theoretical Imagination. Norman, OKGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A. 1983. Statius and the ‘Silvae’: Poets, Patrons and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. . 1997. ‘Questions of authority: the invention of tradition in Ovid Metamorphoses 15’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Princeton, NJ: 182–98Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2010. ‘Crowds and leaders in Imperial historiography and in epic’, in Miller, J. and Woodman, A.J. (eds.), Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions. Leiden. 9–27Google Scholar
Hardie, P. . 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S. (eds.). 1999. Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and its Reception. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G.B. 1966. Ben Jonson: Discoveries 1641. Conversations with William Drummond of Hawthornden 1619. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S.J. . 1988. ‘Vergil on kingship: the first simile of the Aeneid’, PCPhS 34: 55–9Google Scholar
Häussler, R. 1978. Das historische Epos von Lucan bis Silius und seine Theorie: Studien zum historischen Epos der Antike. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, A. 1973. Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. 1999. Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Herrick, M.T. 1946. The Fusion of Horatian and Aristotelian Literary Criticism, 1531–1555. Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. . 1998. Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica: Abbreviated Voyages in Silver Latin Epic. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S. and Hainsworth, J.B. (eds.). 1988. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Volume I. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hillen, H.J. 2003. Von Aeneas zu Romulus: Die Legenden von der Gründung Roms. DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1987. The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 1999. ‘After exile: time and teleology from Metamorphoses to Ibis’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999). 48–67Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2000. ‘Essential epic: genre and gender from Macer to Statius’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 221–44Google Scholar
Hinds, S.E. . 2010. ‘Between formalism and historicism’, in Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford. 369–85Google Scholar
Hine, H. 1987. ‘Aeneas and the arts (Vergil, Aeneid 6. 847–50)’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 173–83Google Scholar
Höistad, R. 1948. Cynic Hero and Cynic King: Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man. UppsalaGoogle Scholar
Holliday, V.L. 1969. Pompey in Cicero’s Correspondence and Lucan’s Civil War. The HagueGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2001. ‘Epic and epiphanies: Simonides and the “New Simonides”’, in Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.), The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford. 135–47Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. . 2019. ‘Livy, Busa the female benefactor, and the evidence of Delian epigraphy’, ZPE 210: 71–5Google Scholar
Hornsby, R.A. 1970. Patterns of Action in the Aeneid: An Interpretation of Vergil’s Epic Similes. Iowa City, IAGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. 1971. ‘Numanus Remulus: ethnography and propaganda in Aen. 9.598ff.’, Latomus 39: 1108–16Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1980. ‘Virgil, Varro’s Imagines and the Forum of Augustus’, AncSoc 10: 20–3Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1982. ‘The structure and purpose of Virgil’s parade of heroes’, AncSoc 12: 12–18Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. . 1989. Cornelius Nepos: A Selection, Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Houston, G.W. 2014. Inside Roman Libraries: Book Collections and their Management in Antiquity. Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Hubaux, J. 1958. Rome et Véies: recherches sur la chronologie légendaire du moyen âge romain. ParisGoogle Scholar
Huber, L. 1965. ‘Herodots Homerverständnis’, in Flashar, H and Gaiser, K. (eds.), Synusia: Festgabe für Wolfgang Schadewaldt. Pfullingen. 29–52Google Scholar
Humbert, M. 1978. Municipium et civitas sine suffragio: l’organisation de la conquête jusqu’à la guerre sociale. RomeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. . 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds.). 2017. Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hutcheon, L. 1980. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Narrative. Waterloo, Ont.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. 2008. Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H.D. 1965. ‘Ancient scholarship and Virgil’s use of Republican Latin poetry. II (continued)’, CQ 15: 126–44Google Scholar
Johnson, W.A. and Parker, H.N. (eds.). 2009. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.R. 1976. Darkness Visible. A Study of Vergil’s Aeneid. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Jörgensen, O. 1904. ‘Das Auftreten der Götter in den Büchern ι—μ der Odyssee’, Hermes 39: 357–82Google Scholar
Kapust, D.J. 2011. Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kates, J.A. 1974. ‘The revaluation of the Classical heroic in Tasso and Milton’, CL 26: 299–317Google Scholar
Kelly, A. and Spelman, H. eds. forthcoming. Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D.F. 1993. The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E.J. 1958. ‘Nequitiae poeta’, in Herescu, N.I. (ed.), Ovidiana: Recherches sur Ovide. Paris. 201–9Google Scholar
Kirk, G.S., Raven, J.E. and Schofield, M. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers2. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. 1967. Virgil. Bucolica, Georgica, Aeneis (Interpretation der Werke Virgils). ZürichGoogle Scholar
Knauer, G.N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils, mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1974. ‘Pindar as innovator: Poseidon Hippios and the relevance of the Pelops story in Olympian 1’, CQ 24: 199–206Google Scholar
König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.). 2013. Ancient Libraries. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. 2009. ‘Cosmopolitan traditions’, in Balot, R.K. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Oxford and Malden, MA. 471–84Google Scholar
Koster, S. . 1979. ‘Liebe und Krieg in der “Achilleis” des Statius’, WJA NF 5: 189–208Google Scholar
Kramer, L.S. 1989. ‘Literature, criticism, and historical imagination: the literary challenge of Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra’, in Hunt, L. (ed.), The New Cultural History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 97–128Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. 1991. ‘Initium turbandi omnia a femina ortum est: Fabia Minor and the election of 367 B.C.’, Phoenix 45: 314–25Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 1994b. ‘“No second Troy”: topoi and refoundation in Livy, Book V’, TAPhA 124: 267–89Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 1997. ‘Livy’, in Kraus, C.S. and Woodman, A.J., Latin Historians. Oxford. 51–81Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . 2019. ‘Fabula and history in Livy’s narrative of the capture of Veii’, in Baines, J., van der Blom, H., Chen, Y.S. and Rood, T. (eds.), Historical Consciousness and the Use of the Past in the Ancient World. Sheffield and Bristol. 345–58Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . forthcominga: ‘Urban disasters and other Romes: the case of Veii’, in Closs, V. and Keitel, E. (eds.), Urban Disasters in the Roman ImaginationGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C.S. . forthcomingb: ‘Livy’s Faliscan schoolmaster’, in Poulsen, A.D. and Jönssen, A. (eds.), Usages of the Past in Roman Historiography. LundGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C.S. (ed.). 1999. The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Texts. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Kremer, D. 2006. Ius Latinum. Le Concept de droit latin sous la république et l’empire. ParisGoogle Scholar
Krevans, N. 1993. ‘Ilia’s dream: Ennius, Virgil, and the mythology of seduction’, HSPh 95: 257–71Google Scholar
Kuttner, A.L. 1995. Dynasty and Empire in the Age of Augustus: The Case of the Boscoreale Cups. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Labate, M. 2013. ‘Constructing the Roman myth: the history of the Republic in Horace’s lyric poetry’, in Farrell, J. and Nelis, D.P. (eds.), Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford. 205–27Google Scholar
Lamacchia, R. 1964. ‘Ciceros Somnium Scipionis und das sechste Buch der Aeneis’, RhM 107: 261–78Google Scholar
Lamarque, P. and Olsen, S.H. 1994. Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A Philosophical Perspective. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Langdon, M.K. 2015. ‘Herders’ graffiti’, in Matthaiou, A.P. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), AXON: Studies in Honor of Ronald S. Stroud. Athens. 49–58Google Scholar
Latacz, J. 1975. ‘Zur Forschungsarbeit an den direkten Reden bei Homer (1850–1970): Ein kritischer Literatur-Überblick’, GB 3: 395–422Google Scholar
Lavan, M., Payne, R.E. and Weisweiler, J. (eds.). 2016. Cosmopolitanism and Empire: Universal Rule, Local Elites, and Cultural Integration in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.J.N. 1964. The Similes of the Iliad and the Odyssey Compared. Parkville, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
Lefèvre, E. . 1976. ‘Die Lehre von der Entstehung der Tieropfer in Ovids Fasten 1, 335–456’, RhM 119: 39–64Google Scholar
Legras, L. 1905. Les Légendes thébaines en Grèce et à Rome. Étude sur la Thébaïde de Stace. ParisGoogle Scholar
Levene, D.S. . 2019. ‘Monumental insignificance: the rhetoric of Roman topography from Livy’s Rome’, in Loar, M.P., Murray, S.C. and Rebeggiani, S. (eds.), The Cultural History of Augustan Rome: Texts, Monuments, and Topography. Cambridge. 10–26Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. . 1971. ‘Vergils Aeneis als Dichtung der Einsamkeit’, in Bardon and Verdière (1971). 175–91Google Scholar
Lipscomb, H.C. 1909. ‘Aspects of the speech in Vergil and the later Roman epic’, CW 2: 114–17Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 1979. Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. . 1987. The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Loraux, N. 1986. The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City, tr. A. Sheridan. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2010. ‘Rom immer wieder gegründet’, in Döring, R., Vinken, B. and Zöller, G. (eds.), Übertragene Anfänge: Imperiale Figurationen um 1800. Munich. 23–49Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. . 2013. ‘Foundation and closure’, in Grewing, F.F., Acosta-Hughes, B. and Kirichenko, A. (eds.), The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art. Heidelberg. 83–102Google Scholar
Luce, J.V. 1965/2009. ‘The dating of Livy’s first Decade’, TAPhA 96: 209–40 = Chaplin and Kraus (2009). 17–48Google Scholar
Lyne, R. 1999. ‘Drayton’s chorological Ovid’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999). 85–102Google Scholar
Lyne, R.O.A.M. . 1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil’s Aeneid. OxfordGoogle Scholar
McInerney, J. (ed.) 2014. A Companion to Ethnicity in the Ancient Mediterranean. Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
Mackie, C.J. 1990. ‘Quisquis in arma vocas: Turnus and Jupiter in the Aeneid’, Antichthon 24: 79–85Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1966. Enemies of the Roman Order: Treason, Unrest, and Alienation in the Empire. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Malmendier, U. 2005. ‘Roman shares’, in Goetzmann, W.N. and Rouwenhorst, K.G. (eds.), The Origins of Value: The Financial Innovations that Created Modern Capital Markets. Oxford. 31–42Google Scholar
Marincola, J. . 1997b. ‘Odysseus and the historians’, Histos 1 (www.dur.ac.uk/Classics/histos/1997/marincola.html)Google Scholar
Marincola, J. . 1999. ‘Genre, convention, and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography’, in Kraus (1999). 281–324Google Scholar
Marincola, J. . 2010. ‘Eros and Empire: Virgil and the historians on civil war’, in Kraus, C.S., Marincola, J. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts. Oxford. 183–204Google Scholar
Mikalson, J.D. . 1991. Honor Thy Gods: Popular Religion in Greek Tragedy. Chapel Hill, NC and LondonGoogle Scholar
Mikalson, J.D. . 2003. Herodotus and Religion in the Persian Wars. Chapel Hill, NC and LondonGoogle Scholar
Mineo, B. 2003. ‘Récit d’une crise: la fin du premier cycle historique de Rome, au livre V de l’Ab Urbe Condita de Tite-Live’, in Franchet d’Espèrey, S. et al. (eds.), Fondements et crises du pouvoir. Bordeaux. 337–51Google Scholar
Moatti, C. 2015. The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome, tr. J. Lloyd. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Moles, J.L. 1987. ‘The tragedy and guilt of Dido’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 153–61Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. . 1993. ‘Truth and untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides’, in Gill and Wiseman (2003). 88–121Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. . 1993/2009. ‘Livy’s Preface’, PCPhS 39: 141–68 = Chaplin and Kraus (2009). 49–87Google Scholar
Monti, R.C. 1981. The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Morgan, L. 1998. ‘Assimilation and civil war: Hercules and Cacus’, in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.), Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London. 175–97.Google Scholar
Morwood, J.H.W. . 1998. ‘Virgil’s pious man and Menenius Agrippa: a note on Aeneid 1.148–53’, G&R 45: 195–8Google Scholar
Most, G. 2000. ‘Generating genres: the idea of the tragic’, in Depew and Obbink (2000). 15–35Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 1998. Italian Unification: A Study in Ancient and Modern Historiography. LondonGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, H. . 2007. ‘The civitas sine suffragio: ancient concepts and modern ideology’, Historia 56: 141–58Google Scholar
Munson, R.V. 2001. Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Münzer, F. . 1937. ‘Die römischen Vestalinnen bis zur Kaiserzeit’, Philologus 92: 47–67, 199–222Google Scholar
Myers, K.S. 1994. Ovid’s Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1979. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Narducci, E. 1979. La provvidenza crudele: Lucano e la distruzione dei miti augustei. PisaGoogle Scholar
Nissen, T. 1940. ‘Historisches Epos und Panegyrikos in der Spätantike’, Hermes 75: 298–325Google Scholar
Nowotny, H. 1994. Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience, tr. N. Plaice. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Obbink, D. 1993. ‘Dionysus poured out: ancient and modern theories of sacrifice and cultural formation’, in Carpenter, T.H. and Faraone, C.A. (eds.), Masks of Dionysus. Ithaca, NY. 65–86Google Scholar
Ober, J. 2001. ‘Not by a nose: the triumph of Antony and Cleopatra at Actium, 31 B.C.’, in Cowley, R. (ed.), What If? 2: Eminent Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. New York. 23–47Google Scholar
O’Hara, J.J. 1996. True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. 2019. ‘Citizenship’s insular cases, from ancient Greece and Rome to Puerto Rico’, Humanities 8: 134Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1997. ‘Gods cruel and kind: tragic and civic ideology’, in Pelling, C. (ed.), Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford. 143–60Google Scholar
Pausch, D. 2011. Livius und der Leser: Narrative Strukturen in ab urbe condita. MunichGoogle Scholar
Payne, M. 2018. ‘Fidelity and farewell: Pindar’s ethics as textual events’, in Budelmann and Phillips (2018). 257–74Google Scholar
Pearson, L. 1975. ‘Myth and archaeologia in Italy and Sicily—Timaeus and his predecessors’, YClS 24: 171–95Google Scholar
Pellam, G. 2014. ‘A peculiar episode from the “struggle of the orders”? Livy and the Licinio-Sextian Rogations’, CQ 64: 280–92Google Scholar
Perkell, C. 1989. The Poet’s Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil’s Georgics. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Pietrusinski, D. 1978. ‘L’Apothéose d’Auguste par la comparaison avec les héros grecques chez Horace et Virgile’, Eos 66: 249–66Google Scholar
Polleichtner, W. 2005. ‘The bee simile: how Vergil emulated Apollonius in his use of Homeric poetry’, GFA 8: 115–60Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. 1967. The Odyssey of Homer: Books I–XII, ed. Mack, M.. London. Originally published 1772Google Scholar
Porter, J. 2004. ‘Homer: the history of an idea’, in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge. 318–37Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. 1962. The Art of Vergil. Image and Symbol in the Aeneid, tr. G. Seligson. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Prag, J.R.W. and Quinn, J.C. (eds.). 2013. The Hellenistic West: Rethinking the Ancient Mediterranean. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. 1965. The Poetry of the Aeneid: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 1979. Virgil’s Poem of the Earth: Studies in the Georgics. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. . 1985. ‘Possessiveness, sexuality, and heroism in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 31: 1–21Google Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Redfield, J. 1975. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Reeve, M.D. 1995. ‘Conclusion’, in Pecere, O. and Reeve, M.D. (eds.), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Spoleto. 497–511Google Scholar
Richardson, J.S. 1995. ‘The Roman mind and the power of fiction’, in Ayres, L. (ed.), The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformations of Classical Traditions Presented to Professor I. G. Kidd. New Brunswick, NJ. 117–30Google Scholar
Roman, L. 2001. ‘The representation of literary materiality in Martial’s Epigrams’, JRS 91: 113–45Google Scholar
Ross, D.O. Jr. 1987. Virgil’s Elements: Physics and Poetry in the Georgics. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
Runciman, D. 2003. ‘The concept of the state. The sovereignty of a fiction’, in Skinner, Q. and Stråth, B. (eds.), States and Citizens: History, Theory, Prospects. Cambridge. 28–38Google Scholar
Runciman, S. 1951. A History of the Crusades. Volume I: The First Crusade and the Foundation of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. 1995. Kalender und Öffentlichkeit: Die Geschichte der Repräsentation und religiösen Qualifikation von Zeit in Rom. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. . 2001. ‘Antike Religionen als Kommunikationssysteme’, in Brodersen, K. (ed.), Gebet und Fluch, Zeichen und Traum: Aspekte religiöser Kommunikation in der Antike. Münster. 13–30Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. . 2011. ‘History’, in Stausberg, M. and Engler, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. London and New York. 285–309Google Scholar
Sailor, D. 2006. ‘Dirty linen, fabrication, and the authorities of Livy and Augustus’, TAPhA 136: 329–88Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 1990. Romulus et ses frères: le collège des frères arvales, modèle du culte public dans la Rome des empereurs. RomeGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2004. ‘Human mobility in Roman Italy, I: the free population’, JRS 94: 1–26Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 1990. Simulacrum et imago. Gli argomenti analogici nel De Rerum Natura. PisaGoogle Scholar
Schindler, C. 2000. Untersuchungen zu den Gleichnissen im römischen Lehrgedicht: Lukrez, Vergil, Manilius. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P.L. 1973. ‘Cicero De Re Publica: Die Forschungen der letzten fünf Dezennien’, ANRW 1.4: 262–333Google Scholar
Schmit-Neuerburg, T. 1999. Vergils Aeneis und die antike Homerexegese: Untersuchungen zum Einfluß ethischer und kritischer Homerrezeption auf imitatio und aemulatio Vergils. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Schrijvers, P.H. 1978. ‘Le regard sur l’invisible: étude sur l’emploi de l’analogie dans l’oeuvre de Lucrèce’, in Gigon, O. (ed.), Lucrèce, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 24. Geneva. 77–114Google Scholar
Schröder, W.A. 1971. M. Porcius Cato: Das erste Buch der Origines. Ausgabe und Erklärung der Fragmente. Meisenheim am GlanGoogle Scholar
Schultze, C.E. 1995. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Roman chronology’, PCPhS 41: 192–214Google Scholar
Shawcross, J.T. 1982. With Mortal Voice: The Creation of ‘Paradise Lost’. Lexington, KYGoogle Scholar
Shay, J. 1994. Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Skutsch, O. . 1972. ‘Readings and interpretations in the Annals’, in Skutsch, O. (ed.), Ennius, Entretiens Fondation Hardt 17. Geneva. 3–37Google Scholar
Smith, C.J. 2011. ‘Citizenship and community: inventing the Roman Republic’, in Terrenato, N. and Haggis, D.C. (eds.), State Formation in Italy and Greece: Questioning the Neoevolutionist Paradigm. Oxford and Oakville, CT. 217–30Google Scholar
Smith, J.Z. 1987. ‘The domestication of sacrifice’, in Hamerton-Kelly, R.G. (ed.), Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, René Girard, and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford, CA. 191–205Google Scholar
Smith, R.A. 1997. Poetic Allusion and Poetic Embrace in Ovid and Virgil. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, J. 1973. Dido v Aeneas, the Case for the Defence: The Sixth Jackson Knight Memorial Lecture. AbingdonGoogle Scholar
Spelman, H. . 2019. ‘Schools, reading and poetry in the early Greek world’, CCJ 65: 150–72Google Scholar
Spence, S. 1988. Rhetorics of Reason and Desire: Vergil, Augustine, and the Troubadors. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Spence, S. . 2002. ‘Pietas and Furor: motivational forces in the Aeneid’, in Anderson, W.S. and Quartarone, L.N. (eds.), Approaches to Teaching Vergil’s Aeneid. New York. 46–52Google Scholar
Spingarn, J.E. . (ed.). 1908. Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century, 3 vols. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Stadter, P.A. 1972/2009. ‘The structure of Livy’s History’, Historia 21: 287–307 = Chaplin and Kraus (2009). 91–117Google Scholar
Stanford, W.B. 1963. The Ulysses Theme: A Study in the Adaptability of a Traditional Hero. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Steadman, J.M. . 1975. ‘The arming of an archetype: heroic virtue and the conventions of literary epic’, in Burns and Reagan (1975). 147–96Google Scholar
Stehle, E. 1989. ‘Venus, Cybele, and the Sabine women: the Roman construction of female sexuality’, Helios 16: 143–64Google Scholar
Stephens, S. 2004. ‘Whose rituals in ink?’, in Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J. and Stephens, S. (eds.), Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome. Munich. 157–60Google Scholar
Stewart, D.J. 1972–3. ‘Mortality, morality and the public life. Aeneas the politician’, Antioch Review 32: 649–64Google Scholar
Stewart, O. 2017. ‘Citizenship as a reward or punishment? Factoring language into the Latin settlement’, Antichthon 51: 186–201Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 1967. ‘Aeneas zwischen Troja und Rom. Zur Funktion der Genealogie und der Ethnographie in Vergils Aeneis’, Poetica 1: 176–204Google Scholar
Swedenberg, H.T. 1944. The Theory of the Epic in England, 1650–1800. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
Syed, Y. 2005. Vergil’s Aeneid and the Roman Self: Subject and Nation in Literary Discourse. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Taussig, M. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Terrenato, N. 2019. The Early Roman Expansion into Italy: Elite Negotiation and Family Agendas. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Thalmann, W.G. 1984. Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Epic Poetry. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. 2000. Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R.F. 1982. Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographical Tradition. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R.F. . 1991. ‘The “Sacrifice” at the end of the Georgics, Aristaeus, and Vergilian closure’, CPh 86: 211–18Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. 1996. «Origine» et «Commune Patrie». Étude de droit public romain (89 av. J.C.–212 ap. J.C.). RomeGoogle Scholar
Tillyard, E.M.W. 1938. ‘Milton and the English epic tradition’, in Seventeenth Century Studies Presented to Sir Herbert Grierson. Oxford. 211–36Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo. 1954. Anna Karenina, tr. C. Garnett. Harmondsworth. Originally published 1878Google Scholar
Tombs, R. and Tombs, I. 2007. That Sweet Enemy: The French and British from the Sun King to the Present. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, A.J. 1965. Hannibal’s Legacy: The Hannibalic War’s Effect on Roman Life, 2 vols. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Tracey, S.V. 1975. ‘The Marcellus passage (Aeneid 6.860–886) and Aeneid 9–12’, CJ 70: 37–42Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Trimble, J.F. 2002. ‘Greek myth, gender, and social structure in a Roman house: two paintings of Achilles at Pompeii’, in Gazda, E.K. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity. Ann Arbor, MI. 225–48Google Scholar
Ungern-Sternberg, J. von 1998. ‘Die Romulusnachfolge des Augustus’, in Schuller, W. (ed.), Politische Theorie und Praxis im Altertum. Darmstadt. 166–82Google Scholar
Vandiver, E. 1999. ‘The founding mothers of Livy’s Rome: the Sabine women and Lucretia’, in Titchener, F.B. and Moorton, R.F. Jr. (eds.), The Eye Expanded: Life and the Arts in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 206–32Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 2015a. Livy’s Political Philosophy: Power and Personality in Early Rome. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Vasaly, A. . 2015b. ‘The composition of the Ab Urbe Condita: the case of the first pentad’, in B. Mineo (2015). 217–29Google Scholar
Versnel, H.S. 1987. ‘What did ancient man see when he saw a god? Some reflections on Greco-Roman epiphany’, in Van der Plas, D. (ed.), Effigies Dei: Essays on the History of Religions. Leiden. 42–55Google Scholar
Versnel, H.S. . 1994. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion 2: Transition and Reversal in Myth and Ritual. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Veyne, P. 1988. Did the Greeks Believe in their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination, tr. P. Wissing. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1987. ‘Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus and the Fasti’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby (1987). 221–30Google Scholar
Walter, A. forthcoming. ‘Ever Since Then’: Time in Ancient Aetiology, chapter 3Google Scholar
Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und Respublica: Zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. (ed.). 1962. John Dryden: Of Dramatic Poesy, and Other Critical Essays, 2 vols. London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
West, D. 1970. ‘Virgilian multiple-correspondence similes and their antecedents’, Philologus 114: 262–75Google Scholar
West, G.S. 1979. ‘Virgil’s helpful sisters. Anna and Juturna in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 25: 10–19Google Scholar
Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.). 1987. Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. BristolGoogle Scholar
White, H. 1978. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore, MD and LondonGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, J.B. 1994. ‘The Iguvine Tablets: problems in the interpretation of ritual text’, in Malone, C. and Stoddart, S. (eds.), Territory, Time and State: The Archaeological Development of the Gubbio Basin. Cambridge. 152–72Google Scholar
Williams, R.C. 1917. The Theory of the Heroic Epic in Italian Criticism of the Sixteenth Century. Diss. Johns HopkinsGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.D. 1971. ‘Dido’s Reply to Aeneas (Aen. 4. 362–387)’, in Bardon and Verdière (1971). 422–8Google Scholar
Williams, R.D. . 1972. ‘The pageant of Roman heroes: Aeneid 6.756–853’, in Martyn, J.R.C. (ed.), Cicero and Virgil: Studies in Honour of Harold Hunt. Amsterdam. 207–17Google Scholar
Winkler, A. 2018. We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won their Civil Rights. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Winkler, J.J. 1990. The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1979. Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 1984. ‘Cybele, Virgil and Augustus’, in Woodman and West (1984). 117–28Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 2002. ‘History, poetry and Annales’, in Levene, D.S. and Nelis, D.P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden. 331–62Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. . 2015. The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wofford, S.L. 1992. The Choice of Achilles: The Ideology of Figure in the Epic. Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, D.M. (ed.). 1953–82. The Complete Prose Works of John Milton, 8 vols. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J. . 2003. ‘Poems to historians: Catullus 1 and Horace Odes 2.1’, in Braund and Gill (2003). 191–216Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. and West, D. (eds.). 1984. Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Yunis, H. (ed.). 2003. Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988: The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, tr. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1986. ‘Theater of self and society in Athenian drama’, in Euben, J.P. (ed.), Greek Tragedy and Political Theory. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. 101–41Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. . 1996. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Culture. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1989. ‘Romane memento: justice and judgment in Aeneid 6’, TAPhA 119: 263–84Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. . 1997. ‘Rome and its traditions’, in Martindale, C (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge. 188–203Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. 1966. Das hellenistische Epos: Ein vergessenes Kapitel griechischer Dichtung2. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Zissos, A. and Gildenhard, I. 1999. ‘Problems of time in Metamorphoses 2’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999). 31–47Google Scholar