Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- 8 Work Motivation
- 9 Experimenting with Leadership in Public Organisations
- 10 Prospects for Experimental Approaches to Research on Bureaucratic Red Tape***
- 11 Managerial Use of Performance Data by Bureaucrats and Politicians
- 12 Citizens and Public Performance Measures: Making Sense of Performance Information
- 13 Public Sector Transparency
- 14 Representative Bureaucracy: An Experimental Approach
- 15 Coproduction of Public Services
- 16 Expectations of and Satisfaction with Public Services
- 17 Citizen and Users’ Responses to Public Service Failure: Experimentation about Blame, Exit, and Voice
- 18 Assessing Public Support for Government Policy: Comparing Experimental and Attitudinal Approaches
- 19 Legislative Oversight of the Bureaucracy: Insights from Formal Modelling and Experimental Testing
- 20 Experimental Research for Nonprofit Management: Charitable Giving and Fundraising
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
14 - Representative Bureaucracy: An Experimental Approach
from Part III - Substantive Contributions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2017
Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- 8 Work Motivation
- 9 Experimenting with Leadership in Public Organisations
- 10 Prospects for Experimental Approaches to Research on Bureaucratic Red Tape***
- 11 Managerial Use of Performance Data by Bureaucrats and Politicians
- 12 Citizens and Public Performance Measures: Making Sense of Performance Information
- 13 Public Sector Transparency
- 14 Representative Bureaucracy: An Experimental Approach
- 15 Coproduction of Public Services
- 16 Expectations of and Satisfaction with Public Services
- 17 Citizen and Users’ Responses to Public Service Failure: Experimentation about Blame, Exit, and Voice
- 18 Assessing Public Support for Government Policy: Comparing Experimental and Attitudinal Approaches
- 19 Legislative Oversight of the Bureaucracy: Insights from Formal Modelling and Experimental Testing
- 20 Experimental Research for Nonprofit Management: Charitable Giving and Fundraising
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experiments in Public Management ResearchChallenges and Contributions, pp. 313 - 328Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aalbert, T. and Todal Jenssen, A. 2007. ‘Gender stereotyping of political candidates: an experimental study of political communication’, Nordicom Review 28(1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R., Ashworth, R., and Meier, K. J. 2014. ‘Representative bureaucracy and fire service performance’, International Public Management Journal 17: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, D. N. and Wilkins, V. M. 2013. ‘Going beyond reading, writing, and arithmetic: the effects of teacher representation on teen pregnancy rates’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 771–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M. and Mullainathan, S. 2004. ‘Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination’, American Economic Review 94(4): 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, M., and Kellough, J. E. 2011. ‘Representative bureaucracy: assessing the evidence on active representation’, American Review of Public Administration 41:157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix, M. and Struyk, R. J. 1993. Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Gade, D. M. and Wilkins, V. M. 2013. ‘Where did you serve? Veteran identity, representative bureaucracy, and vocational rehabilitation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, D. J. 2004. ‘“Walking the Walk” of public service motivation: public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., and Holland, C. 2002. ‘Lipstick and logarithms: gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy’, American Political Science Review 96: 553–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellough, J. E. 1990. ‘Integration in the public workplace: determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies’, Public Administration Review 50: 557–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellough, J. E. and Euel, E. 1992. ‘Demographic and organizational influences on racial/ethnic and gender integration in federal agencies’, Social Science Quarterly 73: 1–11.Google Scholar
Kingsley, J. D. 1944. Representative Bureaucracy: An Interpretation of the British Civil Service. Yellow Springs, OH: The Antioch Press.Google Scholar
Matland, R. E. 1994. ‘Putting Scandinavian equality to the test: an experimental evaluation of gender stereotyping of political candidates in a sample of Norwegian voters’, British Journal of Political Science 24(2): 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. 1975. ‘Representative bureaucracy: an empirical analysis’, American Political Science Review 69(2): 526–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. 1993a. ‘Latinos and representative bureaucracy: testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3: 393–414.Google Scholar
Meier, K. J. 1993b. ‘Representative bureaucracy: a theoretical and empirical exposition’, Research in Public Administration 2: 1–35.Google Scholar
Meier, K. J. and Nicholson-Crotty, J. 2006. ‘Gender, representative bureaucracy and law enforcement: the case of sexual assault’, Public Administration Review 66: 850–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. and Nigro, L. G. 1976. ‘Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences’, Public Administration Review 36: 458–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. and Stewart, J. 1992. ‘The impact of representative bureaucracies: educational systems and public policies’, American Review of Public Administration 22: 157–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, R. B. and Williams, K. C. 2008. ‘Experimentation in political science’. In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–56.Google Scholar
Mosher, F. C. 1968. Democracy and the Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riccucci, N. M. and Meyers, M. 2004. ‘Linking passive and active representation: the case of front-line workers in welfare agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14: 585–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M. and Saidel, J. R. 1997. ‘The representativeness of state-level bureaucratic leaders’, Public Administration Review 57: 423–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Li, H. 2016. ‘Representative bureaucracy and the willingness to coproduce: an experimental study’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Lavena, C. F. 2014. ‘Representative bureaucracy in policing: does it increase perceived legitimacy?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24: 537–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, S. C. 1997. The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Sowa, J. E. and Selden, S. C. 2003. ‘Administrative discretion and active representation: an expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy’, Public Administration Review 63: 700–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, N. A. and Haider-Markel, D. P. 2009. ‘Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: interactions between citizens and police’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19: 409–26.Google Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G. 2008. ‘Validity of an on-line panel approach to citizen surveys’, Public Performance and Management Review 32(2): 236–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G., Riccucci, N. M., and Li, H. 2015. ‘Representative bureaucracy and public engagement in emergency preparedness: a replication experiment’, Paper presented at the 2015 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM) Research Conference, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, L. 2003. ‘Clientelism and voting behavior: evidence from a field experiment in Benin’, World Politics 55(3): 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, V. M. 2007. ‘Exploring the causal story: gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17: 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, V. M. and Keiser, L. R. 2006. ‘Linking passive and active representation by gender: the case of child support enforcement’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by