Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:30:20.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 21 - Hesperocyparis

Cupressales: Cupressaceae S.S.

from Part III - Living Arborescent Gymnosperm Genetic Presentations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2024

Christopher N. Page
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

Small, medium-sized to sometimes large, monoecious evergreen trees, often with characteristically distinctively coloured or patterned bark, at first typically with a conical, tapering crown, but eventually widely open-crowned trees. Some become multi-trunked, and often eventually forming handsome tall-growing trees with foliage mainly in radially structured, clustered, bushy, open-billowing masses, and hence not arrayed into flattened sprays as in most Cupressus.

Type
Chapter
Information
Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
Pattern, Process and Diversity
, pp. 408 - 421
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R.P., Bartel, J.A., & Price, R.A. 2009. A new genus, Hesperocyparis, for the cypresses of the Western hemisphere (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 91: 160185.Google Scholar
Axelrod, D.J. 1957. Late Tertiary floras of the Sierra Nevada uplift. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 68: 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, D.J. 1958. Evolution of the Madro-Tertiary geoflora. Botanical Review 24: 434509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, D.I. 1964 The Miocene Trapper Creek flora of southern Idaho. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 51: 1148.Google Scholar
Axelrod, D.I. 1990. Age and origin of subalpine forest zone. Paleobiology 16(3): 360369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartel, J.A., Adams, R.P., James, S.A., Mumba, L.E. & Pandey, R.N. 2003. Variation among Cupressus species from the western hemisphere based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31: 693702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becarra, J.X. 2005. Timing the origin and expansion of the Mexican tropical dry forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102: 1091910923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.W. 1934. The Recognizable Species of the Green River Flora. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsfeld, S.J., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Gadek, P.A. & Quinn, C.J. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships amongst the genera of the Taxodicaeae and Cupressaceae: Evidence from rbcL sequences. Systematic Botany 19: 253262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartron, J.L., Ceballos, G. & Felger, R.S. (eds). 2005. Biodiversity, Ecosystems and Conservation in Northern Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contreras-Medina, R., Luna Vega, I., & Morrone, J.J. 2007. Gymnosperms and cladistic biogeography of the Mexican Transition Zone. Taxon 56: 905915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gouvenain, R.C. & Ansary, A.A. 2006. Association between fire return interval and population dynamics in four California populations of Tecate cypress (Cupressus forbesii). Southwestern Naturalist 51: 447454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreczy, Z., Musial, K., Price, R.A. & Racz, I. 2009. Relationships and nomenclatural status of the Nootka cypress (Callitropsis nootkatensis, Cupressaceae). Phytologia 91: 140159.Google Scholar
DeBuno, L.F. 1989. Effects of fire on chaparral soils in Arizona and California and postfire management implications. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSN-109.Google Scholar
Eckenwalder, J.F. 2009. Conifers of the World: The Complete Reference. Portland, OR: Timber Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, P.R., Gernandt, D.S., Pinero, D. & Garcillan, P.P. 2011. Plastid DNA diversity is higher in the island endemic Guadalupe cypress than in the continental Tecate cypress. PLoS One 6: e16133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, L. 1994. Hesperocyparis goveniana. In Fire Effects Information System. Washington, DC: USDA.Google Scholar
Farjon, A. 2005. A Monograph of Cupressaceae and Sciadopitys. London: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Gadek, P.A., Alpers, D.L., Heslewood, M.M. & Quinn, C.J. 2000. Relationships within Cupressaceae sensu lato: a combined morphological and molecular approach. American Journal of Botany 87: 10441057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, E.A. & Moore, R.T. 1945. The biotic provinces of Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy 26(4): 347360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, J.A. 1987. A cladistic analysis of conifers: preliminary results. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 68: 269307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruckeberg, A.R. 1984. California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, and management problems. University of California Publications in Botany 78: 1180.Google Scholar
Lal, R. 2004. Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems. Environmental Management 33: 528544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarus, B.E., Richards, J.H., Claassen, V.P., O’Dell, R.E. & Ferrell, M.A. 2011. Species specific plant–soil interactions influence plant distribution on serpentine soils. Plant and Soil 342: 327344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, H. 1962. Catastrophic selection as a factor in speciation. Evolution 16: 257271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D.P. 2006. Evolution and circumscription of the true cypresses (Cupressaceae: Cupressus). Systematic Botany 31: 461480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D.P., Schwarzbach, A.E., Adams, R.P. & Hsieh, C.-F. 2004. The circumscription and phylogenetic relationships of Callitropsis and the newly described genus Xanthocyparis (Cupressaceae). American Journal of Botany 91(11): 18721881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGintie, H.D. 1953. Fossil plants of the Florissant beds, Colorado. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 599Google Scholar
Marshall, C.J. & Liebherr, J.K. 2000. Cladistic biogeography of the Mexican transition zone. Journal of Biogeography 27(1): 203216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, M. 1947. Los Cupressus de Mexico. Annals of the Institute of Biology [Mexico] 18: 71149.Google Scholar
Martinez, M. 1963. Las Pinaceas Mexicanas. Mexico City: Cindad Univesidad de Mexico.Google Scholar
McIver, E.E. 2001. Cretaceous Widdringtonia Endl.(Cupressaceae) from North America. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162(4): 937961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrone, J.J. 2010. Fundamental biogeographic patterns across the Mexican Transition Zone: an evolutionary approach. Ecogeography 33: 355361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehfeldt, G.E. 1997. Quantitative analyses of the genetic structure of closely related conifers with disparate distributions and demographics: the Cupressus arizonica (Cupressaceae) complex. American Journal of Botany 84: 190200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushforth, K., Adams, R.P., Zhong, M. & Pandey, R.N. 2003. Variation among Cupressus species from the eastern hemisphere based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31(1): 1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silba, J. 1994. The trans-Pacific relationship of Cupressus in India and North America. Journal of the International Conifer Preservation Society 1: 128.Google Scholar
Silba, J. 1998. A monograph of the genus Cupressus L. Journal of the International Conifer Preservation Society 5: 198.Google Scholar
Silba, J. 2005. A monograph of the genus Cupressus L. in the twenty first century. Journal of the International Conifer Preservation Society 12: 31103.Google Scholar
Sudworth, G.B. 1908. Forest Trees of the Pacific Slope. San Francisco, CA: USDA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, C.B. 1948. The New World cypresses. Aliso 1: 1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiang, Q.P. & Li, J.H. 2005. Derivation of Xanthocyparis and Juniperus from within Cupressus: evidence from sequences of nrDNA internal transcribed spacer region. Harvard Papers in Botany 9(2): 375382.Google Scholar
Zanoni, T.A. 1982. Cupressaceae. Flora de Veracruz 23: 27.Google Scholar
Zobel, D.B. 1986. Port-Orford-cedar: a forgotten species. Journal of Forest History 30(1): 2936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Hesperocyparis
  • Christopher N. Page, University of Exeter
  • Book: Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
  • Online publication: 11 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009262965.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Hesperocyparis
  • Christopher N. Page, University of Exeter
  • Book: Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
  • Online publication: 11 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009262965.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Hesperocyparis
  • Christopher N. Page, University of Exeter
  • Book: Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
  • Online publication: 11 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009262965.025
Available formats
×