Book contents
- Ethics
- Talking Philosophy
- Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- List of Contributors
- Objective Prescriptions
- Integrity and Self-Identity
- The Better Part
- Invincible Knowledge
- Emmanuel Levinas: Responsibility and Election
- Ethical Absolutism and Education
- Morals and Politics
- Duties and Virtues
- The Definition of Morality
- Ethics, Fantasy and Self-transformation
- How We Do Ethics Now
- Justice without Constitutive Luck
- Who Needs Ethical Knowledge?
- Institutional Ethics
- References
- Index
How We Do Ethics Now
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2023
- Ethics
- Talking Philosophy
- Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- List of Contributors
- Objective Prescriptions
- Integrity and Self-Identity
- The Better Part
- Invincible Knowledge
- Emmanuel Levinas: Responsibility and Election
- Ethical Absolutism and Education
- Morals and Politics
- Duties and Virtues
- The Definition of Morality
- Ethics, Fantasy and Self-transformation
- How We Do Ethics Now
- Justice without Constitutive Luck
- Who Needs Ethical Knowledge?
- Institutional Ethics
- References
- Index
Summary
By far the most common form of argument in ethics nowadays is what can be called piecemeal appeal to intuition. Any reader of philosophy will know the kind of thing I mean. ‘On your principle, it would be all right to do such-and-such. But that’s counter-intuitive. So your principle is wrong.’ The word ‘intuition’ here is not used, as it was in earlier times, to refer to a special way of knowing; instead it is used to mean merely a moral sentiment or belief that persons have independently of the moral theory or philosophy or stance that they might adopt.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ethics , pp. 250 - 279Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022