Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:09:46.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2010

Erich Kirchler
Affiliation:
Universität Wien, Austria
Valerie Braithwaite
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abric, J.-C. (1984). A theoretical and experimental approach to the study of social representations in a situation of interaction. In Moscovici, S. and Farr, R. (eds.), Social representations (pp. 223–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, C. (1993). For good and evil: The impact of taxes on the course of civilization. Lanham, MD: Madison Books.Google Scholar
Adams, C., and Webley, P. (2001). Small business owners' attitudes on VAT compliance in the UK. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental and social psychology (vol. II, pp. 267–99). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Agnell, J., and Persson, M. (2000). Tax arbitrage and labor supply. Journal of Public Economics, 78(1–2), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, E. (2004). Validation of the ‘Management of Shame State – Shame Acknowledgment and Shame Displacement’ (MOSS-SASD) in the context of taxation. Unpublished manuscript. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Ahmed, E., and Braithwaite, V. (2004). When tax collectors become collectors for child support and student loans: Jeopardizing the revenue base? Kyklos, 57(3), 303–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, E., and Braithwaite, V.(2005). Understanding small business taxpayers: Issues of deterrence, tax morale, fairness and work practice. International Small Business Journal, 23(5), 539–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I.(1993). Attitude theory and the attitude–behavior relation. In Krebs, D. and Schmidt, P. (eds.), New directions in attitude measurement (pp. 41–57). New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Alexander, C., and Feinstein, J. S. (1987). A microeconomic analysis of income tax evasion (Mimeo). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Allingham, M., and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, J. (1991). A perspective on the experimental analysis of taxpayer reporting. The Accounting Review, 55(3), 577–93.Google Scholar
Alm, J., Cronshaw, M. B., and McKee, M. (1993). Tax compliance with endogenous audit selection-rules. Kyklos, 46(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M. (1990). Alternative government approaches for increasing tax compliance (Mimeo). Boulder: University of Colorado, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M.(1992a). Institutional uncertainty and taxpayer compliance. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 1,018–26.Google Scholar
Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M.(1992b). Estimating the determinants of taxpayer compliance with experimental data. National Tax Journal, 45(1), 107–14.Google Scholar
Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M.(1993). Fiscal exchange, collective decision institutions, and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22(3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M.(2005). Audit information dissemination, taxpayer communication, and compliance behavior. Retrieved 31 December 2005, from http://aysps.gsu.edu/people/working/AlmJacksonMcKee-DirectversusIndirectEffects-05.18.05.DOC.
Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., and Schneider, F. (2004). ‘Sizing’ the problem of the hard-to tax. In Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J. and Wallace, S. (eds.), Taxing the hard-to-tax: Lessons from theory and practice (pp. 11–75). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., and Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., and Schulze, W. D.(1999). Changing the social norm of tax compliance by voting. Kyklos, 52(2), 141–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, J., McKee, M., and Beck, W. (1990). Amazing grace – tax amnesties and compliance. National Tax Journal, 43(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
Alm, J., Sanchez, I., and deJuan, A. (1995). Economic and noneconomic factors in tax compliance. Kyklos, 48(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, J., and Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderhub, V., Giese, S., Güth, W., Hoffmann, A., and Otto, T. (2001). Tax evasion with earned income: An experimental study. Finanz Archiv, 58(2), 188–206.Google Scholar
Andreoni, J. (1991). The desirability of a permanent tax amnesty. Journal of Public Economics, 45(2), 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J., Erard, B., and Feinstein, J. S. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818–60.Google Scholar
Andrews, M. (2003). New public management and democratic participation: Complementary or competing reforms? A South African study. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8–9), 991–1,016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angermeier, W. F., Bednorz, P., and Hursh, S. R. (1994). Operantes Lernen. Methoden, Ergebnisse, Anwendung. Munich: Ernst Reinhardt.Google Scholar
Antonides, G., and Robben, H. S. J. (1995). True positives and false alarms in the detection of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(4), 617–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Arkes, H. R., and Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkes, H. R., Joner, C. A., Pezzo, M. V., Nash, J. G., Siegel-Jacobs, K. and Stone, E. (1994). The psychology of windfall gains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. (1974). The limits of organization. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldry, J. C. (1987). Income tax evasion and the tax schedule: Some experimental results. Public Finance, 42(3), 357–83.Google Scholar
Baldry, J. C.(1994). Economic analysis and taxpayer compliance: Time for a new agenda. Australian Tax Forum, 11(1), 45–62.Google Scholar
Balestrino, A., and Galmarini, U. (2003). Imperfect tax compliance and the optimal provision of public goods. Bulletin of Economic Research, 55(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Odean, T. (2004). Are individual investors tax savvy? Evidence from retail and discount brokerage accounts. Journal of Public Economics, 88(1–2), 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd edn). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartelsman, E. J., and Beetsma, R. M. W. J. (2003). Why pay more? Corporate tax avoidance through transfer pricing in OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9–10), 2,225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, P. J., Davis, J. S., and Jung, W.-O. (1991). Experimental evidence on taxpayer reporting under uncertainty. Accounting Review, 66(3), 535–58.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benford, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78(4), 551–72.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. S. (2002). Who pays for social policy? A study on taxes and trust. Journal of Social Policy, 31(2), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, M., and Nevarez, A. (2005). The social mechanisms of tax evasion and tax compliance. Politica y Gobierno, 12(1), 9.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, M. (1998). Tax evasion and orders of risk aversion. Journal of Public Economics, 67(1), 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berti, C., and Kirchler, E. (2001). Contributi e contribuenti: Una ricerca sulle rappresentazioni del sistema fiscale. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 28(3), 595–607.Google Scholar
Besim, M., and Jenkins, G. P. (2005). Tax compliance: When do employees behave like the self-employed? Applied Economics, 37(10), 1,201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitterman, M. (1975). The comparative analysis of learning. Science, 188(4,189), 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, C. (2002). A meta-analysis of tax compliance experiments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society and Economic Science Association, San Diego, CA.
Blamey, R., and Braithwaite, V. (1997). The validity of the security-harmony social values model in the general population. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 71–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blickle, G., Schlegel, A., Fassbender, P., and Klein, U. (2006). Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(2), 220–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, M., and Christian, C. (2004). Tax preparers. In Aaron, H. J. and Slemrod, J. (eds.), The crisis in tax administration (pp. 201–29). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bobek, D. D., and Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogardus, E. S. (1928). Immigration and race attitudes. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Bongiovanni, A. (1977). A review of research on the effects of punishment in the schools. Paper presented at the Conference on Child Abuse, Children's Hospital National Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Bosco, L., and Mittone, L. (1997). Tax evasion and moral constraints: Some experimental evidence. Kyklos, 50(3), 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracewell-Milnes, B. (1979). Tax avoidance and evasion: The individual and society. London: Panopticum Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (2003). Large business and the compliance model. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 177–202). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J.(2005). Markets in vice. Markets in virtue. Leichhardt: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V. (1994). Beyond Rokeach's equality–freedom model: Two-dimensional values in a one-dimensional world. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, V.(1998). The value balance model of political evaluations. British Journal of Psychology, 89(2), 223–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, V.(2003a). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and non-compliant actions. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 15–39). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V.(2003b). A new approach to tax compliance. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 1–11). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V.(2003c). Perceptions of who's not paying their fair share. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, V.(ed.). (2003d). Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V., and Ahmed, E. (2005). A threat to tax morale: The case of Australian higher education policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, V., Braithwaite, J., Gibson, D., and Makkai, T. (1994). Regulatory styles, motivational postures and nursing home compliance. Law and Policy, 16(4), 363–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, V. and Job, J. (2003). The theoretical base for the ATO compliance model. Technical Report Research Note 5, CTSI, RSSS, ANU. Retrieved 12 July 2006, from http://ctsi.anu.edu.au/publications/research%20notes/RN5.pdf.
Braithwaite, V., Schneider, F., Reinhart, M., and Murphy, K. (2003). Charting the shoals of the cash economy. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 93–108). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V., and Wenzel, M. (2007). Integrating explanations of tax evasion and avoidance. In Lewis, A. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of psychology and economic behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandstätter, H. (1994). Determinanten der Steuerhinterziehung: Ergebnisse der experimentellen Psychologie. In Smekal, C. and Theurl, E. (eds.), Stand und Entwicklung der Finanzpsychologie (pp. 213–45). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, N., and Doob, A. N. (1990). Tax evasion: Searching for a theory of compliant behavior. In Friedland, M. L. (ed.), Securing compliance: Seven case studies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosio, G., Cassone, A., and Ricciuti, R. (2002). Tax evasion across Italy: Rational noncompliance or inadequate civic concern? Public Choice, 112(3–4), 259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (1985). Business ethics: Is small better? Policy Studies Journal, 13(4), 766–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, H. A., Karlinsky, S. S. and Blanthorne, C. (2005). Perceptions of a white-collar crime: Tax evasion. American Taxation Association's Journal of Legal Tax Research, 3(1), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballe, J., and Panades, J. (2005). Cost uncertainty and taxpayer compliance. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(3), 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderwood, G., and Webley, P. (1992). Who responds to changes in taxation? The relationship between taxation and incentive to work. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 735–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, G. A., and Cuccia, A. D. (1996). An analysis of the effect of tax complexity and its perceived justification on equity judgments. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18(2), 40–56.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. S. (1987). Compliance with the law: A decision-making approach to taxpaying. Law and Human Behavior, 11(4), 319–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. S.(1992). How taxpayers think about their taxes: Frames and values. In Slemrod, J. (ed.), Why people pay taxes: Tax compliance and enforcement (pp. 43–63). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Carslaw, C. A. P. N. (1988). Anomolies in income numbers: Evidence of goal oriented behavior. The Accounting Review, 63(2), 321–7.Google Scholar
Casey, J. T., and Scholz, J. T. (1991). Beyond deterrence: Behavioral decision theory and tax compliance. Law and Society Review, 25(4), 821–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. W., Troutman, C. S., and O'Bryan, D. (2000). An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: Empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, O. H., Nichols, D. R., and Schultz, J. J. (1987). Taxpayer attitudes toward tax audit risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(3), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, O. H., and Schultz, J. J. (1990). The income tax withholding phenomenon: Evidence from TCMP data. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 12(1), 88–93.Google Scholar
Christensen, K., Cline, R., and Neubig, T. (2001). Total corporate taxation: ‘Hidden,’ above-the-line, non-income taxes. National Tax Journal, 54(3), 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, C. W. (1994). Voluntary compliance with the individual income tax: Results from the 1988 TCMP study. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Christie, R., and Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Christopoulos, D. K. (2003). Does underground economy respond symmetrically to tax changes? Evidence from Greece. Economic Modelling, 20(3), 563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, C. Y. (1990). Plea bargaining with the IRS. Journal of Public Economics, 41(3), 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence. Science and practice. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B.(1996). Social influence and the triple tumor structure of organizational dishonesty. In Messick, D. M. and Tenbrunsel, A. E. (eds.), Codes of conduct (pp. 44–58). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Clotfelter, C. (1983). Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 363–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. J., Hanges, P. J., and Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 17(1), 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. H., Milliron, V. C., and Toy, D. R. (1990). Factors associated with household demand for tax preparers. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 12(1), 9–25.Google Scholar
Collins, J. H., Murphey, D., and Plumlee, R. D. (1990). The taxpayer's dilemma: How hard to work and what to report? University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Collins, J. H., and Plumlee, R. D. (1991). The taxpayer's labor and reporting decision: The effect of audit schemes. Accounting Review, 66(3), 559–76.Google Scholar
Copeland, P. V., and Cuccia, A. D. (2002). Multiple determinants of framing referents in tax reporting and compliance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 499–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corman, J., Lussier, R. N., and Nolan, K. G. (1996). Factors that encourage entrepreneural start-ups and existing firm expansion: A longitudinal study comparing recession and expansion periods. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(2), 43–55.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., and McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Courakis, N. (2001). Financial crime today: Greece as a European case study. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 9(2), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowell, F. A. (1992). Tax evasion and inequity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 521–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D., and Plumley, A. (1988). Analyses of voluntary compliance rates for different income source classes. Washington, DC: International Revenue Service, Research Division.Google Scholar
Cross, R. B., and Shaw, G. K. (1982). The evasion–avoidance choice: A suggested approach. National Tax Journal, 34(4), 489–91.Google Scholar
Crush, J. (1985). Colonial coercion and the Swazi tax revolt of 1903–1907. Political Geography Quarterly, 4(3), 179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuccia, A. D., and Carnes, G. A. (2001). A closer look at the relation between tax complexity and tax equity perceptions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullis, J., Jones, P., and Lewis, A. (2006). Tax framing, instrumentality and individual differences: Are there two different cultures? Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 304–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullis, J., and Lewis, A. (1997). Why people pay taxes: From a conventional economic model to a model of social convention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2–3), 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J. B., and Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
Dalton, T. (1994). The new IRS approach to nonfilers and nonpayers. The CPA Journal Online, 64 (December), 68–9.Google Scholar
Das-Gupta, A., Lahiri, R., and Mookherjee, D. (1995). Income tax compliance in India: An empirical analysis. World Development, 23(12), 2,051–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. D., and Holt, C. A. (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juan, A., Lasheras, M. A., and Mayo, R. (1994). Voluntary tax compliant behavior of Spanish income tax payers. Public Finance, 49(4), 90–105.Google Scholar
de Rosa, A. S. (1996). Controversial social representations ‘of’ and ‘around’ advertising: How to sell pullovers by provoking discussion on social issues. Paper presented at the 11th General Meeting of EAESP, Gmunden, Austria.
Dean, P., Keenan, T., and Kenney, F. (1980). Taxpayers' attitudes to income tax evasion: An empirical study. British Tax Review, 25(1), 28–44.Google Scholar
DeCarlo, J. F., and Lyons, P. R. (1979). A comparison of selected personal characteristics of minority and non-minority female entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 17(4), 22–9.Google Scholar
Die Presse (2006). 1,31 Mrd. Euro an Steuerbetrug aufgedeckt. (4 August 2006, page 15).
Dornstein, M. (1976). Compliance with legal and bureaucratic rules: The case of self-employed taxpayers in Israel. Human Relations, 29(11), 1,019–34.Google Scholar
Dornstein, M.(1987). Taxes: Attitudes and perceptions and their social bases. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(1), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. A., LaRue, D. W., and Reckers, P. M. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the influences of selected economic and noneconomic variables in decision making by tax professionals. Advances in Taxation, 2(1), 91–106.Google Scholar
Durham, A. M. (1988). Crime seriousness and punitive severity: An assessment of social attitudes. Justice Quarterly, 5(1), 131–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1976 [1898]). Individuelle und kollektive Vorstellungen. In Durkheim, E. (ed.), Soziologie und Philosophie (pp. 45–83). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Edlund, J. (2003). Attitudes towards taxation: Ignorant and incoherent? Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(2), 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenberger, R., and Frey, B. S. (2002). Democratic governance for a globalized world. Kyklos, 55(2), 265–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
el Sehity, T., Hölzl, E., and Kirchler, E. (2005). Price developments after a nominal shock: Benford's Law and psychological-pricing after the euro introduction. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(4), 471–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
el Sehity, T., Kirchler, E., and Muehlbacher, S. (2003). Rise and decline of social objects: Ten case studies on the social development of meaning. Paper presented at the IAREP-workshop ‘Euro: Currency and symbol’, Vienna, Austria.
Elffers, H. (1999). Tax evasion. In Earl, P. E. and Kemp, S. (eds.), The Elgar companion to consumer research and economic psychology (pp. 556–60). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Elffers, H.(2000). But taxpayers do cooperate! In Vugt, M. V., Snyder, M., Tyler, T. R. and Biel, A. (eds.), Cooperation in modern society. Promoting the welfare of communities, states and organizations (pp. 184–194). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elffers, H., and Hessing, D. J. (1997). Influencing the prospects of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2–3), 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elffers, H., Robben, H. S. J., and Hessing, D. J. (1991). Under-reporting income: Who is the best judge – taxpayer or tax inspector? Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 154(1), 125–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elffers, H., Robben, H. S. J., and Hessing, D. J.(1992). On measuring tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 545–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elffers, H., Weigel, R. H., and Hessing, D. J. (1987). The consequences of different strategies for measuring tax evasion behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(3), 311–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erard, B. (1997). Self-selection with measurement errors: A microeconometric analysis of the decision to seek tax assistance and its implications for tax compliance. Journal of Econometrics, 81(2), 319–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erard, B., and Feinstein, J. S. (1994a). Honesty and evasion in the tax compliance game. Rand Journal of Economics, 25(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erard, B., and Feinstein, J. S.(1994b). The role of moral sentiments and audit perceptions in tax compliance. Public Finance, 49 (Suppl.), 70–89.Google Scholar
Erard, B., and Ho, C. C. (2001). Searching for ghosts: Who are the nonfilers and how much tax do they owe? Journal of Public Economics, 81(1), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, K., and Fallan, L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation: A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, W.s (1944). An experimental study of punishment. Psychological Monographs, 57 (reprinted in Boe, E. and Church, R. (1968) (eds.), Punishment: Issues and experiments (p. 108–65). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension. Toward a new economy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Falkinger, J. (1988). Tax evasion and equity: A theoretical analysis. Public Finance, 43(3), 388–95.Google Scholar
Falkinger, J.(1995). Tax evasion, consumption of public goods and fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkinger, J., and Walther, H. (1991). Rewards versus penalties: On a new policy against tax evasion. Public Finance Quarterly, 19(1), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallan, L. (1999). Gender, exposure to tax knowledge, and attitudes towards taxation. An experimental approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., and Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. (1998). Reciprocity and economics. The economic implications of homo reciprocans. European Economic Review, 42(3–5), 845–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, L. P., and Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, L. P., and Frey, B. S.(2005a). Illegal, immoral, fattening or what? How deterrence and responsive regulation shape tax morale. In Bajada, C. and Schneider, F. (eds.), Size, causes and consequences of the underground economy (pp. 16–37). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Feld, L. P., and Frey, B. S.(2005b). Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. Retrieved 31 December 2005, from http://www.dur.ac.uk/john.ashworth/EPCS/Papers/Feld_Frey.pdf.
Feld, L. P., and Kirchgässner, G. (2000). Direct democracy, political culture, and the outcome of economic policy: A report on the Swiss experience. European Journal of Political Economy, 16(2), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, L. P., and Tyran, J. R. (2002). Tax evasion and voting: An experimental analysis. Kyklos, 55(2), 197–221.Google Scholar
Ferster, C., Culbertson, S., and Perron Boren, M. (1975). Behavior principles (2nd edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fetchenhauer, D. (2004). Different perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Kumulative Habilitation. Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. M., Wartick, M., and Mark, M. M. (1992). Detection probability and taxpayer compliance: A review of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 11(1), 1–46.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fishlow, A., and Friedman, J. (1994). Tax evasion, inflation and stabilization. Journal of Development Economics, 43(1), 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fjeldstad, O.-H. (2004). What's trust got to do with it? Non-payment of service charges in local authorities in South Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies, 42(4), 539–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fjeldstad, O.-H., and Semboja, J. (2001). Why people pay taxes: The case of the development levy in Tanzania. World Development, 29(12), 2,059–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fjeldstad, O.-H., and Tungodden, B. (2003). Fiscal corruption: A vice or a virtue? World Development, 31(8), 1,459–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzoni, L. A. (2000). Tax evasion and tax compliance. In Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (vol. IV, pp. 51–94). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Freiberg, A. (1986). Enforcement discretion and taxation offences. Australian Tax Forum, 3(1), 55–91.Google Scholar
French, J. R. P., and Raven, B. H. (1959). The basis of social power. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–67). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. (1992). Tertium datur – pricing, regulating and intrinsic motivation. Kyklos, 45(2), 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S.(1997). Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S.(2003). Deterrence and tax morale in the European Union. European Review, 11(3), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S.(2004). Politische Partizipation und Steuermoral. In Bizer, K., Falk, A. and Lange, J. (eds.), Am Staat vorbei. Transparenz, Fairness und Partizipation kontra Steuerhinterziehung (pp. 47–57). Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S., and Feld, L. P. (2002). Deterrence and morale in taxation: An empirical analysis: Working Paper No. 760. CESifo GmbH.
Frey, B. S., and Weck-Hannemann, H. (1984). The hidden economy as an ‘unobserved’ variable. European Economic Review, 26(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, N. (1982). A note on tax evasion as a function of the quality of information about the magnitude and credibility of threatened fines: Some preliminary research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 54–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, N., Maital, S., and Rutenberg, A. (1978). A simulation study of income tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 10(1), 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frijters, P. (2000). Do individuals try to maximize general satisfaction? Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(3), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. (2005). Understanding the meaning of tax: Young people's knowledge of the principles of taxation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(5), 703–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, H., Sandefur, C. A., and Rogers, A. C. (1990). De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration: When sunk costs and negative feedback coincide. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 721–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassner, W. (1983). Steuervermeidung, Steuerumgehung, Steuerhinterziehung. Unpublished manuscript. Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.
Gehring, W. J., and Willoughby, A. R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295(5563), 2279–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gërxhani, K. (2004). Tax evasion in transition: Outcome of an institutional clash? Testing Feige's conjecture in Albania. European Economic Review, 48(4), 729–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gërxhani, K.(2006). ‘Did you pay your taxes? How (not) to conduct tax evasion surveys in transition countries’. Social Indicators Research, 80(4), 555–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gërxhani, K., and Schram, A. (2006). Tax evasion and income source: A comparative experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(3), 202–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., and Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative ‘description of personality’: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1,216–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(1), 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, J. (2005). Focus on compliance issues for the Tax Office in 2005. Retrieved 5 August 2005, from http://www.ato.gov.au/corporate/content.asp?doc=/content/55484.htm.
Grasmick, H. G., and Bursik, R. J. Jr (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review, 24(3), 837–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasmick, H. G., Bursik, R. J., and Cochran, J. K. (1991). ‘Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's’: Religiosity and taxpayers' inclinations to cheat. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(2), 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasso, L., and Kaplan, S. E. (1998). An examination of ethical standards. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(1), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravelle, H., and Rees, R. (1981). Microeconomics. London: Longman Group Ltd.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., Kahneman, D., and Kunreuther, H. (1994). How the scope and method of public funding affect willingness to pay for public goods. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, O. (2005). Gespenst der Flat Tax geht um. Die Presse (12 September), p. 4.
Groenland, E. A. (1992). Developing a dynamic research strategy for the economic psychological study of taxation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 589–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenland, E. A. G., and Veldhoven, G. M. (1983). Tax evasion behavior: A psychological framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(2), 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F., and Mittone, L. (2005). Experiments in economics: external validity and the robustness of phenomena. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(4), 495–515.CrossRef
Güth, W., and Sausgruber, R. (2004). Tax morale and optimal taxation: CESifo Working Paper No. 1284. CESifo GmbH.
Halperin, R., and Tzur, J. (1990). Tax evasion and the low penalty, low audit rate phenomenon. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9(3), 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A. (1999). IRS enforcement drops sharply. Tax Notes (8 April), p. 188.
Hansford, A., and Hasseldine, J. D. (2002). Best practice in tax administration. Public Money and Management, 22(1), 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162 (3859), 1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organzations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hasseldine, J. D. (1998a). Prospect theory and tax reporting decisions: Implications for tax administrators. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, 52(11), 501–5.Google Scholar
Hasseldine, J. D.(1998b). Tax amnesties: An international review. Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, 52(7), 303–10.Google Scholar
Hasseldine, J. D., and Bebbington, K. J. (1991). Blending economic deterrence and fiscal psychology models in the design of responses to tax evasion: The New Zealand experience. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12(2), 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasseldine, J. D., and Hite, P. A. (2003). Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 517–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasseldine, J. D., and Kaplan, S. E. (1992). The effect of different sanction communications on hypothetical taxpayer compliance: Policy implications from New Zealand. Public Finance, 47(1), 45–60.Google Scholar
Hasseldine, J. D., and Li, Z. (1999). More tax evasion research required in new millennium. Crime Law and Social Change, 31(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., and Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 79–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helson, H. (1964). Adaption-level theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Herbert, M. (1989). Discipline: A positive guide for parents. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hessing, D. J., Elffers, H., Robben, H. S. J., and Webley, P. (1993). Needy or greedy – the social-psychology of individuals who fraudulently claim unemployment benefits. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 226–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessing, D. J., Elffers, H., and Weigel, R. H. (1988). Exploring the limits of self-reports and reasoned action: An investigation of the psychology of tax evasion behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessing, D. J., Kinsey, K. A., Elffers, H., and Weigel, R. H. (1988). Tax evasion research: Measurement strategies and theoretical models. In Raaij, W. F., Veldhoven, G. M. and Warneryd, K. E. (eds.), Handbook of economic psychology (pp. 516–37). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1998a). From expectancies to worldviews: Regulatory focus in socialization and cognition. In Darley, J. M. (ed.), Attribution and social interaction. The legacy of Edward E. Jones (pp. 243–69). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. T.(1998b). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. XXX, pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T.(2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, T. P. (1995). The significant-digit phenomenon. American Mathematical Monthly, 102(4), 322–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hite, P. A. (1987). An application of attribution theory in taxpayer noncompliance research. Public Finance, 42(1), 105–18.Google Scholar
Hite, P. A.(1988). An examination of the impact of subject selection on hypothetical and self-reported taxpayer noncompliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(4), 445–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hite, P. A.(1989). A positive approach to taxpayer compliance. Public Finance, 44(2), 249–67.Google Scholar
Hite, P. A.(1990). An experimental investigation of the effect of tax shelters on taxpayer noncompliance. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 45(1), 90–108.Google Scholar
Hite, P. A., and Hasseldine, J. D. (2003). Tax practitioner credentials and the incidence of IRS audit adjustments. American Accounting Association, 17(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Hite, P. A., and McGill, G. A. (1992). An examination of taxpayer preference for aggressive tax advice. National Tax Journal, 45(4), 389–403.Google Scholar
Hodson, G., and Olson, J. M. (2005). Testing the generality of the name letter effect: Name initials and everyday attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1,099–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge and Paul Kegan.Google Scholar
Horton, S. (2003). Guest editorial: Participation and involvement: The democratisation of new public management? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(6), 403–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, E. C., Larkins, E. R., and Iyer, G. (1999). On compliance with ethical standards in tax return preparation. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, I., McDowell, E., and Raines, B. (1977). Corporal punishment and alternatives in the schools: An overview of theoretical and practical issues. In Wise, J. (ed.), Proceedings: Conference on corporal punishment in the schools (pp. 1–18). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
IRS (1978). A dictionary of compliance factors. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office.
Jackson, B. R., and Milliron, V. (1986). Tax compliance research: Findings, problems, and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5(1), 125–65.Google Scholar
Jackson, B. R., Milliron, V. C., and Toy, D. R. (1988). Tax practitioners and the government. Tax Notes (17 October), pp. 333–8.Google Scholar
James, S. (1998, July). The behaviour of revenue services as a variable in tax administration and taxpayer compliance. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Socioeconomics. SASE/SABE, Vienna, Austria.
James, S., and Alley, C. (2002). Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 2(2), 27–42.Google Scholar
James, S., Hasseldine, J. D., Hite, P. A., and Toumi, M. (2003). Tax compliance policy: An international comparison and new evidence on normative appeals and auditing. Paper presented at the ESRC Future Governance Workshop, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria.
Job, J., and Honaker, D. (2003). Short-term experience with responsive regulation in the Australian Taxation Office. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 111–29). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Job, J., and Reinhart, M. (2003). Trusting the tax office: Does Putnam's thesis relate to tax? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 307–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Job, J., Stout, A., and Smith, R. (2007). Culture change in three taxation administrations: From command-and-control to responsive regulation. Law and Policy, 29(1), 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 150(1), 18–36.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.(1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. E., Reckers, P. M. J., and Reynolds, K. D. (1986). An application of attribution and equity theories to tax evasion behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 7(4), 461–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, S. (2004). Preferences for funding particular government services from flat or progressive tax. Paper presented at the Joint SABE/IAREP Annual Colloquium, Philadelphia, PA.
Kim, C. K. (2002). Does fairness matter in tax reporting behavior? Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(6), 771–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S., and Sheffrin, S. M. (2002). Tax evasion and equity theory: An investigative approach. International Tax and Public Finance, 9(4), 505–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, K. A., and Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Did the tax reform act of 1986 improve compliance? Three studies of pre- and post-TRA compliance attitudes. Law and Policy, 15(4), 239–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, K. A., Grasmick, H. G., and Smith, K. W. (1991). Framing justice: Taxpayer evaluations of personal tax burdens. Law and Society Review, 25(4), 845–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchgässner, G., Feld, L. P., and Savioz, M. R. (1999). Die direkte Demokratie. Munich: Vahlen.Google Scholar
Kirchler, E. (1997a). Balance between giving and receiving: Tax morality and satisfaction with fiscal policy as they relate to the perceived just distribution of public resources. Reitaku International Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 59–70.Google Scholar
Kirchler, E.(1997b). The burden of new taxes: Acceptance of taxes as a function of affectedness and egoistic versus altruistic orientation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 26(4), 421–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, E.(1998). Differential representations of taxes: Analysis of free associations and judgments of five employment groups. Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(1), 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, E.(1999). Reactance to taxation: Employers' attitudes towards taxes. Journal of Socio-Economics, 28(2), 131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, E., and Berger, M. M. (1998). Macht die Gelegenheit den Dieb? In Jahrbuch für Absatz- und Konsumentenforschung (vol. 44), pp. 439–62.Google Scholar
Kirchler, E., and Hölzl, E. (2003). Economic psychology. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 29–80.Google Scholar
Kirchler, E., and Maciejovsky, B. (2001). Tax compliance within the context of gain and loss situations, expected and current asset position, and profession. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., and Schneider, F. (2003). Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax flight: Do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 535–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., and Schwarzenberger, H. (2005). Specious confidence after tax audits: A contribution to the dynamics of compliance. Unpublished manuscript, University of Vienna, Austria.
Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., and Weber, M. (2005). Framing effects, selective information, and market behavior: An experimental analysis. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(2), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S., Hölzl, E., and Webley, P. (2005). Effort and aspirations in tax evasion: Experimental evidence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Vienna, Austria.
Kirchler, E., Niemirowski, P., and Wearing, A. (eds.) (2006). Shared subjective views, intent to cooperate and tax compliance: Similarities between Australian taxpayers and tax officers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(4), 502–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages and sequences: The cognitive development approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. (ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNelly.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, R. M., and Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations. Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lamnek, S., Olbrich, G., and Schaefer, W. (2000). Tatort Sozialstaat: Schwarzarbeit, Leistungsmissbrauch, Steuerhinterziehung und ihre (Hinter)Gruende. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberger, M., and Meilijson, I. (1982). Incentive generating state dependent penalty system: The case of income tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 19(3), 333–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, O., Nöhrbass, K.-H., and Stahl, K. (1997). On income tax avoidance: The case of Germany. Journal of Public Economics, 66(2), 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, S., Tarpy, R. M., and Webley, P. (1987). The individual in the economy. A survey of economic psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lenartova, G. (2003). Prepared tax reform in the Slovak Republic according to the criteria of tax theory and practice. Ekonomicky Casopis, 51(6), 664.Google Scholar
Leuthold, J. H. (1983). Home production and the tax system. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(2), 145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S. and Willis, R. H. (eds.), Social exchange (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Garboua, L., Masclet, D., and Montmarquette, C. (2005) A micro-foundation for the Laffer curve in a real effort experiment. Retrieved 30 March 2006, from ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/cahiers2005/Bla05071.pdf.
Lewin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., and Gaeth, G. S. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–88.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. (1978). Perception of tax rates. British Tax Review, 6, 358–66.Google Scholar
Lewis, A.(1979). An empirical assessment of tax mentality. Public Finance, 34(2), 245–57.Google Scholar
Lewis, A.(1982). The psychology of taxation. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Liebig, S., and Mau, S. (2005). When is a tax system just? Attitudes towards general principles of taxation and the justice of tax burdens. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 34(6), 468–91.Google Scholar
Lin, W.-Z., and Yang, C. C. (2001). A dynamic portfolio choice model of tax evasion: Comparative statics of tax rates and its implication for economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25(11), 1,827–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lochbuy, T. M., and O'Rourke, R. J. (1996). Catching tax cheats using meta-alphabetological analysis. Australian Tax Review, 25 (June), 79–82.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., and Issacharoff, S. (1994). Source dependence in the valuation of objects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(3), 157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, S. B., and Schwartz, R. D. (1987). The impact of IRS audits on taxpayer compliance: A field experiment in specific deterrence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington, DC.
Long, S. B., and Swingen, J. A. (1991). Taxpayer compliance: Setting new agendas for research. Law and Society Review, 25(3), 637–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCoun, R. J. (2005). Voice, control, and belonging: The double-edged sword of procedural fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1(1), 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, A. S., and Schwab, R. M. (1991). The economics of tax amnesties. Journal of Public Economics, 46(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, R. L., Armstrong, R. W., and Smith, M. (1998). The ethical environment of tax practitioners: Western Australian evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1,265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R., and Calvin, L. D. (1978). A study of admitted income tax evasion. Law and Society Review, 13 (Fall), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBarnet, D. (2001). When compliance is not the solution but the problem: From changes in law to changes in attitude. Canberra: Australian National University, Centre for Tax System Integrity.Google Scholar
McBarnett, D. (1992). Legitimate rackets: Tax evasion, tax avoidance, and the boundaries of the law. The Journal of Human Justice, 3(2), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffery, E. J., and Baron, J. (2003). Heuristics and biases in thinking about tax. Retrieved 30 April 2005, from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=467440.
McCaffery, E. J., and Baron, J.(2004). Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6), 679–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKerchar, M. (1995). Understanding small business taxpayers: Their sources of information and level of knowledge of taxation. Australian Tax Forum, 12(1), 25–41.Google Scholar
McKerchar, M.(2001). The study of income tax complexity and unintentional noncompliance: Research method and preliminary findings. ATAX Discussion paper. University of Sydney, Orange.
Meier, K., and Kirchler, E. (1998). Social representations of the euro in Austria. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(6), 755–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, J. (2005). Prospect theory and political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérö, L. (1996). Optimal entscheiden. Spieltheorie und die Logik unseres Handelns. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., and Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In Weeler, L. and Shaver, P. (eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 231–240). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Milliron, V. (1988). A conceptual model of factors influencing tax preparers' aggressiveness. In Moriarity, S. and Collins, J. H. (eds.), Contemporary tax research (pp. 1–15). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Milliron, V., and Toy, D. (1988). Tax compliance: An investigation of key features. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 9(2), 84–104.Google Scholar
Mittone, L. (1999). Psychological constraints on tax evasion: An empirical approach. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Bristol University.
Mittone, L.(2002). Individual styles of tax evasion: An experimental study. Retrieved 30 April 2005, from http://www.inomics.com/cgi/repec?handle=RePEc:wop:uteepu.
Mittone, L.(2006). Dynamic behaviours in tax evasion. An experimental approach. Retrieved 30 April 2005, from http://www.inomics.com/cgi/repec?handle=RePEc:wop:uteepu.
Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S.(2001). The phenomenon of social representations. In Moscovici, S. and Duveen, G. (eds.), Social representations: Explorations in social psychology (pp. 18–77). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, D. V., Evans, J. H. III, and Kim, C. K. (1995). The effects of horizontal and exchange inequity on tax reporting decisions. Accounting Review, 70(4), 619–34.Google Scholar
Moser, H. (1994). Zur Kritik der Sprache von Gesetzen. Anmerkungen eines Sprachwissenschaftlers. In Smekal, C. and Theurl, E. (eds.), Stand und Entwicklung der Finanzpsychologie (pp. 171–84). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Mumford, A. (2001). Taxing culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. (2003a). An examination of taxpayers' attitudes towards the Australian tax system: Findings from a survey of tax scheme investors. Australian Tax Forum, 18(2), 209–42.Google Scholar
Murphy, K.(2003b). Preventing widespread resistance to decisions: The role of trust in regulating taxpayers. Paper presented at the 28th Annual IAREP Colloquium, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Murphy, K.(2003c). Procedural justice and tax compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K.(2004a). Aggressive tax planning: Differentiating those playing the game from those who don't. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(3), 307–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K.(2004b). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, G. D. (2000). Wasteful government, tax evasion, and the provision of public goods. European Journal of Political Economy, 16(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nationmaster-Encyclopedia (2005). Retrieved 6 July 2005, from http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Gambler%27s-fallacy.
Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1–4), 39–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemirowski, P., Baldwin, S., and Wearing, A. (2001). Thirty years of tax compliance research: Of what use is it to the ATO? In Walpole, M. and Evans, C. (eds.), Tax administration in the 21st century (pp. 199–214). St Leonards: Prospect Media.Google Scholar
Niemirowski, P., and Wearing, A. (2003). Taxation agents and taxpayer compliance. Journal of Australian Taxation, 6(2), 166–200.Google Scholar
Niemirowski, P., Wearing, A. J., Baldwin, S., Leonard, B., and Mobbs, C. (2002). The influence of tax related behaviours, beliefs, attitudes and values on Australian taxpayer compliance. Is tax avoidance intentional and how serious an offence is it? Sydney: University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Nigrini, M. J. (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford's Law. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18(1), 72–91.Google Scholar
Nigrini, M. J.(1999). I've got your number. Journal of Accountancy, 187 (May), 79–83.Google Scholar
Noga, T., and Arnold, V. (2002). Do tax decision support systems affect the accuracy of tax compliance decisions? International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3(3), 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, E., Koch, B., and Boone, J. (2005). The influence of domain knowledge and task complexity on tax professionals' compliance recommendations. Accounting Organizations and Society, 30(2), 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2004). Guidance note. Compliance risk management: Managing and improving tax compliance. Retrieved 30 September 2006 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/19/33818656.pdf.
Orviska, M., and Hudson, J. (2002). Tax evasion, civic duty and the law abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, J., and Hamilton, S. (2004). Experience and innovations in other countries. In Aaron, H. J. and Slemrod, J. (eds.), The crisis in tax administration (pp. 347–88). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Park, C. G., and Hyun, J. K. (2003). Examining the determinants of tax compliance by experimental data: A case of Korea. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25(8), 673–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paternoster, R., and Simpson, S. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review, 30(3), 549–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. L. (1993). Costly returns: The burdens of the U.S. tax system. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Peabody, D. (1985). National characteristics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pelzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelzmann, L. (1985). Wirtschaftspsychologie. Arbeitslosenforschung, Schattenwirtschaft, Steuerpsychologie. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
Pingle, M. (1997). Submitting to authority: Its effect on decision-making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pommerehne, W., and Frey, B. S. (1992). The effects of tax administration on tax morale (Series II, No. 191): University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Pommerehne, W., Hart, A., and Frey, B. S. (1994). Tax morale, tax evasion and the choice of policy instruments in different political systems. Public Finance, 49 (Suppl.), 52–69.Google Scholar
Pommerehne, W., and Weck-Hannemann, H. (1992). Steuerhinterziehung: Einige romantische, realistische und nicht zuletzt empirische Befunde. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, 112(3), 433–66.Google Scholar
Pommerehne, W., and Weck-Hannemann, H.(1996). Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice, 88(1–2), 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppe, M. (2005). The specificity of social dilemma situations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(3), 431–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porcano, T. M. (1988). Correlates of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porschke, C., and Witte, E. H. (2002). Psychologische Faktoren der Steuergerechtigkeit. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 4(1), 34–44.Google Scholar
Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11–46.Google Scholar
Rawlings, G. (2003). Cultural narratives of taxation and citizenship: Fairness, groups and globalisation. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 269–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, G.(2004). Law, liquidity and eurobonds. The Journal of Pacific History, 39(3), 325–41.Google Scholar
Reckers, P. M. J., Sanders, D. L., and Roark, S. J. (1994). The influence of ethical attitudes on taxpayer compliance. National Tax Journal, 47(4), 825–36.Google Scholar
Reinganum, J. F., and Wilde, L. L. (1985). Income tax compliance in a principal-agent framework. Journal of Public Economics, 26(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinganum, J. F., and Wilde, L. L.(1988). A note on enforcement uncertainty and taxpayer compliance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(4), 793–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M., and Sawyer, A. (2001). A taxonomy of the tax compliance literature: Further findings, problems and prospects. Australian Tax Forum, 16(2), 137–320.Google Scholar
Robben, H. S. J. (1991). A behavioral simulation and documented behavior approach to income tax evasion. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Robben, H. S. J., Webley, P., Elffers, H., and Hessing, D. J. (1989). A cross-national comparison of attitudes, personality, behaviour, and social comparison in tax evasion experiments. In Grunert, K. and Ölander, F. (eds.), Understanding economic behaviour (pp. 121–34). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robben, H. S. J., Webley, P., Elffers, H., and Hessing, D. J.(1990a). Decision frames, opportunity and tax evasion: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 14(3), 353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robben, H. S. J., Webley, P., Weigel, R. H., Wärneryd, K. E., Kinsey, K. A., Hessing, D. J., Alvira Martin, F., Elffers, H., Wahlund, R., Langenhove, L., Long, S. B., and Scholz, J. (1990b). Decision frame and opportunity as determinants of tax cheating: An international experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11(3), 341–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. L., and Hite, P. A. (1994). Progressive taxation, fairness and compliance. Law and Policy, 16 (January), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. L., Hite, P. A., and Bradley, C. F. (1994). Understanding attitudes toward progressive taxation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(2), 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, E. G., and Lee, M.-S. (1996). Does firm origin matter? An empirical examination of types of small business owners and entrepreneurs. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sakurai, Y., and Braithwaite, V. (2003). Taxpayers' perceptions of practitioners: Finding one who is effective and does the right thing? Journal of Business Ethics, 46(4), 375–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandmo, A. (2003). Three decades of tax evasion: A perspective on the literature. Paper presented at the Skatteforum (The Research Forum on Taxation), Rosendal, Norway.
Sanson, A., Montgomery, B., Gault, U., Gridley, H., and Thomson, D. (1996). Punishment and behaviour change: An Australian Psychological Society position paper. Australian Psychologist, 31(3), 157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schadewald, M. S. (1989). Reference point effects in taxpayer decision making. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 10(2), 68–84.Google Scholar
Schepanski, A., and Kelsey, D. (1990). Testing for framing effects in taxpayer compliance decisions. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 12(2), 60–77.Google Scholar
Schepanski, A., and Shearer, T. (1995). A prospect theory account of the income tax withholding phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 174–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. R. (2001). The prospects of taxpayer agreement with aggressive tax advice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmölders, G. (1959). Fiscal psychology: A new branch of public finance. National Tax Journal, 12 (December), 340–5.Google Scholar
Schmölders, G.(1960). Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schmölders, G.(1964). Finanzwissenschaft und Finanzpolitik. Tübingen: J. c. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Schmölders, G.(1970a). Finanzpolitik (3th edn). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Schmölders, G.(1970b). Survey research in public finance: A behavioural approach to fiscal theory. Public Finance, 25(2), 300–306.Google Scholar
Schmölders, G.(1975). Einführung in die Geld- und Finanzpsychologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Schneider, F. (2003). Zunehmende Schattenwirtschaft in Deutschland: Eine wirtschafts- und staatspolitische Herausforderung. Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 72(1), 148–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, F., and Enste, D. (2000). Shadow economies: size, causes, and consequences. The Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, F., and Klinglmair, R. (2004). Shadow economics around the world: What do we know? Retrieved 25 April 2005, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=518526.
Scholz, J. T., and Pinney, N. (1995). Duty, fear and tax compliance – the heuristic basis of citizenship behaviour. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 490–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, R., and Orleans, S. (1967). On legal sanctions. University of Chicago Law Review, 34 (Winter), 274–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, C., and Traub, S. (2001). Taxpayers' attitudes, behavior, and perception of fairness. Pacific Economic Review, 6(2), 255–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, C., and Traub, S.(2002). Die Akzeptanz des deutschen Steuersystems: Eine demoskopische Untersuchung. In Theurl, E. and Thöni, E. (eds.), Zukunftsperspektiven der Finanzierung öffentlicher Aufgaben (pp. 7–27). Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Seldon, A. (ed.). (1979). Tax avoision: The economic, legal and moral inter-relationships between avoidance and evasion. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. (1992). Helplessness. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Shefrin, H. M., and Thaler, R. H. (1988). The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelak, B. J. (1997). The impact of the U.S. underground activity. A note relating to the impact on state finances. Journal of Government Information, 24(2), 113–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S., and Fouraker, L. (1960). Bargaining and group decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sigala, M., Burgoyne, C., and Webley, P. (1999). Tax communication and social influence: Evidence from a British sample. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9(3), 237–41.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, S. S. (2002). Corporate crime, law, and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Slemrod, J. (1985). An empirical test for tax evasion. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(2), 232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slemrod, J.(ed.). (1992). Why people pay taxes: Tax compliance and enforcement. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Slemrod, J., Blumenthal, M., and Christian, C. (2001). Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. Journal of Public Economics, 79(3), 455–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. W., and Kinsey, K. A. (1987). Understanding taxpaying behaviour: A conceptual framework with implications for research. Law and Society Review, 21(4), 639–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. W., and Stalans, L. J. (1991). Encouraging tax compliance with positive incentives: A conceptual framework and research directions. Law and Policy, 13(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1962). An experimental study of competitive market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 70(2), 111–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.(1964). Effect of market organization on competitive equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78 (May), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, A., and Warren, R. S. J. (2005). Tax evasion under random audits with uncertain detection. Economics Letters, 88(1), 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y.-D., and Yarbrough, T. E. (1978). Tax ethics and taxpayer attitudes: A survey. Public Administration Review, 38(5), 442–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souleles, N. (1999). The response of household consumption to income tax refunds. American Economic Review, 89(4), 947–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, M. W., and Becker, L. A. (1980). Fiscal inequity and tax evasion: An experimental approach. National Tax Journal, 33(2), 171–5.Google Scholar
Spicer, M. W., and Hero, R. E. (1985). Tax evasion and heuristics: A research note. Journal of Public Economics, 26(2), 263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, M. W., and Lundstedt, S. B. (1976). Understanding tax evasion. Public Finance, 21(2), 295–305.Google Scholar
Spicer, M. W., and Thomas, J. E. (1982). Audit probabilities and tax evasion decision: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(3), 241–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, T. N. (1973). Tax evasion: A model. Journal of Public Economics, 2(4), 339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stainer, A., Stainer, L., and Segal, A. (1997). The ethics of tax planning. Business Ethics. A European Review, 6(7), 213–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalans, L. J., and Lind, E. A. (1997). The meaning of procedural fairness: A comparison of taxpayers' and representatives' views of their tax audits. Social Justice Research, 10(3), 311–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stella, P. (1991). An economic analysis of tax amnesties. Journal of Public Economics, 46(3), 283–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management, 2 (Spring), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroebe, W., and Frey, B. S. (1982). Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21(2), 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strümpel, B. (1966). Disguised tax burden compliance costs of German business men and professionals. National Tax Journal, 19(1), 70–77.Google Scholar
Strümpel, B.(1969). The contribution of survey research to public finance. In Peacock, A. T. (ed.), Quantitative analysis in public finance (pp. 13–22). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Tan, L. M. (1999). Taxpayers' preference for type of advice from tax practitioner: A preliminary examination. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(4), 431–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, V., and Shome, P. (1994). A primer on tax evasion. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, 48(6–7), 328–37.Google Scholar
Taylor, N. (2001). Social justice. In Brown, R. and Gaertner, S. (eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 344–64). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, N.(2003). Understanding taxpayer attitudes through understanding taxpayer identities. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 71–92). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H.(1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J., Fredland, N., and Walker, L. (1974). Compliance with rules: Some social determinants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(6), 792–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66(4), 541–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. K. (1989). Unusual patterns in reported earnings. The Accounting Review, 64(4), 773–87.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. (1898). Animal intelligence. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, 2(4, Whole No. 8).Google Scholar
Thorndike, J. J., and Ventry, D. J. J. (eds.). (2002). Tax justice: The ongoing debate. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Thurman, Q., St John, C., and Riggs, L. (1984). Neutralization and tax evasion: How effective would a moral appeal be in improving compliance to tax laws? Law and Policy, 6(3), 309–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibbetts, S. G., Joulfaian, D., and Rider, M. (1997). Shame and rational choice in offending decisions: Tax evasion in the presence of negative income tax rates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(2), 234–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(5), 657–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgler, B.(2003a). Does culture matter? Tax morale in an East-West-German comparison. FinanzArchiv, 59(4), 504–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgler, B.(2003b). Tax morale in transition countries. Post-Communist Economies, 15(3), 357–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgler, B.(2003c). Tax morale, rule-governed behaviour and trust. Constitutional Political Economy, 14(2), 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgler, B.(2003d). To evade taxes or not to evade: That is the question. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(3), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgler, B.(2005a). Tax morale and direct democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 525–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgler, B.(2005b). Tax morale in Latin America. Public Choice, 122(1–2), 133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgler, B. and Schneider, F. (2004). Does culture influence tax morale? Evidence from different European countries. CREMA Working Paper No. 2004-17. Basel: Center for Research in Economics, Management and Arts.
Traub, S. (1998). The framing of tax reliefs. Public Finance, 53(2), 243–62.Google Scholar
Traub, S.(1999). Framing effects in taxation: An empirical study using the German tax schedule. Heidelberg: Physica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traub, S.(2000). Rahmungseffekte und die Kunst der Besteuerung. Wirtschaftsdienst. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, 80(12), 745–50.Google Scholar
Trivedi, V. U., Shehata, M., and Lynn, B. (2003). Impact of personal and situational factors on taxpayer compliance: An experimental analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivedi, V. U., Shehata, M., and Mestelman, S. (2004). Attitudes, incentives, and tax compliance. Hamilton: McMaster University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., and Onorato, R. (1997). Social identity, personality and the self-concept: A self-categorisation perspective. In Tyler, T., Kramer, R., Roderick, M. and John, O. (eds.), The psychology of the social self: Applied social research (pp. 11–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157), 1,124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.(1981). The framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.(1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R.(1994). Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 850–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R.(2001a). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19(2), 215–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R.(2001b). Trust and law abidingness: A proactive model of social regulation. Boston University Law Review, 81(2), 361–406.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R.(2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, T. R., and De Cremer, D. (2006). How do we promote cooperation in groups, organizations, and societies? In Lange, P. A. M. (ed.), Bridging social psychology. Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 427–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organisational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 331–56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. XXV, pp. 115–91). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tyszka, T. (1994). Cognitive representation of economics. Paper presented at the IAREP/SABE Annual Colloquium, Rotterdam.
Braak, H. (1983). Taxation and tax resistance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(2), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Social dilemmas: The state of the art. In Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. and Wilke, H. A. M. (eds.), Social dilemmas. Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Varma, K. N., and Doob, A. N. (1998). Deterring economic crimes: The case of tax evasion. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 165–84.Google Scholar
Vasin, A. A., and Navidi, K. (2003). Optimal tax inspection strategy. Computational Mathematics and Modeling, 14(2), 160–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasina, P. A. (2003). Optimal tax enforcement with imperfect tax payers and inspectors. Computational Mathematics and Modeling, 14(3), 309–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verheul, I., Uhlaner, L., and Thurik, R. (2005). Business accomplishments, gender and entrepreneurial self-image. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(4), 483–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihanto, M. (2003). Tax evasion and the psychology of the social contract. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(2), 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. (1974). Taxation and public opinion in Sweden: An interpretation of recent survey data. National Tax Journal, 27(1), 499–513.Google Scholar
Wahlund, R. (1992). Tax changes and economic behavior: The case of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 657–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallschutzky, I. G. (1984). Possible causes of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 5(4), 371–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Wärneryd, K., and Walerud, B. (1982). Taxes and economic behaviour: Some interview data on tax evasion in Sweden. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(3), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartick, M. (1994). Legislative justification and the perceived fairness of tax law changes: A reference cognitions theory approach. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 16(2), 106–23.Google Scholar
Wearing, A., and Headey, B. M. (1995). The would-be tax evader: A profile. Paper presented at the 1995 Compliance Research Conference, Canberra.Google Scholar
Webley, P. (1987). Audit probabilities and tax evasion in a business simulation. Economics Letters, 25(3), 267–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webley, P.(2004). Tax compliance by businesses. In Sjögren, H. and Skogh, G. (eds.), New perspectives on economic crime (pp. 95–126). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webley, P., Cole, M., and Eidjar, O.-P. (2001). The prediction of self-reported and hypothetical tax-evasion: Evidence from England, France and Norway. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webley, P., Robben, H., and Morris, I. (1988). Social comparison, attitudes and tax evasion in a shop simulation. Social Behaviour, 3(3), 219–228.Google Scholar
Webley, P., Robben, H. S. J., Elffers, H., and Hessing, D. J. (1991). Tax evasion: An experimental approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weck-Hannemann, H., and Pommerehne, W. (1989). Einkommenssteuerhinterziehung in der Schweiz: Eine empirische Analyse. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 125(4), 515–56.Google Scholar
Weigel, R. H., Hessing, D. J., and Elffers, H. (1987). Tax evasion research: A critical appraisal and theoretical model. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(2), 215–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, B. (1996). Level of aspiration. In Manstead, A. and Hewstone, M. (eds.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of social psychology (p. 362). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, M. R., Xu, Y. L., Bjarnason, T., and O'Donnell, P. (2005). ‘But everybody does it …’: The effects of perceptions, moral pressures, and informal sanctions on tax cheating. Sociological Spectrum, 25(1), 21–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M. (2000). Justice and identity: The significance of inclusion for perceptions of entitlement and the justice motive. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(2), 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M.(2001). A social categorisation approach to distributive justice: Social identity as the link between relevance of inputs and need for justice. British Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 316–35.Google Scholar
Wenzel, M.(2002). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers' identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 629–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenzel, M.(2003). Tax compliance and the psychology of justice: Mapping the field. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 41–69). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wenzel, M.(2004a). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 213–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M.(2004b). A social categorisation approach to distributive justice. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(7), 219–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M.(2004c). Social identification as a determinant of concerns about individual-, group-, and inclusive-level justice. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(1), 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M.(2004d). The social side of sanctions: Personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(5), 547–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M.(2005a). Misperception of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(6), 862–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M.(2005b). Motivation or rationalisation? Causal relations between ethics, norms and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. R., and Wearing, A. J. (1996). Lay people's cognitive models of the economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(1), 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. L. F., and Sheffrin, S. (2005). Understanding surveys of taxpayer honesty. Finanzarchiv, 61(2), 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, A. D., and Woodbury, D. F. (1985). The effect of tax laws and tax administration on tax compliance: The case of the US individual income tax. National Tax Journal, 38(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Worsham, R. G. (1996). The effect of tax authority behaviour on taxpayer compliance: A procedural justice approach. Journal of American Taxation Association, 18(2), 19–39.Google Scholar
Wortman, C., and Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. VIII, pp. 277–336). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yaniv, G. (1990). Tax evasion under differential taxation. The economics of income source misreporting. Journal of Public Economics, 43(3), 327–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaniv, G.(1994). Tax evasion and the income tax rate: A theoretical re-examination. Public Finance, 49(1), 107–12.Google Scholar
Yaniv, G.(1999). Tax compliance and advance tax payments: A prospect theory analysis. National Tax Journal, 52(4), 753–64.Google Scholar
Yaniv, G.(2001). Revenge, tax informing, and the optimal bounty. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 3(2), 225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaniv, G.(2003). Auditing ghosts by prosperity signals. Economics Bulletin, 8(9), 1–10.Google Scholar
Yitzhaki, S. (1974). A note on income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 201–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yitzhaki, S., and Vakneen, Y. (1989). On the shadow price of a tax inspector. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 44(3), 492–505.Google Scholar
Zeelenberg, M., and Dijk, E. (1997). A reverse sunk cost effect in risky decision making: Sometimes we have too much invested to gamble. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(6), 677–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimbardo, P., and Gerrig, R. (2004). Psychologie (16th edn.). Munich: Pearson Studium.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Erich Kirchler, Universität Wien, Austria
  • Foreword by Valerie Braithwaite, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour
  • Online publication: 13 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Erich Kirchler, Universität Wien, Austria
  • Foreword by Valerie Braithwaite, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour
  • Online publication: 13 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Erich Kirchler, Universität Wien, Austria
  • Foreword by Valerie Braithwaite, Australian National University, Canberra
  • Book: The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour
  • Online publication: 13 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238.010
Available formats
×