Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T22:57:29.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Structural Reforms and Fiscal Sustainability

from Part II - Macroeconomic Implications of Reforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2020

By
Davide Furceri  and
João Tovar Jalles
Edited by
Nauro F. Campos ,
Paul De Grauwe  and
Yuemei Ji
Nauro F. Campos
Affiliation:
University College London
Paul De Grauwe
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Yuemei Ji
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

This paper examines the effect of structural (domestic and external finance, trade and product market) reforms on public debt. It applies the local projection method to a dataset of major reforms and regulatory changes for a sample of 90 advanced and developing countries spanning between 1973 and 2003. The results suggest that over the medium term – that is, four to six years after the reform takes place – reforms contribute to lower the debt-to-GDP ratio. This effect depends on the initial debt-to-GDP at the time of the reform. The findings are robust to the inclusion of all reforms simultaneously and to an instrumental variable approach, which uses political economy drivers of reforms as instruments.

Keywords

public debtgrowthderegulationimpulse responseslocal projection methodnonlinearitiesinstrumental variables
Type
Chapter
Information
Economic Growth and Structural Reforms in Europe , pp. 214 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. and Roubini, N. (1992). “Political Cycles in the OECD,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 59, No. 4, 663–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andres, J., Arce, O. and Thomas, C. (2014). “Structural Reforms in a Debt Overhang,” Documentos de Trabajo No. 1421, Banco de Espana, Spain.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A., and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2013). “Output Spillovers from Fiscal Policy,” American Economic Review, Vol. 103, No. 3, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2017). “Fiscal Stimulus and Fiscal Sustainability,” NBER Working Paper No. 23789, Boston, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H., Kugler, A. R.. and Kerr, W. D. 2007. “Do Employment Protections Reduce Productivity? Evidence from U.S. States,” Economic Journal, Vol. 117 , No. 521, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassanini, A. and Duval, R. (2006). “Employment Patterns in OECD Countries: Reassessing the Roles of Policies and Institutions,” OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No. 486.Google Scholar
Bean, C. (1998). “The Interaction of Aggregate Demand Policies and Labor Market Reform,” Swedish Economic Policy Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 353–382.Google Scholar
Beetsma, R. and Debrun, X. (2003). “Reconciling Stability and Growth: Smart Pacts and Structural Reforms,” CEPR Discussion Paper No 3930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetsma, R. and Debrun, X. (2005). “The New Stability and Growth Pact: A First Assessment,” Mimeo, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bentolila, S. and Bertola, G. (1990). “Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad Is Eurosclerosis?” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 57, No. 3, 381–402.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Giavazzi, F. (2003). “Macroeconomic Effects of Regulation and Deregulation in Goods and Labour Markets,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 3, 879–907.Google Scholar
Boeri, T. (2005). “Reforming Labor and Product Markets: Some Lessons from Two Decades of Experiments in Europe,” IMF WP/05/97.Google Scholar
Boeri, T., et al. (2006). Structural Reforms without Prejudices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buti, M., et al. (2008). “Defying the ‘Juncker Curse’: Can Reformist Governments Be Reelected?” European Economy: Economic Papers No. 324, May.Google Scholar
Cacciatore, M. and Fiori, G. (2016), “The Macroeconomic Effects of Goods and Labor Market Deregulation,” Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1–24.Google Scholar
Cacciatore, M., Duval, R., Fiori, G. and Ghironi, F. (2016a). “Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain: Market Deregulation and Monetary Policy in Small Open Economies,” Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 57, 86–114.Google Scholar
Cacciatore, M., Duval, R., Fiori, G. and Ghironi, F. (2016b). “Market Reforms in the Time of Imbalance,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 72, 66–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmfors, L. (2001). “Unemployment, Labour-Market Reform and Monetary Union,” Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 265–289.Google Scholar
Campoy, J. C. and Negrete, J. C. (2010). “Structural Reforms and Budget Deficits in a Monetary Union: A Strategic Approach,” B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingano, F., Leonardi, M., Messina, J. and Pica, G. (2010). “The Effects of Employment Protection Legislation and Financial Market Imperfections on Investment: Evidence from a Firm-Level Panel of EU Countries,” Economic Policy, Vol. 25, 117–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deroose, S. andTurrini, A. (2005). “The Short-Term Budgetary Implications of Structural Reforms: Evidence from a Panel of EU Countries,” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5217.Google Scholar
Devries, P., Leigh, D., Guajardo, J. and Pescatori, A. (2011). “A New Action-Based Dataset of Fiscal Consolidation,” IMF Working Paper No. 11/128, International Monetary Fund, Washington.Google Scholar
Draghi, M. (2015), “Monetary Policy and Structural Reforms in the Euro Area,” presented at Prometeia, Bologna, Italy, December 14.Google Scholar
Duval, R. and Furceri, D. (2017). “The Effects of Labor and Product Market Reforms: The Role of Macroeconomic Conditions and Policies,” IMF Economic Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, 31–69.Google Scholar
Duval, R., Furceri, D. and Jalles, J. T. (2017). “Job Protection Deregulation in Good and Bad Times,” IMF Working Paper No. 17/277, Washington.Google Scholar
Duval, R., Furceri, D. and Miethe, J. (2019). “The Needle in the Haystack: What Drives Labor and Product Market Reforms in Advanced Economies,” IMF Working Paper (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Duval, R., Furceri, D., Hu, B., Jalles, J. and Nguyen, H. (2018). “A New Narrative Database on Product and Labor Market Reforms in Advanced Economics,” IMF Working Paper.Google Scholar
Eggertsson, G., Ferrero, A. and Raffo, A. (2014). “Can Structural Reforms Help Europe?” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 61, 1–22.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B. and Wyplosz, C. (1998). “The Stability Pact: More than a Minor Nuisance?” Economic Policy, Vol. 26, 65–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escolano, J. (2010). “A Practical Guide to Public Debt Dynamics, Fiscal Sustainability, and Cyclical Adjustment of Budgetary Aggregates,” IMF Technical Note and Manual, International Monetary Fund, Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslava, M., Haltiwanger, J,, Kugler, A. and Kugler, M. (2004). “The Effects of Structural Reforms on Productivity and Profitablity Enhancing Reallocation: Evidence from Colombia,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 75, No. 2, 333–371.Google Scholar
European Commission, (2013). “The Growth Impact of Structural Reforms,” in Quarterly Report on the Euro Area, No. 4, 17–27.Google Scholar
Giuliano, P., Mishra, P. and Spilimbergo, A. (2013). “Democracy and Reforms: Evidence from a New Dataset,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, Vol. 5, No. 4, 179–204.Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. and Teräsvirta,. T. (1993). Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. and Harrison, R. (2004). “The Link between Product Market Reform and Macro-Economic Performance,” Economic Paper, n° 209, European Commission.Google Scholar
Griffith, R., Harrison, R. and Macartney, G. (2007). “Product Market Reforms, Labour Market Institutions and Unemployment,” Economic Journal, Vol. 117, No. 519, 142–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S. and Webb, S. B. (ed.) (1994). Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization, and Economic Adjustment. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haltiwanger, J. C., Jarmin, R. S. and Miranda, J. (2010). “Who Creates Jobs? Small vs. Large vs. Young,” NBER Working Papers 16300, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Heinemann, F. (2005). “How Distant Is Lisbon from Maastricht? The Short-Run Link between Structural Reforms and Budgetary Performance.” In Deroose, S, Flores, E, and Turrini, A (ed.), Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop “The Budgetary Implications of Structural Reforms,” December 2.Google Scholar
Heylen, F., Hoebeeck, A. and Buyse, T. (2013). “Government Efficiency, Institutions, and the Effects of Fiscal Consolidation on Public Debt,” European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 31, 40–59.Google Scholar
Hughes-Hallett, A., Hougaard Jensen, S. E. and Richter, C. (2004). “The European Economy at the Cross Roads: Structural Reforms, Fiscal Constraints, and the Lisbon Agenda,” unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2013). “World Economic Outlook. Transitions and Tensions,” October.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2016). “World Economic Outlook, Time for a Supply Side Boost? Macroeconomic Effects of Labor and Product Market Reforms in Advanced Economies,” chapter 3, April.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2017). “Labor and Product Market Reforms in Advanced Economies: Fiscal Costs, Gains and Support,” Staff Discussion Note, 17/03, March.Google Scholar
Jordà, O. (2005). “Estimation and Inference of Impulse Responses by Local Projections,” American Economic Review, Vol. 95, No. 1, 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordà, P. and Taylor, A. (2016). “The Time for Austerity: Estimating the Average Treatment Effect of Fiscal Policy,” Economic Journal, Vol. 126, No. 590, 219–255.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (2014), “Structural Deformity,” New York Times, November 20.Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Leigh, D. and Plekhanov, A. (2007). “Fiscal Adjustments: Determinants and Macroeconomic Consequences,” IMF Working Paper 07/196.Google Scholar
Mabbett, D. and Schelkle, W. (2007). “Bringing Macroeconomics Back into the Political Economy of Reform: The Lisbon Agenda and the ‘Fiscal Philosophy’ of EMU,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 45, No. 1, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, A., Storesletten, K. and Zilibotti, F. (2016). “The Political Color of Fiscal Responsibility,” Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 14, No. 1, 252–302.Google Scholar
Nickell, S., Nunziata, L. and Ochel, W. (2005). “Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s: What Do We Know?” Economic Journal, Vol. 115, No. 500, 1–27.Google Scholar
OECD (2012). Economic Policy Reforms 2012: Going for Growth, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Ostry, J. D., Spilimbergo, A. and Prati, A. (2009). “Structural Reforms and Economic Performance in Advanced and Developing Countries,” IMF Occasional Paper No. 268, International Monetary Fund, Washington.Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, D. and Vourvachaki, E. (2017), “Macroeconomic Effects of Structural Reforms and Fiscal Consolidations: Trade-Offs and Complementarities,” European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 48, 54–73.Google Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2002). Political Economics: Explaining Economics Policy. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (ed.) (2001). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Razin, A. and Sadka, E. (2002). Labor, Capital and Finance: International Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1996). “Coordination Failures and Government Policy: A Model with Applications to East Asia and Eastern Europe,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 40, No. 1–2, 1–22.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2015). “The Mirage of Structural Reform,” Project Syndicate, October 8.Google Scholar
Romer, C. and Romer, D. (1989). “Does Monetary Policy Matter? A New Test in the Spirit of Friedman and Schwartz,” in Blanchard, O. J. and Fischer, S. (ed.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1989. MIT Press, pp. 121–170.Google Scholar
Romer, C. and Romer, D. (2010). “The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks,” American Economic Review, Vol. 100, No. 3, 763–801.Google Scholar
Romer, C. and Romer, D. (2015). “New Evidence on the Impact of Financial Crises in Advanced Countries,” NBER Working Paper No. 21021, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Romer, C. and Romer, D. (2017). “New Evidence on the Aftermath of Financial Crises in Advanced Countries,” American Economic Review, Vol. 107, No. 10, 3072–3118.Google Scholar
Roubini, N. and Sachs, J. (1989). “Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrial Economies,” European Economic Review, Vol. 33, No. 5, 903–938.Google Scholar
Saint-Paul, G. (1996). “Exploring the Political Economy of Labor Market Institutions,” Economic Policy, Vol. 23, 265–315.Google Scholar
Saint-Paul, G. (2002). “Distribution and Growth in an Economy with Limited Needs,” CEPR Discussion Papers, 2834, CEPR Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
Sajedi, R. (2018). “Fiscal Consequences of Structural Reform under Constrained Monetary Policy,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 93(C), 22–38.Google Scholar
Tagkalakis, A. (2009). “Fiscal Adjustments and Asset Price Movements,” Working Papers 104, Bank of Greece.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavares, J. (2004). “The Open Society Assesses its Enemies: Shocks, Disasters and Terrorist Attacks,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 51, No. 5, 1039–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Schaik, T. and van de Klundert, T. (2013). “Employment Protection Legislation and Catching-Up,” Applied Economics, Vol. 45, No. 8, 973–981.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×