National systems of production, innovation, and competence building

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511493386.011

10 - National systems of production, innovation, and competence building

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Bengt-åke Lundvall ,

Björn Johnson ,

Esben S. Andersen and

Bent Dalum

Edited by

Karen R. Polenske

Show author details

Bengt-åke Lundvall: Affiliation:
Professor of Economics in the Department of Business Studies Aalborg Uiversity
Björn Johnson: Affiliation:
Associate Professor and Reader in Economics and connected to the economic studies program Aalborg University, Aalborg Ost, Denmark
Esben S. Andersen: Affiliation:
Associate Professor Department of Business Studies, Aalborg University, Denmark
Bent Dalum: Affiliation:
Associate Professor in Economics Aalborg University
Karen R. Polenske: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

What follows is a shortened, and slightly revised, version of a paper published in Research Policy (Lundvall et al., 2002). In this introduction, We provide a few brief reflections on the innovation system concept in the light of economic geography. We make no attempt to give full justice to the literature on economic geography that predates the literature on innovation systems, however.

While the idea of a national system of innovation (NSI) attempts to explain and understand innovation in economic terms, the concept may also be seen as a combination of different elements – some of which emanate from economic geography and from the development literature. Perroux (1969) and Brookfield (1975), for instance, are among the common references. The overlap of ideas also has to do with timing. The NSI idea was shaped in the first half of the 1980s, and this was also a period of renewal of Marshallian economic geography related to regional studies that referred to industrial districts and clusters (Scott 2000: 29).

It is therefore not so surprising that currently the most advanced and frequent “users” of the concept of NSIs are to be found among economic geographers rather than among economists. This can be documented, for instance, by using the search machine, Google Scholar. Another factor is that economic geographers, for historical and epistemological reasons, are much less inhibited in their use of heterodox ideas emanating from bordering disciplines.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Economic Geography of Innovation , pp. 213 - 240

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493386.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amable, B., Barré, R., and Boyer, R., 1997. Les systèmes d'innovation a l'ère de la globalization, Paris: EconomicaGoogle Scholar

Andersen, E. S., 1992. “Approaching National Innovation Systems,” in Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.), National Innovation Systems, London: Pinter: 68–92Google Scholar

Andersen, E. S., Brændgaard, A., Johnson, B., and Lundvall, B.-Å., 1979. Industriel udvikling og international konkurrenceevne, Serie om industriel udvikling, 6, Aalborg: Aalborg University PressGoogle Scholar

, Andersen E. S., Dalum, B., and Villumsen, G., 1981a. International Specialisation and the Home Market: An Empirical Analysis, Aalborg: Aalborg University PressGoogle Scholar

1981b. “The Importance of the Home Market for Technological Development and the Export Specialization of Manufacturing Industry,” in Freeman, C. (ed.), Technical Innovation and National Economic Performance, Aalborg: Aalborg University Press: 49–102Google Scholar

Andersen, E. S., Johnson, B., and Lundvall, B.-Å., 1978. Industriel udvikling og industrikrise, Serie om industriel udvikling, 4, Aalborg: Aalborg University PressGoogle Scholar

Andersen, E. S. and B.-Å. Lundvall, 1988. “Small National Innovation Systems Facing Technological Revolutions: An Analytical Framework,” in Freeman, C. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (eds.), Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution, London: Pinter: 9–37Google Scholar

Archibugi, D. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (eds.), 2001. Europe in the Globalising Learning Economy, Oxford:Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K. J., 1962, “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” Review of Economic Studies, 29(80): 155–173CrossRef Google Scholar

Breschi, S. and F. Malerba, 1997. “Sectoral Innovation Systems,” in Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations, London: Pinter: 130–152Google Scholar

Brookfield, H., 1975. Interdependent Development, London: MethuenGoogle Scholar

Carlsson, B. and S. Jacobsson, 1997. “Diversity Creation and Technological Systems: A Technology Policy Perspective,” in Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London: Pinter: 266–290Google Scholar

Christensen, J. L. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (eds.), 2004. Product Innovation, Interactive Learning, and Economic Performance, Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar

, Coleman J., 1990. Foundations of Social Theory, London: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Cooke, P., 1992. “Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in Europe,” Geoforum, 23: 365–382

Dahmén, E., 1970. Entrepreneurial Activity and the Development of Swedish Industry 1919–1939, Homewood, IL: American Economic Association Translation SeriesGoogle Scholar

Dalum, B., Gregersen, M., Schmidt, J., and Villumsen, G., 1981. Økonomiers langsigtede udvikling: en struktur og teknologidiskussion, Aalborg: Aalborg UniversityGoogle Scholar

Dalum, B., Laursen, K., and Villumsen, G., 1998. “Structural Change in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Specialisation Patterns: Specialisation and ‘Stickiness’,” International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3): 421–443CrossRef Google Scholar

DeBresson, C. (ed.), 1996. Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity: An Input-Output Analysis, Aldershot: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar

Dore, R., 1986. Flexible Rigidities: Industrial Policy and Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy 1970–1980, London: Athlone PressGoogle Scholar

Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R. R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. (eds.), 1988. Technological Change and Economic Theory, London: PinterGoogle Scholar

Drejer, I., 1999. “Technological Change and Interindustrial Linkages: Introducing Knowledge Flows in Input-Output Studies,” Aalborg: Aalborg University, PhD thesis

Edquist, C. and B.-Å. Lundvall, 1993. “Comparing the Danish and Swedish Systems of Innovation,” in Nelson, R. R. (ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 265–298Google Scholar

Foray, D., 2000. The Economics of Knowledge, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology PressGoogle Scholar

Freeman, C., 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan: London: PinterGoogle Scholar

1995a. “The National Innovation Systems in Historical Perspective,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1): 5–24

1995b. “History, Co-Evolution, and Economic Growth,” IIASA Working Paper, Laxenburg: 95–76

1997. “Innovation Systems: City-State, National, Continental, and Sub-National,” Paper presented at the Montevideo conference, University of Sussex, Science Policy Research Unit, Mimeo

Freeman, C. and C. Perez, 1988. “Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles, and Investment Behaviour,” in Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, Pinter: 38–67Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F., 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: Simon & SchusterGoogle Scholar

Georgescu-Roegen, N., 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, J., 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, I, Boston: Beacon PressGoogle Scholar

Hirschman, A. O., 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development, Clinton, MA: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Jensen, M. B., B. Johnson, E. Lorenz, and B.-Å. Lundvall, 2004. “Absorptive Capacity, Forms of Knowledge and Economic Development,” Paper presented at the the Second Globelics Conference in Beijing, October 16–20

Jessop, B., 1999. “The State and the Contradictions of the Knowledge-Driven Economy,” Development Research Working Papers, Department for Development and Planning

Johnson, B., 1988. “An Institutional Approach to the Small Country Problem,” in Freeman, C. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (eds.), Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution, London: Pinter: 279–298Google Scholar

1992. “Institutional Learning,” in Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.), National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter: 23–44Google Scholar

1998. “Institutional Learning and Clean Growth,” in Tylecote, A. and Straaten, J. (eds.), Environment, Technology and Economic Growth, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 93–111Google Scholar

Kline, S. J. and N. Rosenberg, 1986. “An Overview of Innovation,” in Landau, R. and Rosenberg, N. (eds.), The Positive Sum Game, Washington, DC: National Academy Press: 275–305Google Scholar

Linder, S. B., 1961. An Essay on Trade and Transformation, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

List, F., 1841. Das Nationale System der Politischen Ökonomie, Basel: Kyklos; trans. and pub. under the title, The National System of Political Economy, London: Longmans, Green & Co. (1841)Google Scholar

Lundvall, B.-Å., 1985. Product Innovation and User–producer Interaction, Aalborg: Aalborg University PressGoogle Scholar

1988. “Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User–Producer Interaction to the National Innovation Systems,” in Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R. R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter: 349–370Google Scholar

1999a. “National Business Systems and National Innovation Systems,” International Studies of Management and Organization, 29(2): 60–77CrossRef

1999b. “Spatial Division of Labour and Interactive Learning,” Revued'Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 3: 469–488

2001. Innovation, Growth and Social Cohesion: The Danish Model, London: Edward Elgar

2004, “Introduction to ‘Technological Infrastructure and International Competitiveness,’ by Christopher Freeman,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3): 531–539CrossRef

Lundvall, B.-Å. and Borras, S., 1998. The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy, Brussels: DG Ⅻ-TSER, European CommissionGoogle Scholar

Lundvall, B.-Å. and Johnson, B., 1994. “The Learning Economy,” Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2): 23–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Lundvall, B.-Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., and Dalum, B., 2002. “National Systems of Production, Innovation, and Competence Building,” Research Policy, 31: 213–231CrossRef Google Scholar

Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A., 1997. “Towards an Explanation of Regional Specialization and Industry Agglomeration,” European Planning Studies, 5(1): 25–41Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, K. and S. Kvale, 1999. “Mesterlære som aktuel læringsform,” in Nielsen, K. and Kvale, S. (eds.), Mesterlære, Læring som Social Praksis, Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag: 9–53Google Scholar

Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), 1982. “Technological Infrastructure and International Competitiveness,” Paris: OECD, unpublished paper; see Lundvall (2004)

2000. Knowledge Management in the Learning Economy, Paris: OECD

2001. The Well-Being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

Pavitt, K., 1984. “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory,” Research Policy, 13: 343–373CrossRef Google Scholar

Perroux, F., 1969, L'Economie du XXe siècle, 3rd edn., Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar

Porter, M., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: MacmillanCrossRef Google Scholar

Posner, M. V., 1961. “International Trade and Technical Change,” Oxford Economic Papers, 13(3): 323–341CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N., 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Rothwell, R., 1977. “The Characteristics of Successful Innovators and Technically Progressive Firms,” R&D Management, 7(3): 191–206Google Scholar

Sako, M., 1990. “Buyer–Supplier Relationships and Economic Performance: Evidence from Britain and Japan,” University of London, PhD thesis

Schumpeter, J. A. and Opie, R., 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Scott, A. J., 2000. “Economic Geography: The Great Half-Century,” in Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., and Gertler, M. S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 18–44Google Scholar

Segura-Bonilla, O., 1999. Sustainable Systems of Innovation: The Forest Sector in Central America, SUDESCA Research Papers, 24, Department of Business Studies, Aalborg University, PhD dissertationGoogle Scholar

Smith, A., 1776/1957. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London: J. M. Dent & SonsGoogle Scholar

Stewart, F., 1977. Technology and Underdevelopment, London: MacmillanCrossRef Google Scholar

Tomlinson, M., 2001. “A New Role for Business Services in Economic Growth,” in Archibugi, D., and Lundvall, B.-Å. (eds.), Europe in the Globalising Learning Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 97–107Google Scholar

Vernon, R., 1966. “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(1): 190–207CrossRef Google Scholar

Whitley, R., 1994. Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets and Societies, London: SageGoogle Scholar

Williamson, D. F., 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Woolcock, M., 1998. “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework,” Theory and Society, 27(2): 151–207CrossRef Google Scholar