Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T21:23:39.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Kinship and succession in China, Japan, and Korea

from Part II - Cultural negotiations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Evelyn S. Rawski
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

The last chapter examined how northeast conquest regimes and nearby states shaped a ritual vocabulary imported from the Central Plain to meet their specific situations. By exploring issues surrounding the legitimacy of royal succession that arose when newly emergent states in Korea and Japan adopted Chinese-style legal codes, this chapter aims to provide a fresh perspective on the idiosyncrasies of Chinese Confucian practices. The native legacy of rulership and succession which constrained the exportability of Confucian practices helps explain how, despite commonalities in their initial kinship systems, Japanese and Korean regimes ended up with strikingly different resolutions in their attempts to implement Chinese-style political structures.

The fundamental problem was the Chinese legal code that was introduced into the emerging states of the Korean peninsula and thence into the Japanese archipelago during the state-building era. The normative ideas of political legitimacy embedded in the codes were generally regarded as Confucian, referring to a set of principles which were incorporated into the education of elites and rulers. Assumed to be universally applicable, these norms were in actuality predicated on the Chinese patrilineal kinship system rather than the very different indigenous kinship and succession systems practiced in early Korea and Japan. Ancient Japanese and Korean kingship was based on bilateral kinship, which emphasized the blood lines of mothers as well as fathers. Rulership was dominated by a royal lineage, which practiced brother–sister marriage. Chinese legal principles denied inheritance rights to daughters and wives and dictated that only sons could ascend the throne. They proved difficult to implement, especially because they threatened the legitimacy of native rulers. Although Japan and Korea eventually adopted patrilineal principles, the end results deviated from the Chinese system and from each other in significant respects.

This chapter begins with a brief survey of the Chinese patrilineal kinship system, which marked status differences by gender, generation, and birth order within the descent group or lineage.

Type
Chapter
Information
Early Modern China and Northeast Asia
Cross-Border Perspectives
, pp. 144 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×