Style and other factors affecting children's recognition of their own drawings

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489730.004

4 - Style and other factors affecting children's recognition of their own drawings

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Robin N. Campbell ,

Pauline A. Duncan ,

Anita L. Harrison and

Lynne C. Mathewson

Edited by

Chris Lange-Küttner and

Annie Vinter

Show author details

Robin N. Campbell: Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Pauline A. Duncan: Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Anita L. Harrison: Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Lynne C. Mathewson: Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Chris Lange-Küttner: Affiliation:
London Metropolitan University
Annie Vinter: Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, France

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Previous research suggests that 4-year-old children can recognize their own drawings after significant delay. Five possible bases for such recognition are identified by Campbell et al. Two of these, recognition of personal drawing style and recollection of the drawing episode, are perhaps available to most 4-year-olds capable of drawing objects. A preliminary study shows that most children of that age have a distinctive personal drawing style. Three studies explore the developing ability to recognize drawings after a one-month delay, and refine methods for studying this achievement, at individual and group level. These studies show little success at group level until late in the fifth year. However, at the individual level, the proportion of children demonstrating recognition ability increases steadily throughout the fifth year, and even some young 4-year-olds show competence. The contributions of the factors of style and episodic memory in achieving this ability remain elusive. However, it is argued that the task is a promising one for studying these developing aspects of self-knowledge.

the age at which children can reliably recognize their own drawings was investigated around thirty years ago by Stacey and Ross (1975), and a few years later by Nolan, Adams and Kagan (1980), and Nolan and Kagan (1980, 1981). Five-year-old children recognized their own drawings without difficulty after delays of a week or more (five weeks in one of Stacey and Ross's conditions). The position with younger children was less clear.

Type: Chapter
Information: Drawing and the Non-Verbal Mind
A Life-Span Perspective
, pp. 63 - 85

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489730.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnheim, R. (1954). Art and visual perception. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

David, F. N. and Barton, D. E. (1962). Combinatorial chance. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar

Erickson, M. J. (1996). Introduction to combinatorics. New York:Wiley.CrossRef Google Scholar

Flavell, J., Miller, P. and Miller, S. (2002). Cognitive development. Hillsdale, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Gross, J. and Hayne, , H. (1999). Young children's recognition and description of their own and others' drawings. Developmental Science, 2, 476–89.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayes, B. K. and Hennessy, R. (1996). The nature and development of nonverbal implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 22–43.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kellogg, , R. (1969). Analyzing children's art. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books.Google Scholar

Kerschensteiner, , G. (1905). Die Entwickelung der zeichnerischen Begabung. Munich: Carl Gerber.Google Scholar

Luquet, , H. (1927). Le dessin enfantin [Children's drawing]. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar

Nolan, E., Adams, , S. and Kagan, , J. (1980). Children's recognition memory for their drawings. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 137, 11–15.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nolan, E. and Kagan, , J. (1980). Recognition of self and self's products in preschool children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 137, 285–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nolan, E. and Kagan, , J. (1981). Memory for products in pre-school children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 138, 15–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smedslund, J. (1969). Psychological diagnostics. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 237–48.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Snodgrass, , J. G. and Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.Google Scholar PubMed

Stacey, J. T. and Ross, B. M. (1975). Scheme and schema in children's memory of their own drawings. Developmental Psychology, 11, 37–41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Van, Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Willats, J. (1985). Drawing systems revisited: the role of denotation systems in children's figure drawings. In Freeman, N. H. and Cox, M. V. (eds.), Visual order (pp. 78–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Willats, J. (1997). Art and representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar