Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:10:10.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Empiricism and Public Justification

from Part Two - Responding to the Case for Inclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Howard H. Schweber
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

In Chapter 11, there was a shift from focusing on the accessibility of justifications to the accessibility of standards of reliability, an example of the by-now-familiar move to a second order of inquiry. That change in focus responded to Alexander's approach of comparing the different ways in which persons experience their beliefs in descriptive statements about events. Religiously grounded political arguments, however, more often have to do with moral teachings than with declarations of fact. The nonequivalence of Ann's beliefs about descriptions of states of affairs does not obviously extend to a similar nonequivalence between religious and secular normative principles. In addressing that question, the focus of the discussion shifted to another second-order question, this time one that focused on the accessibility of the logic that connected empirical beliefs with normative consequences rather than on the evidence that established the basis for belief in the occurrence of events. These are not cleanly separable inquiries. It should be clear that an epistemological standard of accessibility implicates arguments about both the basis for reliability claims and the ways in which those claims are made the basis for arguments that appeal to shared values. Nonetheless, the questions of whether standards of reliability are publicly accessible and how standards of reliability address normative justifications remain distinct in their respective focus on the basis for accepting empirical assertions as true and the logic by which normative claims are derived. And there is yet a third question to be asked: What do these epistemological standards require of citizens in practice? These three questions – What are the evidentiary standards of accessibility for second-order claims of reliability?; How do those standards constrain the logic of justification?; and What demands do epistemological standards of accessibility impose on citizens as a matter of democratic practice? – provide the organizing structure for this chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Democracy and Authenticity
Toward a Theory of Public Justification
, pp. 364 - 390
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×