Book contents
- Decoding Chinese Bilateral Investment Treaties
- Decoding Chinese Bilateral Investment Treaties
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Current Landscape and Puzzling Issues
- 2 China’s Foreign Investment Law in the Past Four Decades
- 3 Substantive Protection Provisions in Chinese BITs
- 4 Nondiscriminatory Standards in China’s BITs
- 5 Expropriation in Local and Global Contexts
- 6 How Are Chinese BITs Interpreted? Jurisprudential Review of Treaty Interpretative Tools in Chinese BIT-based Arbitration Cases
- 7 Parallel Proceedings under Chinese BITs
- 8 Transitional Clauses in Transition and the Black Hole in Chinese BIT Law
- 9 Evolutionary Path of China’s BIT Law in the Return of the State Paradigm: A Statistical and Textual Approach
- 10 Who Makes Chinese BITs? An Empirical Investigation
- 11 By Way of Conclusion: Chinese BIT Law and Practice in the Jungle
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2021
Book contents
- Decoding Chinese Bilateral Investment Treaties
- Decoding Chinese Bilateral Investment Treaties
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Current Landscape and Puzzling Issues
- 2 China’s Foreign Investment Law in the Past Four Decades
- 3 Substantive Protection Provisions in Chinese BITs
- 4 Nondiscriminatory Standards in China’s BITs
- 5 Expropriation in Local and Global Contexts
- 6 How Are Chinese BITs Interpreted? Jurisprudential Review of Treaty Interpretative Tools in Chinese BIT-based Arbitration Cases
- 7 Parallel Proceedings under Chinese BITs
- 8 Transitional Clauses in Transition and the Black Hole in Chinese BIT Law
- 9 Evolutionary Path of China’s BIT Law in the Return of the State Paradigm: A Statistical and Textual Approach
- 10 Who Makes Chinese BITs? An Empirical Investigation
- 11 By Way of Conclusion: Chinese BIT Law and Practice in the Jungle
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Decoding Chinese Bilateral Investment Treaties , pp. 333 - 352Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Achaval, Clara Picasso, “Tipping the Balance towards Investors” (2008) 9 Journal of World Investment & Trade 147.Google Scholar
Adda, Marco, “Consolidation of Arbitral and Court Proceedings in Investment Disputes” in Cremades Sanz-Pastor, Bernardo M. and Lew, Julian D. M. (eds.), Parallel State and Arbitral Procedures in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2005) 100.Google Scholar
Adede, A. O., “A Fresh Look at the Meaning of the Doctrine of Denial of Justice under International Law” (1976) 14 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adlung, Rudolf, and Molinuevo, Martin, “Bilateralism in Services Trade: Is There Fire Behind the (BIT)–Smoke?” (2008) WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2008-01, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allee, Todd, and Peinhardt, Clint, “Delegating Differences: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bargaining over Dispute Resolution Provisions” (2010) 54(1) International Studies Quarterly 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschner, Wolfgang, and Skougarevskiy, Dmitriy, “Mapping the Universe of International Investment Agreements” (2016) 19(3) Journal of International Economic Law 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschner, Wolfgang, Pauwelyn, Joost and Puig, Sergio, “The Data-Driven Future of International Economic Law” (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law 217.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Guillermo Aguilar, “The New Face of Investment Arbitration: NAFTA Chapter 11” (2003) 28 Yale Journal of International Law 365.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., “Limits of Change by Way of Subsequent Agreements and Practice” in Nolte, Georg (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press 2013) 123.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., “The Once and Future Foreign Investment Regime” in Arsanjani, Mahnoush H., Cogan, Jacob Katz, Sloane, Robert D. and Wiessner, Siegfried (eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Brill 2010) 607.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment (Martinus Nijhoff 2011).Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., “The Return of the State” (2011) 20 Minnesota Journal of International Law 223.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., and Sauvant, Karl P. with Ahmed, Kamil Gérard and Vizcaíno, Gabriela P. (eds.), The Evolving International Investment Regime: Expectations, Realities, Options (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, C. F., Local Remedies in International Law (2nd edition, Cambridge University Press 2004).Google Scholar
Amirfar, Catherine M., “Dispute Settlement Clauses in Investor-State Arbitration: An Informed Approach to Empirical Studies about Law: A Response to Professor Yackee” (2014) 52 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 506.Google Scholar
Arsen, Matveev, “Investor-State Dispute Settlement: The Evolving Balance between Investor Protection and State Sovereignty” (2015–2016) 40 University of Western Australia Law Review 348.Google Scholar
Ayangbah, Shirley, and Sun, Liu, “Comparative Study of Foreign Investment Law: The Case of China and Ghana” (2017) 3 Cogent Social Sciences 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baetens, Freya, “Discrimination on the Basis of Nationality: Determining Likeness in Human Rights and Investment Law” in Schill, Stephen (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) 279.Google Scholar
Balkanyi-Nordmann, Nadine, “The Perils of Parallel Proceedings: Is an Arbitration Award Enforceable If the Same Case Is Pending Elsewhere?” in Carbonneau, Thomas E. and Jaeggi, Jeanette A. (eds.), Handbook on International Arbitration and ADR (American Arbitration Association 2006) 185.Google Scholar
Barber, Nigel, Evolution in the Here and Now: How Adaptation and Social Learning Explain Humanity (Prometheus Books 2020).Google Scholar
Barry, Donald, and Keith, Ronald (eds.), Regionalism, Multilateralism and the Politics of Global Trade (UBC Press 1999).Google Scholar
Basedow, Robert, “A Legal History of the EU’s Investment Policy” (2016) 17(5) Journal of World Investment & Trade 743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bath, Vivienne, “‘One Belt, One Road’ and Chinese Investment” in Wolff, Lutz-Christian, Chao, Xi and Chan, Jenny (eds.), Legal Dimensions of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (Wolters Kluwer 2016) 8.Google Scholar
Bath, Vivienne, “Substantive Provisions in ChAFTA’s Investment Chapter” in Picker, Colin, Wang, Heng and Zhou, Weihuan, The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement: A 21st-Century Model (Hart Publishing 2018) 195.Google Scholar
Bederman, David J., International Law Frameworks (2nd edition, Foundation Press 2006).Google Scholar
Behn, Daniel, Fauchald, Ole Kristian and Langford, Malcolm, “Empirical Perspectives on the Legitimacy of International Investment Tribunals” (2015) PluriCourts Investment, Internal Working Paper, www.jus.uio.no/pluricourts/english/topics/investment/documents/1-2015-legitimacy-book-project.pdf.Google Scholar
Bento, Lucas, “From Anarchy to Rational Design: Direction and Perception in International Investment Law” in Bjorklund, Andrea K. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2014–2015 (Oxford University Press 2016) 246.Google Scholar
Berge, Tarald Laudal, and St. John, Taylor, “Asymmetric Diffusion: World Bank ‘Best Practice’ and the Spread of Arbitration in National Investment Laws” (2020) Review of International Political Economy, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3447365 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3447365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Axel, “Investment Rules in Chinese Preferential Trade and Investment Agreements – Is China Following the Global Trend towards Comprehensive Agreements?” (2013) German Development Institute Discussion Paper 7/2013, www.files.ethz.ch/isn/163216/DP%207.2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Berger, Axel, “The Politics of China’s Investment Treaty-Making Program” in Broude, Tomer, Busch, Marc L. and Porges, Amelia (eds.), The Politics of International Economic Law (Cambridge University Press 2011) 174.Google Scholar
Bergsten, C. Fred, Hufbauer, Gary Clyde and Miner, Sean, Bridging the Pacific: Toward Free Trade and Investment between China and the United States (Peterson Institute for International Economics 2014).Google Scholar
Bevan, Alan, Estrin, Saul and Meyer, Klaus, “Foreign Investment Location and Institutional Development in Transition Economies” (2004) 13 International Business Review 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Christina, Kriebaum, Ursula, Reinisch, August and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Robert, and Cohay, Daniel R., “The Impact of Compulsory Licensing on Foreign Direct Investment: A Collective Bargaining Approach” (2008) 45 American Business Law Journal 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, R. Doak, Crawford, James and Reisman, W. Michael, Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary (Kluwer International Law 2005).Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K., “Waiver of Local Remedies and Limitation Periods” in Kinnear, Meg, Fischer, Geraldine R., Almeida, Jara Mínguez, Torres, Luisa Fernanda and Bidegain, Mairée Uran (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Kluwer Law International 2016) 250.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Sadie, “State Consent, Temporal Jurisdiction, and the Importation of Continuing Circumstances Analysis into International Investment Arbitration” (2011) 10 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 419.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, Jonathan, “Assessing the Impacts of Investment Treaties: Overview of the Evidence” (2017) International Institute for Sustainable Development Report, www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/assessing-impacts-investment-treaties.pdf.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, Jonathan, “Investment Wars: Contestation and Confusion Debate about Investment Liberalization” (2019) 22 Journal of International Economic Law 652.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, Jonathan, and Williams, Zoe Phillips, “State Liability for ‘Politically’ Motivated Conduct in the Investment Treaty Regime” (2020) 33(1) Leiden Journal of International Law 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnitcha, Jonathan, Skovgaard Poulsen, Lauge N. and Waibel, Michael, The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (Oxford University Press 2017) 57.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles. H., II, “Why the FTC Notes of Interpretation Constitute a Partial Amendment of NAFTA Article 1105” (2006) 46(2) Virginia Journal of International Law 347.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles N., and Henin, Paula F., “Res Judicata” in Kinnear, Meg N. et al. (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Kluwer Law International 2015) 55.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles N., Ottolenghi, Micael and Prows, Peter, “The Saga of CMS: Res Judicata, Precedent and the Legitimacy of ICSID Arbitration” in Binder, Christina et al. (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) 846.Google Scholar
Brown, Kerry, The Rise of the Dragon: Inward and Outward Investment in China in the Reform Period 1978–2007 (Chandos Publishing 2008) Preface xxiii.Google Scholar
Brown, Ronald C., “A New Leader in Asian Free Trade Agreements: Chinese Style Global Trade: New Rules, No Labor Protections” (2017) 35(1) UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Ronald C., “China-EU BIT and FTA: Building a Bridge on the Silk Road Not Detoured by Labor Standard Provisions” (2019) 29(1) Washington International Law Journal 61.Google Scholar
Brown, Ronald C., “China-U.S. Implementation of ILO Standards by BITs and Pieces (FTAs)” in Liukkunen, Ulla and Chen, Yifeng (eds.), Fundamental Labour Rights in China – Legal Implementation and Cultural Logic (Springer 2016) 169.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (8th edition, Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Brummer, Chris, Minilateralism: How Trade Alliances, Soft Law, and Financial Engineering Are Redefining Economic Statecraft (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Bruner, Philip I., “Dual Track Proceedings in Arbitration and Litigation: Reducing the Peril of ‘Double Jeopardy’ by Consolidation, Joinder and Appellate Arbitration” (2014) (31) 4 International Construction Law Review 537.Google Scholar
Buckley, Peter J., et al., “Explaining China’s Outward FDI: An Institutional Perspective” in Sauvant, Karl P. et al. (eds.), The Rise of Transnational Corporations from Emerging Markets: Threat or Opportunity? (Edward Elgar 2008) 104.Google Scholar
Bunn, Isabella D., The Right to Development and International Economic Law: Legal and Moral Dimensions (Hart 2012).Google Scholar
Buser, Andeas, “Recalibrating Policy Space in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Is There a Common B(R)ICS Approach?” in Cai, Congyan and Chen, Huiping (eds.), The BRICS in the New International Legal Order on Investment (Brill 2020) 163.Google Scholar
Buyse, , Antoine, A., “Lifeline in Time – Non-retroactivity and Continuing Violations under the ECHR” (2006) 75 Nordic Journal of International Law 63.Google Scholar
Cage, Monkey, “The EU Will Start Screening Foreign Investment. Here Is the Full Story,” Washington Post, April 10, 2019, www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/04/10/eu-will-start-screening-foreign-investment-heres-full-story/.Google Scholar
Cai, Congyan, “China-US BIT Negotiations and the Future of Investment Treaty Regime: A Grand Bilateral Bargain with Multilateral Implications” (2009) 12(2) Journal of International Economic Law 457.Google Scholar
Cai, Congyan, “Outward Foreign Direct Investment Protection and the Effectiveness of Chinese BIT Practice” (2006) 7(5) Journal of World Investment & Trade 621.Google Scholar
Cai, Congyan, “Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Multilateralization of International Investment Law” (2013) 6 Journal of East Asia and International Law 385.Google Scholar
Carrai, Maria Adele, Sovereignty in China: A genealogy of a Concept Since 1840 (Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Carter, Justin, “The Protracted Bargain: Negotiating the Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement” (2009) 47 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 197.Google Scholar
Carver, Jeremy, “How to Avoid Conflicting Awards: The Lauder and CME Cases” (2004) 5 Journal of World Investment & Trade 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, Ronald A., “Compulsory Licensing of Intellectual Property: The Exception that Ate the Rule?” (2007) Washington Legal Foundation Working Paper Series No. 150.Google Scholar
Chai, Joseph C. H., and Roy, Kartik C, Economic Reform in China and India: Development Experience in a Comparative Perspective (Edward Elgar 2006) 51.Google Scholar
Che, Luyao, China’s State-Directed Economy and the International Order (Springer 2019).Google Scholar
Chen, An, “Queries to the Recent ICSID Decision on Jurisdiction upon the Case of Tza Yap Shum v. Republic of Peru: Should China-Peru BIT 1994 Be Applied to Hong Kong SAR under the ‘One Country Two Systems’ Policy?” (2009) 10 Journal of World Investment & Trade 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, An, “Should the Four ‘Great Safeguards’ in Sino-foreign BITs Be Hastily Dismantled? Comments on Critical Provisions Concerning Dispute Settlement in Model US and Canadian BITs” (2006) 7 Journal of World Investment & Trade 899.Google Scholar
Chen, An, “To Open Wider or to Close Again: China’s Foreign Investment Policies and Laws in The Voice from China” in AN CHEN on International Economic Law (Springer-Verlag 2013) 451.Google Scholar
Chen, Chunlai, “The Liberalisation of FDI Policies and the Impacts of FDI on China’s Economic Development” in Garnaut, Ross, Song, Ligang and Fang, Cai (eds.), China’s 40 Years of Reform and Development (ANU Press 2018) 612.Google Scholar
Chen, Huiping, “China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiative and Its implications for Sino-African Investment Relations” (2016) 8(3) Journal of Transnational Corporations Review 178.Google Scholar
Chen, Huiping, “China’s Innovative ISDS Mechanisms and Their Implications” (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law 207.Google Scholar
Chen, Richard C., “Bilateral Investment Treaties and Domestic Institutional Reform” (2017) 55 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 547.Google Scholar
Chew, Pat K. “Political Risk and U.S. Investment in China: Chimera of Protection and Predictability” (1994) Virginia Journal of International Law 34, 615.Google Scholar
Chi, Manjaio, “The China-EU BIT as a Stepping Stone towards a China-EU FTA: A Policy Analysis” in Bungenburg, Marc et al. (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law (Springer 2017) 475.Google Scholar
Chi, Manjiao, “The ‘Greenization’ of Chinese BITs: An Empirical Study of the Environmental Provisions in Chinese Bits and Its Implications for China’s Future BIT-Making” (2015) 18(3) Journal of International Economic Law 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, Manjiao, and Wang, Xi, “The Evolution of ISA Clauses in Chinese IIAs and Its Practical Implications: The Admissibility of Disputes for Investor-State Arbitration” (2015) 16(5–6) Journal of World Investment & Trade 869.Google Scholar
Choudhury, Barnali, “Evolution or Devolution? Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law” (2005) 6 Journal of World Investment & Trade 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choukroune, Leila, “Indian and Chinese FDI in Developing Asia: The Standards Battle Beyond Trade” (2015) 7 Indian Journal of International Economic Law 89.Google Scholar
Chow, Daniel C. K., “Why China Wants a Bilateral Investment Treaty with the United States” (2015) 33 Boston University International Law Journal 101.Google Scholar
Christie, George C., “What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law?” (1962) 28 British Yearbook of International Law 207.Google Scholar
Claxton, James, Nottage, Luke and Ubilava, Ana, “Pioneering Mandatory Investor-State Conciliation Before Arbitration in Asia-Pacific Treaties: IA-CEPA and HK-UAE BIT,” Kluwer Arbitration Blog, September 5, 2020, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/09/05/pioneering-mandatory-investor-state-conciliation-before-arbitration-in-asia-pacific-treaties-ia-cepa-and-hk-uae-bit/?print=pdf.Google Scholar
Clegg, Jeremy, and Voss, Hinrich, “The New Two-Way Street of Chinese Direct Investment in the European Union” (2016) 5(2) China-EU Law Journal 79.Google Scholar
Coe, Jack, Jr., and Rubins, Noah, “Regulatory Expropriations and the TECMED Case: Context and Contributions” in Weiler, Todd (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Investment Treaties and Customary International Law (Cameron May 2005) 601.Google Scholar
Cohen, Tyler, and Schneiderman, David, “The Political Economy of Chinese Bilateral Investment Treaty Policy” (2017) 5(1) Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 110.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M., “Investment Protection in Bilateral and Free Trade Agreements: Implications for the Granting of Compulsory Licenses” (2004) 26 Michigan Journal of International Law 346.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul P., “The Stability, Coordination and Governance Treaty: Principle, Politics and Pragmatism” (2012) 37 European Law Review 231.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Crawford, James, “Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration” (2008) 24 Arbitration International 351.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, Martin, “The Effect of the Passage of Time on the Interpretation of Treaties: Some Reflections on Costa Rica v. Nicaragua” (2011) 24 Leiden Journal of International Law 201.Google Scholar
De Graaff, Nana, “China Inc. Goes Global: Transnational and National Networks of China’s Globalizing Business Elite” (2020) 27(2) Review of International Political Economy 208.Google Scholar
De Graaff, Nana, ten Brink, Tobias and Parmar, Inderjeet, “China’s Rise in a Liberal World Order in Transition – Introduction to the Forum” (2020) 27(2) International Political Review 191.Google Scholar
Delaume, Georges R., “ICSID and the Banker” (1983) 2 International Financial Law Review 9.Google Scholar
Delaume, Georges, “ICSID Arbitration in Practice” (1984) 2 International Tax and Business Lawyer 58.Google Scholar
De Luca, Anna, and Angelica, Bonfanti, “Investment and Human Rights: Is There an Elephant in the Room?” Columbia FDI Perspectives No. 282, July 23, 2020, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2018/10/No-282-de-Luca-and-Bonfanti-FINAl.pdf.Google Scholar
Deng, Xiaoping, “Emancipating the Mind, Seeking Truth from Facts, Looking Forward Together” in Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Vol. 2 (Foreign Language Press 1994) 146.Google Scholar
Deng, Xiaoping, “Make a Success of Special Economic Zones and Open More Cities to the Outside World” in Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Vol. 3 (Foreign Language Press 1994) 61.Google Scholar
Desbordes, Rodolphe, and Vicard, Vincent, “Foreign Direct Investment and Bilateral Investment Treaties: An International Political Perspective” (2009) 37 Journal of Comparative Economics 372.Google Scholar
Dickson-Smith, Kyle Dylan, “Lessons Learned from the Canada-China FIPA for the US-China BIT and Beyond – Chinese Whispers or Chinese Chequers?” in Chaisse, Julien (ed.), China’s International Investment Strategy: Bilateral, Regional, and Global Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2019) 138.Google Scholar
Djeffal, Christian, Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, “Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties” (2005) 39 International Law 87.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, “Indirect Expropriation of Alien Property” (1986) 1 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 41.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, “Indirect Expropriations: New Developments?” (2002) 11 New York University Environmental Law Journal 79.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (2nd edition, Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, and Stevens, Margrete, Bilateral Investment Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnan, Shawn, “Trump Drops New Restrictions on China Investment,” Financial Times, June 12, 2018, www.ft.com/content/a819ec8a-79f4-11e8-8e67-1e1a0846c475.Google Scholar
Dorr, Oliver, and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer 2012).Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, “Preconditions to Arbitration and Consent of States to ICSID Jurisdiction” in Kinnear, Meg et al. (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Kluwer Law International 2016) 235.Google Scholar
Dyer, Geoff, Tucker, Sundeep and Mitchell, Tom, “Forbidden Country? How Foreign Deals in China Are Hitting Renewed Resistance,” Financial Times, August 8, 2006, 11.Google Scholar
Eaker, Lawrence, and Tao, Sun, “Chinese Investment in the European Union & National Security Review: Is the EU Legal Regime About to Follow the US Model?” (2014) 9(1) Frontiers of Law in China 42.Google Scholar
Egger, Peter, and Merlo, Valeria, “BITs Bite: An Anatomy of the Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Multinational Firms” (2012) 114(3) Scandinavian Journal of Economics 1240.Google Scholar
Egli, Gabriel, “Don’t Get Bit: Addressing ICSID’s Inconsistent Application of Most-Favored-Nation Clauses to Dispute Resolution Provisions” (2007) 34 Pepperdine Law Review 1045.Google Scholar
El-Hosseny, Farouk, Civil Society in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Status and Prospects (Brill Nijhoff 2019) 22.Google Scholar
Elkemann, Catherine, and Ruppel, Oliver C., “Chinese Foreign Direct Investment into Africa in the Context of BRICS and Sino-African Bilateral Investment Treaties” (2015) 13(4) Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business 593.Google Scholar
Endicott, Martin, “China and International Investment Law: An Evolving Relationship” in Shan, Wenhua (ed.), China and International Investment Law: Twenty Years of ICSID Membership (Brill-Nijhoff 2014) 220.Google Scholar
Enright, Michael J., “China’s Inward Investment: Approach and Impact” in Chaisse, Julien (ed.), China’s International Investment Strategy: Bilateral, Regional, and Global Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2019) 28.Google Scholar
European Commission, “Investment in TTIP and Beyond – The Path for Reform,” May 6, 2015, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/may/tradoc_153408.PDF.Google Scholar
Ewert, Insa, “The EU-China Bilateral Investment Agreement: Between High Hopes and Real Challenges” (2016) Security Policy Brief No. 68, www.egmontinstitute.be.Google Scholar
Fauchald, Ole Kristian, “The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals: An Empirical Analysis” (2008) 19(2) European Journal of International Law 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiezzoni, Silvia Karina, “The Challenge of UNASUR Member Countries to Replace ICSID Arbitration” (2011) 2 Beijing Law Review 134.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change” (1998) 52 International Organization 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Susan D., “Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration” (2009) 50(2) Harvard International Law Journal 435.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D., “Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law” (2007) 19 Global Business & Development Law Journal 348.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D., “Rationalizing Costs in Investment Treaty Arbitration” (2011) 88(4) Washington University Law Review 769.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D., “The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions” (2005) 73 Fordham Law Review 1521.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D., et al., “The Diversity Challenge: Exploring the ‘Invisible College’ of International Arbitration” (2015) 53 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 429.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Gunter, “Critical Comparisons: Re-thinking Comparative Law” (1985) 26 Harvard International Law Journal 411.Google Scholar
Friedman, Steven, “Changes to the Constitution May Boost, Not Weaken, South African Property Rights,” The Conversation, August 3, 2018, https://theconversation.com/changes-to-the-constitution-may-boost-not-weaken-south-african-property-rights-100979.Google Scholar
Froese, Marc D., Sovereign Rules and the Politics of International Economic Law (Routledge 2018).Google Scholar
Fu, Hongyu, and Wan, Meng, “Convergences and Divergences in the China-EU and the China-US BIT Negotiations” in Li, Yuwen, Qi, Tong and Bian, Cheng (eds.), China, the EU and International Investment Law: Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement (Routledge 2019) ch. 3.Google Scholar
Gaillard, Emmanuel, and Banifatemi, Yas, “The Meaning of ‘and’ in Article 42 (1), Second Sentence of the ICSID Convention: The Role of International Law in the ICSID Choice of Law Process” (2003) 18 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 375.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Norah, “Parallel Proceedings, Res Judicata and Lis Pendens, Problems and Possible Solutions” in Mistelis, Loukas A. and Lew, Julian D. M. (eds.), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2006) 334.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Norah, and Shan, Wenhua, Chinese Investment Treaties: Policies and Practice (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Gann, Pamela B., “The US Bilateral Investment Treaty Program” (1985) 21 Stanford Journal of International Law 373.Google Scholar
Gantz, David, “An Appellate Mechanism for Review of Arbitral Decisions in Investor-State Disputes: Prospects and Challenges” (2006) 39 Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 39.Google Scholar
Gantz, David, “Challenges for the United States in Negotiating a BIT with China: Reconciling Reciprocal Investment Protection with Policy Concerns” (2015) Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 14-03, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf,?abstract_id=2383919.Google Scholar
Gantz, David A., “Challenges for the United States in Negotiating a BIT with China: Reconciling Reciprocal Investment Protection with Policy Concerns” (2014) 31(2) Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 204.Google Scholar
Garnaut, Joh, “Australia Scores ‘Most Favoured Nation’ Provisions in FTA with China,” Sydney Morning Herald, March 13, 2015.Google Scholar
Gaukrodger, David, and Gordon, Kathryn, “Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A Scoping Paper for the Investment Policy Community,” OECD Working Papers on International Investment (OECD 2012).Google Scholar
Gavin, Brigid, “Europe Needs a Dynamic International Investment Regime with China,” (2012) 47(2) Intereconomics 248.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Gagné, and Jean-Frédéric, Morin, “The Evolving American Policy on Investment Protection: Evidence from Recent FTAs and the 2004 Model BIT” (2006) 9 Journal of International Economics Law 357.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Robert, “Legitimizing Expectations in Arbitration through Political Risk Analysis” in Bjorklund, Andrea K. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2014–2015 (Oxford University Press 2016) 224.Google Scholar
Goettler, Peter, and Ikenson, Daniel, “Averting Conflict by Promoting Commerce: The Case for a US-China Investment Treaty” in Wenniges, Tim and Lohman, Walter (eds.), Chinese FDI in the EU and the US: Simple Rules for Turbulent Times (Palgrave MacMillan 2019) 41.Google Scholar
Goldman, Jorge A. Huerta, “Domestic, Regional and Multilateral Investment Liberalization” in Drabek, Zdenek and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Regulations of Foreign Investment: Challenges to International Harmonization (World Scientific 2013) 87.Google Scholar
Gomez, Katia Fach, “Latin American Approach to International Dispute Resolution,” American Society of International Law Meeting in Washington, March 25, 2011, www.academia.edu/830249/latin_American_Approaches-to_International_Dispute_Resolution.Google Scholar
Gómez-Palacio, Ignacio, and Muchlinski, Peter, “Admission and Establishment” in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 229.Google Scholar
Gong, Baihua, “The Change of the Perspective of Rule of Law from China’s Free Trade Pilot Zone to Free Trade Port” (2019) 190 Journal of Political Science and Law 109.Google Scholar
Goodman, Charity L., “Uncharted Waters: Financial Crisis and Enforcement of ICSID Awards in Argentina” (2007) 28 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 449.Google Scholar
Gradziuk, Artur, and Wnukowski, Damian, “Rocky Road to a Level Playing Field in EU-China Investment and Trade Relations” (2014) 8(91) Polish Institute of International Affairs Policy Paper.Google Scholar
Griffith, Spencer S., “US-China BIT Negotiations March On: The Road Ahead Is Challenging but Worthwhile” (2009) China Brief 13.Google Scholar
Gupta, Sayantan, “Changing Faces of International Trade: Multilateralism to Regionalism” (2008) 3(4) Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology 260.Google Scholar
Hadley, Kate, “Do China’s BITs Matter – Assessing the Effect of China’s Investment Agreements on Foreign Direct Investment Flows, Investors Rights, and the Rule of Law” (2013) 45(1) Georgetown Journal of International Law 255.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., “Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression” (2005) 59 International Organization 593.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Montgomery, Alexander H., “The Hegemon’s Purse: No Economic Peace Between Democracies” (2008) 45 Journal of Peace Research 111.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Victor, David G., “Secrecy in International Investment Arbitration: An Empirical Analysis” (2016) 7 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 161.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C. and Victor, David G., “Predictability Versus Flexibility: Secrecy in International Investment Arbitration” (2016) 68(3) World Politics 413. doi:10.1017/S004388711600006X.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Victor, David G. and Lupu, Yonatan, “Political Science Research on International Law: The State of the Field” (2012) 106 American Journal of International Law 47.Google Scholar
Hallinan, David, “The EU-China Bilateral Investment Treaty: A Challenging First Test of the EU’s Evolving BIT Model” (2016) 5(1–2) China-EU Law Journal 31.Google Scholar
Hamanaka, Shintaro, “China-Japan-Korea Trilateral Investment Treaty: Implications for Future Investment Negotiations in Asia” in Chaisse, Julien, Ishikawa, Tomoko and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Asia’s Changing International Investment Regime: Sustainability, Regionalization, and Arbitration (Springer 2017) 121.Google Scholar
Hamanaka, Shintaro, “Dynamics of Investment Negotiations between China and Japan: The China-Japan-Korea Trilateral Investment Treaty and Beyond” (August 2016), Institute of Developing Economics Discussion Paper No. 613, www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Download/Dp/pdf/613.pdf.Google Scholar
Han, Xiuli, “The China–South Africa Bilateral Investment Treaty: National Rule of Law Versus International Rule of Law” (2017) 24(3) South African Journal of International Affairs 269.Google Scholar
Hanotiau, Bernard, “Foreword” in Badia, Albert, Piercing the Veil of State Enterprises in International Arbitration (Wolters Kluwer 2014) xxi.Google Scholar
Harpaz, Marcia Don, “China’s Coherence in International Economic Governance” (2016) 21 Journal of Chinese Political Science 123.Google Scholar
He, Fan, and Wang, Bijun, “Chinese Interests in the Global Investment Regime” (2014) 7(1) China Economic Journal 4.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Jarrod, Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, “The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law” in Academie de Droit International, 176 Recueil des Cours. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 1982-III (M. Nijhoff 1983) 271.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, “Time and the Law: International Perspectives on an Old Problem” 46 International & Comparative Law Quarterly (1997) 501.Google Scholar
Hindelang, Steffen, and Krajewski, Markus, “Towards a More Comprehensive Approach in International Investment Law” in Hindelang, Steffen and Krajewski, Markus (eds.), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified (Oxford University Press 2016) 2.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Moshe, “International Tribunals as Agents of Harmonization” in Drabek, Zdenek and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Regulations of Foreign Investment: Challenges to International Harmonization (World Scientific 2013) 342.Google Scholar
Hobér, Kai, “Res Judicata and Lis Pendens in International Arbitration” (2013) 366 Recueil de courses 311.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Anne K., “Indirect Expropriation” in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) 156.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Rainer, Schill, Stephan W. and Tams, Christian J. (eds.), Preferential Trade and Investment Agreements: From Recalibration to Reintegration (Nomos 2013).Google Scholar
Hong, Guang, “Scope of Arbitration in Chinese BITs: Policies & Implications” (2009) University of Miami, https://works.bepress.com/guanghong/1/.Google Scholar
Horn, Norbert, “Arbitration and the Protection of Foreign Investment: Concepts and Means” in Horn, Norbert and Kroll, Stefan (eds.), Arbitrating Foreign Disputes (Kluwer Law International 2004) 1.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Pasha L., “The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement: A 21st-Century Model by Colin B. Picker, Heng Wang, and Weihuan Zhou (eds), Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018. ISBN 978 1 509 91538, 363pp.” (2018) 21(4) Journal of International Economic Law 923.Google Scholar
Hu, Jiaxiang, “FTZs, Can They Initiate a New Round of Reforms in China?” (2016) 59 Boletim Ciencias Economicas 9.Google Scholar
Hu, Weinian, and Pelkmans, Jacques, “China-EU Leadership in Globalization: Ambition and Capacity,” CEPS Policy Insights No. 2017/18, May 2017.Google Scholar
Huang, Jie (Jeanne), “Procedural Models to Upgrade BITs: China’s Experience” (2018) 31(1) Leiden Journal of International Law 93.Google Scholar
Huang, Jie, “Challenges and Solutions for the China-US BIT Negotiations: Insights from the Recent Development of FTZs in China” (2015) 18 Journal of International Economic Law 307.Google Scholar
Jadhav, Pravin, “Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in BRICS Economies: Analysis of Economic, Institutional and Political Factor” (2012) 37 Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 5.Google Scholar
Jansen, Marion, Pauwelyn, Joost and Carpenter, Theresa, The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Jean, Ho, State Responsibility for Breaches of Investment Contracts (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Jemielniak, Joanna, Nielsen, Laura and Olsen, Henrik Palmer, Establishing Judicial Authority in International Economic Law (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur KCMG QC (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law (9th edition, Longman 1992).Google Scholar
Jiang, Zemin, “Highly Holding the Great Banner of Deng Xiaoping Theory and Pushing the Construction of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics into the 21st Century” in Selected Works of Jiang Zemin, Vol. 2 (Foreign Language Press 2006) 27.Google Scholar
Jiang, Zemin, “Open Strategy for the Implementation of ‘Introduction’ and ‘Going Global’” in Selected Works of Jiang Zemin, Vol. 2 (Foreign Language Press 2006) 91.Google Scholar
John, Shijian Mo, “The Dilemma of Applying Bilateral Investment Treaties of China to Hong Kong and Macao: Challenge Raised by Sanum Investments to China” (2018) 33(1) ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 125.Google Scholar
John, Taylor St., The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Jonas, David S., and Saunders, Thomas N., “The Object and Purpose of a Treaty: Three Interpretive Methods” (2010) 43(3) Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 565.Google Scholar
Jones, Lee, “Does China’s Belt and Road Initiative Challenge the Liberal, Rules-Based Order?” (2019) Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, DOI: 10.1007/s40647-019-00252-8.Google Scholar
Jung, Heon Joo, and Kim, Eun Mi, “International Treaties and Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis of Effects of Bilateral Investment Treaties on South Korea’s FDI” (2020) 25(3) Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 402.Google Scholar
Kao, Chi-Chung, “Alternative Access to Investor-State Arbitration for Taiwanese Corporate Investors against China via Treaty Shopping” (2015) 23(2) Asia Pacific Law Review 121.Google Scholar
Karamanian, Susan, “International Decision, Compania de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. & Vivendi Universal S.A. v Argentine Republic” (2011) 105 American Journal of International Law 553.Google Scholar
Karton, Joshua, “Beyond the ‘Harmonious Confucian’: International Commercial Arbitration and the Impact of Chinese Cultural Values” in Lo, Chang-fa et al. (eds.), Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Professor Herbert Han-pao Ma (Springer 2016) 519.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo, “Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2008” (June 2009) World Bank Policy Research Working Paper WPS 4978.Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabriella, “Interpretive Powers of the Free Trade Commission and the Rule of Law” in Gaillard, Emmanuel and Bachand, Frédéric, Fifteen Years of NAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration (JurisNet LLC 2011) 190.Google Scholar
Kawashima, Shin, “Japan’s Painful Choice on RCEP,” The Diplomat, August 3, 2020, https://thediplomat.com/2020/08/japans-painful-choice-on-rcep/.Google Scholar
Kawharu, Amokura, and Nottage, Luke, “Models for Investment Treaties in the Asia-Pacific Region: An Underview” (2017) 34(3) Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 525.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith, “Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of International Election Monitoring” (2008) 62 International Organization 221.Google Scholar
Kidane, Won, “China and India’s Differing Investment Treaty and Dispute Settlement Experiences and Implications for Africa” (2017) 49 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 405.Google Scholar
Kidane, Won, “China’s Bilateral Investment Treaties with African States in Comparative Context” (2016) 49(1) Cornell International Law Journal 141.Google Scholar
Kiely, Ray, The Clash of Globalisations: Neo-liberalism, the Third Way and Anti-Globalization (Brill 2005).Google Scholar
Kinsella, N. Stephan, and Rubins, Noah D., International Investment, Political Risk and Dispute Resolution (Oceana 2005).Google Scholar
Kläger, Roland, “Revising Treatment Standards – Fair and Equitable Treatment in Light of Sustainable Development” in Hindelang, Steffen and Krajewski, Markus (eds.), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2016) 67.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, “Internationalization through Socialization” (2005) 54 Duke Law Journal 975.Google Scholar
Kohl, Tristan, “The Belt and Road Initiative’s Effect on Supply-Chain Trade: Evidence from Structural Gravity Equations” (2019) 12 Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 77.Google Scholar
Kong, Qingjiang, “Bilateral Investment Treaties: The Chinese Approach and Practice” in Sik, K., Masahiro, Miyoshi, Pinto, M. and Subedi, S. (eds.), Asian Yearbook of International Law 1998/1999 (Martinus Nijhoff 2003).Google Scholar
Kong, Qingjiang, “Towards WTO Compliance: China’s Foreign Investment Regime in Transition” (2002) 3 Journal of World Investment 859.Google Scholar
Kong, Qingjiang, and Wang, Yilin, “Transparency Standards in International Investment Agreement Negotiations: A Chinese Lawyer’s Perspective on the UNCITRAL Rules” (2015) 1(1) China and WTO Review 7.Google Scholar
Kotera, Akira, “Regulatory Transparency” in Muchlinski, Peter et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 617.Google Scholar
Koven, Vance R., “Expropriation and the ‘Jurisprudence’ of OPIC” (1981) 22 Harvard International Law Journal 269.Google Scholar
Kronby, Matthew, “Canada-China Investment Treaty: Evidence Doesn’t Support Doomsayers,” The Globe and Mail, October 26, 2012, www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/canada-china-investment-treaty-evidence-doesnt-support-doomsayers/article4665002/.Google Scholar
Ku, Julian, “The Enforcement of ICSID Awards in the People’s Republic of China” (2013) 6 Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 31.Google Scholar
Kueh, Y. Y., “Foreign Investment and Economic Change in China” (1992) 131 China Quarterly 637.Google Scholar
Kurkela, Matti, “Due Process in Arbitration: A Finnish Perspective” (2004) 21(2) Journal of International Arbitration 221.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen, and Nottage, Luke, “Investment Treaty Arbitration ‘Down Under’: Policy and Politics in Australia” (2015) 30(2) ICSID Review 465.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Elihuand, and Bethlehem, Daniel, “The Scope and Content of the Principle of Non-refoulement: Opinion” in Feller, Erika, Türk, Volker and Nicholson, Frances (eds.), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge University Press 2003) 104.Google Scholar
Lavranos, Nikos, “Beyond USMCA: ISDS à la carte,” Kluwer Arbitration Blog, October 8, 2018, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/10/08/beyond-usmca-isds-la-carte/?doing_wp_cron=1591771908.0552899837493896484375.Google Scholar
Lawder, David, and Freifeld, Karen, “Exclusive: U.S. Commerce’s Ross Eyes Anti-China ‘Poison Pill’ for New Trade Deals,” Reuters, October 6, 2018, www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-ross-exclusive/exclusive-u-s-commerces-ross-eyes-anti-china-poison-pill-for-new-trade-deals-idUSKCN1MF2HJ.Google Scholar
Lazo, Rodrigo Polanco, “The No of Tokyo Revisited: Or How Developed Countries Learned to Start Worrying and Love the Calvo Doctrine” (2015) 30 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 172.Google Scholar
Lestsas, George, “Internationalism and the Interpretation of the ECHR” in Merkouris, Panos, Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Elias, Olufemi (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Martinus Nijhoff/Brill 2010) 266.Google Scholar
Levander, Samuel, “Resolving ‘Dynamic Interpretation’: An Empirical Analysis of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency” (2014) 52 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 506.Google Scholar
Levashova, Yulia, The Right of States to Regulate in International Investment Law: The Search for Balance between Public Interest and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Wolters Kluwer 2019).Google Scholar
Li, Wangqiang, “Chinese Foreign Investment Laws: A Review from the Perspective of Policy-Oriented Jurisprudence” (2011) 19(1) Asia Pacific Law Review 35.Google Scholar
Li, Yuwen, and Bian, Cheng, “A New Dimension of Foreign Investment Law in China: Evolution and Impacts of the National Security Review System” (2016) 24 Asia Pacific Law Review 149.Google Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth, and Oksenberg, Michael, Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes (Princeton University Press 1988).Google Scholar
Lillich, Richard B., and Weston, Burns H., “Lump Sum Agreements: Their Contribution to the Law of International Claims” (1988) 82 American Journal of International Law 69.Google Scholar
Lin, Tsai-Yu, “Compulsory Licenses for Access to Medicines, Expropriation and Investor-State Arbitration under Bilateral Investment Agreements – Are There Issues Beyond the TRIPS Agreement?” (2009) 40 International Review of Intellectual Property Law 152.Google Scholar
Linarelli, John, Salomon, Margot E. and Sornarajah, M., The Misery of International Law: Confrontations with Injustice in the Global Economy (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Lippert, Barbara, and Perthes, Volker (eds.), “Strategic Rivalry between United States and China: Causes, Trajectories, and Implications for Europe,” German Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP Research Paper, April 2020, www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/research_papers/2020RP04_China_USA.pdf.Google Scholar
Liu, Meichen, “The New Chinese Foreign Investment Law and Its Implication on Foreign Investors” (2018) 38 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 285.Google Scholar
Lo, Chang-fa, Li, Nigel and Lin, Tsai-Yu (eds.), Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order – A Liber Amicorum in Honour of Professor Herbert Han-Pao Ma (Springer 2016).Google Scholar
Lui, Gladie, “Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone: Shaping of China’s Future Foreign Investment Environment” (2014) 40 Journal of International Taxation 31.Google Scholar
Magnarelli, Martina, Privity of Contract in International Investment Arbitration: Original Sin or Useful Tool? (Wolters Kluwer 2020).Google Scholar
Magnarelli, Martina, “The Unresolved Conundrum of Contract-Based and Treaty-Based Claims: An Extra Element of Contention: Privity of Contract and Forum Selection Clauses in Investment Contracts” (2016) 1 European Investment Law and Arbitration Review 85.Google Scholar
Mahdev, Mohan, “Asian Perspective on Investment Agreements and Arbitration: An Evolving Marcottage” in Bjorklund, Andrea K. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2014–2015 (Oxford University Press 2016) 338.Google Scholar
Malmstrom, Cecilia, “Investments in TTIP and Beyond – Towards an International Investment Court,” May 5, 2015, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/may/tradoc_153408.PDF.Google Scholar
Manciaux, Sébastien, “The Notion of Investment: New Controversies” (2008) 9 Journal of World Investment & Trade 443.Google Scholar
Marisi, Flavia, Environmental Interests in Investment Arbitration: Challenges and Directions (Wolters Kluwer 2020).Google Scholar
Markert, Lars, “Arbitration under China’s Investment Treaties: Does It Really Work?” (2012) 5(2) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 205.Google Scholar
Martinez, Sebastian Green, “Case Comment: Ping An Life Insurance Company of China, Limited and Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Limited v. Kingdom of Belgium – A Jurisdictional Black Hole Between Two BITs?” (2015) Transnational Dispute Management.Google Scholar
Martinez-Fraga, Pedro J., and Reetz, C. Ryan, Public Purpose in International Law: Rethinking Regulatory Sovereignty in the Global Era (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres S., “The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles upon Interpretation: Textuality Reviews” (1967) 43(3) American Journal of Translational Law 992.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, Shore, Laurence and Weiniger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar
McNamara, Timothy S., “The China-Canada BIT, Its Shortcomings, and the Risks for Chinese Investors” (2019) 10 Beijing Law Review 287.Google Scholar
McRae, Donald, “The World Trade Organization and International Investment Law: Converging Systems – Can the Case for Convergence Be Made?” (2014) 9 Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 13.Google Scholar
Merkouris, Panos, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Brill Nijhoff 2015).Google Scholar
Mertha, Andrew, “‘Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0’: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process” (2009) 200 China Quarterly 995.Google Scholar
Meunier, Sophie, “Divide and Conquer? China and the Cacophony of Foreign Investment Rules in the EU” (2014) 21(7) Journal of European Public Policy 996.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., “Introduction: The Global Economy, FDI, and the Regime for Investment” (2014) 66 World Politics 1.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., and Voon, Tania, “Senior Editor’s Preface” in Hepburn, Jarrod (ed.), Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2017) vii.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., Heaton, David and Henckels, Caroline, Non-discrimination and the Role of Regulatory Purpose in International Trade and Investment Law (Edward Elgar 2016).Google Scholar
Mitrovic, Dragana, “The Belt and Road: China’s Ambitious Initiative” (2016) 59 China International Studies 76.Google Scholar
Monique, Sasson, Substantive Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration: The Unsettled Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law (2nd edition, Kluwer Law International 2017).Google Scholar
Moran, Theodore H., “Foreign Acquisitions and National Security: What Are Genuine Threats? What Are Implausible Worries? A Framework for OECD Countries, and Beyond” in Drabek, Zdenek and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Regulations of Foreign Investment: Challenges to International Harmonization (World Scientific 2013) 371.Google Scholar
Mouyal, Lone Wandahl, International Investment Law and the Right to Regulate (Routledge 2016).Google Scholar
Mwanza, Rosemary, “Chinese Foreign Direct Investment and Human Rights in Kenya: A Mutually Affirming Relationship” (2016) 2 Strathmore Law Journal 133.Google Scholar
Narlikar, Amrita, Poverty Narratives and Power Paradoxes in International Trade Negotiations and Beyond (Cambridge University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Naughton, Barry, State Capitalism, Institutional Adaption, and the Chinese Miracle (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew, “The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law” (2005) ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 8.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew, “The Use of General Exceptions in IIAs: Increasing Legitimacy or Uncertainty” in De Mestral, Armand and Lévesque, C. (eds.), Improving International Investment Agreements (Routledge 2012) ch. 15.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew, and Paradell, Lluis, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties (Kluwer Law International 2009).Google Scholar
Ning, Hongling, and Qi, Tong, “A Chinese Perspective on the Investment Court System in the Context of Negotiating EU-China BIT” (2018) 11 Tsinghua China Law Review 91.Google Scholar
Nottage, Luke, “Investor-State Arbitration Policy and Practice in Australia,” CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series Paper No. 6, June 2016.Google Scholar
Nottage, Luke, and Miles, Kate, “‘Back to the Future’ for Investor-State Arbitrations: Revising Rules in Australia and Japan for Public Interests” (2009) 26(1) Journal of International Arbitration 25.Google Scholar
Odumosu, Ibironke T., “The Law and Politics of Engaging Resistance in Investment Dispute Settlement” (2007) 26 Penn State International Law Review 251.Google Scholar
Ofodile, Uche Ewelukwa, “Africa-China Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Critique” (2013) 35 Michigan Journal of International Law 131.Google Scholar
Ohmae, Kenichi, The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies (The Free Press 1995).Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L., Oppenheim’s International Law, Volume 1 Peace, edited by Sir Robert Jennings QC and Sir Arthur Watts KCMG QC (9th edition, Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Ortino, Federico, “Public Services, Investment Liberalization and Protection” in Drabek, Zdenek and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Regulations of Foreign Investment: Challenges to International Harmonization (World Scientific 2013) 415.Google Scholar
Pan, Xiaoming, “China’s FTA Strategy,” The Diplomat, June 1, 2014, https://thediplomat.com/2014/06/chinas-fta-strategy/.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, “MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving Beyond Maffezini and Plama?” (2011) ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 14.Google Scholar
Parra, Antonio R., “Provisions on the Settlement of Investment Disputes in Modern Investment Laws, Bilateral Investment Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment” (1997) 12 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 334.Google Scholar
Pathirana, Dilini, “Rising China and Global Investment Governance: An Overview of Prospects and Challenges” (2018) 4(2) Chinese Journal of Global Governance 122.Google Scholar
Patrick, Griffin, “CFIUS in the Age of Chinese Investment” (2017) 85 Fordham Law Review 1757.Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan, Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Pauwely, Joost, and Elsig, Manfred, “The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2012) 450.Google Scholar
Peat, Daniel, Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall, China’s Long March Toward Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press 2002).Google Scholar
Peled, Hadas, and don Harpaz, Marcia, “Innovation as a Catalyst in the China-Israel Investment Relationship: The China-Israel Bit (2009) and the Prospective FTA” in Chaisse, Julie (ed.), China’s International Investment Strategy: Bilateral, Regional, and Global Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2019) 142.Google Scholar
Petersen, Neils, “The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Politics of Identifying Customary International Law” (2017) 28(2) European Journal of International Law 357.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst Ulrich, Multilevel Constitutionalism for Multilevel Governance of Public Goods: Methodology Problems in International Law (Hart 2017).Google Scholar
Petsche, Markus A., “The Fork in the Road Revisited: An Attempt to Overcome the Clash between Formalistic and Pragmatic Approaches” (2019) 18 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 391.Google Scholar
Picker, Colin B., Wang, Heng and Zhou, Weihuan (eds.), The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement: A 21st-Century Model (Hart 2018).Google Scholar
Pietrowski, Robert, “Evidence in International Arbitration” (2006) 22(3) Arbitration International 373.Google Scholar
Pinard, Laurie A., “United States Policy Regarding Nationalization of American Investments: The People’s Republic of China’s Nationalization Decree of 1950” (1984) 14 California Western International Law Journal 148.Google Scholar
Polanco, Rodrigo, The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes: Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? (Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Porterfield, Matthew C., “Exhaustion of Local Remedies in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?” (2015) 41 Yale Journal of International Law Online, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2735036.Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B., “Foreign Investment Law in the People’s Republic of China: Dilemmas of State Control” (1995) China Quarterly 155.Google Scholar
Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard, Bonnitcha, Jonathan and Yackee, Jason Webb, “Analytical Framework for Assessing Costs and Benefits of Investment Protection Treaties” (LSE Enterprise 2013) www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/archive/Analytical-framework-for-assessment-costs-and-benefits-of-investment-protection.pdf.Google Scholar
Prislan, Vid, “Non-investment Obligations in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Towards a Greater Role for States?” in Baetens, Freya (ed.), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2016) 450.Google Scholar
Puig, Sergio, and Shaffer, Gregory, “Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law” (2018) 112(3) American Journal of International Law 361.Google Scholar
Puig, Sergio, and Strezhnev, Anton, “The David Effect and ISDS” (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 731.Google Scholar
Qi, Tong, “How Exactly Does China Consent to Investor-State Arbitration: On the First ICSID Case Against China” (2012) 5(2) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 265.Google Scholar
Qian, Hongdao, Azam, Sonia and Mukhtar, Hamid, “China Pakistan Economic Corridor: Legal Injunctions and Protection of Chinese Investment in Pakistan Under OBOR Initiative” (2018) 6(2) European Journal Research in Social Sciences 29.Google Scholar
Radi, Yannick, “The Application of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause to the Dispute Settlement Provisions of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Domesticating the ‘Trojan Horse’” (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 757.Google Scholar
Rajput, Aniruddha, “Safeguarding India’s Regulatory Autonomy: Analysis of the New Model Bilateral Investment Treaty” (2017) 14(3) Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 279.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R., “Global Investment Rules as a Site for Moral Inquiry” (2019) 27(1) Journal of Political Philosophy 107.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Keohane, Robert O., “Toward a Post-Kyoto Climate Change Architecture: A Political Analysis” (2008) 5 Journal of Scholarly Perspectives 50.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, “The Issues Raised by Parallel Proceedings and Possible Solution” in Waibel, Michael, Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Kyo-Liz and Balchin, Claire (eds.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (Kluwer Law International 2010) 115.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, “The Scope of Investor-State Dispute Settlement in International Investment Agreements” (2013) 21 Asia Pacific Law Review 3.Google Scholar
Reinman, W. Michael, “The Regime for Lacunae in the ICSID: Choice of Law Provision and the Question of Its Threshold” (2000) 15 Foreign Investment Law Journal 362.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, and Sloane, Robert D., “Indirect Expropriation and Its Valuation in the BIT Generation” (2004) 74 British Year Book of International Law 115.Google Scholar
Ren, Qing, “Ping An v. Belgium: Temporal Jurisdiction of Successive BITs” (2016) 31(1) ICSID Review 129.Google Scholar
Repousis, Odysseas G., “On Territoriality and International Investment Law: Applying China’s Investment Treaties to Hong Kong and Macao” (2015) 37(1) Michigan Journal of International Law 113.Google Scholar
Ripinsky, Sergey, “Global Economic Crisis and the Danger of Protectionism: Does International Law Help?” (2009) 1 Amsterdam Law Forum 3.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, “Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System” (2013) 107 American Journal of International Law 45.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, “Incremental, Systemic and Paradigmatic Reform of Investor-State Arbitration” (2018) 113(2) American Journal of International Law 410.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, “Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States” (2010) 104 American Journal of International Law 179.Google Scholar
Robin, Patricia M., “The BIT Won’t Bite: The American Bilateral Investment Treaty Program” (1984) 33 American University Law Review 941.Google Scholar
Roland, Kläger, “Revising Treatment Standards – Fair and Equitable Treatment in Light of Sustainable Development” in Hindelang, Steffen and Krajewski, Markus (eds.), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified (Oxford University Press 2016) 66.Google Scholar
Rolland, Nadège, “China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Underwhelming or Game-Changer?” (2017) 40(1) Washington Quarterly 133.Google Scholar
Rolland, Sonia E., “The Return of State Remedies in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Trends in Developing Countries” (2017) 49 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 387.Google Scholar
Rooney, Kim M., “ICSID and BIT Arbitrations and China” (2007) 24 Journal of International Arbitration 689.Google Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai, and Ronen, Yaël, The Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920–2005 (4th edition, Martinus Nijhoff 2006).Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, Giorgio, “Is USMCA Really ‘the New Gold Standard’ of Investment Protection?” Columbia FDI Perspectives No. 281, June 29, 2020, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2018/No-281-FINAL-Sacerdoti.pdf.Google Scholar
Sampson, Michael, “The Evolution of China’s Regional Trade Agreements: Power Dynamics and the Future of the Asia-Pacific” (2019) Pacific Review 1. DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2019.1660397.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Guillermo J. Garcia, “The Footprint of the Chinese Petro-dragon: The Future of Investment Law in Transboundary Resources” (2020) 94 Tulane Law Review 313.Google Scholar
Saunders, Matthew, “Bilateral Investment Treaties Oil the Wheels of Commerce: An Increase in BITs Is Helping to Encourage and Protect International Business,” IBA in the News, June 23, 2004.Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P., Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P., “Emerging Markets and the International Investment Law and Policy Regime” in Grosse, Robert and Meyer, Klaus E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Management in Emerging Markets (Oxford University Press 2019) 151.Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P., “Introduction, International Investment Law and Policy 2008–2009: Overview” in Sauvant, Karl P. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2008–2009 (Oxford University Press 2009) 6.Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P., and Chen, Huiping, “A China-US Bilateral Investment Treaty: A Template for a Multilateral Framework for Investment?” (2013) 5(1) Transnational Corporations Review 1.Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P., and Zitian Chen, Victor, “China’s Regulatory Framework for Outbound Foreign Direct Investment” (2014) 7(1) China Economic Journal 141.Google Scholar
Schemers, Henry G., and Blokker, Niels M., International Institutional Law (3rd revised edition, Martinus Nijhoff 1995).Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., “Fair and Equitable Treatment under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law” (2006) IILJ Working Paper 06.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., “In Defense of International Investment Law” (2016) 7 European Journal of International Economic Law 309.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephen W., “Multilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses” (2009) 27(2) Berkeley Journal of International Law 496.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., “Tearing Down the Great Wall: The New Generation Investment Treaties of the People’s Republic of China” (2007) 15(1) Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 73.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., Tams, Christian J. and Hofmann, Rainer, International Investment Law and History (Edward Elgar 2018).Google Scholar
Schneiderman, David, Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise (Cambridge University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Schneiderman, David, “Investment Rules and the New Constitutionalism” (2000) 25(3) Law & Social Inquiry 757.Google Scholar
Schott, Jeffrey J., and Cimino, Cathleen, “The China-Japan-Korea Trilateral Investment Agreement: Implications for US Policy and the US-China Bilateral Investment Treaty” in Peterson Institute for International Economics, Toward a US-China Investment Treaty (PIIE Briefing 15-1, February 2015).Google Scholar
Schott, Jeffrey J., Jung, Euijin and Cimino-Isaacs, Cathleen, “An Assessment of the Korea-China Free Trade Agreement,” Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief Number PB15-24, December 2015.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, “Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice” (2005) 6 Journal of World Investment & Trade 357.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, “Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Investment Treaty Application” (2014) 1(1) McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 1.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H., “The Concept of Expropriation under the ETC and Other Investment Protection Treaties” (2005) 5(2) Transnational Dispute Management 28.Google Scholar
Schwindt, Constance J., “Interpreting the United Nation Charter: From Treaty to World Constitution” (2000) UC Davis Journal of International Law and Policy 198.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Ginsburg, Tom, “The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship” (2012) 106(1) American Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Shan, Wenhua, “From North-South Divide to Private-Public Debate: Revival of the Calvo Doctrine and the Changing Landscape in International Investment Law” (2006–2007) 27 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 631.Google Scholar
Shan, Wenhua, and Jinyuan, Su (eds.), China and International Investment Law: Twenty Years of ICSID Membership (Brill Nijhoff 2015).Google Scholar
Shan, Wenhua, and Wang, Lu, “The China-EU BIT: The Emerging ‘Global BIT 2.0’” (2014) Columbia FDI Perspectives No. 128.Google Scholar
Shan, Wenhua, and Gallagher, Nora, Chinese Investment Treaties, Policies and Practice (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Shan, Wenhua, and Wang, Peng, “A Matrix Analytical Framework for Investment Disputes and Their Settlement” (2018) Foreign Investment Law – ICSID Review 1.Google Scholar
Shan, Wenhua, Gallagher, Norah and Zhang, Sheng, “National Treatment for Foreign Investment in China: A Changing Landscape” (2012) 27 ICSID Review 120.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, “Contract Claims vs. Treaty Claims: Mapping Conflicts Between ICSID Decisions on Multi-sourced Investment Claims” (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law 835.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford University Press 2003).Google Scholar
Sharma, Ajay, “A Comparative Analysis of the Chinese and Indian FDI Regimes” (2015) 15(1) Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law 1.Google Scholar
Shaun, Breslin, “How China Changed the Global Economy and the Global Economy Changed China: Thirty Years of Investment and Trade” (n.d.), https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/people/breslin/research/30years.pdf.Google Scholar
Sheargold, Elizabeth, “The USMCA/CUSMA/T-MEC’s Entry Into Force: USMCA as Part of a Global Trend Away from ISDS – An Australian Perspective,” Kluwer Arbitration Blog, June 27, 2020, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/06/27/the-usmca-cusma-t-mecs-entry-into-force-usmca-as-part-of-a-global-trend-away-from-isds-an-australian-perspective/.Google Scholar
Shen, Wei, “‘A Tale of Three Zones’ – Promises and Pitfalls of Three Financial Experimental Zones in China” (2014) Banking Law Journal 399.Google Scholar
Shen, Wei, “Beyond the Scope of ‘Investor’ and ‘Investment’: Who Can Make an Arbitration Claim Under a Chinese BIT? – Some Implications from a Recent ICSID Case” (2010) 6(2) Asian International Arbitration Journal 164.Google Scholar
Shen, Wei, “Expropriation in Transition: Evolving Chinese Investment Treaty Practices in Local and Global Contexts” (2015) 28 Leiden Journal of International Law 579.Google Scholar
Shen, Wei, “Is SAFE Safe Now? – Foreign Exchange Regulatory Control over Chinese Outbound and Inbound Investments and a Political Economy Interpretation of Policies” (2010) 11(2) Journal of World Investment & Trade.Google Scholar
Shen, Wei, “Is This a Great Leap Forward? A Comparative Review of the Investor-State Arbitration Clause in the ASEAN-China Investment Treaty: From BIT Jurisprudential and Practical Perspectives” (2010) 27 Journal of International Arbitration 379.Google Scholar
Shen, Wei, “The Good, the Bad, or the Ugly? A Critique of the Decision on Jurisdiction and Competence in Tza Yap Shum v. The Republic of Peru” (2011) 10(1) Chinese Journal of International Law 55.Google Scholar
Shen, Wei, and Vanhullebusch, Matthias, “Where Is the Alchemy? The Experiment of the Shanghai Free Trade Zone in Freeing the Foreign Investment Regime in China” (2015) 16(2) European Business Organization Law Review 321.Google Scholar
Shetty, Nish, “Treaty Protection for Indian Investments Abroad: The Changed Landscape,” May 29, 2019, www.cliffordchance.com/briefings/2019/05/treaty_protectionforindianinvestmentsabroad.html (accessed April 5, 2021).Google Scholar
Shields, Justin, “Smart Machines and Smarter Policy: Foreign Investment Regulation, National Security, and Technology Transfer in the Age of Artificial Intelligence” (2018) 51 John Marshall Law Review 279.Google Scholar
Shihata, Ibrahim F. I., “Towards a Greater Depoliticization of Investment Disputes: The Roles of ICSID and MIGA” (1986) 1 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Shirk, Susan L., The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China (University of California Press 1993).Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., “Bargaining over BITs, Arbitrating Awards: The Regime for Protection and Promote of International Investment” (2014) 66(1) World Politics 12.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Ian M., The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Manchester University Press 1973).Google Scholar
Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edition, Manchester University Press 1984).Google Scholar
Song, Guoyou, and Yuan, Wen Jin, “China’s Free Trade Agreement Strategies” (2012) 35(4) Washington Quarterly 107.Google Scholar
Sorel, Jean-Marc, and Eveno, Valerie Boré, “Article 31” in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2011) 804.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., Resistance and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., “The Case Against a Regime on International Investment Law” in Trakman, Leion and Ranieri, Nicola (eds.), Regionalism in International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2013) 496.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment (2nd edition, Cambridge University Press 2004).Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment (3rd edition, Cambridge University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., The Settlement of Foreign Investment Disputes (Kluwer Law International 2000).Google Scholar
Stifter, Lukas, and Reinisch, August, “Expropriation in the Light of the UNCTAD Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development” in Hindelang, Steffen and Krajewski, Markus (eds.), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified (Oxford University Press 2016) 86.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan, The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (Cambridge University Press 1996).Google Scholar
Suda, Ryan, “The Effect of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Human Rights Enforcement and Realization” in de Schutter, Oliver (ed.), Transnational Corporations and Human Rights (Hart 2006) 80.Google Scholar
Surya, P. Subedi, International Investment Law: Reconciling Policy and Principle (Hart 2008).Google Scholar
Swenson, Deborah L., “Why Do Developing Countries Sign BITs?” (2005) 12 UC Davis Law Review 131.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. John, The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, “The Law and Procedure of International Court of Justice 1960–1989” (1991) British Yearbook of International Law 16.Google Scholar
Titi, Catharine, “Are Investment Tribunals Adjudicating Political Disputes? Some Reflections on the Repoliticization of Investment Disputes and (New) Forms of Diplomatic Protection” (2015) 32 Journal of International Arbitration 261.Google Scholar
Tobin, Jennifer, and Busch, Marc L., “A BIT Is Better than a Lot: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Preferential Trade Agreements” (2010) 62(1) World Politics 1.Google Scholar
Trakman, Leon E., “Bilateral Trade and Investment Agreements” in Trakman, Leon E. and Ranieri, Nicola W. (eds.), Regionalism in International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2013) 85.Google Scholar
Trakman, Leon E., “China’s Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment” in Chaisse, Julien, Ishikawa, Tomoko and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Asia’s Changing International Investment Regime: Sustainability, Regionalization and Arbitration (Springer 2017).Google Scholar
Trakman, Leon, “Geopolitics, China and Investor–State Arbitration” in Toohey, Lisa, Picker, Colin B. and Greenacre, Jonathan (eds.), China in the International Economic Order: New Directions and Changing Paradigms (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Trakman, Leon E., “The ICSID under Siege” (2013) 45 Cornell International Law Journal 603.Google Scholar
Trakman, Leon E., and Ranieri, Nicola W. (eds.), Regionalism in International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Trakman, Leon E., and Sharma, Kunal, “Jumping Back and Forth between Domestic Courts and ISDS: Mixed Signals from the Asia-Pacific Region” in Hindelang, Steffen and Krajewski, Markus (eds.), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified (Oxford University Press 2016) 336.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, IIA Issue Note No. 3: Reform of the IIA Regime: Four Paths of Action and a Way Forward (2014).Google Scholar
UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2016 – Investor Nationality: Policy Challenges (2016).Google Scholar
Vadi, Valentina, Analogies in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Van Damme, Isabelle, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., “A Brief History of International Investment Agreements” (2005) 12 UC Davis Journal of International Law and Policy 157.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., “US Bilateral Investment Treaties: The Second Wave” (1993) 14 Michigan Journal of International Law 621.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., United States Investment Treaties: Policy and Practice (Kluwer 1992).Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., U.S. International Investment Agreements (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus, “Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetrical Adjudication: An Empirical Study of Investment Treaty Arbitration” (2012) 50 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 211.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus, “Contributions and Limitations of Empirical Research on Independence and Impartiality in International Investment Arbitration” (2011) 1(4) Oñati Socio-Legal Series 1.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus, “The Canada-China FIPPA: Its Uniqueness and Non-reciprocity” (2014) 51 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 3055.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus, and Loughlin, Martin, “Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law” (2006) 17(1) European Journal of International Law 121.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus, and Malysheuski, Pavel, “Who Has Benefited Financially from Investment Treaty Arbitration? An Evaluation of the Size and Wealth of Claimants” (2016) 12 Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14.Google Scholar
Vanhonnaeker, Lukas, Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff 2012).Google Scholar
Wälde, Thomas, and Kolo, Abba, “Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and ‘Regulatory Taking’ in International Law” (2001) 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 811.Google Scholar
Wälde, Thomas W., “Interpreting Investment Treaties: Experiences and Examples” in Binder, Christina, Kriebaum, Ursula, Reinisch, August and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) 724.Google Scholar
Waldock, Humphrey, Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties, Yearbook of International Law Commission (1996) Vol. I (Part Two).Google Scholar
Wallace, Cynthia Day, The Multinational Enterprise and Legal Control: Host State Sovereignty in an Era of Economic Globalization (Kluwer Law 2002).Google Scholar
Wang, Guiguo, “China’s FTAs: Legal Characteristics and Implications” (2011) 105(3) Chinese Journal of International Law 493.Google Scholar
Wang, Guiguo, “China’s Practice in International Investment Law: From Participation to Leadership in the World Economy” (2009) 34 Yale Journal of International Law 575.Google Scholar
Wang, Guiguo, “Chinese Mechanisms for Resolving Investor-State Disputes” (2011) 1(1) Jindal Journal of International Affairs 204.Google Scholar
Wang, Guiguo, “International Investment Law: An Appraisal from the Perspective of the New Haven School of International Law” (2016) 18(1) Asia Pacific Law Review 19.Google Scholar
Wang, Guiguo, and Xiaoli, He, “Mediation and International Investment: A Chinese Perspective” (2012) 65(1) Maine Law Review 216.Google Scholar
Wang, Heng, “Paradigm Shift in Investment Rules of China’s Free Trade Agreements? The Present and Future,” August 14, 2018, https://lki.lk/blog/paradigm-shift-in-investment-rules-of-chinas-free-trade-agreements-the-present-and-future/.Google Scholar
Wang, Heng, “The Differences between China’s Recent FTA and the TPP: A Case Study of the China-Korea FTA” in Chaisse, Julien, Gao, Henry and Chang-fa, Lo (eds.), Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law Rule-Making (Springer 2017) 299.Google Scholar
Wang, Heng, “The RCEP and Its Investment Rules: Learning from Past Chinese FTAs” (2017) 3(2) Chinese Journal of Global Governance 160.Google Scholar
Wang, Huiyao, and Miao, Lu, “China’s Outbound Investment: Trends and Challenges in the Globalization of Chinese Enterprises” in Chaisse, Julien (ed.), China’s International Investment Strategy: Bilateral, Regional, and Global Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2019) 47.Google Scholar
Wang, Orange, “China, Japan, South Korea Agree to Continue Push for Free-Trade Deal Despite Ongoing Tensions Across Region,” South China Morning Post, December 22, 2019, www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3043166/china-japan-and-south-korea-agree-continue-push-free-trade.Google Scholar
Wang, Tingliang, “Western Misperceptions and China’s Approach to International Investment Law” (2019) 17(1) Santa Clara Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Wang, Wei, “Super-National Treatment: A Misconception or a Creation with Chinese Characteristics?” (2010) 5 Frontiers of Law in China 376.Google Scholar
Weeramenatry, J. Romesh, Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Wei, Dan, “Bilateral Investment Treaties: An Empirical Analysis of the Practices of Brazil and China” (2010) 33(3) European Journal of Law and Economics 663.Google Scholar
Weinhardt, Clara, and ten Brink, Tobias, “Varieties of Contestation: China’s Rise and the Liberal Trade Order” (2020) 27(2) Review of International Political Economy 258.Google Scholar
Wellhausen, Rachel L., “International Investment Law and Foreign Direct Reinvestment” (2019) 73 International Organization 839.Google Scholar
Willems, Jane Y., “The Settlement of Investor State Disputes and China New Developments on ICSID Jurisdiction” (2011) 8(1) South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business 21.Google Scholar
Wilson, Claire, “Protecting Chinese Investment under the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Regime: A Review in Light of Ping An v. Belgium” in Chaisse, Julien (ed.), China’s International Investment Strategies: Bilateral, Regional and Global Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2019) 474.Google Scholar
Witkowska, Janina, “The Attitude of the European Union and China towards Foreign Direct Investment: Implications for Bilateral Relations” (2019) 22(3) Comparative Economic Research 83.Google Scholar
Wu, Kane, “Investment Deal Expected to Bolster European Dealmaking in China,” Reuters, January 7, 2021, www.reuters.com/article/us-china-eu-investments/investment-deal-expected-to-bolster-european-dealmaking-in-china-idUSKBN29C0LE (accessed March 24, 2021).Google Scholar
Xi, Jinping, “Decisive Victory to Build a Well-Off Society in an All-Round Way to Win a Great Victory in Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era – Report at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China,” People’s Daily, October 28, 2017.Google Scholar
Xi, Jinping, “Opening, Creating, Prospering, Innovating, Leading the Future – Keynote Speech at the Opening Ceremony of the 2018 Annual Meeting of the Boao Forum for Asia,” People’s Daily, April 11, 2018.Google Scholar
Xiao, Jun, “How Can a Prospective China-EU BIT Contribute to Sustainable Investment: In Light of the UNCTAD Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development” (2015) 8(6) Journal of World Energy Law & Business 521.Google Scholar
Xiao, Lin, National Test: System Design of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (Springer 2016).Google Scholar
Yackee, Jason Webb, “Conceptual Difficulties in the Empirical Study of Bilateral Investment Treaties” (2008) 33(2) Brooklyn Journal of International Law 405.Google Scholar
Yackee, Jason Webb, “Sacrificing Sovereignty: Bilateral Investment Treaties, International Arbitration, and the Quest for Capital,” http://ssrn.com/abstract=950567.Google Scholar
Yang, Songling, “China’s Administrative Mode for Foreign Investment: From Positive List to Negative List” (2015) 33 Singapore Law Review 93.Google Scholar
Yannaca-Small, Katia, “Practical Proceedings” in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 1026.Google Scholar
Ye, Yu-ting, “Towards a Balanced and Liberal Chinese Bilateral Investment Treaty Regime in the Context of One Belt One Road” (2018) 41(1) Houston Journal of International Law 107.Google Scholar
Yin, Wei, “Challenges, Issues in China-EU Investment Agreement and the Implication on China’s Domestic Reform” (2018) 26(2) Asia Pacific Law Review 170.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K., “The Incremental Development of the ASEAN-China Strategic Partnership for Intellectual Property” in Antons, Christoph and Blakeney, Michael (eds.), Intellectual Property in Southeast Asia (Edward Elgar 2020).Google Scholar
Zarra, Giovanni, “The Issue of Incoherence in Investment Arbitration: Is There Need for a Systemic Reform?” (2018) 17(2) Chinese Journal of International Law 127.Google Scholar
Zeitler, Helge Elisabeth, “The Guarantee of ‘Full Protection and Security’ in Investment Treaties Regarding Harm Caused by Private Actors” (2006) Stockholm International Arbitration Review.Google Scholar
Zeng, Jianghan, “Chinese Views of Global Economic Governance” (2019) 40(3) Journal of Third World Quarterly 578.Google Scholar
Zhang, Anran, “Letter to the Journal: The Standing of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises in Investor-State Arbitration: The First Two Cases” (2018) 17 Chinese Journal of International Law 1147.Google Scholar
Zhang, Guangliang, “China’s Stance on Free Trade-Related Intellectual Property: A View in the Context of the China-Japan-Korea FTA Negotiations” (2016) 24(1) Asia Pacific Law Review 36.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jianhong, and Xinming, He, “Economic Nationalism and Foreign Acquisition Completion: The Case of China” (2014) 23 International Business Review 212.Google Scholar
Zhang, Sheng, “The Status of State-Owned Enterprises in ISDS from a Chinese Perspective” in Li, Yuwen et al. (eds.), China, the EU and International Investment Law: Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement (Routledge 2019) 198.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shu, “Developing China’s Investor-State Arbitration Clause Discussions in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative” in Shan, Wenhua, Nuotio, Kimmo and Zhang, Kangle (eds.), Normative Readings of the Belt and Road Initiative (Springer 2018) 147.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yuqing, “The Case of China” in Moser, Michael (ed.), Investor-State Arbitration – Lessons for Asia (Juris 2008) 156.Google Scholar
Zhao, Chunlei, “Investor-State Mediation in a China-EU Bilateral Investment Treaty: Talking about Being in the Right Place at the Right Time” (2018) 17(1) Chinese Journal of International Law 111.Google Scholar
Zheng, Xinli, China’s 40 Years of Economic Reform and Development: How the Miracle Was Created (The Commercial Press/Springer Nature 2018).Google Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan, “Chinese Investment in Australia: A Critical Analysis of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement” (2017) 18 Melbourne Journal of International Law 407.Google Scholar
Zhu, Keliang, and Prosterman, Roy, “Land Reform Efforts in China,” China Business Review, October 1, 2012, www.chinabusinessreview.com/land-reform-efforts-in-china/.Google Scholar
Zhu, Wenlong, “The National Treatment Clause in Chinese Bilateral Investment Treaties” (2014) 4 WTO & China 72.Google Scholar